Operator: RonaldB-nl (talk)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually assisted

Programming Language(s): VB6 + SQLserver

Function Summary: Blocking and unblocking of certain confirmed open proxies. See this page for more info.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Appr. twice a week, initially more often to catch up with backlog.

Edit rate requested: 5 per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Blocking/unblocking of confirmed open proxies in the categories: TOR exit node, cascaded exit node and anonymizer IP. See here for a more technical description of the process as applied on nl:w for over a year. Look at the above link for further explanation on measures taken to prevent unnecessary blocking(periods).

That would require an adminbot. Mønobi 23:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)reply

This would indeed require an admin bot, what do other BAG members think? Dreamy ^§ 23:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)reply

this is in fact an admin bot that enforces our current policy on open proxies better than admins can. Im going to see if a Bcrat will flag this. due to the nature of the enforcement im going to have a bcrat flag this. β^_command 00:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)reply

I'd like to think we could just send it off to a 'crat to be flagged, but the overly-bureaucratic nature of wikipedia makes it impossible :S . You're going to be forced to put it through an RFA if you wanna run it, which, like betacommand said, will probably fail... :( Mønobi 04:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)reply

Not to mention it does not appear you are an admin, which means you would probably need a RFA too. Soxπed Ninety Three | tcdb 23:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)reply

And so, Denied. Soxred93 | talk count bot 15:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)reply

Thanks, Captain Obvious! Миша13 21:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)reply

Just noticed this, don't see why is should be necessary denied, Soxred. And no, nowhere is written that adminbots operator must be admins :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 10:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)reply