given case, consider the following sections. Shortcuts WP:CONCEPTDABWP:CONCEPTDAB WP:DABCONCEPTWP:DABCONCEPT If the primary meaning of a term proposed for...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:CONCEPTDAB. Adequately covered by religious democracy (i.e. especially this section)...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Further expansion of the page per WP:CONCEPTDAB can occur as a content discussion on the talk page. — CactusWriter (talk)...

nominator misunderstands as "SYNTH" is actually the development of a WP:CONCEPTDAB which explains the appearance of "diverse meanings" because the phrase...

LadyofShalott 04:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Comment @LadyofShalott: According to WP:CONCEPTDAB which states, "If the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation...

the same television series, a disambiguation page is unnecessary per WP:CONCEPTDAB. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

of a dog's breakfast at the moment, and I really don't like it, but WP:CONCEPTDAB certainly allows for an article with this title. Done well, it could be...

Veverve (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Keep: Meets the purpose of WP:CONCEPTDAB  // Timothy :: talk  11:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

2017 (UTC) Comment it may be useful, but it is not a dab page. See WP:CONCEPTDAB. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) I agree, and it seems...

10 September 2018 (UTC) Keep. I would think the page is useful as a WP:CONCEPTDAB until/unless someone decides to write a proper article on the broad-concept...

redundant. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Keep, as a WP:CONCEPTDAB. It is not OK to redirect to a DAB page, as DAB page entries are required...

misplaced, and perhaps what we need is for cafe and café to point to a WP:CONCEPTDAB. As pointed out above, coffeehouse is not the primary topic for either...

per our editing policy. Deletion would disrupt such work. See also WP:CONCEPTDAB, which provides a sensible framework for a broad summary which is appropriate...

It should be deleted to make space fora broad concept article per WP:CONCEPTDAB. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Keep. This...

Disambiguation is not appropriate as the title matches are not exact and WP:CONCEPTDAB states "A disambiguation page should not be created just because it is...

it may very well be merged elsewhere, but it could well remain as a WP:CONCEPTDAB. Ping User:BD2412 due to his post at Talk:Will_of_God, which people may...

Brother 2 (disambiguation), Celebrity Big Brother should be the central WP:CONCEPTDAB page for all versions and seasons. -- Netoholic @ 17:25, 8 November 2017...

used at the already existing Iron Man, where's there is scope for a WP:CONCEPTDAB. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

the same word is used. This is exactly the situation envisaged by WP:CONCEPTDAB – a broad concept which has particular applications. In such cases, it...

23:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC) This shouldn't be a disambig, though; it's a WP:CONCEPTDAB. We should have an article similar to your explanation above that covers...

December 2013 (UTC) Not a good idea in the middle of an AFD, and see WP:CONCEPTDAB. The US is unusual in having what are effectively parallel penal systems...

(talk) 18:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Keep The page is valid and helpful per WP:CONCEPTDAB. Andrew D. (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC) I agree there might be a WP:Broad...

(currently a redirect to Sailor) that slowly morphed into a haphazard WP:CONCEPTDAB, then got split off.  OBSIDIAN†SOUL 16:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Delete...

the field of nutrition [3]. So perhaps this needs to be some kind of WP:CONCEPTDAB, but WP:TNT applies at this point to the present content. Someone not...

(talk) 09:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC) It isn't anymore -- I've created a WP:CONCEPTDAB article about fruit brandy, with a much clearer scope than before. Still...

Train-and-equip program, which might actually be a good candidate for a WP:CONCEPTDAB. If we treat it as a proper name, it would be Train-and-equip Program...

Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Convert to disambiguation page or conceptdab, and revert the previous move and move it back to Demographics of China...

to merge to two different targets at the same time. In such cases, WP:CONCEPTDAB indicates that a summary-level page is appropriate. And Rhododendrites...

21 June 2014 (UTC) Comment if this is kept, it should be restricted to CONCEPTDAB pages. All other uses overlap with other processes (Outlines, Portals...

the outlines be removed? Category:Outlines ; Are crosslink pages WP:CONCEPTDABs, WP:OUTLINEs, WP:INDEXes? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:45, 19 May 2014...

This is the encyclopedic WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and also serves as a good WP:CONCEPTDAB for the other uses, including the Disney film and character. As someone...

or dabpage; which can be converted to a title article later. (adding {{conceptdab}} could cover the dabpage conversion), an SIA can natively host a bit...

great shape. It has an empty section, for one. That's why I think a WP:CONCEPTDAB-type page in W-space would be the best option, with a very brief overview...

Kashmir being a disambiguation page. It would be better to have a WP:CONCEPTDAB article about the geographic region—compare to Ireland. We could also...

disambiguation page could be marked {{Broad-concept article}}, per WP:CONCEPTDAB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Disambiguate (draft provided)...

hybrid. (We probably want to transition it to a set-index article or WP:CONCEPTDAB.) --BDD (talk) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(disambiguation) is worth considering too. Maybe a better candidate for a WP:CONCEPTDAB, but could move to the base title if the redirect is deleted. I would...

multiple topics that could be referred to as "Psychology of math". WP:CONCEPTDAB, maybe. --BDD (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

65 links Musical: 61 links Salyut: 70 links - no longer a dab per WP:CONCEPTDAB Salish: 66 links 2000s: 52 links AMT: 50 links Iris: 53 links Egyptian:...

though I can understand the argument for treating them separately. A WP:CONCEPTDAB about the flat bread seems like the best answer for now. --BDD (talk)...

trivial mentions. And I don't think this is a good candidate for a WP:CONCEPTDAB. But perhaps a short section at National anthem (#Legislation ?) on the...

nominator misunderstands as "SYNTH" is actually the development of a WP:CONCEPTDAB which explains the appearance of "diverse meanings" because the phrase...

notice. Thanks, – Uanfala 12:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC) Retarget to new WP:CONCEPTDAB stub Linguistic confusion (or other suggestion, but "Easily confused words"...

management: 31 links Freestyle: 31 links Score (music): 206 links: either a WP:CONCEPTDAB or an incomplete disambiguation Journey to the Center of the Earth (disambiguation):...

worried about where these titles point. Alternatively, the idea of a WP:CONCEPTDAB at Syrian Orthodox Church could be helpful, if we don't have to resort...

Thryduulf (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Can it please be a WP:CONCEPTDAB instead? -- Tavix (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC) If you wish. As...

December 2015 (UTC) Yeah, that was kinda my concern with it too. Maybe a Wp:CONCEPTDAB would be good? 127.0.0.1 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC) yes best...

they should be, and that could be a natural target. And aren't SIAs and CONCEPTDAB articles different things? --BDD (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC) No...

royal court. Unless I'm wrong, it's perhaps best to make this into a {{conceptdab}} for now, linking to the UK and Empire of Japan articles and perhaps...

not first or second degree). So this ends up being kind of a verbose WP:CONCEPTDAB rather than a "real article" ... Anyway I'd suggest retargeting third...

the same word is used. This is exactly the situation envisaged by WP:CONCEPTDAB – a broad concept which has particular applications. In such cases, it...

(see, e.g., this book and this book); I don't think we should make a WP:CONCEPTDAB for this term, but I do think that it would be most helpful to readers...

hatnote, and anyone should feel free to change the redirect into a WP:CONCEPTDAB. --BDD (talk) 15:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Scientific researchScientific...

2015 (UTC) If we decide to disambiguate, it'd probably have to be a WP:CONCEPTDAB. -- Tavix (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...

23:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC) This shouldn't be a disambig, though; it's a WP:CONCEPTDAB. We should have an article similar to your explanation above that covers...

LadyofShalott 04:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Comment @LadyofShalott: According to WP:CONCEPTDAB which states, "If the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation...

existence of the gods. So... perhaps a set index, disambiguation page or conceptdab is in order -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Delete...

Primefac (talk) 21:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Delete: Supercar is a WP:CONCEPTDAB / WP:SETINDEX page on the term, which applies to at least four completely...

disambiguation page, which could eventually progress (perhaps via WP:CONCEPTDAB) to a real article. --BDD (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Unsuitable...

and Global jihad (disambiguation) redirecting there. I wonder if a WP:CONCEPTDAB article is possible, though. I have my own suggestion, though. See below...

expulsion or collective expulsion, and that expulsion isn't even a WP:CONCEPTDAB, may be deplorable, but insofar remains irrelevant. --PanchoS (talk) 20:09...

field of nutrition [40]. So perhaps this needs to be some kind of WP:CONCEPTDAB, but WP:TNT applies at this point to the present content. Someone not...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:CONCEPTDAB. Adequately covered by religious democracy (i.e. especially this section)...

January 2012 (UTC) P.S. I just discovered such brilliant example of WP:CONCEPTDAB in mathematics as Triangle center. Note that is it an article, not a dab...

December 2013 (UTC) Not a good idea in the middle of an AFD, and see WP:CONCEPTDAB. The US is unusual in having what are effectively parallel penal systems...

point to the disambiguation page or be a disambiguation page, or be a WP:CONCEPTDAB -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC) WP:COMMONNAME refers...

the man Rick Santorum is the whole purpose of disambig pages, per WP:CONCEPTDAB. The other option would be to have a hatnote for Santorum (neologism)...

Disambiguation is not appropriate as the title matches are not exact and WP:CONCEPTDAB states "A disambiguation page should not be created just because it is...

(talk) 18:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Keep The page is valid and helpful per WP:CONCEPTDAB. Andrew D. (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC) I agree there might be a WP:Broad...

to merge to two different targets at the same time. In such cases, WP:CONCEPTDAB indicates that a summary-level page is appropriate. And Rhododendrites...

it may very well be merged elsewhere, but it could well remain as a WP:CONCEPTDAB. Ping User:BD2412 due to his post at Talk:Will_of_God, which people may...

notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONCEPTDAB. See Historical development and theoretical principles of compressors...

13 March 2020 (UTC) Unsure if it is suitable in this case - but a WP:CONCEPTDAB is also something that can exist. It's almost like a disambiguation article...

redundant. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Keep, as a WP:CONCEPTDAB. It is not OK to redirect to a DAB page, as DAB page entries are required...

(currently a redirect to Sailor) that slowly morphed into a haphazard WP:CONCEPTDAB, then got split off.  OBSIDIAN†SOUL 16:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Delete...

of a dog's breakfast at the moment, and I really don't like it, but WP:CONCEPTDAB certainly allows for an article with this title. Done well, it could be...

the same television series, a disambiguation page is unnecessary per WP:CONCEPTDAB. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

2017 (UTC) Comment it may be useful, but it is not a dab page. See WP:CONCEPTDAB. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) I agree, and it seems...

It should be deleted to make space fora broad concept article per WP:CONCEPTDAB. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Keep. This...

mathematics but also are strongly related, we are in the case of a WP:CONCEPTDAB, and the disambiguation must not been done in a disambiguation page, but...

notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONCEPTDAB. See Historical development and theoretical principles of compressors...

here is a broad concept article which is sensible in this case per WP:CONCEPTDAB which states, "If the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation...

January 2012 (UTC) P.S. I just discovered such brilliant example of WP:CONCEPTDAB in mathematics as Triangle center. Note that is it an article, not a dab...

here is a broad concept article which is sensible in this case per WP:CONCEPTDAB which states, "If the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation...

the man Rick Santorum is the whole purpose of disambig pages, per WP:CONCEPTDAB. The other option would be to have a hatnote for Santorum (neologism)...

Brother 2 (disambiguation), Celebrity Big Brother should be the central WP:CONCEPTDAB page for all versions and seasons. -- Netoholic @ 17:25, 8 November 2017...

Sickness: 12 links Plaza de Armas: 47 links (see Talk:Plaza de Armas for WP:CONCEPTDAB discussion) – tagged as WP:DABCONCEPT - no longer a disambig page Materials...

10 September 2018 (UTC) Keep. I would think the page is useful as a WP:CONCEPTDAB until/unless someone decides to write a proper article on the broad-concept...

(talk) 09:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC) It isn't anymore -- I've created a WP:CONCEPTDAB article about fruit brandy, with a much clearer scope than before. Still...

per our editing policy. Deletion would disrupt such work. See also WP:CONCEPTDAB, which provides a sensible framework for a broad summary which is appropriate...

propose a merge of the two pages in question to make a WP:CONCEPTDAB, followed by that conceptdab taking primary topic at carbon fiber after a successful...

Sharp (talk) 06:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Possibly, you could write a WP:CONCEPTDAB for Antineutronium, but I think allowing the Wikipedia Search to do it...

November 2017 (UTC) I have attempted to boldly resolve this by creating a CONCEPTDAB prototype at Far-right (Special:Permalink/812052066). Discussion is necessary...

participants." (65.94.169.222 as oppose?) The DAB page was essentially the WP:CONCEPTDAB page that was previously butchered. The link was made by In ictu oculi...

consensus in the past that the current mold article act as a general WP:CONCEPTDAB focusing mostly on fungal mold, but directing readers to all the other...

“what is orchid”? I think a better disambiguation page, maybe even a CONCEPTDAB, noting the word “orchid” predates genetic science that redefines plant...

Sharp (talk) 06:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Possibly, you could write a WP:CONCEPTDAB for Antineutronium, but I think allowing the Wikipedia Search to do it...

the primary topic for Human appearance and the article serves as a WP:CONCEPTDAB for subtopics and related topics. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 22:58, 31 October...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Further expansion of the page per WP:CONCEPTDAB can occur as a content discussion on the talk page. — CactusWriter (talk)...

Wikipedia:Disambiguation again, it looks like making a broad-based article per WP:CONCEPTDAB might be the correct thing to do, but it doesn't look like there's any...

interested editor should do this. 5Q5|✉ 12:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC) Per WP:CONCEPTDAB, because alternative learning programs are broad and relate to roughly...

used at the already existing Iron Man, where's there is scope for a WP:CONCEPTDAB. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

discussion, but the most practical. There's maybe even scope for a WP:CONCEPTDAB here. Something that lists all the national Welsh teams is what is required...

Veverve (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Keep: Meets the purpose of WP:CONCEPTDAB  // Timothy :: talk  11:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

January 2025 (UTC) If someone were to boldly write a DAB page, or a WP:CONCEPTDAB, this DRV would be moot. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)...

simply a split, or a wider article on the type. Seems like a suitable [[WP:CONCEPTDAB]]. Only issue is when this sort of thing turns into a "how-to" article...

January 2025 (UTC) If someone were to boldly write a DAB page, or a WP:CONCEPTDAB, this DRV would be moot. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)...