Articles for deletion (AfD) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article or disambiguation page should be deleted or merged. Articles listed are normally...

(UTC) Comment: It can be grounds for deletion; see my post below quoting WP:GAFD. I will go check out The_Cunctator's page though, and see what he has to...

(UTC) Actually they can, assuming they present policy correctly. See WP:GAFD#Discussion. howcheng {chat} 19:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...

work worthless. --Phroziac(talk) 23:42, 27 September 2005 (UTC) From WP:GAFD#Shorthands: "-cruft (for example, 'fancruft', 'gamecruft' or 'forumcruft')...

allowed one "AFD recommendation" per deletion discussion. Kindly see WP:GAFD.Princess of Ara 20:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

have reversed an undiscussed merger into Nephilim (disambiguation), per WP:GAFD. -- Visviva 07:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Keep don't see the problem here, but...

29 January 2011 (UTC) Comment Redirected before close in violation of WP:GAFD Anarchangel (talk) 02:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC) While in many cases redirecting...

situation. Although they have a right to participate in this discussion (see WP:GAFD, "The author of the article can make his/her case like everyone else"), I...

sockpuppets and meatpuppets: Attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

Rand). Anyway, Sarahbern, your attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

-The Tom 12:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC) Spinboy should also be aware that WP:GAFD provides for pure votes without reasons to be discounted. He should also...

guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct} WP:POINT, WP:CIVIL, WP:NOT, WP:GAFD, WP:CONSENSUS (provide diffs and links) Many of the above AfDs contain attempts...

co-operation.KWinYO 23:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Comment "Cruft" is defined at WP:GAFD. howcheng {chat} 00:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Comment Thank you Howcheng...

Wikipedia:FAQ/Readers WP:RFAQ Wikipedia:FAQ/Schools WP:SFAQ Wikipedia:Guide to deletion WP:GAFD, WP:GD, Wikipedia:Help desk WP:HD Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves...

explicitly mentioned as a legitimate option (short of deletion) both at WP:GAFD and template:notability. Redirections do not require AfDs, as Madman2001...

situation. Although they have a right to participate in this discussion (see WP:GAFD, "The author of the article can make his/her case like everyone else"), I...

"keep" or some other choice in your post, usually at the beginning. See WP:GAFD for further details—that's actually a very good document to read if you're...

allowed one "AFD recommendation" per deletion discussion. Kindly see WP:GAFD.Princess of Ara 20:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

have reversed an undiscussed merger into Nephilim (disambiguation), per WP:GAFD. -- Visviva 07:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Keep don't see the problem here, but...

29 January 2011 (UTC) Comment Redirected before close in violation of WP:GAFD Anarchangel (talk) 02:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC) While in many cases redirecting...

sockpuppets and meatpuppets: Attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

05:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC) Attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

Rand). Anyway, Sarahbern, your attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

05:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC) Attention is called to this passage from WP:GAFD: One exception to the principle of assume good faith concerns the use of...

suggests that the closer has a fundamental misunderstanding how AFD works. WP:GAFD is clear it's not a vote, but a discussion. In that discussion of 9 "delete...

"keep" or some other choice in your post, usually at the beginning. See WP:GAFD for further details—that's actually a very good document to read if you're...

(UTC) Comment: It can be grounds for deletion; see my post below quoting WP:GAFD. I will go check out The_Cunctator's page though, and see what he has to...

co-operation.KWinYO 23:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC) Comment "Cruft" is defined at WP:GAFD. howcheng {chat} 00:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Comment Thank you Howcheng...

work worthless. --Phroziac(talk) 23:42, 27 September 2005 (UTC) From WP:GAFD#Shorthands: "-cruft (for example, 'fancruft', 'gamecruft' or 'forumcruft')...

(UTC) Actually they can, assuming they present policy correctly. See WP:GAFD#Discussion. howcheng {chat} 19:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC) The above discussion...

Wikipedia:Google test Template:WP:GT Wikipedia:Guide to deletion Template:WP:GAFD, Template:WP:GD, Template:WP:GTD Wikipedia:Guide to improving articles Template:WP:IA...

suggests that the closer has a fundamental misunderstanding how AFD works. WP:GAFD is clear it's not a vote, but a discussion. In that discussion of 9 "delete...

community. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines and may reflect varying levels of consensus. Shortcuts WP:GDWP:GD WP:GTDWP:GTD WP:GAFDWP:GAFD...