statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. Shortcuts WP:GEOLANDWP:GEOLAND WP:NPLACEWP:NPLACE WP:NCITYWP:NCITY WP:NTOWNWP:NTOWN WP:NSETTLEMENTWP:NSETTLEMENT...

Articles about locations must pass the WP:GEOLAND notability guideline as a minimum requirement. Even where WP:GEOLAND is passed, such articles may still be...

deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC) @Onel5969: WP:GEOLAND Pizza0614 (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Keep There are plenty of government...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep. We have plenty of articles...

this page.‎ The result was keep. The consensus is that the place meets GEOLAND; discussion of a potential merger or redirect may be taken up on the article's...

mobile home parks in Arizona would be presumptively notable), fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 10:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC) Note: This...

sources already present, the article meets WP:GEOLAND. We have a precedent to keep articles under GEOLAND as long as there is even one reliable source...

Census Bureau, this passes WP:GEOLAND. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 11:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Keep. Meets GEOLAND, i think, and further seems likely...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

consensus. The problem here- in terms of assessing consensus- is that GEOLAND does not require a place to be populated, only to have at some time been...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep. We have plenty of articles...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC) *Keep meets WP:GEOLAND Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

Large subdivision/census tract census-designated place, does not meet WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 16:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC) –dlthewave ☎ 16:05, 29 March...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

passes GEOLAND, and there is no clear merge target as one of the Neighbourhoods of Kochi. Reywas92Talk 19:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Since...

census-designated places qualify as "populated, legally recognized places" under WP:GEOLAND. I see that there is an ongoing discussion on the talk page of the guideline;...

arguing in favor of keep presented a rebuttal to the fact that notability in GEOLAND is only presumed and not inherited for simply any populated/official locality...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND JTZegers (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus is that this does not satisfy WP:GEOLAND #2. Deor (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Clear consensus that GEOLAND applies (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Listing in the USGS...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable development which fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 02:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

article. That's not typical practice for non-notable places that fail GEOLAND, and it strikes me as UNDUE. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

elected representatives and are inhabited, they would appear to pass WP:GEOLAND. The caveat there would be if we already have articles for each of the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Listing in the USGS...

this page.‎ The result was keep. The consensus is that the place meets GEOLAND; discussion of a potential merger may be taken up on the article's talk...

Delete per OP. Chetsford (talk) 21:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND contrary to nom's ridiculous assertions that it doesn't. Enough is enough...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:GEOLAND.In India, a ward is an officially categorized habited place. (non-admin...

to this page.‎ The result was Snow Keep. places/villages are kept per GEOLAND (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Clyde,...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Listing in the USGS...

North America1000 23:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Keep- Per point one of WP:GEOLAND, "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Clear consensus that GEOLAND is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2018...

Clearly exists/verifiable per WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer talk 03:18, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GEOLAND as it has now been verified, regards...

GNIS, about which nothing is described beyond mere existence, fails WP:GEOLAND Reywas92Talk 17:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

first glance, I though this might be a keep, but two things come to mind. GEOLAND doesn't guarantee acceptance by virtue of being a distinct populated area...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

page.‎ The result was keep. There is consensus that the subject meets WP:GEOLAND. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC) Chikkajala (edit | talk |...

article. That's not typical practice for non-notable places that fail GEOLAND, and it strikes me as UNDUE. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

and should pass WP:GEOLAND fulfilling our role - WP:5P1 as a gazetteer. Icewhiz (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Recognised settlement...

pretty clear-cut to me. Joel.Miles925 18:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC) WP:GEOLAND explicitly says that offially recognised places with very low, even zero...

Springs, Mississippi per above; WP:GEOLAND is met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GEOLAND Atlantic306 (talk) 16:49, 2 June...

September 2016 (UTC) Villages are generally considered notable per WP:GEOLAND. Is there any reason why this should be an exception? 86.17.222.157 (talk)...

12:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets GEOLAND, simple as that. --qedk (t 桜 c) 19:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:38, 24 May...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND JTZegers (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Why? Mccapra (talk) 21:17, 12...

recognised town, which can be verified through reliable sources. Hence WP:GEOLAND applies. (non-admin closure) —usernamekiran(talk) 18:51, 17 May 2019 (UTC)...

result was delete. Consensus is that this "place" does not satisfy WP:GEOLAND. Deor (talk) 17:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

clearer consensus. Relisting comment: WP:GEOLAND is sufficient for notability, but evidence is needed of meeting GEOLAND, and only one !vote thus far directly...

(UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - Clearly recognized as a village per WP:GEOLAND. Meatsgains (talk) 01:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

page.‎ The result was keep. The consensus is that this article meets WP:GEOLAND based on solitary source of a government census website. Liz Read! Talk...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable area which fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 02:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

to the town itself. TartarTorte 02:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC) May pass GEOLAND, but IAR merge with Argentonnay as the existing commune which therefore...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-Notable neighborhood which does not pass WP:GNG or WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Delete Agree with nom, reasonably sure someone will be along waving WP:GEOLAND around and saying a low bar to inclusion applies, but it doesn't. Fails...

doesn't have any implied geography hook for notability as it fails WP:GEOLAND, and this particular fire district also fails WP:GNG. A PROD was declined...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND due to lack of significant coverage; sourced only to topo map and GNIS...

Keep a listing in the Government of India official census qualifies under GEOLAND --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Dhani Kumharan, Taranagar...

" SportingFlyer T·C 23:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Keep According to WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally-recognized places are considered notable, and official...

The result was redirect to Dospey Heights. The nomination contends that GEOLAND is not met because no "information beyond statistics and coordinates is...

page.‎ The result was keep. Complete Keep Consensus determined by the WP:GEOLAND policy. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88(talk) 22:49, 28 October 2019...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND. Gudde calls it a railroad station, Durham calls it a locality. Searching...

additionally cited, but census tracts are not automatically notable per WP:GEOLAND, and this reference only describes the census block which it calls "Sonora...

2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2019...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep as the subject passes WP:GEOLAND (non-admin closure) FITINDIA 00:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC) AfDs for this...

18:03, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND per above. Smartyllama (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC) GEOLAND says "This guideline specifically excludes...

as required by WP:GEOLAND. "Keep" !voters in the recent AfD failed to demonstrate that the article meets either of these WP:GEOLAND criteria; "GEOnet...

notable? Is GEOLAND broken? This is unambiguously a housing development. Keep - This is a "populated, legally recognized place", per WP:GEOLAND. The US Department...

2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2019...

improvement, but enough is available to confirm this as coming under WP:GEOLAND, for example recent news stories ("Freak storm hits Kampung Pasir Putih"...

pass WP:GEOLAND, and it appears that other villages will do the same. Mangoe (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Keep It complies with WP:GEOLAND.--Asqueladd...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus that GEOLAND doesn't apply, and that notability can't be shown through specific cases...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:GEOLAND it's all fading awaytalk 00:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subdivision lacks sufficient coverage to meet WP:GEOLAND/WP:GNG, with little potential for expansion beyond the current stub. –dlthewave...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

result was snow keep as a populated place with a GNIS reference (see WP:GEOLAND). Non-admin closure. "Pepper" @ 16:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Nelson City...

is obviously notable, per WP:GEOLAND. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC) Strong and speedy keep per WP:GEOLAND. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:35, 28 April...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Run-of-the-mill subdivision fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Although the article is more than just a stub, it's sourced...

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SNOW. Consensus is that it meets WP:GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC) [Hide...

(UTC) Keep - Per WP:GEOLAND. GobsPint (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC) Delete/merge Existence is NOT automatic notability. WP:GEOLAND#4 does NOT say any...

2017 (UTC) Keep per SoWhy. Clear pass of GEOLAND. DrStrauss talk 10:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Keep. Passes GEOLAND. Also found this Not sure of it's reliability...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

JSTOR · TWL) Rennick calls it a Locale (geography), these generally fail WP:GEOLAND as locales are, by definition, not communities. Pre-1954 topos show nothing...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Closing on keep based on WP:GEOLAND. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk)...

in the Boaz, West Virginia community, no coverage found to support WP:GEOLAND#2. Reywas92Talk 20:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

@User:Reywas92 with the rationale "Notability not established for locale, fails WP:GEOLAND; recreation welcome with significant sources to pass WP:V and WP:N". Deprodded...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND this is an officially recognised community so is pretty much automatically...

defined solely for the purpose of taking a census are not notable per WP:GEOLAND Tylr00 (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC) What makes you think that this...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Population has not even reported in the 2016 census: Ctrl+F "245560" here...

statistics that fails WP:GEOLAND#4. Reywas92Talk 20:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Redirect to List of mountain peaks of Uttarakhand, fails WP:GEOLAND #4 due to lack of...

2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2019...

WP:GEOLAND instead. I understand that many school districts have more than two schools, but I am unsure why you think this is an exception to WP:GEOLAND...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

believe that WP:GEOLAND is not met here, especially given the article creator's history with creating such articles that fail WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon...

be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus that it meets WP:GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide...

qualify under WP:GEOLAND, though it apparently does exist. KDS4444 (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Keep Not doing any harm as is, and GEOLAND is sufficiently...

wouldn't classify this as a populated place under GEOLAND#1, but an informal populated place under GEOLAND#2. As such, there is not enough known info to meet...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Note that this was...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Listed in the Board of Geographic Names' National Gazetteer [2] which...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 20:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

to meet GNG or WP:GEOLAND. Contrary to the keep !vote above's claim, appearances in GNIS do not give automatic notability, and GEOLAND #2 requires unofficial...

local languages? 165.91.13.29 (talk) 15:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND and WP:NPLACE as an officially recognised populated place. Existence verified...

meet GEOLAND.--MONGO (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Keep passes WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 14:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:GEOLAND, which...

reliable references are available that attest to its notability. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP:GEOLAND. Being a stub is irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Stop & Think! - WP:GEOLAND goes to notability. WP:GEOLAND is a...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prodded, and then deprodded with "passes WP:GEOLAND". In my opinion it does not, since it's only a couple of farms outside...

passes WP:GEOLAND but only barely. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 05:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep per nom, just barely scrapes through passing WP:GEOLAND, has potential...

keep. After renaming for clarity, consensus appears to be that it passes GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Aminpur...

8 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.--Alireza Khabib (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Which part of GEOLAND? How does it meet this guide? FOARP...

particular Parks Place. So, WP:GEOLAND#1 does not apply. There is only trivial coverage, so this location does not meet WP:GEOLAND #2. Delete. Delete. Delete...

populated place ("his wife was from Braegarie") which would probably meet WP:GEOLAND. Another PDF document also refers to "the older settlements of Balintuim...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Keep as per WP:GEOLAND. Recognized land as in the census. Would consider a redirect to parent...

JSTOR · TWL) Does not seem to meet requirements for notability per WP:GEOLAND. Also, there seems to be a dearth of reliable sources. C l y d e 2 3 9...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This doesn't look like it passes WP:GEOLAND. Not marked on topos, no GNIS entry, not in Gudde. Topos show a rail siding...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear meet WP:GEOLAND and has no WP:SIGCOV. – Meena • 18:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable subdivision, fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 22:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

from two different ones. See WP:GEOLAND. Drmies (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Keep - Drmies is correct. As per WP:GEOLAND and WP:5PILLARS, all population...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Meets WP:GEOLAND. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 15:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Javara...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Listing in the USGS...

RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per Wikipedia:GEOLAND. The source is existent. I have now repaired the broken link via the Internet...

to this page.‎ The result was withdrawn. The article appears to meet WP:GEOLAND and has been cleaned up to establish that. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007...

which means it probably has historical significance. The subject meets WP:GEOLAND. - MrX 🖋 22:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC) As shown at Wikipedia:Articles for...

community, and it lacks significant coverage to establish notability under GEOLAND or GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 03:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

notability under WP:GEOLAND is that it exists. Every lake on earth is not automatically presumed notable just because it exists, however -- GEOLAND states that...

be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Concern about failing WP:GEOLAND not rebutted. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

GNIS, about which nothing is described beyond mere existence, fails WP:GEOLAND Reywas92Talk 17:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

on for meeting WP:GEOLAND. The consensus of the discussion is that these are probably not populated places that would meet WP:GEOLAND, and there is not...

indicated with WP:GEOLAND, population centers come with inherent notability. --Oakshade (talk) 06:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC) Keep WP:GEOLAND Vinegarymass911...

made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per the precedent of WP:GEOLAND, and arguments below, a verifiable census town with reliable source. —usernamekiran...

WP:GNG...Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND, confirmed here. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC) Note:...

inclusionist.--MONGO (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC) The relevant SNG, WP:GEOLAND, requires that "information beyond statistics and coordinates is known...

December 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC) Keep Barely scrapes by to meet WP:GEOLAND, as per reasoning by KylieTastic...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) None of the current sourcing meets WP:GEOLAND, was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, to no avail. Onel5969 TT me...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Keep As per WP:GEOLAND, place is appears to be inhabited and although unincorporated is still...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Insignificant village, fails WP:GEOLAND#2. I suggest to rewrite as redirect to the municipality of Samopše, which...

Montreal (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Keep Villages satisfy WP:GEOLAND. Also, AFD is not cleanup. The article needs a lot of work, but it's clearly...

unincorporated community or populated place at this location. Fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 17:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

March 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets GEOLAND. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 15:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Keep. This place meets WP:GEOLAND and there is no evidence of an...

blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this place passes WP:GEOLAND. GNIS sources it to a rural schools map (Since school != actual community...

keep. A verifiable consensus settlement, village. Legally recognised. WP:GEOLAND applies. If there are issues in article content, kindly update it. AfD...

Keep, per GEOLAND. People live here.--Hippeus (talk) 09:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Clearly a recognised settlement, so passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp...

Junction, California, which has been deleted. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 05:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

essay, WP:GEOLAND is a guideline, and I think I'll stick with the latter. Antepenultimate (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Keep - Passes WP:GEOLAND. The article...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod removed citing, WP:GEOLAND, however as per #4 in that guideline (which is the pertinent citation)...

notability but I think it still passes WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T·C 14:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC) Keep Meets GEOLAND is is now sourced. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~...

be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. All villiages get kept per GEOLAND (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Mārkalne...

18:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 20:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Keep; GEOLAND, but gng as well. Jacona (talk) 18:46,...

article it deserves to be kept per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Wrong guideline! GEOLAND, used for geographic regions, populated...

mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng. Although it is indeed a valuable piece of information that...

have absolutely no idea how we handle this sort of situation against WP:GEOLAND, so this is really a test nomination more than anything. I can see a case...

discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognized barangays. Also, coverage found in books....

result was keep. Consensus was that the article should be kept per WP:GEOLAND and that AfDs are not a substitute to article improvements. (non-admin...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable...

result was keep. As mentioned by Coolabahapple and North America, meets WP:GEOLAND notability guideline.. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:41,...

organisations like Himalayan Journal or Indian Mountaineering Federation. Fails WP:GEOLAND MaysinFourty (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't look like this passes WP:GEOLAND. Topos show a loose scatter of three buildings generally near a railroad...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was Keep as withdrawn, it meets WP:GEOLAND anyway. (non-admin closure) Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was snow keep per WP:HEY, WP:GEOLAND, and WP:OUTCOMES. Great job of a rescue by Northamerica1000. Bearian (talk)...

2017 (UTC) Keep subject passes WP:GEOLAND. Pratyush (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Keep – Pile-on per WP:GEOLAND + article has been markedly improved...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported 28 people in 6 families in the 2016 census...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported 26 people in 7 families in the 2016 census...

(ping me) 13:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Keep since this village satisfied WP:GEOLAND. The village[1] has a senior secondary school (class 12)[2],[3] which signifies...

an old newspaper result calling it a shipping point on the railroad. WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met. Hog Farm Bacon 06:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Note:...

that this province exists. Fails WP:GEOLAND and GNG. Steve Quinn (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC) Weak Keep on GEOLAND grounds. Rio is a frazione (village)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG/GEOLAND due to lack of significant coverage. The only source besides GNIS and topo...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG — Amkgp 💬 20:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

20th-century role as a sportsmen's club, but there's nothing that meets WP:GEOLAND/WP:GNG and no indication that this was ever anything more than a single...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND. Topos show an undeveloped point on the railroad. The only newspapers.com...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Locality fails WP:GEOLAND due to lack of legal recognition or significant coverage. Sourcing consists...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable; fails WP:GEOLAND. Individual trailer-parks are not inherently notable. Listing in the USGS...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Don't think this place passes WP:GEOLAND. The State Historical Society calls it a small trading point, which isn't...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable, area which fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Lightburst (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

of WP:GEOLAND unless it's demonstrated the village isn't legally recognised. Uanfala (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Keep as passing WP:GEOLAND ,most...

names database. No evidence of being at all populated, thus failing WP:GEOLAND. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC) Comment - here we find...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This area does not pass WP:GEOLAND#2 or WP:GNG. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Lakes Estates, California...

passes WP:GEOLAND on its face, but the article does need a source or two. SportingFlyer talk 06:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:GEOLAND. I have...

this village. CatcherStorm talk 12:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable...

this editor. Mccapra (talk) 20:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND#1, fails WP:GNG, and even just responding to this has probably used 10-20...

User:Serial Number 54129 with "It is not a locality, but a house ([1]): fails WP:GEOLAND." and removed without explanation. Source on page also calls it an estate/house...

not necessarily indicate a place is "legally recognized" as meant in WP:GEOLAND. RL0919 (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

result was delete. Consensus is that this locality does not meet either GEOLAND or otherwise the GNG. My feeling is also that mentioning it in a "parent"...

ITalk to my owner:Online 03:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. The verifiability policy requires us to have at least one independent...

Conversely, the argument by FOARP that a standalone page is not viable even if GEOLAND is met is also grounded in policy (per WP:NOPAGE), and hasn't been discussed...

2021 (UTC) Keep Meets GEOLAND as a former populated place. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 01:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:GEOLAND requires either A) legal...

Shumway had a post office (see also postmaster at Shumway) thus #1 of WP:GEOLAND applies. Here are trivial clippings from newspapers.com when I search for...

(UTC) Keep meets GEOLAND and is still being mentioned in the news. -DJSasso (talk) 18:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Magnolia677 (talk)...

creek is based on a map entry alone, mass-produced, and thus fails WP:GEOLAND. Geschichte (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND, has sources (language does not matter). Hughesdarren (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND since it cites...

Keep - a village reporting a population in a national census meets WP:GEOLAND for me. Hog Farm Talk 18:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC) But the source says...

discussions. clpo13(talk) 08:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:GEOLAND, "Populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case...

per WP:GEOLAND and accord one of the WP:FIVEPILLARS being a gazetteer. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 07:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND as a verifiable...

Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Delete A sitio is too small to satisfy WP:GEOLAND and be automatically notable...

say a CDP "easily passes" GEOLAND? It's a census tract and a housing development, both of which are excepted from GEOLAND? Levivich [dubious – discuss]...

new official consensus at WP:GEOLAND or elsewhere should be considered. (Note: I've just uncovered some ambiguity at GEOLAND in which I've sought some interpretation...

JSTOR · TWL) Lacks significant coverage to establish notability under GEOLAND or GNG. The only sources that give anything more than a passing mention...

discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:GEOLAND. There are businesses with this address listed in books [1], [2], [3],...

indication of failig WP:GEOLAND. Geschichte (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC) Keep the appropriate notability standard is WP:GEOLAND. A redirect to the long...

it isn't notable isn't a valid argument, per the guidelines set by WP:GEOLAND and WP:DEGRADE it is. Also, how is it not a ghost town? Does the definition...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported 11 people in 5 families in the 2016 census...

exists. Appears on the map. Passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC) Comment WP:GEOLAND sets a higher bar than simply appearing...

this area. Does not pass geoland or gng. Lightburst (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC) Comment; how does this not pass GEOLAND? J947 (c), at 22:56, 18...

kind, oh my God! ~PogingJuan 05:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

keep it as a stub. If it's about the subject's notability, then per WP:GEOLAND "populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

recognised settlement which can be verified in reliable sources. Hence, WP:GEOLAND applies. The nominator, RedBulbBlueBlood9911, is suggested to go through...

2021 (UTC) Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND. Reporting a population as a settlement in an official government census should meet GEOLAND #1. Hog Farm Talk 23:54,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported exactly 0 people in the 2016 census....

population center easily passing WP:GEOLAND.Oakshade (talk) 19:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Keep. Clear pass of WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 10 June...

determine if it is officially recognized such as is required to pass WP:GEOLAND but perhaps this can aid in searching. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:17, 8...

WP:NOTE Apriestofgix (talk) 18:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND and really no reason stated for deletion, and a WP:TROUT to the nom for...

geographic feature of Lake Wawasee, not a distinct populated place. Fails WP:GEOLAND. Stub was created from erroneous GNIS data which often labels landforms...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. The topic appears to satisfy WP:GEOLAND requirements. Thanks for the detective work, y'all. Joyous! | Talk 01:16...

page.‎ The result was keep. Users felt the articles were notable under WP:GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:49...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Redirect. Again, it has been a...

(UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Clearly a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Strong Keep per WP:GEOLAND. It is legally recognized...

by GEOLAND, having a population doesn't necessarily imply that the SNG is met. SportingFlyer T·C 10:53, 9 April 2021 (UTC) According to WP:GEOLAND: "Populated...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus to keep per WP:GEOLAND, article has significantly improved since deletion nomination. (non-admin...

and Poland. jolielover♥talk 14:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. The village had 154 inhabitants according to 2011 census[1]. Kelob2678...

of this, can it stay per GEOLAND? ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 12:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Scrap the question, Speedy keep per GEOLAND. Paşakonağı: [4]. Yenitaşköprü:...

considered notable (WP:GEOLAND). Pratyush (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Keep, per Northamerica1000, satisfies WP:GEOLAND. Just to quibble a bit...

I'm not so sure it will pass WP:GEOLAND. Blackwater Beach has no legal recognition and thus does not meet #1 of WP:GEOLAND and has very little coverage,...

are necessary. Reywas92Talk 15:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

Clearly meets WP:GEOLAND as a recognised settlement, even if only formerly. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND. MrsSnoozyTurtle...

25 October 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.[1] فرهنگ2016 (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Keep - per WP:GEOLAND. - MA Javadi (talk) 23:36, 28 October...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported exactly 0 people in the 2016 census....

locale, so WP:GEOLAND #1 is not met. I found no "non-trivial coverage by their name in multiple, independent reliable sources", so WP:GEOLAND #2 is not met...

this locale was legally recognized, so WP:GEOLAND #1 is not met. There are only trivial mentions, so WP:GEOLAND #2 is not met. Cxbrx (talk) 20:44, 20 October...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable village. Doesn't meet with WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND guideline. References are not reliable. No notability. ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN...

meaningful. Looks like some sort of railroad feature, failing WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND, although I am not quite sure what this was. Hog Farm Bacon 23:24, 3 December...

here convinces me that this subject passes WP:GNG or the standards of WP:GEOLAND. Simply existing doesn't merit inclusion. If folks find reliable secondary...

Talk to me! Stuff I have done 15:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND which states in part: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:GEOLAND fail. No sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

Durham, unsourced. Reywas92Talk 19:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Delete - WP:GEOLAND, WP:GNG, you name it, it fails it. FOARP (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2020...

names and mentions of the Levy-Zentner company. No evidence this passes WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 17:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Upper Dick. Seems to fail WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Talk 04:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Seems to me this fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. There isn't any indication...

sort, but not the sort of legally recognized community that passes WP:GEOLAND. Pre-GNIS topos show a Lake Shore Drive, but no Lakeshore community (it...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND on grounds fails: Named natural features are often notable, provided information...

debatable evidence of some historical habitation, that's not a criterion of WP:GEOLAND, and nobody's been able to find much evidence of any legal recognition...

national level. Doesn't seem to have been anything that would pass WP:GEOLAND, but since it does have a state-level historical listing, a merge to the...

@Carrite: I concur that GNIS lists it as a populated place. However, WP:GEOLAND has two criteria in the first group; populated and legally recognized....

April 2020 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GEOLAND#2 Lightburst (talk) 22:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Keep Actually passes WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognized, populated...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:11, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Delete or Merge to Calamba, Laguna...

15 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND criterium 1. gidonb (talk) 03:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND, seems to be a verified village. SportingFlyer...

WP:GEOLAND Wm335td (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.[1] فرهنگ2016 (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Keep - per WP:GEOLAND. -...

more than a church and one room schoolhouse, so it appears to fail WP:GEOLAND. I'm willing to be proved wrong, especially since searching is complicated...

is this ranch. Coverage is primarily last names. Doesn't seem to meet GEOLAND or GNG. Hog Farm Talk 02:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG Paul H. (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. I was unable to find evidence that this was a notable, GEOLAND-passing...

somewhat...proxy-like, but I'm inclined to accept its reliability, and thus GEOLAND is met. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC) @Nosebagbear: what...

TWL) The article has only one source, a primary one, so clearly fails WP:GEOLAND. Potentially could be merged into Baton Rouge metropolitan area. It also...

frequently not notable per WP:GEOLAND, but the latter are. You, however, seem to be assuming a blanket non-notability. GEOLAND, however, is quite clear on...

deleted.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:GEOLAND, as a populated place that seems to be legally recognised. However, from...

the spelling of town's name, but apparently they are the same town. WP:GEOLAND applies. Also see comment by GSS. Side note: nominator blocked for self...

May 2019 (UTC) Keep per Andrew and WP:GEOLAND. SpinningSpark 23:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC) Keep per Andrew and WP:GEOLAND. Britishfinance (talk) 12:14, 2 June...

discussions. North America1000 08:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally recognized place. It is listed in the Population...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:GEOLAND and has no WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate notability. – Meena • 08:17, 3 July...

deletion discussions. 11WB (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

about all I could find for this point - no indication of a pass of WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Talk 04:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

December 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GEOLAND. —hueman1 (talk • contributions)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable area which fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:GEOLAND - Possible merge with main Dunlop article Diagear (talk) 04:42, 12 December...

that most commenters here feel it is), such an ATD would align with WP:GEOLAND (which provides for a subset geo article to be covered in the superset...

referring to WP:GEOLAND - it's not (just) a commercial development but would be more of an inhabited location in the company town sense. Geoland does use a...

discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC) Procedural Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Notable taluk with a population of over 70,000 in 2011. Has received substantial...

page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is towards the place meeting WP:GEOLAND (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 17:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Any formally recognized populated place will do, and this one has some...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm not sure that this site meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Found some older coverage stating that this was a resort with...

"meadows" and this is not a legally recognised place, so not notable per WP:GEOLAND]. Any information about the SSSI in general can and should be on the page...

administrative subdivision that contains it" per GEOLAND". However, this phrasing is under point #2 of WP:GEOLAND for Populated places without legal recognition...

which doesn't necessarily mean a WP:GEOLAND pass anyway (only legally recognized populated places get a GEOLAND pass. After further research, it's pretty...

of California, for efficiency's sake, this is needed. These all fail WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 16:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Delete all Lacks significant...

(UTC) Delete per nom. Daask (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND. Yet another ridiculous nomination of places in Indiana for seemingly no...

to be a WP:GEOLAND #1 pass. FOARP (talk) 08:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Delete - Appears to just be a named intersection, fails WP:GEOLAND. –dlthewave...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. The article presents only one source of questionable reliability...

March 2019 (UTC) Keep. Surely this article straightforwardly meets WP:GEOLAND: 'Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

- (same message as other nomination because same thing applies) See WP:GEOLAND. Permanently inhabited places are almost always notable when they can be...

https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/53d82203e4b06f0f87b75b2c WP:GEOLAND has a really low bar and this passes it. CT55555(talk) 05:14, 13 March...

recognized civil divisions are rather clear-cut acceptable topics per WP:GEOLAND: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not convinced this one passes WP:GEOLAND. The State Historical Society calls it a small trading point, but Wikipedia:Articles...

this is/was, it doesn't appear to have been the sort of place to pass WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 15:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

the Almighty (talk) 14:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC) Keep According to WP:GEOLAND all named populated places, no matter how small, are notable. And the first...

this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. I swear these small fry failed geolands are going to haunt me in my sleep... lol Missvain (talk) 20:35, 11 December...

information on this in the other standard sources, I'd say this fails WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

another mentioning the Ribier cotton gin. I'm seeing no evidence that WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG are met. Hog Farm Bacon 05:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

municipality that was a stub. In general, every municipality will pass WP:GEOLAND. In the case of the Czech ones, there is no doubt that there are enough...

Southern Pacific. Without anything to really explain what this was, WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG are not met. Hog Farm Bacon 05:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Cable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this one meets WP:GEOLAND. GNIS entry is sourced to Rennick, but this Whippoorwill isn't in his Marion...

No sign of significant coverage or official recognition to meet GNG or GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 20:46, 18 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

WP:GEOLAND. Needs improvement, not deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 14:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per AllyD's sources; this seems to be a legitimate GEOLAND-passing...

definitely a village, appears to pass GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 04:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC) Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND as per the two editors above; the OR...

JSTOR · TWL) This does not appear to be a formal community, thus it fails WP:GEOLAND. Rather, it appears to be a collection of lakefront second-home properties...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable subdivision. Fails WP:GEOLAND. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

there: [14]. - Netherzone (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Delete: Per GEOLAND, populated places without legal recognition require SIGCOV, simple mentions...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) NN per WP:GEOLAND. This is apparently unpopulated despite the claim in the article and the...

2009. The village is stubbish and thus unnotable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

WP:PLACEOUTCOMES Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND as legally recognized place. See [3] for recent use (dispite mis-spelling)...

it does not meet #1 of WP:GEOLAND. In particular, sites of formerly legally recognized tribes could meet #1 of WP:GEOLAND. One could make an argument...

Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Mccapra (talk) 03:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Keep - I've sourced some of the statistical claims, and it clearly meets WP:GEOLAND by virtue...

justify notability. Mangoe (talk) 02:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep. WP:GEOLAND says that named natural features are often notable if there are enough...

although his index refers to it as a locale; locales generally fail WP:GEOLAND. Topos show three isolated buildings. GNIS states that Barnett Springs...

policy is WP:GEOLAND, which states, Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. This article meets WP:GEOLAND. Owen× ☎ 15:12...

‎ The result was keep. Seems like late in the discussion compelling WP:GEOLAND-based arguments for keeping came in. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:25, 1 December...

a community, and as a place at least one person was from, it passes WP:GEOLAND as a (once-)populated place that is/was recognized as a community. −−−...

is needed. But it doesn't matter - it was a company town and passes WP:GEOLAND, which is exactly why this bulk deletion concerns me. [4] SportingFlyer...

TWL) Large rock in a marsh that fails to meet notability criteria per WP:GEOLAND. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 00:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

that describes this as anything more than a railroad landmark. Fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 04:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This Antarctica stub fails WP:GEOLAND. It is related to a geological/geographical land feature on a continent...

Carlos fake settlement, Fails GEOLAND.--🌀Kieran207-talk🌀 01:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Delete. Good gravy. Fails WP:GEOLAND: no sign of legal recognition...

"small Farmstead and Hamlet" created by a now-blocked user. Fails WP:GNG;WP:GEOLAND with considerable brio. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)...

keep‎. Consensus for notability, and sources linked show clearly meeting GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) AviationFreak💬 15:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [Hide this...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND per "legal recognition" in particular. A union council is the lowest legally...

but at this stage notability is not established. Counter this with WP:GEOLAND appears to favour allowing populated named locations though. Article needs...

deletion discussions. DankPedia (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC) Keep per GEOLAND.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Keep. Please see WP:GEOLAND - “Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

WeirdNAnnoyed's dislike of GEOLAND is irrelevant. Clarityfiend (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC) Neutral (was Keep) per WP:GEOLAND. These township articles...

those inside of larger communities, aren't presumed to be notable per WP:GEOLAND, and this one isn't notable for any other reason. (See this AfD, among...

school: [1].--Pontificalibus 13:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG and GEOLAND, "Populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Per WP:GEOLAND, places must either be legally recognized or notable per WP:GNG to qualify...

what type of place this was, although the lack of coverage suggests a WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG failure. Hog Farm Bacon 02:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

time the record was made by USGS, and that should be good enough per WP:GEOLAND, WP:NTEMP and WP:DEGRADE. I believe the problem here centers on the use...

page.‎ The result was keep. All villiages, towns etc are all kept per GEOLAND (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Bohipora...

fails WP:GEOLAND #4 due to lack of information beyond location. –dlthewave ☎ 12:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND as there is...

sourcing is insufficient to meet WP:GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 04:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Keep. This passes WP:GEOLAND; it's inhabited and it is legally recognized...

2018 (UTC) Yes, GEOLAND does apply. James500 (talk) 21:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC) @James500: @DBigXray:It doesn't. Lets take a look at GEOLAND criteria : It...

the III to discover Desert Vista Estates is just a subdivision) and WP:GEOLAND, and only sourced to the GNIS database (and a census data aggregator which...

it was a community, it doesn't meet GEOLAND/GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 04:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Delete: Fails GEOLAND. SL93 (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2021...

incorporated Zionsville, Indiana. Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:GEOLAND#2. Reywas92Talk 04:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to location near Al Manama, local mosque is named in Arabic...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND/WP:GNG. Only sources located on a search are trivial mentions in name...

12:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:18, 5...

02:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:GEOLAND appears unpopulated.   // Timothy :: talk  13:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC) Note:...

and anyway does not meet the requirement for legal recognition under WP:GEOLAND#1 per WP:GNIS. The Wisconsin historical society page linked in the article...

recognition, so #1 of WP:GEOLAND is not met. The coverage is trivial and indicates that Truckhaven was a non-notable cafe so #2 of WP:GEOLAND is not met. It was...

project. Fails [{WP:GNG]]. - MrX 12:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Keep Per WP:GEOLAND and recent removal of promotional material. 11:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC) -...

There is not much to be seen here on a map. Clear fail of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Contested WP:BLAR to its parent body of water, Altamaha River . Per WP:GEOLAND, natural features are notable "provided information beyond statistics and...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable area which fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Appears to be a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet notability criteria per WP:GEOLAND. There are no sources online beyond basic location information. Balon Greyjoy...

significant coverage, so #2 of WP:GEOLAND is not met. As this location has no legal recognition, #1 of WP:GEOLAND is not met. Cxbrx (talk) 17:20, 29...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails in WP:GEOLAND, the only source is a satellite image. Svartner (talk) 16:25, 4 October...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable subdivision, fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 22:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally recognised place. SailingInABathTub (talk) 16:50...

city]. With a population of more than half a million, it easily passes WP:GEOLAND. Best, MaysinFourty (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Do you have a citation...

mass-produced from labels on a map with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92Talk 19:28, 4 March...

populated place by several geodatabases and should be notable under WP:GEOLAND. The difficulty is the fact it's in the hardest country in the world to...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND, WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG in my opinion. Boleyn (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)...

the PDF mentioned below about it to pass GEOLAND. Fade258 (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND, which is the relevant policy on notability...

as a generic ferry, and there's no GNIS entry. As a ferry, it fails WP:GEOLAND and would have to survive based on multiple examples of significant coverage...

seeing the notability. Mangoe (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND: "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond...

results are just last names and misspellings of chrome. No evidence that WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG is met. Hog Farm Bacon 06:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

Dikval rather than Dikwal. I've added some refs, which IMO get it past GEOLAND. I've also taken out the genealogy. There is quite a lot left which still...

to me to be a failure of BEFORE. As much as I hate geostubs, it meets GEOLAND as a legally-recognized populated place. The 2011 Census of India website...

per WP:GEOLAND it is notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Keep village with its own census data so probably satisfies GEOLAND#1. Crouch...

say WP:GEOFEAT will apply here over WP:GEOLAND, since it explicitly covers private residences. And even if GEOLAND applies, this would fall under populated...

TWL) Another isolated rail junction, not a notable community. Fails WP:GEOLAND. Mangoe (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

subsection/neighborhood/street in Jiaxing City this doesn't qualify under WP:GEOLAND but has to pass WP:SIGCOV. If we don't even have a source defining the...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Clear fail of WP:GEOLAND. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision...

populated place, meaning it passes WP:GEOLAND. Curbon7 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Clearly a recognised settlement. See...

an apparent field. Two major problems with keeping this article: Per WP:GEOLAND, named natural features may have articles if significant content has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod removed. Per WP:Geoland: "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met. Does not seem to appear on topographic maps. This...

majority of editors in this discussion believe this town satisfies WP:GEOLAND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

million people a town? Its is notable per the first bulletin point on WP:GEOLAND. Badly sourced but notable topic.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:40, 11 June...

Spider) 20:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Keep - I believe townships meet WP:GEOLAND, as they are formal and legally recognized functioning government districts...

State parks would be notable under WP:GEOLAND, regardless of whether it's a current or former park. Indeed, GEOLAND links to WP:NOTTEMPORARY, in cases like...

Delete - Subdivision fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 21:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Delete a subdivision which fails WP:GEOLAND#2 Lightburst (talk) 23:20,...

guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. WP:GEOLAND may apply, although it is unknown if this is a legally recognized place...

a community. Insufficient SIGCOV to establish notability under GNG or GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the first criterion of WP: GEOLAND, that is to say it has no mention on the websites of Registrar General...

include [4][5]. What part of WP:GEOLAND is not met? Magnolia677 (talk) 11:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC) My god, what part of GEOLAND is met? A plantation is not a...

fails WP:GNG. Wikicology (talk) 08:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Keep - Per WP:GEOLAND: "Populated, legally-recognized places are typically considered notable...

home park and senior center in central Mesa which fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND #1. See [1] and [2]. SportingFlyer T·C 18:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Note:...

Typically articles about villages are kept as long as the requirements of WP:GEOLAND are met, even if the detail provided in the article is minimal. As to the...

something, in which case I'm willing to withdraw this, but I'm not seeing a WP:GEOLAND pass. Rennick's Ohio County directory's description of Kirtley is stating...

creek is based on a map entry alone, mass-produced, and thus fails WP:GEOLAND. Geschichte (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

confirm that these are named road junctions, not communities. Fail WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Also included in this nomination are: Buckners Corner, Virginia...

January 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND as mentioned above. Lijil (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)...

does not meet our requirements for WP:GEOLAND#2. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 18:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)...

not to the extent that would help subject meet GNG standard. It fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)...

"populated place" under WP:GEOLAND. Another case of a mis-classification in GNIS. MB 21:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND because it's not a populated...

not necessary. And it passes WP:GEOLAND. Knightrises10 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC) Speedy Keep passes WP:GEOLAND. Theroadislong (talk) 16:36, 22...

well-established community with a properly sourced or notable history. Per GEOLAND, neighborhoods must meet GNG for a separate article. Article has five sources...

creator citing WP:GEOLAND. This stream is short, in a rural region, and has few (if any) sources that aren't in database form. GEOLAND states that "named...

This island does not appear to qualify as notable by the terms of WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Also see Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. KDS4444 (talk) 07:08...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not entirely convinced that WP:GEOLAND is met here. While not cited in this article, here is the GNIS feature...

notable under GEOLAND or GNG, whatever it was. –dlthewave ☎ 15:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC) Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:GEOLAND. Passing trivial...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There is no sign that this housing development meets WP:GEOLAND or our general notability guideline. –dlthewave ☎ 04:50, 10 March 2020...

gazetteer about lakes, while that is not true. This does not meet wp:GNG or wp:GEOLAND or any other criteria for existence. This is similar to recent Wikipedia:Articles...

place with legal recognition. Reywas92Talk 16:30, 10 May 2019 (UTC) WP:GEOLAND provides that Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND Hyperwave11 (talk) 01:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

population in the village, but passes WP:GEOLAND#1-2. Lightburst (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 11 April...

settlements are notable per WP:GEOLAND, and we don't merge settlement stubs. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Keep Per WP:GEOLAND which states that all...

mass-produced from labels on a map with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92Talk 19:28, 4 March...

and WP:GEOLAND) —JJBers 18:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC) I agree, the Fire Department only proves that people live there. However, per WP:GEOLAND "Populated...

County and I find quite a few references to show that it passes our WP:GEOLAND as a populated place and the lake is a named natural feature. It is over...

that formed around a store. Lacking any evidence of legal recognition, WP:GEOLAND is not met, and I don't think WP:GNG is, either. Hog Farm Bacon 23:29,...

and scientific report sources now in the article are sufficient for WP:GEOLAND. AllyD (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Keep Current state & sources are...

creek is based on a map entry alone, mass-produced, and thus fails WP:GEOLAND. Geschichte (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

notability to me. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Keep Per WP:GEOLAND, which doncram alluded to but didn't link. Smartyllama (talk) 10:53, 31...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. This is complex since GEOLAND makes it typically easy, however we're unable to verify the existence of...

regarding this. Rasel ‍Hasan Talk 14:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND, verifiable real world populated places. Grokipedia article here. Obviously...

to be the same place. If it is the same place I think it will pass WP:GEOLAND. However the current article looks like pure original research. Unless...

locale, so #1 WP:GEOLAND does not apply. There is only trivial coverage of this railroad station, so it does not meet #2 of WP:GEOLAND. Cxbrx (talk) 03:41...

subdivision, no sign that this is an officially recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. –dlthewave ☎ 04:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

place. Dl.thinker (talk) 03:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Keep. According to WP:GEOLAND, Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

consists mainly of real estate notices and advertisements, does not meet GEOLAND or GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 13:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Which coverage? Where...

blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. These all fail WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have...

to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus seems to be that both WP:GEOLAND and WP:NTEMP qualify keeping the article. Happy to relist in the event...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unpopulated location with no citations, fails GEOLAND dudhhrContribs 05:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

2020 (UTC) Weak Keep. It had a post office, so I feel it meets #1 of WP:GEOLAND. I acknowledge that most editors disagree with me on this and would not...

newspapers, I don't think it's notable to pass GEOLAND. Reywas92Talk 17:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Indian village established about 1907 on...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GEOLAND: Its population has been reported exactly 0 people in the 2016 census....

wrong about GEOLAND because no evidence has been provided that this is a populated, legally-recognised place which is required to meet GEOLAND. AusLondonder...

had notability. Reywas92Talk 21:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND as a recognised railroad station (which shut down in 1971). The place is...

places as landmarks or guide points, this coverage does not indicate a WP:GEOLAND pass or any form of notability. There are also some false positives (for...

(UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Appears to be a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Pin points to scrubland in area West of Kalba. Alexandermcnabb (talk)...

WP:GEOLAND but also separately because of its documented scientific significance. Thparkth (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Keep – Meets WP:GEOLAND as...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep‎. Consensus that GEOLAND is met Nosebagbear (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

are non-peripheral reliable sources that show that this topic passes WP:GEOLAND, nothing like "random name references". 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:45, 27...

JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced since 2005. Fails WP:GNG. No evidence this passes WP:GEOLAND either.4meter4 (talk) 19:19, 21 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

may not meet Wikipedian standards as per WP:Notability, It may meet WP:Geoland but is too small locality to have a seperate article— IM3847 (talk) 18:13...

train station. This certainly meets WP:GEOLAND. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:GEOLAND. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:43, 9 June...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable subdivision, fails WP:GEOLAND #2. –dlthewave ☎ 02:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacking sources, so fails WP:GEOLAND. Found no in-depth content. Prior speedy delete January of 2009, then created...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. If we take GEOLAND to be the valid guideline for this article, then only criterion 2 applies:...

and Virginia. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND or at least find a suitable WP:ATD. It's a populated place just looking...

Satisfies GEOLAND.[1][2][3][4] Lourdes 19:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Keep. The term is certainly in use, so it should not be deleted. Does WP:GEOLAND really...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable subdivision. Fails WP:GEOLAND. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

Nothing relevant in RS in Google books or on Google. I don't think WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG are met here. Hog Farm Talk 01:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Note:...

notable per WP:GEOLAND, and WP:GEOFEAT is not applicable. SportingFlyer (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Comment- Which part of WP:GEOLAND does this fall...

here. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Keep – As per WP:GEOLAND, "Populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable...

Notable feature, not a town. Passes GEOLAND. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Keep Passes GEOLAND. AFD is not cleanup, if a claim is unsourced/incorrect...

that the site exists and as a former populated place it is notable per WP:GEOLAND. I've expanded the article a little with these sources, but since the site...

an obscure railroad siding. I'm seeing no way this possibly passes WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 21:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

2016 (UTC) Keep. I have cited a source confirming that this passes WP:GEOLAND. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

source for apparent subdivision/housing development/neighborhood to pass WP:GEOLAND#2. Reywas92Talk 04:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

why the article for Glenburnie should be kept amounts to "See WP:GEOLAND." WP:GEOLAND says that "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. Google results are all WP generated. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:28, 17...

this last name. Not a legally recognized community, fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 21:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable neighborhood according to GNG and WP:GEOLAND, and it isn't turning up any reliable sourcing via Google. Merge and redirect...

00:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. WestCD (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC) I don't see how WP:GEOLAND applies. This isn't a populated place...

they do not meet our guideline for notability, failing WP:GEOLAND#1 they must meet WP:GEOLAND#2. They do not: Elmore Desert Ranch, California (edit | talk |...

pass of WP:GEOLAND. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Keep: Legally recognised populated village should be kept per WP:GEOLAND. Content...

wells, pumps, petrol stations, farms, bridges, etc.). Therefore fails WP:GEOLAND#1, and also WP:GNG. We cannot do WP:OR based on satellite photos that could...

(UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Clearly exists and is a recognised settlement. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC) Keep per GEOLAND. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~...

Knowing what "Brent" came from is not significant coverage to pass WP:GEOLAND#2, every newspapers.com mention other than this address in the classifieds...

pretty much comparable. So we keep it. Many ancient castles may meet WP:GEOLAND as legally (or illegally) populated places. Castles were often at some...

either names or scanner errors. Not in Gudde. Doesn't seem to pass WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 06:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

that have come down, this fails WP:GEOLAND. FOARP (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Delete Article fails WP:GEOLAND.TH1980 (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2020...

keep Another disruptive AFD nomination by the OP. Was told it meets WP:GEOLAND and WP:BEFORE was not done. Place hosts a university and airport. [1] --NeilN...

07:29, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Mccapra (talk) 05:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:30, 9 October...

settlement. If that can be verified, the subject would be notable per WP:GEOLAND. However, an initial search only finds that the local Catholic archdiocese...

relevant guideline is WP:GEOFEAT which it does not pass, rather than WP:GEOLAND. The place is legally recognized (by NOVA Parks), but it is not "populated"...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't establish that this meets WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

" The mind boggles about the other interesting sites. Fails WP:GNG; WP:GEOLAND with gusto. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

blocked for creating similarly poorly-sourced stubs. This one fails WP:GEOLAND which requires populated places to either be legally recognized or have...

recognized place with ~1,670 people per Census of India,[1] thus passing WP:GEOLAND. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:Blow it up and start...

05:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Article gives reason to presume that WP:GEOLAND is not met, and the AfD nomination makes no case otherwise. MrsSnoozyTurtle...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

Geography and Kerala. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Keep WP:GEOLAND - is a census designated place, has a post office, has government recognition...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. The indication in WP:GEOLAND is that natural features are "often notable", not that they always are...

doesn't have it. Prof.PMarini (talk) 10:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:GEOLAND once you figure out the mis-spelling: "Kouroudjel" brings up a town at...

Redirect >> Wayne Township, Bartholomew County, Indiana per Wikipedia:Geoland, which clearly states: If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. WP:BEFORE indicates that this is a generic subdivision. WP:GEOLAND has been held in prior AFDs to not extend down to the subdivision level...

much for now.-Nizil (talk) 14:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Keep All per WP:GEOLAND and close. This AfD is a massive abuse of the AfD process with an objective...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

Newspapers.com hits are for places in other counties. Looks to fail WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 04:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

significant coverage. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 07:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Keep - per WP:GEOLAND, Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable...

JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG. No evidence this passes WP:GEOLAND.4meter4 (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep‎ . Appears to meet GEOLAND per consensus. Content issues can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi...

with no elaboration. I think it's fairly clear that it doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND as either a legally recognized entity, or a notable non-recognized populated...

evidence that this passes WP:GEOLAND. Lightburst (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC) Delete doesn't appear to pass WP:GEOLAND. According to this source [2]...

18:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:GEOLAND. GSS 💬 18:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognised place. Coolabahapple...

going off the guide that inhabited places have inherent notability per WP:GEOLAND, because it's hard to find sources on this that aren't too affiliated;...

Prairie School" at the site. Newer topos call it a post office. Clearly a WP:GEOLAND fail. Hog Farm Bacon 18:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Marin County and the one now known as Magalia. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 07:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Thrissur district? Sam-2727 (talk) 16:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. This is not strictly a village but the coastal segment (see here) attached...

encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they...

15:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Redirect to Howell Township, New Jersey Per WP:GEOLAND, as this neighborhood is unincorporated, WP:GNG needs to be met and it...

creek is based on a map entry alone, mass-produced, and thus fails WP:GEOLAND. Geschichte (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Subject is notable per WP:GEOLAND and/or WP:GEONATURAL. (non-admin closure) Gommeh (talk! sign!) 19:19, 27...

them! Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Speedy keep - per WP:GEOLAND. DrStrauss talk 18:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Keep, I've added the official...

WP:BLAR to its parent body of water, Little Piney Creek (Missouri) . Per WP:GEOLAND, natural features are notable "provided information beyond statistics and...

AtheistGeorgian (talk) 08:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC) Keep. This place meets WP:GEOLAND and there is no evidence of an exhaustive search required to overturn the...

meet GEOLAND? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC) I believe it meets GEOLAND because...

20 November 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:GEOLAND. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC) Keep as per WP:GEOLAND it is a population center and a legally...

the place, other mentions are as a railroad landmark. Seems to fail WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 19:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

place, and reference works of the past note the community's population. WP:GEOLAND is thus satisfied: "Populated, legally recognized places are typically...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a distinct community, fails WP:GEOLAND #2. "Kangaroo Beach" is a townhouse development and is actually on the...

was speedy keep. with the sources now provided, article now fulfils WP:GEOLAND. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...