Arbitration Committee's ruling in Episodes and characters 2 It may reflect varying levels of consensus. Shortcuts WP:FAITWP:FAIT WP:FAITACCOMPLIWP:FAITACCOMPLI...

George Ho (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Keep and reverse the WP:FAITACCOMPLI actions aimed at rendering it useless. Under-utilized templates are not...

create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. And when their WP:FAITACCOMPLI is challenged, it would be nice if those who tried to create the WP:FAITACCOMPLI accepted offers...

bad faith nominations, BLARs and templates has reached the point of WP:FAITACCOMPLI. My everyday life has literally ground to a halt trying to deal with...

you're suggesting would mean any one Wikipedia editor could cause a WP:FAITACCOMPLI simply by creating a single bogus article and then forcing us to try...

mass revert another editor's WP:FAITACCOMPLI, but now howls in fury that a much smaller set of NA1K's WP:FAITACCOMPLI has been reverted. --BrownHairedGirl...

improvements to ~100 portals were an "extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI". NA1K's improvements were executed over a period of several weeks, largely...

this, please. giso6150 (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Yes, see WP:FAITACCOMPLI; you can't establish a "standard" that others object to by ensure that...

These votes are certainly disruptive spam and a deliberate attempt at WP:FAITACCOMPLI, since he is trying to overwhelm the community with mass votes, and he...

improvement. The other articles would appear to be an example of WP:FAITACCOMPLI/WP:OSE. Moreover, given baseball's noted interest in arcane statistics...

the move ("WP:FAITACCOMPLI", 2nd oppose, "no consensus"), I pointed out that this was a case of gaming the system and WP:FAITACCOMPLI (also pointed out...

such moves are controversial,[1] but, in a violation against Wikipedia:FAITACCOMPLI, has stormed ahead with another dozen moves just today: Dominik Riečický...

process to secure retrospective consensus for the attempt at creating a WP:FAITACCOMPLI for their very poor-quality list-making which they obscured by technical...

has created a large number of very similar stubs, effectively as a WP:FAITACCOMPLI, yes? My reading is that under such circumstances is is entirely appropriate...

other processes. It is a very valid concern but we do have policy via WP:FAITACCOMPLI that would prevent that, and we should have a plan going forward if its...

categories.[1][2] This is disruptive editing, because it creates a WP:FAITACCOMPLI, and impedes the ability of this consensus-forming discussion to form...

to anyone that disagrees" (proof: [35][36]), I'm being critical of WP:FAITACCOMPLI actions to delete all the templates' uses in situ to make them seem unused...

2016 (UTC) Procedural oppose as too soon / too iffy and potential WP:FAITACCOMPLI. The bold moves should be undone at the WP:RM section for that, and a...

are the product of SADIn's preference for using tools to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI rather than building WP:CONSENSUS. Maybe there could be consensus for...

lodge a complaint about it at WP:ANI, and expect drama. It is not WP:FAITACCOMPLI to use ABW to make a bunch of trivially complex changes that are just...

to change it is to propose a change at WT:MOSICONS, not to try the WP:FAITACCOMPLI and WP:GAMING approach of just defying it at article after article until...

came to that, take it to WP:RFARB first. Given the past history of WP:FAITACCOMPLI and WP:LOCALCONSENSUS extremism (i.e., WP:FALSECONSENSUS) cases, I have...

possibly okay, but creating 128 redirects in an hour is disruptive WP:FAITACCOMPLI editing. Blow it up and start again. The OK ones can be recreated by...

see WP:ROPE. Because Liefting has previously engaged in blatant WP:FAITACCOMPLI action, I would support only after the mainspace-categories-in-templates...

having wikistalked Kauffner for months and orchestrated disruptive WP:FAITACCOMPLI moves to place or re-place diacritics on titles for which the consensus...

consensus for it before making mass changes, rather than engaging in WP:FAITACCOMPLI editing. Same for "Black"/"black" and any other MOS issues. Levivich...

see WP:ROPE. Because Liefting has previously engaged in blatant WP:FAITACCOMPLI action, I would support only after the mainspace-categories-in-templates...

(new diff) and in the first response at DRV. This comment linked to WP:FAITACCOMPLI. This comment linked to WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/A Nobody, which...

in articles from one system to the other, in attempt to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI and use that to change the MOS to favour their POV on measuring systems...

through articles literally by the thousand, attempting to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI as a means of changing MOSNUM. This damages Wikipedia because it means...

before a disruptive editor was topic banned did not exist and was WP:FAITACCOMPLI as though this were the status quo is what is WP:GAMING June 10: Calling...

that that such mass-conversion is almost always disruptive. Note WP:FAITACCOMPLI, which points out an Arbcom ruling describing just this kind of behaviour:...

busy using the tools for just this sort of edit to try to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI, despite being that it contravened WP:SUBCAT, anf has refused to clean...

decided by a wide consensus). Relevant policies and guidelines include WP:FAITACCOMPLI, WP:BRD and WP:EW. Regarding the content dispute, I'm frankly appalled...

pointed out, rather than WP:MEATBOT, I think the real issue here is WP:FAITACCOMPLI (though they're related.) Tom is aware that their edits are controversial...

the lead is silly, but consensus is not established by disruptive WP:FAITACCOMPLI "make it my way in a big hurry before enough people can fight back" behavior...

unsuccessful and deleted.[300] Not sure if their intent is to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. My biggest complaint is it is flooding my watchlist with changes that...

(see the list at User talk:Miraclepine/1#Ipswich_MPS_CFD). This is WP:FAITACCOMPLI conduct. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)...

NeilN, please explain how you arbitrary "longstanding" concept is not WP:FAITACCOMPLI. I think that when you say longstanding you really are just assuming...

no deadline and two wrongs do not make a right. WP:CONSENSUS and WP:FAITACCOMPLI are both things. Thryduulf (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC) It's not...

make, but should be made with a degree of caution to avoid rewarding WP:FAITACCOMPLI behavior; often they're necessary, but if someone objects and starts...

probable this approach does not have consensus, and is possibly a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC) I would have...

such examples. Laurel Lodged's default modus operandi is to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI by bypassing CFD ... and then come to CFD with misleading nominations...

multi-word parameters already. This argument directly goes against WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Also, stop referring to them as "depreciated" - it is clear that there...

anti-infoboxers to remove [old] infoboxes from thousands of articles as a WP:FAITACCOMPLI action. I have no objection, of course, to discussions of removing unhelpful...

CFD or CFDS, I was not aware of this proposal by JPxG to ratify a WP:FAITACCOMPLI which they had already created. So we now have almighty mess of some...

now has 57 transclusions in article space. Whatever the opposite of WP:FAITACCOMPLI is, this one has it. Recommend keeping, now that it is useful, as its...

procedurally speaking. Otherwise it borders on an unintentional WP:FAITACCOMPLI. I didn't expect any argument at all, but some actually did arise at...

fraction of the articles on which this bludgeoning template have been WP:FAITACCOMPLI inserted robotically, show any consensus for such a template to be there...

quantity becomes its own quality. Consider the role of quantity in WP:FAITACCOMPLI, WP:BLUDGEON, WP:TLDR, etc. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)...

buy-in, completely dominated a topical wikiproject here, and used WP:FAITACCOMPLI tactics. It led to anyone not in agreement with them being hounded out...

categories of breeds are presently capitalized is best addressed at WP:FAITACCOMPLI to the extent it isn't simply an entirely incidental result of WP:NCFAUNA...

but with some editors who spent many years attempting to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI of metric-first, by going through articles by the thousand and flipping...

such as WP:ONUS and WP:BURDEN, and would also partially address some WP:FAITACCOMPLI issues related to article creation. BilledMammal (talk) 02:32, 30 August...

roll forwards with controversial changes and accomplish them via WP:FAITACCOMPLI while ignoring objections.) Maintaining that balance helps keep new page...

Procedural comment: IMNERHO, it was both procedurally wrong, from a WP:FAITACCOMPLI standpoint, to gut the usage of the template then list it for deletion...

came to that, take it to WP:RFARB first. Given the past history of WP:FAITACCOMPLI and WP:LOCALCONSENSUS extremism (i.e., WP:FALSECONSENSUS) cases, I have...

at CFD (see these edits). That presented CFD participants with a WP:FAITACCOMPLI: keeping the categories was not a viable option, because they were already...

far as I can see. This has gone a little beyond WP:BRD and brings up FAITACCOMPLI issues. However, the resolution of this AfD should hopefully also resolve...

that NA1K's improvements were an "extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI". Yet at the ANI, a clear majority supported BHG's reverts being undone...

they've found it, and linking to examples of them doing so, which is WP:FAITACCOMPLI.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  08:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Update:...

the difference in numbers very convincing either, considering the WP:FAITACCOMPLI you and others attempted in the past and the fact that Module:User: wasn't...

to WP:VPP. Attempts to promote it as if it were a guideline, and WP:FAITACCOMPLI actions to force all birds articles to obey it, over many, many other...

far as I can see. This has gone a little beyond WP:BRD and brings up FAITACCOMPLI issues. However, the resolution of this AfD should hopefully also resolve...

rapid-fire stream of deletion nominations, of course, is that it's WP:FAITACCOMPLI. No one not obsessed with portals, pro or con, can keep up, and MfD leans...

these names anyway. (Whether that constitutes a de facto consensus or WP:FAITACCOMPLI is an open question, exactly as it was in WP:BIRDCON.)  — SMcCandlish...

after very little new discussion they barged ahead and created this WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Crossroads -talk- 17:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC) You do recognize that support...

was at best reckless, and at worst gaming the system by creating a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. When tested in April in two mass deletions of automated portals (one...

While the proof of concept has been semi-boldly created, be aware of WP:FAITACCOMPLI concerns regarding transcluding it on more redirects while the VP discussion...

GenSmark are the only users to date who have invoked WP:FAITACCOMPLI on the page, i.e. "WP:FAITACCOMPLI where actions are justified by virtue of being already...

May 2024 (UTC) Bumping this to ensure we're not about to close a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC) I have removed my delete...

of the number. That was a blatant, shameless attempt to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLi. Supporters of the steamrollered spam have fought a sustained, wikilayering...

the evidence here points overwhelmingly to an attempt to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. However, also I have to note that if NA1K had a conscious goal to impose...

after very little new discussion they barged ahead and created this WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Crossroads -talk- 17:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC) You do recognize that support...

What this venue is incorrect for is one project winning a years-long WP:FAITACCOMPLI war, getting what will look like an administrative stamp of approval...

2017-12-12: [78] (their RM/TR multi-move – which looks like an attempt at WP:FAITACCOMPLI against Talk:Kalininsko-Solntsevskaya Line#Requested move 11 December...

an attempt to avoid consensus and present the participants with a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Hut 8.5 20:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Preempting deletion is justified...

your editing, you are expected to engage in some self-policing, per WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Shrigley (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC) You ([67][68][69]) and H ([70][71][72][73])...

chronological) is certainly obstructive, and might confront me with a WP:FAITACCOMPLIS. I see no reason why a closing admin cannot look at the chronological...

Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC) WP:POINT and WP:FAITACCOMPLI, arguably block-worthy as unrepentantly disruptive and a harbinger of...

an attempt to avoid consensus and present the participants with a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Hut 8.5 20:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Preempting deletion is justified...

way to do this case-by-case, and requiring that would make this a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. But per your and Lethargilistic's comments, I wouldn't have any problem...

attempt to WP:WIN a silly style dispute at the Fey article by using WP:FAITACCOMPLI to change the rule in the background, to make the guideline say what...

to change it is to propose a change at WT:MOSICONS, not to try the WP:FAITACCOMPLI and WP:GAMING approach of just defying it at article after article until...

also basically be invalidated, though it is already invalid under WP:FAITACCOMPLI and other provisions anyway (which is why it's not happening all the...

about reverts on the grounds of how many are reverted, is textbook WP:FAITACCOMPLI Editors who are collectively or individually making large numbers of...

WP:MEATBOT behavior with no consensus behind it. This is not the only WP:FAITACCOMPLI activity by this editor. See also Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation...

bad faith nominations, BLARs and templates has reached the point of WP:FAITACCOMPLI. My everyday life has literally ground to a halt trying to deal with...

I've committed. I've just learned, from lower down this page, of WP:FAITACCOMPLI, which seems to indicate otherwise. – .Raven  .talk 18:41, 22 April 2023...

unworkable - indeed it is a repeal and suggestion to replace with WP:FAITACCOMPLI. In your first branch you are saying that if someone can sneak in an...

you're suggesting would mean any one Wikipedia editor could cause a WP:FAITACCOMPLI simply by creating a single bogus article and then forcing us to try...

are in the first place, and the only reason they exist right now is WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC) Of course there...

unjustifiable exception and then try to use it as wedge to get more. That's WP:FAITACCOMPLI at its worst and exactly what WP:CONLEVEL policy was implemented to bring...

WP:FORUMSHOPPING (specifically the "asking the other parent" version) and WP:FAITACCOMPLI, as well as contrary to WP:MULTI and WP:TALKFORK.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 ...

these templates with LST and should be deleted". This is presenting a WP:FAITACCOMPLI to voters. There ought to be clear consensus from the larger community...

(including while this RfC is running, which is disruptive). This is WP:FAITACCOMPLI, not a consensus. Whether you find my own personal position "unclear"...

chronological) is certainly obstructive, and might confront me with a WP:FAITACCOMPLIS. I see no reason why a closing admin cannot look at the chronological...

Black Kite (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC) Yes there's a major WP:FAITACCOMPLI aspect to all this. --JBL (talk) 17:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC) Support topic...

improvement. The other articles would appear to be an example of WP:FAITACCOMPLI/WP:OSE. Moreover, given baseball's noted interest in arcane statistics...

bot editing and about semi-automated editing (meatbot), and even WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Automated editing wasn't that big of a deal in Wikipedia's early days...

These votes are certainly disruptive spam and a deliberate attempt at WP:FAITACCOMPLI, since he is trying to overwhelm the community with mass votes, and he...

change or implementation is reached through discussion; instead, WP:FAITACCOMPLI is attempted too often). Material higher up in that policy is also frequently...

objections on their talk page about WP:COSMETICBOT, WP:MEATBOT, and WP:FAITACCOMPLI that had gone unanswered for approximately six hours while they continued...

some of what they broke, we shouldn't revert" - Or in other words - WP:FAITACCOMPLI. I wonder what WP:Arbcom thinks of that. This has got to be one of the...

recent-ish past did not impress me, where they edited at high velocity to FAITACCOMPLI some article moves to new titles despite requests to slow down. (Scrolled...

what you're doing is an improvement, before going forward with it as WP:FAITACCOMPLI. I for one do not understand the logic behind these redirects, which...

to check which talk pages have archives and which ones don't.) Per WP:FAITACCOMPLI, the fact that these edits have already been made should not be a reason...

for Vector 2022.) to be weak. That argument just seems to reward WP:FAITACCOMPLI. Thanks for listening. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:25, 25 February 2023...

moves of "indigenous" to "Indigenous" by a single editor to create a WP:FAITACCOMPLI that would be very difficult to undo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 17 July...