Help FAQs Article subjects Article subjects' FAQ Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Index of FAQs Main FAQ Overview Readers Schools Contributing Editing...

qualify for CSD G7? Train2104 (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 'Delete Not much...

this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons, you are asked to read WP:BFAQ, which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...

notable (not suitable subjects for encyclopedia articles). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Edit other topics. See Wikipedia:Community portal if...

patrolling admin and checkuser comments Geronimo ahmo blocked as an obvious sock, and advised to read the WP:BFAQ. Amalthea 10:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)...

this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons you are asked to read WP:BFAQ which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...

demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Papi Paul Poeme (talk ·...

the short answer to your question about which parts is "all parts". See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for an explanation of why it's a bad idea for a company to try to...

notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Wikipedia is not for advertising, promotion, or public...

Wikipedia's requirements; it was deleted for violating copyright. See also WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and your talk page. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)...

important things; If you have a conflict of interest, be very careful. See WP:BFAQ, WP:BESTCOI. Everything should be verifiable, using inline references to...

am posting this on their behalf. I will direct the site owner to read WP:BFAQ. Jehochman Talk 12:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Thank you, Jehochman! I've added...

guidelines for inclusion, and should not be the subject of an article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY enlightening. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)...

you've provided, Wikipedia doesn't need a page about AUH Foundation. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)...

2010 (UTC) Unreferenced, promotional, username is against policy. See WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  05:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC) 3PL Systems Inc. (3PL Systems)...

clear what guidelines those would be. The only guideline I can see is the WP:BFAQ#Company page that ICONICS (talk · contribs) referenced on Category talk:Automation...

inspire confidence that the author is willing to work within the bounds of WP:BFAQ. COI aside, it doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG and is full of promotional language...

initially declined), so the draft may never be accepted. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)...

are not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC) Goodhew (talk ·...

attention to your request. For more information about your options, see WP:BFAQ. Although written about businesses and other organizations, it broadly applies...

gooma (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC) @Kabirnahak: You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. Worldbruce (talk) 07:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Samuel Blaison (talk ·...

articles. So there may be nothing you can do to get the draft accepted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2018...

(UTC) See WP:ADVERT and WP:CORP, Only has a primary source. Please, read WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  06:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC) I have been working on this entry...

this weekend. - Dank (push to talk) 17:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC) How about WP:BFAQ#WHY WP:WHYNOT? It was a little sloppy, but I've tightened it up; it's more...

see WP:VRS. One reference is definitely not enough. Also, please read WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC) This is a wiki for the non-profit organization...

Stick to facts from independent reliable sources. Also, please read WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  02:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC) I posted this article and it was deleted...

articles, (and even long-running minor venues in a list article). Suggest WP:BFAQ#COMPANY if you think your own venue deserves an article. Chris Neville-Smith...

so isn't as simple as us telling you to reshape your vowel sounds. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for alternatives. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)...

not adding material that volunteers would have to delete. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Ajg2345 (talk ·...

with respect to companies. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC) Ericawallace35 (talk ·...

of the company, it shouldn't have an article in Wikipedia. Most companies shouldn't. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)...

of interest is a supremely bad idea, and is strongly discouraged. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)...

wait. Studying Wikipedia's guidelines and best writing may be helpful. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY also contains good advice. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:29, 27 November...

you shouldn't edit on the topic. What is the alternative? You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY useful. Gather sources that are independent of the company - nothing...

Corporation, BuroHappold Engineering, and Hochtief. Before proceeding, read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Most businesses do not, and should not, have Wikipedia articles...

encyclopedia). No amount of editing will make the draft acceptable. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)...

Taira-prime (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Hi Taira-prime. Please see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Taira-prime Wikipedia...

is the subject, Levyx. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. You're welcome to write about something else, but if...

work without a signature. With regard to your question, you may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC) BorgFabian (talk ·...

inclusion in the encyclopedia). Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. No amount of editing can fix the problem of notability...

not to try to write the article yourself, but to follow the guidance at WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Ayman2121 (talk ·...

articles about them. If someone creates one, it should be deleted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC) WikiBPAN (talk ·...

but those things do not satisfy any of the notability criteria. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2019...

let me know what the issue is? Thanks! Peter Hi Pyeargin. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The draft was rejected because the topic is not notable...

have been written about it in reliable independent sources. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)...

source for you. It's a bad idea to write about a company you work for. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2021...

to write about a topic with which you have a conflict of interest. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Tatyana Malaysian (talk ·...

excluded as trivial coverage. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)...

notability guidelines for companies. Most business do not. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Knockaround may have satisfied the guidelines as they...

However, you need to change your username, see WP:CORPNAME. And please read WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  15:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Not sure how to write this article...

article on Wikipedia (most organizations don't, and shouldn't). Please read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. I recommend that you set the draft aside and concentrate on the...

22:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC) The user-page was deleted as an advert. See WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  20:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Volcom7205 (talk) 22:53, 10 February...

empty handed. I encourage the creator to read the second paragraph at WP:BFAQ#WHY and explain to his/her client that without sources about the foundation...

Smehra2801 (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC) Smehra2801, Firstly read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY For a business to be notable in Wikipedia terms, it requires significant...

time. PeterSymonds | talk 10:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Also see: WP:BFAQ#DELETE, WP:BFAQ#WHY, WP:EIW#Company, and WP:WWMPD. --Teratornis (talk) 15:26, 11...

coverage of the business, but I wouldn't hold your breath. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Longislandbrief...

article, review this guide. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 14:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. Why do you "need" to write about your employer on Wikipedia? Did you employer...

It has no independent reliable sources, and is not neutral. See also WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  10:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Fred, thanks for the prompt feedback...

write an encyclopedia article about your company, I encourage you to read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. What you're doing is a terrible idea, for so many reasons. To be...

an uphill battle meeting the encyclopaedia’s inclusion criteria. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)...

are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC) LoLo0732 (talk ·...

are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Briannaburns123...

demonstrate that the company is notable. You may find it helpful to read WP:BFAQ#COMPANY before you go any further. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:08, 22 February...

it's a horrible idea for you to write the article. Follow the advice in WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and let volunteers at Wikipedia:Requested articles write any article...

for any form of publicity, promotion, or public relations. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)...

Please see WP:NPOV. It needs independent, reliable sources. The WP:ONESOURCE is not enough. See also WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  16:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)...

are not suitable subjects for stand alone encyclopedia articles. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It...

you have a conflict of interest, please be very careful, and read the WP:BFAQ. Best,  Chzz  ►  04:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC) An article about Dr. Paul A....

are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The rejection of the draft is not based on the size...

inclusion in Wikipedia). Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. No amount of editing can fix the problem. There is no...

anything you can do to make the draft acceptable to Wikipedia. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Skornflakes (talk ·...

--Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Hi Lucienne Lopez bkv. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. If multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources exist (think...

businesses are not notable and drafts about them will never be accepted. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. On the other hand, I'm sure you've learned...

belong in the encyclopedia. Most businesses aren't notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#Company informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Vesta82601 (talk ·...

understand that most companies are not suitable subjects for Wikipedia, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. You have been advised to study the guideline on conflict of interest...

kitty because No third party references are stated in the article as per WP:BFAQ#DELETE, so this article can be deleted. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability...

December 2017 (UTC) @Primacyeditor: Thank you for your disclosure. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for the best way to proceed. When describing the company for Wikipedia:Requested...

businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)...

org/wiki/Draft:AwardWallet) published? Alexiveresch (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC) @Alexiveresch: See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)...

shared by multiple individuals. With regard to the draft, you may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Peter...

may pain you, but whatever you do, don't edit the article directly. See WP:BFAQ#EDIT. If you try to sway consensus against this result by posting on Talk:Geely...

notable organization based on sources that are indisputably reliable? See WP:BFAQ for examples of issues to keep in mind for any article about an organization...

Australian Financial Review, The New Zealand Herald, and the like). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)...

businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)...

neutrally, never able to produce an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Bollinmoor (talk ·...

commissioner of a study. Most businesses are not notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC) MadShelton (talk ·...

about the company, only quotes someone who works there. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC) Timofeytv (talk ·...

Bloggersparadise (talk • contribs) 04:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ, particularly WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. —teb728 t c 05:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Also WP:SOAP...

business aren't notable (aren't suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)...

your conflict of interest, we do not recommend writing the article; see WP:BFAQ. In addition, note that articles need independent reliable sources; see WP:FIRST...

the mainspace. DrStrauss talk 13:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC) @Dmurray06: See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Companies are strongly advised not to submit articles at all. It's...

being labelled as a single-purpose account. See e.g. WP:BACKLOG. See also WP:BFAQ for general guidance.  Chzz  ►  17:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Further to the...

interest, so we recommend against writing about that organization; see WP:BFAQ. Also, it is not neutral, and has no references to reliable sources. It is...

are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)...

there's no sign of that being just around the corner for EdCast. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)...

they are "contributing significantly" to their industry. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 72.132...

Mulryan. Don't write about yourself, your family, friends, or company. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and Wikipedia:Autobiography for further explanation of why. If you're...

topic to have any realistic hope of writing about it objectively. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for recommended ways forward. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:25, 8 January...

which describes the business at significant length. You may wish to read WP:BFAQ and WP:CORP for more information. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:41, 28 November...

to follow the advice in the WP:BFAQ page that you read, than to go by other stuff that exists. Pages like the WP:BFAQ represent the best thinking of highly...

baranwal (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC) Hi Manjeet.baranwal. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Most businesses are not notable. The guidelines for...

regional media, and do they contain significant coverage of NBSO? See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for your best course of action. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:42, 5 February...

The essay WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS may help you understand why. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC) JIm DeNunzio (talk ·...

Electricsity. The company is not notable. Most businesses aren't, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. You're wasting your time trying to improve the draft, because no...

businesses are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. WP:SIGCOV is the general notability guideline. For what...

knowledge of Wikipedia's rules "wins." Everyone involved should read WP:OWN, WP:BFAQ, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, WP:FOOT, and the Astroturfing article. If someone criticizes...

but at present the company is not notable. Most business aren't. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. Revisit the topic in a few years when it is...

wonder if you are involved with that company? If so, please carefully read WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI. It needs better references Blogs are not "Reliable sources"...

ISBN 978-0-7626-0585-9. That isn't nearly enough to justify an encyclopedia article. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)...

conflict of interest, will not be the right person to write about it. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)...

inclusion in the encyclopedia). Most businesses are not. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic...

businesses and organizations should not have an article on Wikipedia, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. An encyclopedia article should not be a regurgitation of what they...

Facebook or LinkedIn, and is not to be used to manage your own reputation. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY is written about organizations and companies, but applies equally...

different reviewers, you don't appear to be prepared for the task. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for alternatives. Attention reviewers (Chetsford—AngusWOOF—Atlan...

are already well-known. Also, be careful of conflict of interest; see WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  03:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC) Hi, could you please do me a favor...

stand-alone article on Wikipedia (at this time). You might find the WP:BFAQ helpful, although it's written primarily for for-profit businesses. Also...

extends to biographies of their living founders or executives. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains...

notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Shashwat SSJS 007 (talk ·...

approach to this is based on Durova's, as taught to me by her splendid WP:BFAQ. Perhaps we should try doing a somewhat more specialized one, as this sort...

businesses are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)...

touch with me or someone, and we will explain the facts of life about WP:BFAQ and how to have reasonable articles in WP, instead of stuff like these which...

notable, so Wikipedia should not have an article about it. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. The encyclopedia is not for any kind of advertising...

this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons, you are asked to read WP:BFAQ, which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...

notable (not suitable subjects for stand alone encyclopedia articles). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)...

on behalf of any of your clients, please read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ.--ukexpat (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Athomedia est une agence...

the entry for pyrrhic victory. But this seems to be a situation which WP:BFAQ doesn't seem to cover: we're more worried about companies unreasonably adding...

to organisations. --Fredrick day (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC) WP:BFAQ has advice that is just as relevant to non-profit organisations as businesses...

April 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia is not to be used for marketing. Please see WP:BFAQ. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Just as a general notice, the above...

PrimeHunter (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC) I am aware of the FAQ WP:BFAQ#ADVERT involving commercial advertisements and have been removing them from...

but here's another take, since I've already typed it up. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY helpful. The best advice is not to author the draft yourself. Instead...

businesses don't have Wikipedia articles about them and aren't suppose to. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)...

company, it is not appropriate to add it to Wikipedia - please see WP:VRS, WP:BFAQ. Urban Dictionary, YouTube and other wikis are not a reliable source. You...

WP:YFA and WP:CORP. – ukexpat (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ and WP:PEACOCK. On Wikipedia we do not have "staff" in the usual corporate...

(Talk to me and find out what I've done) 13:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned...

a thorough understanding of WP:COI guidelines and the WP:PAID policy. WP:BFAQ#COMPANY may be helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)...

possible. That being said, why don't we refer them to the process at Wikipedia:BFAQ#COMPANY? We'd also need assurances that they're not account sharing. justinfr...

subject. The subject of Wikipedia articles must be notable. See WP:BUS and WP:BFAQ. —teb728 t c 00:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC) My sister gave me a group of old postcards...

September 2010 (UTC) Not until you have a nice sit-down with them explaining WP:BFAQ. Unless they understand having a COI and writing about something they are...

you meant that Draft:The feath3r theory is about your organization, see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. Writing about yourself or your organization on Wikipedia is strongly...

them to set up individual accounts, and referring them to WP:NOSHARE and WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT for further clarification. However, both those documents state that...

Does not have independent reliable sources, see WP:FIRST, WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  04:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Hello, my article was reviewed while...

organization and uses the term "we" on its userpage, which is a violations of WP:BFAQ#ACCOUNT which states that It is against our local policy for two or more...

necessarily get better over time. I strongly advise that you consider WP:BFAQ#COMPANY before continuing with the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:44, 26 July...

are generated" - who says they're "high quality"? ...etc. See WP:NPOV, WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  01:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Thank you very much - very helpful feedback...

(talk) 17:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Pages aren't preserved, see WP:BFAQ#PROTECT. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC) What do you mean...

Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do? (WP:BFAQ#COMPANY) Thank you for reading the instructions in WP:BFAQ and attempting to do the right thing. On Wikipedia...

that Wikipedia can't be used the way you want it to be. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. Some specific problems with the draft include: The lede...

quality of people’s lives all over the world are not appropriate. See also WP:BFAQ.  Chzz  ►  05:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Article about an extinct indigenous...

by 174.60.117.52 (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Please don't - see WP:BFAQ. If the websites are notable then someone else will write about them. Chzz  ► ...

added by Dwiltshi (talk • contribs) 02:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Also see WP:BFAQ, and note that general advice can be off the mark by varying degrees in specific...

10:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Tagged for deletion as an advert; please see WP:BFAQ and WP:FIRST.  Chzz  ►  14:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Is ICFAI University...

kainaw wrote, you will need to read these pages: WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:BFAQ in addition to WP:COI. Also note the difference between policies and guidelines...

businesses are not appropriate subjects for an encyclopedia article. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. The draft cites two trade publications and...

07:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) WP:COI, WP:PSCOI, WP:BPCOI, WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:AfC, WP:RA, WP:YFA. (Also, so you may properly get mad at my...

(talk) 01:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC) I added a section to the FAQ to address questions like this: WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. --Teratornis (talk) 21:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)...

an organization.. --RyRy5 (talk) 02:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Please read WP:BFAQ too, and WP:WWMPD to see what often happens to new articles by new users...

are not a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)...

with, please read WP:COI as well as relevant FAQs such as WP:ASFAQ and WP:BFAQ. I am trying to add a note in the Notes section of http://en.wikipedia...

news-focussed already. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC) WP:BFAQ might be the most helpful page. The corporate publicity office (if any) probably...

comment added by Kyouria (talk • contribs) 21:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC) I was attempting...

sources for the things they wanted to write here about. See WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. There are many other wikis that do accept original work. See WikiIndex....

companies that meet our requirements for notability (see WP:CORP). Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC) is it leagle to chew tobacco...

It would be wise for you to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:ADVERT, and WP:BFAQ. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC) I understand that...

presence, Internet presence management, and Content management system. Also see WP:BFAQ and WP:PEACOCK. --Teratornis (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)...

promotional language. If you are affiliated with the subject, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. See WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, WP:RS, and WP:V. The draft contains a number...

are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)...

Biddulph (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC) And please also read WP:ORG and WP:BFAQ. – ukexpat (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Hi, I just tried to edit the...

but it could be a promising article. Could you follow the directions at WP:BFAQ#COMPANY and find at least two independent reliable sources? Thanks, Goodvac...

- if you're editing about anything to do with a company, please read WP:BFAQ. As to why it won't save...I don't honestly know. But you're probably best...

comment added by 149.164.121.43 (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC) No. See WP:BFAQ#PROTECT —SpaceFlight89 15:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Further to SpaceFlight89...

the corresponding big yellow box on your talk page. You may also find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY useful. Most likely there's nothing anyone can do to get the draft...

about themselves, rather than just being part of a larger subject) and WP:BFAQ. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC) You miss my points. I...

please re-introduce the material after reading: WP:COI, WP:SPAM and WP:BFAQ, if you are still satisfied that your additions are unbiased and that they...

shortcuts and display them with the {{Shortcut}} template. See for example WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI, which links to a particular business FAQ entry, and is easy to...

sources to demonstrate notability. In the meantime, please read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:CORPNAME.--ukexpat (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Mentioned...

18:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC) You should also take a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for guidance about writing articles about companies and the related notability...

quite a backlog.--SPhilbrickT 16:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Please read WP:BFAQ and let us know if you have any more questions not answered there. It covers...

you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Also read WP:BFAQ and WP:COI, in case you are associated with the subject you want to write...

touch with me or someone, and we will explain the facts of life about WP:BFAQ and how to have reasonable articles in WP, instead of stuff like these which...

inspire confidence that the author is willing to work within the bounds of WP:BFAQ. COI aside, it doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG and is full of promotional language...

correctly without reading our friendly manuals first. See WP:YFA and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Perhaps you mean this...

clear what guidelines those would be. The only guideline I can see is the WP:BFAQ#Company page that ICONICS (talk · contribs) referenced on Category talk:Automation...

speedily deleted, and you are editing it in your userspace now.) See WP:BFAQ, if you haven't already. To get your references in shape, see: WP:FOOT, WP:CITE...

guidance. If you are connected with the company, please also read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI. Hope this helps.--ukexpat (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)...

rifair.com/) and therefore you have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI.--ukexpat (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC) The article...

creation. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Also see WP:NOT, WP:BFAQ, and WP:WWMPD. "Theatrical services" sounds like a specialized topic, and...

am posting this on their behalf. I will direct the site owner to read WP:BFAQ. Jehochman Talk 12:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Thank you, Jehochman! I've added...

or Facebook. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 21:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 02:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC) The user has been indefinitely...

which is probably more directly relevant to your question. Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC) (e/c) I'm afraid you can't...

about it will poison your interactions with other Wikipedians. Also see WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. The draft was rejected because it is unsuitable for Wikipedia, not...

page. Since you are associated with the company, please read WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Hi, On the bmw page of...

and cannot be promotional. TNXMan 21:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ and Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. --Teratornis (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2009...

in its current form. Suggest that you spend some time reading WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:RS and WP:SPAM. – ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Those articles...

kitty because No third party references are stated in the article as per WP:BFAQ#DELETE, so this article can be deleted. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability...

--AndrewHowse (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC) See WP:LAYOUT, WP:WIKIFY, WP:BFAQ, WP:PEACOCK, WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, and WP:YFA. It also helps to look at some...

notable organization based on sources that are indisputably reliable? See WP:BFAQ for examples of issues to keep in mind for any article about an organization...

Wikipedia:Why was my article deleted? If you (Jheiv) are part of a business, see: WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC) The User is Forum shopping...

empty handed. I encourage the creator to read the second paragraph at WP:BFAQ#WHY and explain to his/her client that without sources about the foundation...

articles, (and even long-running minor venues in a list article). Suggest WP:BFAQ#COMPANY if you think your own venue deserves an article. Chris Neville-Smith...

draft and at the moment it is not ready to be moved. Please read WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:SPAM and WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Hello...

7 December 2010 (UTC) (edit conflict)Please read the following pages: WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:COI and WP:SPAM, before you try to create the article. If you...

with policy and guidelines. Please also take a look at WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ. Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 13:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Gustave Kahnt (1848–1923)...

(UTC) Before we get into that, please read WP:SPAM,WP:COI, WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ. You are strongly discouraged from writing articles about subjects where...

.... Dendodge.TalkHelp 11:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Please read all of WP:BFAQ before starting an article about your company. --Teratornis (talk) 15:16...

well here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ, WP:COI, and WP:PEACOCK. Almost all companies need to advertise, but companies...

reflect this. I suggest you choose a generic username and read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ before editing. --59.95.111.96 (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC) It's been...

And see WP:OWN. --Teratornis (talk) 08:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC) And WP:BFAQ, Personal wiki, and Corporate wiki. --Teratornis (talk) 08:28, 10 November...

Wikipedia about the institute with which you are affiliated, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. You can also request that someone else write an article about your institute...

parties - be open and honest about your conflict of interest. Please read WP:BFAQ. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  06:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC) (edit conflict)x2 Hey Dan,...

WP:SPAM, WP:RS and WP:YFA.  – ukexpat (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC) And WP:BFAQ. Note that writing new articles on Wikipedia and having them stick can be...

an article. TNXMan 20:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC) And see WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ. If the company is not notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia, you...

was notable enough to have an article. Read that link, and WP:WEB and WP:BFAQ; then, if you think you can establish notability by showing significant coverage...

scholarly articles, etc.). See: WP:V, WP:RS, WP:FOOT, WP:CITE, WP:CITET, and WP:BFAQ. (The last one explains how even nonprofit organizations can be considered...

additionally read WP:YFA, WP:LAYOUT, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:CITE, and WP:FOOT. Those should be just about enough to get you started...

personally connected in any way with the subject of the article. And see WP:BFAQ for general information about articles relating to business. See WP:EIW#Dispute...

and WP:YFA. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 18:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC) And see: WP:BFAQ and WP:LAYOUT. If you work for the company, see WP:COI and WP:PEACOCK. Writing...

reading all the other kajillion instruction pages we mentioned, also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Good afternoon, I like to...

AlfadorTalk|@ 14:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) See MediaWiki, Corporate wiki, WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI, and b:Wiki Science/How to start a wiki. --Teratornis (talk) 19:49...

articles, here are the steps I’ve taken so far: Read up on COI policy, WP:BFAQ, and other relevant guidelines. Created an identity and user page indicating...

Moxy (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Also read WP:COI, WP:OWN, and WP:BFAQ. Your account shows only this edit. If you did not have extensive editing...

appropriate place for a draft article. Please take a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for help with the notability requirements for companies and similar organisations...

by the helpers above, you should read WP:LAYOUT, WP:COI, WP:CORP, and WP:BFAQ, and take the WP:TUTORIAL. Reading the manuals is key to working productively...

with the subject of the Anglia Television article. If so, see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. Note that Wikipedia articles do not consist merely of users' personal knowledge;...

in reliable, independent secondary sources. Have a look at WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ, and check with Slakr (talk), the deleting admin, before you repost it. JohnCD...

coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. See WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for more detail. JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Clergy Sexual Abuse...

otherwise who would pay for it? See also WP:COI, WP:PEACOCK, WP:ADVERT, and WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC) I sincerely thank you both...

to what Wikipedia is trying to be - a reliable encyclopedia. Also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Dear Sirs, When I create a...

the MediaWiki wiki. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 00:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC) And see WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI. --Teratornis (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Working my way through...

you could fix the article, you can ask me on my talk page. Also read WP:BFAQ. Killiondude (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC) I've made substantial additions...

04:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Since you have a business interest, also see WP:BFAQ. --Teratornis (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Where in the WP community...

account AzMomDoc which would imply one individual user). Please read all of WP:BFAQ for general guidelines about writing an article on Wikipedia about any business...

are trying to write, you need to understand at least all this material: WP:BFAQ, WP:PEACOCK, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:LAYOUT. For the editing basics...

rules than they do. In general you should read all the stern warnings in WP:BFAQ, and if you're really serious, read Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. Study...

conflict of interest, it is strongly advised against. Please see WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. If you have any more questions feel free to ask them here. Kind regards...

to start from scratch. Tell him to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:PROMO, WP:BFAQ, WP:V, WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:YFA, WP:PEACOCK - it looks an intimidating reading...

you attempt to create an article about Edgo Energy, please read WP:COI, WP:BFAQ and WP:BESTCOI.--ukexpat (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Would like to...

WP:LAYOUT for pointers. Since you seem to be writing about a corporation, see WP:BFAQ. Beware of the common mistake of not providing enough reliable sources that...

understanding the WP:MTAU, the page creator should learn the facts mentioned on WP:BFAQ. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC) This is not exactly...

definition". (All of this is somehow reminding me of the last line in WP:BFAQ#DISCLOSURE, which advises would-be subjects of Wikipedia articles not to...

a conflict of interest. Dismas|(talk) 18:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC) See WP:BFAQ. There is no monetary cost to editing on Wikipedia, but there can be other...

advice on your talk page in a day or two, but meanwhile read WP:YFA and WP:BFAQ and note particularly that you need to establish WP:Notability by showing...

(UTC) @Carl Poxon: Hi Carl, and welcome to the teahouse. As suggested by WP:BFAQ, Wikipedia tries to prevent organizations from advertising material. However...

probably doesn't qualify for an article here. You probably need to read the WP:BFAQ and the WP:LUC (as well as all of WP:COI, especially the parts about being...

reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, WP:42. You can probably do that for Booker, so I have userfied the article...

User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard. Think hard about notability, and read WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ. If you think you can show notability, I will "userfy" the article for you...

links may well be removed no matter what your username is; see Wikipedia:BFAQ.) -- Soap Talk/Contributions 15:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Username Plaganegra (talk ·...

watch | logs | views) I am Conservapedia Sysop User:RobSmith. Per Wikipedia:BFAQ#ATTACK, I believe my organization is under attack. Factual inaccuries. Notice...

11 July 2007 (UTC) Because of this, there's now the new busness FAQ at WP:BFAQ. Might be helpful to direct people to this. Nathanww 01:30, 12 July 2007...

promotional user-name. I gave the user a welcome note including a pointer to WP:BFAQ and a COI warning, and he has not edited since. I will check out the books...

editing on behalf of a corporation is frowned-upon on Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:BFAQ. -Jéské (v^_^v X of Swords) 04:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)  Done Kingturtle (talk)...

justifiable way: release it under GFDL--this is the general suggestion at WP:BFAQ and applies to everyone. Of course we will continue to link to individual...

understanding the WP:MTAU, the page creator should learn the facts mentioned on WP:BFAQ. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC) This is not exactly...

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is subject to WP:Sockpuppetry and WP:BFAQ#ADVERT + WP:Advertising. Page should be protected indefinitely until sockpuppetry...

this WikiProject. If you are one of those persons you are asked to read WP:BFAQ which will help you to understand why this practice is an issue. In addition...

about notable subjects, and in this case, those guidelines are at WP:ORG. WP:BFAQ should also be essential reading. – ukexpat (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)...

have a question about this? In the meantime, please read WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Hi i am just starting...

18:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC) It is strongly advisable not to. See WP:COI, WP:BFAQ, WP:SPAM and WP:CORP.--ukexpat (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC) (edit conflict)If...

company, it is not appropriate to add it to Wikipedia - please see WP:VRS, WP:BFAQ. Urban Dictionary, YouTube and other wikis are not a reliable source. You...

definition". (All of this is somehow reminding me of the last line in WP:BFAQ#DISCLOSURE, which advises would-be subjects of Wikipedia articles not to...

creation/Full Support Healthcare, you need to read at least WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ, and WP:COPYVIO. - David Biddulph (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Hello...

should not be creating the article. Please read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI and WP:BFAQ. At the moment the draft is far too promotional in tone and it will need...

detailed fair-use rationale. Additionally, you may want to read WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. It looks like you are directly involved with this magazine and that your...

comment added by 58.7.149.15 (talk) 08:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:BFAQ. Please also note that this page is only for questions about images and media...

shortcuts to the Wikipedia:FAQ (so we can link to individual FAQs, such as WP:BFAQ#CORPWIKI). Some users already started, but we did not finish. See User talk:Manors#Task...

encyclopedia, not generate search engine rankings. The OP should read WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP and WP:COI. – ukexpat (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Answered...

Google search indicates that you have a conflict. Also take a look at WP:BFAQ, WP:CORP, WP:SPAM and WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)...

Don't get fooled by the scammers" and link to the scam warning (or to the WP:BFAQ). A less-intrusive form would be to put a small note at the end of the Main...

WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC) As a historical note, the WP:BFAQ used to recommend that businesses that wanted a volunteer to write an article...

organization they wanted to have an article), then I'd encourage them to take WP:BFAQ#WHY to heart, especially the practical and helpful advice "to add to your...