PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Search Results: Wikipedia:BLPRFC

Redirect to:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Sabtu, 2022-05-21 22:07:51

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. Shortcuts WP:BLPRFCWP:BLPRFC WP:BLPRFC3WP:BLPRFC3 WP:BLPRFCIIIWP:BLPRFCIII The previous RFCs held at...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people/Phase I
Kamis, 2026-03-12 20:07:01

Shortcuts WP:RFC/BLPWP:RFC/BLP WP:BLPRFCWP:BLPRFC The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/January 2010
Jumat, 2022-04-01 16:41:25

from June 2010 and definitely every UBLP that existed when the whole WP:BLPRFC issue happened! Outstanding work by all, regardless of whether we hit this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/CleanupProjectArchive
Jumat, 2021-08-06 20:21:00

23, 2010, around the time of the events that lead to the great big WP:BLPRFCs and the eventual development of these projects. This project won't be able...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-03-08/News and notes
Sabtu, 2024-01-06 08:15:58

← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 8 March 2010 News and notes Contribute  —   Share this  E-mail  Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  Reddit  Digg By Phoebe...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive208
Kamis, 2024-10-17 20:45:17

nothing in the currently ongoing discussions or the ArbCom motion (see WP:BLPRFC#View by Sandstein)) allows administrators to edit-war on fully protected...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 60
Kamis, 2024-10-17 20:43:27

more than a waste of resources. Mr.Z-man 14:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC) WP:BLPRFC was a waste of resources. This might actually achieve something. I'll qualify...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 41
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:31:04

3-to-1 rejection of MZMcBride's proposal of immediate deletion in the WP:BLPRFC? The-Pope (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC) I agree with Balloonman, if ArbCom...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Phantomsteve
Jumat, 2026-03-06 20:18:37

expectations of that community. It will be interesting to see the results of BLPRFC will be. As anyone who has read my comments on that RFC will know, I believe...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 36
Kamis, 2023-02-09 16:48:45

use these systems on other cleanup issues. At the end of one of the WP:BLPRFC (I think we're up to 3 so far this year alone), we proposed a project and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/Archive 22
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:10:58

that sets a bad precedent, IMO. IIRC, Risker's closure of the first WP:BLPRFC specifically noted that she was closing it on her own "authority", not ArbCom's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2010-03-08
Selasa, 2023-11-07 07:53:14

Single-page Edition WP:POST/1 8 March 2010 News and notes Financial statements, discussions, milestones In the news Pentagon shooter used Wikipedia, soon...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Unsourced biographies of living persons/Archive 1
Sabtu, 2022-04-02 22:23:03

definition, the definition of contentious has been contentious since the first BLPRFC this year... I don't think we'll ever get total agreement, which is why...

Click to read more »