article is not based primarily on such sources. Shortcut WP:BLPGOSSIPWP:BLPGOSSIP Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether...

withdrawn my argument that the section violates WP:BLPGOSSIP. Am I correct that WP:GRAPEVINE and WP:BLPGOSSIP are the same thing? JamesRoberts (talk) 00:12...

subject. Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, WP:BLPSTYLE and WP:BLPGOSSIP. North America1000 11:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Delete: No suggestion of...

little information about his professional career -- we have to consider WP:BLPGOSSIP as well. The subject has not received any industry awards or made any...

But sources cited Allkpop are unreliable, it would eventually fail WP:BLPGOSSIP. Absolutiva 08:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

–yeagvr · ✉ 22:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC) BLP sources still exists, as well as WP:BLPGOSSIP for each secondary sources are insufficient. Absolutiva 22:37, 6 May 2026...

Military, and France. Surtsicna (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC) Delete WP:BLPGOSSIP: Avoid repeating gosip. "Rumoured" isn't good enough. And with that and...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable and poorly sourced, see WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLPREMOVE. This may be suitable for speedy delete. Kcmastrpc (talk)...

romantic relationships, but such inclusion would go beyond limits of WP:BLPGOSSIP. George Ho (talk) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

catalogues, but weeding out passing mentions, what's left is mostly on the WP:BLPGOSSIP level, and mostly writing about a past brief relationship with a more...

(Rrarr) 11:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delist. Some of the more egregious WP:BLPGOSSIP violations have been removed, but I still count approximately 44 sources...

The main arguments from delete !voters were WP:BLP (and specifically WP:BLPGOSSIP), WP:RECENT, and WP:NOTNEWS. They felt that, instead of focusing on the...

simply stating his name. So widespread definition simply forms a gossip WP:BLPGOSSIP. On the other hand, the presence of repeated vandalism of the page shows...

differently from other information. Moreover, there's major concerns about WP:BLPGOSSIP which states "Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source...

Anything called "The Hollywood Gossip" is probably going to fail WP:BLPGOSSIP. These are just the very basic things I noticed on first reading. I couldn't...

it violates the biography of living persons policy, particularly WP:BLPGOSSIP: Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself…whether the material is being presented...

understatement. This article suffers from neutrality issues (namely UNDUE WEIGHT/BLPGOSSIP problems) and poor sourcing. Some1 (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Support...

given no independent confirmation that he is dead). Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NPF. Nableezy 17:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

connect to tar all paid editors by association. Should be removed per WP:BLPGOSSIP. NE Ent 11:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC) It was a significant local issue which...

MidnightMayhem (talk) 04:43, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete: Clear example of WP:BLPGOSSIP and that's being charitable, it's a problematic piece. It's also an example...

Wikipedia's strict policy for Biographies of Living Persons (WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:BLPPRIVACY). 1. Remove Govindarajan (m.1997; div.1999) from spouses...

that aren't notable, not least because of the risk of straying into WP:BLPGOSSIP territory. (The author understandably dislikes the descriptor "conspiracy...

experienced writer - wants her on wikipedia to get her notable. WP:RS, WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Ben Ben (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Do Not...

elsewhere(see George Hewison, William Kashtan). So much of it sounds like WP:BLPGOSSIP that I would worry about WP:LIBEL. Maybe these guys really don't care...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

local politician wing of WP:NPOL, but there are surely some shades of WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLP1E. I would be a weak keep in the absence of a request from...

spirit of WP:BLPGOSSIP as the primary rationale for deletion. So I thought, regardless of that policy's text, what is the spirit of WP:BLPGOSSIP, or what...

Dr. Phil (about giving away a vodka bottle and a Xanan pill) speaks WP:BLPGOSSIP. Speaking of BLP1E, I'm unconvinced that his Survivor win suffices to...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

(UTC) Propose Deleting Category:Deep Throat Nominator's rationale: Per WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:V and WP:COP This mostly categorizes individual people who were not...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

(Rrarr) 11:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delist. Some of the more egregious WP:BLPGOSSIP violations have been removed, but I still count approximately 44 sources...

privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid" - and is full of WP:BLPGOSSIP. The article contains next to no out-of-universe commentary from verifiable...

opinion is therefore POV of the LDS church and is a BLP issue per WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, and WP:BLPGROUP.--Amadscientist (talk) 22:09, 29 April...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

inserting Pritish Nandy qoute even after reasoning with him about its WP:BLPGOSSIP violation as same was removed from another article Diff:[34] by Admin...

enough when compounded with WP:PROFRINGE (and, to a lesser extent, WP:BLPGOSSIP). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Delete unquestionably...

there's no evidence of significant national, encyclopedic coverage. WP:BLPGOSSIP requires "Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable;...

Bishonen | tålk 21:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC). At Talk:Curtis Yarvin#WP:BLPGOSSIP This article is Defamatory and Places wikipedia in legal jeopardy. sbelknap (talk ·...

tabloid fodder and should not be used per WP:NOTGOSSIP and policy at WP:BLPGOSSIP. 4meter4 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Comment You say this, yet ALL...

following reasons: WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, WP:BLP1E...

completely new information to me, that my last proposed sentence was WP:BLPGOSSIP,[211] so their RfC close apparently did indeed bar any mention at all...

association, and biased, malicious or overly promotional content. WP:BLPGOSSIP:Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether...

about the most recent owners and problems with neighbours etc (see WP:BLPGOSSIP). No way would this be considered appropriate in a biography on someone...

above, including references to wherever the supposed violations of WP:BLPGOSSIP Moreover, I feel like it should be brought up that Zoe Quinn has had 36...

a category that clearly runs afoul of WP:OCEGRS, WP:OPINIONCAT and WP:BLPGOSSIP. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC) No, it is a typical...

Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source doesn't specify the year when...

tabloid newspaper, NY Post which are disparaging and sensationalist WP:BLPGOSSIP. These articles also mention his wife by name who was arrested for money...

(a guideline) trumps BLP (a policy) and all of its subparts, including BLPGOSSIP? LetsGoSurfing (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC) BLP is a content guideline...

article is that it violates virtually every point on WP:BLP, including WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:COATRACK. The article is a tabloid, and there seems to be a consensus...

cautious about so-called "controversy" (making him "notable") per WP:BLPGOSSIP (or any other part of the WP:BLP policy). I've done my best to improve...

differently from other information. Moreover, there's major concerns about WP:BLPGOSSIP which states "Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source...

lacking WP:RS are precisely the sort of slander that runs afoul of WP:BLPGOSSIP. I have asked editors, both above and on the article's talk page, to cite...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

article is that it violates virtually every point on WP:BLP, including WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:COATRACK. The article is a tabloid, and there seems to be a consensus...

WP:RS. And while I know this isn't about a living person, I think WP:BLPGOSSIP certainly applies. But since we're on the topic of how long the NTSB report...

tabloid newspaper, NY Post which are disparaging and sensationalist WP:BLPGOSSIP. These articles also mention his wife by name who was arrested for money...

tabloid newspaper, NY Post which are disparaging and sensationalist WP:BLPGOSSIP. These articles also mention his wife by name who was arrested for money...

reputation and legacy through the dirt "with absolutely no facts" WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:SENSATION. It is then easy to empathize with the family's exacerbated...

other parts of BLP policy, such as the prohibition on sensationalism and BLPGOSSIP, from showing a 'substantial or well-documented' role. After material...

lacking WP:RS are precisely the sort of slander that runs afoul of WP:BLPGOSSIP. I have asked editors, both above and on the article's talk page, to cite...

little information about his professional career -- we have to consider WP:BLPGOSSIP as well. The subject has not received any industry awards or made any...

01:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Merge to Jennifer Lopez per WP:NOTTABLOID, WP:BLPGOSSIP. Having a separate article for this subject matter gives it undue weight...

tabloid fodder and should not be used per WP:NOTGOSSIP and policy at WP:BLPGOSSIP. 4meter4 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Comment You say this, yet ALL...

tabloid newspaper, NY Post which are disparaging and sensationalist WP:BLPGOSSIP. These articles also mention his wife by name who was arrested for money...

experienced writer - wants her on wikipedia to get her notable. WP:RS, WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Ben Ben (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Do Not...

enough when compounded with WP:PROFRINGE (and, to a lesser extent, WP:BLPGOSSIP). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Delete unquestionably...

notion of general reliability. That being said, we need to observe WP:BLPGOSSIP. The one thing I think we can/need to use this article for is the statement...

following reasons: WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, WP:BLP1E...

leans toward rumors and speculation. Editors should be cautious, since WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP tell us to avoid gossip. Many of the articles are summaries...

elsewhere(see George Hewison, William Kashtan). So much of it sounds like WP:BLPGOSSIP that I would worry about WP:LIBEL. Maybe these guys really don't care...

imply that the "rapists" were, in fact, guilty. edit summary "rm per WP:BLPGOSSIP and basic common sense; come on, now, people; we don't stoop to amplifying...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

opinion is therefore POV of the LDS church and is a BLP issue per WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, and WP:BLPGROUP.--Amadscientist (talk) 22:09, 29 April...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid" - and is full of WP:BLPGOSSIP. The article contains next to no out-of-universe commentary from verifiable...

does not add greatly to what is already known, and risks creating a WP:BLPGOSSIP feedback loop.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC) The source...

simply stating his name. So widespread definition simply forms a gossip WP:BLPGOSSIP. On the other hand, the presence of repeated vandalism of the page shows...

(UTC) Delete — WP:BADIDEA WP:NOTSCANDAL inconsistent garbage with WP:BLPGOSSIP specious purpose to defame or denigrate. Note that Elizabeth Warren did...

01:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Merge to Jennifer Lopez per WP:NOTTABLOID, WP:BLPGOSSIP. Having a separate article for this subject matter gives it undue weight...

(a guideline) trumps BLP (a policy) and all of its subparts, including BLPGOSSIP? LetsGoSurfing (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC) BLP is a content guideline...

Hello! mostly publishes celebrity gossip, which is discouraged in WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. For what it's worth, this magazine tends to publish...

sexual assault. I removed the material as an obvious violation of WP:BLPGOSSIP, as I said in my edit summary, and frankly it seemed like a no-brainer...

(talk) 10:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC) I probably would have removed it under BLPGOSSIP. The source is reliable for what it is saying, it is reporting an interview...

Debate on if it meets criteria for BLP or not, and specifically if WP:BLPGOSSIP applies as the story relies on unnamed sources, and has no specific allegations...

given statement. If we analyze it from the narrower POV of BLP, then WP:BLPGOSSIP says that Wikipedia articles shouldn't repeat gossip, but it does not...

speculation/attributes it to sources; and it should be excluded per WP:BLPGOSSIP, and also because I can only find other tabloids when trying to find another...

through an anonymity service called bitmessage. This is addressed in WP:BLPGOSSIP: "Be wary of sources that use weasel words and that attribute material...

even making the factual claim that is in our article.. Please see WP:BLPGOSSIP which says we should avoid innuendo based largely on anonymous sources...

itself as "a celebrity gossip site". It should generally be avoided per WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. We've previously blacklisted gossip blogs (such as Just...

Writing style: balance (WP: BLPBALANCE) Gossip and feedback loops (WP: BLPGOSSIP) Contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced Etc.— Preceding...

which just absolutely must appear in a BLP is beyond me. It violates WP:BLPGOSSIP. Pointing this out on the talk page has not resulted in much constructive...

articles but I didn't find anything more detailed then WP:GRAPEVINE and WP:BLPGOSSIP.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC) There is an article I...

reputation and legacy through the dirt "with absolutely no facts" WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:SENSATION. It is then easy to empathize with the family's exacerbated...

interpretation of it. BLPGOSSIP is more on point. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC) I respectfully point out that WP:BLPGOSSIP (and also WP:NOTGOSSIP)...

extremely high-quality sources confirming the authenticity of the leaks. WP:BLPGOSSIP comes into play here. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC) Rising...

(weight). Jiminy Cricket. Atsme☯Consult 00:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC) No - WP:BLPGOSSIP for starters and WP:10YT for a relevancy check. Comments and reactions...

describes itself as "CELEBRITY GOSSIPY BIO", and should be avoided per WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. — Newslinger talk 19:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC) No As...

sources who were engaged in a legal dispute with the LP? (Cf. NEWSORG, BLPGOSSIP, IMPARTIAL.) Op-ed (in Mass. Lawyers Weekly): The Swartz suicide and the...

174 (talk) 00:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC) I've removed it, as I think WP:BLPGOSSIP applies here. It's from gossip website Radar Online quoting an "anonymous...

removed from these articles here and here, content that look to violate WP:BLPGOSSIP. IP 99.38.132.172 (talk · contribs · IP contribs · WHOIS) cleaned up the...

It just makes it an collection of summarized hearsay. That's what WP:BLPGOSSIP is supposed to prevent. Waalkes (talk) 21:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)...

first place. Collect (talk) 22:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Specifically WP:BLPGOSSIP - "Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable;...

watch | logs) Reason: Multiple recently registered editors violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Semi-protected for...

The Caravan and reflects author Meera Visvanathan's views about BLP WP:BLPGOSSIP. The same source is cited multiple times in the section. (Ref - is an...

Ryan Vesey Review me! 12:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Keep out of the article, per WP:BLPGOSSIP: "Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable;...

because there are thousands of hits for it being a rumor. Please read WP:BLPGOSSIP before making brash statements about something not violating BLP. Newsblog...

Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source doesn't specify the year when...

authenticity and no official information. The reversion was based on WP:RS, WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:AVOIDVICTIM, and I fully support them. Dwpaul (talk) 20:45, 5 September...

source] I've removed the sentence, as to me it seemed to be violating WP:BLPGOSSIP. On reading the article, the author seems to be using a strident tone...

You more have to look at this in terms of WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPRS, WP:BLPGOSSIP (and feedback loops), and WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE. Most of the sources are...

several reasons: "WP:BLPCRIME, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:NPF, WP:BLPSOURCE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, Fails WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, WP:BLP1E...

to biased sources. No balancing aspects. Written like a tabloid , WP:BLPGOSSIP. Attack. Please moderate.--DDupard (talk) 11:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC) You...

available. XOR'easter (talk) 02:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC) This falls under WP:BLPGOSSIP, and sources are not presenting these allegations as anywhere close to...

another source picked it up. At the moment it just looks like it's WP:BLPGOSSIP since it's all "was possibly the artist" and other people's confirmations...

BLP's require a higher level of notability, this can be gleaned from WP: BLPGOSSIP, for inclusion of material. BLP is pretty clear and consistent that we...

not the case here, but this section that looks like a gossip. Read: WP:BLPGOSSIP. -- ClaudioSantos¿? 06:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC) "Even the title of Walls...

resources, do not re-add); here with AnonIP writing: Violates WP:BLPSTYLE, WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:BLPSPS and probably others. The statement is an accurate...

belong in an article, which is a different part of BLP. For instance, WP:BLPGOSSIP says that we should consider whether "even if true, it is relevant to...

political views of the subject. This seems like a clear violation of WP:BLPGOSSIP as the views or her relatives are not "relevant to a disinterested article...

be removed, as long as the move is not controversial among editors? WP:BLPGOSSIP also seems to apply. Keep in mind that this question is not just about...

stuff about the white power gesture is such a mess, and, at least, a WP:BLPGOSSIP vio. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC) I should probably...

against “biased, malicious… content.” The quote also arguably violates WP:BLPGOSSIP since it is a snarky anonymous quote. As a whole, this statement is a...

Unfortunately no person is willing to lay claim to this statement. Per WP:BLPGOSSIP one should be wary when using anonymous sources. Additionally from WP:BLP...

normally treat WP:BLPGOSSIP (assuming it's agreed this is gossip). Madshurtie (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC) It does seem to be BLPGOSSIP, assuming by...

took place on the talk page. I think it should be remove according to WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLPCRIME but since I am not super familiar with the WP:BLP policy...

vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives, WP:BLPGOSSIP et al), WP:NPOV(WP:UNDUE). cf. WP:RECENTISM. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 23:22...

situation, I have entirely removed the section based on this material per WP:BLPGOSSIP. I'd like it if someone could review this action and let me know if it...

situation, I have entirely removed the section based on this material per WP:BLPGOSSIP. I'd like it if someone could review this action and let me know if it...

policy violations – Current tabloid scandal drawing serious violations of BLPGOSSIP.  Rebbing  19:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Pending-changes protected. Mark...

editing – repeated IP editors adding unsourced, poorly sourced, or WP:BLPGOSSIP materials in violation of BLP. Joeyconnick (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2020...

cited material. Further, being mentioned in an email fails WP:DUE and WP:BLPGOSSIP. - Wikmoz (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Vernon Coleman This article...

WP:BLPGOSSIP only because the subject is a private lady. When they have so much media coverage, they do not remain private anymore. WP:BLPGOSSIP dictates...

it's entirely based on quotes from unnamed sources. Clearly fails WP:BLPGOSSIP. January (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Zakir Naik (edit | talk |...

unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties." Also WP:BLPGOSSIP - "Be wary of sources that...attribute material to anonymous sources."...

find a policy that this neatly fits into. I suppose the closest is WP:BLPGOSSIP ("whether, even if true, it is relevant to a disinterested article about...

diff=544491137&oldid=544481911 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLPGOSSIP#Avoid_gossip_and_feedback_loops http://en.wikipedia...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

meaningful notability here, only WP:BLPCRIME, and much of this is mostly WP:BLPGOSSIP about the family. See also WeirdNAnnoyed for a more succinct summary....

[97][98][99][100] Me and Orson Welles was also reviewed in the region. [101] Per WP:BLPGOSSIP: Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable;...

specific sources proposed to support politically-related WP:BLPCRIME/WP:BLPGOSSIP content in the article. I have wanted to research The National Desk more...

rules of biographies. Czoal (talk) 22:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC) WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTNEWS spring fairly readily to mind. I would consider...

used weasel words like "reportedly". To me that says rumor/gossip. WP:BLPGOSSIP I looked at WP:WELLKNOWN "If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party...

been squabbling with Dervorguilla about some alleged WP:QUOTEFARM or WP:BLPGOSSIP material taken from an op-ed by Harvey Silverglate and reprinted at Aaron...

article. The reasoning behind the reverts have been violations of WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:NPOV, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, and WP:UNDUE. The editors have...

criticism I now see, while still remembering BLP policy as well for WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:AVOIDVICTIM while keeping WP:WELLKNOWN in mind as well.--Amadscientist...

magazine) a reliable source for these claims made in the article. WP:BLPGOSSIP I tried twice to remove the material accordingly to WP:BLP but my edits...

WP:GRAPEVINE; that is, the sources are your typical gossip sources. Per WP:BLPGOSSIP: the source isn't as reliable as it could be; his previous statements...

Other media is citing the two gossip magazines looking very much like WP:BLPGOSSIP applies. FWIW, the Kristen Stewart article links to http://www.kristenstewart...

We add that to the article neutrally, etc. But not at this point. WP:BLPGOSSIP covers this well - the gossip loop might come from the Profil article...

Fairfax[51] (Fairfax denied using that specific phrase) would violate WP:BLPGOSSIP. That is interesting, but incorrect because if it were true that Fairfax...

report given as a source for this paragraph seems to plainly violate WP:BLPGOSSIP: "Be wary of relying on sources that use weasel words and that attribute...

Noting the flag tweet itself without independent RSes would verge on BLPGOSSIP territory. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Not only gossip...

AMA are inappropriate to include in WP due to WP:BLP, WP:GOSSIP, and WP:BLPGOSSIP. Other input could be used. Thanks.— James Cantor (talk) 22:34, 3 January...

grounds of WP:BLP (As I felt and still feel that it fails WP:GRAPEVINE/WP:BLPGOSSIP, since the first link in Sam Hocevar's comment is a social forum and the...

"defeat evil robot machines". It is not a quality source. The additions are BLPGOSSIP that did not add relevant information to the BLP subject's contributions...

is an adult in the United States. However, the speculation is straight BLPGOSSIP without any evidence. No RS has given this theory any credence. The speculation...

regarding this section, also. Do not these jokes merely constitute WP:BLPGOSSIP? Thanks in advance, Liberal Classic (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2011 (UTC) I...

few others have been very supportive in removing some of the worst WP:BLPGOSSIP and other attacks using Wikipedia's voice. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:07...

speculation/attributes it to sources; and it should be excluded per WP:BLPGOSSIP, and also because I can only find other tabloids when trying to find another...

:Redirect I think much of the media coverage for the events would violate WP:BLPGOSSIP, most specifically (but other thing also listed on the BLP page more loosely)...

like that. Uncle G (talk) 19:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Definitely seems WP:BLPGOSSIP Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC) There is a discussion...

true, it is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject." WP:BLPGOSSIP In Peris book edited by Kutlesa - there is gossip. (5) Remove immediately...

userspace. Andre🚐 05:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC) [ WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:BLPSELFPUB, WP:BLPGOSSIP Andre🚐 17:25, 4 May 2026 (UTC)] Delete per Tamzin and TheTimesAreAChanging...

involves material "heard through the grapevine". (WP:SOAP, WP:GRAPEVINE, WP:BLPGOSSIP) Neither McElroy nor Virkkala make any claim that Tucker was responsible...

attempts to include alleged academic bullying appear to run contrary to WP:BLPGOSSIP. Someone more knowledgeable than I should take a look. –Skywatcher68 (talk)...

does not violate WP:BLP, but actually, I think it does; specifically, WP:BLPGOSSIP. The "definition" is, of course, important to an understanding of the...

Anything called "The Hollywood Gossip" is probably going to fail WP:BLPGOSSIP. These are just the very basic things I noticed on first reading. I couldn't...

October 2022 (UTC) Out of an abundance of caution, per WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:RECENTISM, I've removed content sourced exclusively to Rolling...

thinks it violates WP:BLPGOSSIP. He also created a section on the BLP noticeboard. I disputed that the section violates WP:BLPGOSSIP, which led to another...

quote from Palmer says incredible partner, then the source falls under WP:BLPGOSSIP, right? That is, the source may say it, but the source isn't reliable...

administrator deletes these collapsed sections as a violation of BLP (WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:AVOIDVICTIM) and provide a warning within those discussions...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable and poorly sourced, see WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLPREMOVE. This may be suitable for speedy delete. Kcmastrpc (talk)...

Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC) WP:REDFLAG and WP:BLPGOSSIP seem to apply here. I have no idea how reliable Mediapart is but the controversial...

other parts of BLP policy, such as the prohibition on sensationalism and BLPGOSSIP, from showing a 'substantial or well-documented' role. After material...

Benedict Cumberbatch to comply with WP:BLPSOURCES, WP:GRAPEVINE, and WP:BLPGOSSIP as evidenced in the following: 1. Source doesn't specify the year when...

The sources that report on the relationship are not strong given the WP:BLPGOSSIP headlines and I have removed the section as a result. Morbidthoughts (talk)...

:Redirect I think much of the media coverage for the events would violate WP:BLPGOSSIP, most specifically (but other thing also listed on the BLP page more loosely)...

that aren't notable, not least because of the risk of straying into WP:BLPGOSSIP territory. (The author understandably dislikes the descriptor "conspiracy...

are all gossip, and using edit summaries variously referring to BLP, BLPGOSSIP, BLPRS, BLPREMOVE, and lastly ONUS. Discussions on both talk pages have...

request may well be AI generated, but the reasoning has some merit. WP:BLPGOSSIP cautions against using sources that attribute material to anonymous sources...

contribs) 04:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) Cheating allegations does seem like WP:BLPGOSSIP and the cited sources are not the strongest. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:13...

Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons#Proposed expansion of WP:BLPGOSSIP. Thanks! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 15:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC) This...

issues of WP:BLPNAME and WP:BLPGOSSIP. The BLPNAME issue is whether the birth name should be published[1] while WP:BLPGOSSIP issue is whether she had a...

public conflict between two podcasters. Whether that should be considered BLPGOSSIP? Probably since there's no other RS covering it to satisfy WP:PUBLICFIGURE...

article. This looks to me to be a celebrity gossip site, thus failing WP:BLPGOSSIP and being unsuitable for BLP articles as a result. I wanted to inquire...

WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. I understand the BLP implications with regards to BLPPRIVACY/BLPGOSSIP, but if the family releases a statement to a single source (in this case...

Without demonstrating impact on this person's career, this is just WP:BLPGOSSIP. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC) TheGamer should absolutely...

sites like indy100 are clickbait sites. Any overdose speculation is WP:BLPGOSSIP. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC) Extraordinary claims...

with the only changes being more sources being added. This seems to be a BLPGOSSIP issue since all of the sources regarding their adopted son added back...

someone experienced in BLP. There's no chance "fan fiction" goes beyond WP:BLPGOSSIP. Soni (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC) I have (before seeing this thread)...

July 2024 (UTC) Y'all gotta be shitting me that this is anything but WP:BLPGOSSIP. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Very much WP:GOSSIP,...

unconfirmed possibility. My opponent also returned this infringing WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLPBALANCE information about possibility to the article. [17] I...

transgender healthcare in Florida I reverted this citing WP:BLPSTYLE and WP:BLPGOSSIP. In the ensuing talk discussion several editors swiftly called for reinstatement...

But sources cited Allkpop are unreliable, it would eventually fail WP:BLPGOSSIP. Absolutiva 08:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

unsourced material describing violent and sexual acts, citing BLP / BLPGOSSIP / UNDUE. My edit summary used the shorthand “NOTGRAPHIC,” a mistyped reference...

of that publication. Is dirt.com too tabloidish (i.e. going against WP:BLPGOSSIP or similar rules) to be added? Is it reliable, at all? Your views on this...

local politician wing of WP:NPOL, but there are surely some shades of WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:BLP1E. I would be a weak keep in the absence of a request from...

self-published source. This constitutes a WP:BLPVIO and falls under WP:BLPGOSSIP" The report has nothing to do with Noorani himself and the argument that...

heavy reliance on rumors and sensationalist headlines which is against WP:BLPGOSSIP. For me Bunshun is okay for interviews with attribution, if the person...

source for BLPs. And a lot of the content would be discouraged under WP:BLPGOSSIP Tristario (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC) She is a professor in Biblical...

or sex characteristics may be covered when it is encyclopedic (not WP:BLPGOSSIP), widely reported by reliable non-medical sources and clearly attributed...

wtf. This isnt policy and not worth answering. The closest policy is WP:BLPGOSSIP, and by that overly broad definition watergate is to gossipy to include...

8 August 2024 (UTC) Other P&Gs that play into my reasoning include WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:10YT. I'd question by what standard you are asserting topical importance...

country, it makes no sense to use Wikipedia to spread such content per WP:BLPGOSSIP. In terms of political views, everyone has one and everyone has an opinion...

The entire History section of this article is the equivalent of a WP:BLPGOSSIP hitlist borne from rumour and unverified claims that have received media...

BLP sourcing. JFHJr (㊟) 03:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC) Good removal per WP:BLPGOSSIP. Orientls (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2025 (UTC) Subject: Request for urgent...

romantic relationships, but such inclusion would go beyond limits of WP:BLPGOSSIP. George Ho (talk) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

tabloid range ("stealing her boyfriend") and in general don't belong for WP:BLPGOSSIP reasons. I've invited them to discuss on the talk page but their revert...

be put in the legacy section. A lot of the incidents just seem like WP:BLPGOSSIP. I've issued a BLP alert on the person's account. Morbidthoughts (talk)...

catalogues, but weeding out passing mentions, what's left is mostly on the WP:BLPGOSSIP level, and mostly writing about a past brief relationship with a more...

removing the section on her personal life. He claims the sources are WP:BLPGOSSIP which is not true since the multiple sources are WP:BLPSOURCES and the...

Dr. Phil (about giving away a vodka bottle and a Xanan pill) speaks WP:BLPGOSSIP. Speaking of BLP1E, I'm unconvinced that his Survivor win suffices to...

MidnightMayhem (talk) 04:43, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete: Clear example of WP:BLPGOSSIP and that's being charitable, it's a problematic piece. It's also an example...

understatement. This article suffers from neutrality issues (namely UNDUE WEIGHT/BLPGOSSIP problems) and poor sourcing. Some1 (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Support...

don't think that the level of sourcing is enough to overcome WP:NPF, WP:BLPGOSSIP, etc. I do think that it is likely that this material will be WP:DUE for...

(talk • contribs) 22:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC) I've cut down a lot of the WP:BLPGOSSIP detail.[18] It is an article about Mako rather than Kei. Others feel free...

meaningful notability here, only WP:BLPCRIME, and much of this is mostly WP:BLPGOSSIP about the family. See also WeirdNAnnoyed for a more succinct summary....

discussion should commence. Preferably after everyone involved reads WP:BLPGOSSIP. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC) @Muboshgu A new deletion...

cautious about so-called "controversy" (making him "notable") per WP:BLPGOSSIP (or any other part of the WP:BLP policy). I've done my best to improve...

and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked...

Writing style: balance (WP: BLPBALANCE) Gossip and feedback loops (WP: BLPGOSSIP) Contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced Etc.— Preceding...

Military, and France. Surtsicna (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC) Delete WP:BLPGOSSIP: Avoid repeating gosip. "Rumoured" isn't good enough. And with that and...

–yeagvr · ✉ 22:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC) BLP sources still exists, as well as WP:BLPGOSSIP for each secondary sources are insufficient. Absolutiva 22:37, 6 May 2026...

much better. A lot of the removed material looks an awful lot like WP:BLPGOSSIP and should probably be removed for BLP policy reasons. Edit warring is...

with Diff B? I objected to the contention that the information violated BLPGOSSIP. Diff C is not by me, but by Marcelus. How can I defend it? Diff E and...

with the very title - or heck the concept! Broken policies include WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA...

AfD (WP:XC-restricted, to avoid the obvious factors that lead to these BLPGOSSIP issues), or if admins are feeling particularly ballsy we could just go...

InedibleHulk (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Oppose per Masem, BLPCRIME, and BLPGOSSIP. Some people seem to think that this is a list of people who Epstein connected...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Persistent addition of WP:BLPGOSSIP by IP users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Declined...

question a BLP's disclosed gender. The argument supporting this violates WP:BLPGOSSIP, MOS:GENDERID and WP:MEDRS at minimum. The talk page was already EC locked...

discussion should commence. Preferably after everyone involved reads WP:BLPGOSSIP. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC) @Muboshgu A new deletion...

article for over six years. It was initially removed by an editor citing WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:GRAPEVINE. Although I restored it, another editor subsequently...

watch | logs) Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:NPOV and WP:BLPGOSSIP issues.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:52, 6 August 2025 (UTC) Semi-protected...

semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Editing based on player transfer rumours. WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 18:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)...

in sensitive biographies of living persons subject to WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPGOSSIP. This isn't about editorial disagreement or Jackson’s reputation, it's...

(per WP:RSP) or sources of unknown reliability that likely violate WP:BLPGOSSIP (8, 9, 10, 11). A minority of their contributions to the article were...

March 2026 Some1 asks ToBeFree to block me over content after I raised WP:BLPGOSSIP concerns with an opinion statement alleging right-wing "reverse racism"...

8 August 2024 (UTC) Other P&Gs that play into my reasoning include WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:10YT. I'd question by what standard you are asserting topical importance...

content over the span of 3 days (or 10 days if you include my initial WP:BLPGOSSIP contest) is a procedural roadblock on account of how mild it is, but WP:BLPRESTORE...