they are used to, and to ask others if unsure. Shortcut WP:ADMINCONDWP:ADMINCOND Administrators should lead by example and, just like all editors, should...

the main quality for admins to possess and is codified in policy @ WP:ADMINCOND. His approach to communication is way too aggressive and combative, and...

appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors. (WP:ADMINCOND) Passed 7 to 0 at 19:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 8) No matter who is the...

am wrong. I missed the first AfD. I should have known better. See WP:ADMINCOND\WP:ADMINACCT That said, I do not think I have misused my WP:ADMIN privileges...

purpose of WP:ADMINCOND, and that Fram felt unable to give a reassurance that they would pay closer attention to the purpose of WP:ADMINCOND, which would...

the WP:ADMINCOND dimension have been appropriately accepted. On an aside, that table might meaningfully be extended for cases where ADMINCOND was alleged...

restrictions just four months ago and I think we're unambiguously within WP:ADMINCOND territory. The community cannot make a decision to desysop under current...

User:SandyGeorgia (who also contributed to the opening of this case) refers us to WP:ADMINCOND, "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful...

the WP:ADMINCOND dimension have been appropriately accepted. On an aside, that table might meaningfully be extended for cases where ADMINCOND was alleged...

clutch) Denominator: The pipeline for ADMINCOND cases is leaky. This is a good thing. It means that most ADMINCOND issues get solved before it comes to...

colloborative and collegial manner which suggests an inability to abide by WP:ADMINCOND (example of editor statements to support these characterizations include...

WP:TOOLMISUSE - bullet 1 (WP:INVOLVED), and bullet 2 (out of policy actions) WP:ADMINCOND issues WP:ADMINACCT issues March 2020: In response to a cordial comment...

clutch) Denominator: The pipeline for ADMINCOND cases is leaky. This is a good thing. It means that most ADMINCOND issues get solved before it comes to...

the RFAR. --GRuban (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC) ADMINACCT and ADMINCOND are still requirements that administrators must adhere to. The Arbitration...

WP:ADMINCOND issue, and as Robert McClenon says, there is also interplay with content, policy and editor conduct. We need an update to WP:ADMINCOND stressing...

"traditional" cases (as opposed to cases in our exclusive jurisdiction, such as ADMINCOND, private information, etc.). This is a good trend, but this case presents...

tools, but I think the links above show a serious failure to follow WP:ADMINCOND and indicate someone who really should not be an admin. Over to you for...

Optional question from CycloneFootball71 4. Are there any aspects of WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT and generally WP:ADMIN in which you disagree with and why...

thinking of, if not precisely that table, the general narrative about ADMINCOND cases. To be precise, it's easy to look at the table and think Arbcom...

(UTC) Additional questions from Leaky 6. Are there any aspects of WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT with which you disagree and why? A:Not really. I think...

civility restriction, to me, that's akin to saying that they can't follow WP:ADMINCOND at all. Maxim(talk) 01:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Per my remarks below...

be helpful if she would separately address the issues (portals and WP:ADMINCOND) in a statement. AGK ■ 21:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC) BrownHairedGirl has...

WP:COSMETICEDIT? Why was it necessary following the changes to COSMETICBOT? All: WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT require administrators to exercise good judgement and...

tools, but I think the links above show a serious failure to follow WP:ADMINCOND and indicate someone who really should not be an admin. Over to you for...

for this, in my view, is that ADMINACCT is a natural extension of WP:ADMINCOND's expectation that administrators lead by example. Even without the administrator...

abide by Admincond". Will you abide by WP:ADMINCOND and WP:5P4? Cabayi (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2019 (UTC) A: Yes, I will follow WP:ADMINCOND and WP:5P4...

policy, rather than calling on her conduct herself in accordance with WP:ADMINCOND by following policies. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:38, 6...

Second, the issue here is a combination of misuse of autopatrol and ADMINCOND/ADMINACCT. I don't think we'd have gotten to the latter without the former...

[20]). Gamaliel's conduct was below that expected of an administrator (WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT) and an arbitrator (WP:ARBCOND). Passed 11 to 0 at 03:39...

those ADMINs who are not good role models be reported? A: Yes, per WP:ADMINCOND (first two sub-questions). The "senior editor" status that is ascribed...

guide to comment on content, not contributors. I suggest you read WP:ADMINCOND.  // Timothy :: talk  08:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC) A kettle calling the pot...

section and the community invited for input on the associated talk page. WP:ADMINCOND states "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in...

advocating that as a major reason desysopping should be considered. WP:ADMINCOND is what editors have been arguing. Besides, the argument that we shouldn't...

want to merge these ANI and AN threads? I'm raising ADMINACCT and WP:ADMINCOND concerns in the AN I opened.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:50, 18 March 2019...

to be fully held accountable of every action of theirs and follow WP:ADMINCOND to the letter which would invariably curb admin abuse. I do have few reservations...

to examine the conduct of RexxS with view of complaints to do with WP:ADMINCOND. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: 2) Language...

arguments. That's the level of administration in Wikipedia. what about WP:ADMINCOND? Administrators should lead by example and, like all editors, should behave...

that was the consensus outcome later, when all the dust had settled). WP:ADMINCOND mandates admins to be civil in their interactions with other editors,...

JIP | Talk 16:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC) No-one has mentioned vandalism. WP:ADMINCOND does not just cover admin actions but also policy knowledge, and it is...

admins can be desysopped for reasons other than abuse of admin tools. WP:ADMINCOND says that admins must uphold good standards of conduct, follow policies...

on the mop instead of pushing it. [56]. (This is not a violation of wp:admincond but helps establish context). Despite not doing much actual admin work...

October 2022 (UTC) That's a pretty egregious breach of WP:NPA and WP:ADMINCOND. I hope Athaenara has one hell of an apology ready, or that this is a...

Amakuru raises a fair point of course; is there a potential issue of WP:ADMINCOND here? ——SerialNumber54129 11:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Had it been a regular...

he is in no position to make any kind of demands concerning ARBPOL, ADMINCOND, ADMINACCT etc. unless he wants to discuss his own case, of course. I...

accomplish. Admins are of course, only human, and humans make mistakes. ADMINCOND accounts for that where it says Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible...

citing my belief that the words used were bullying. In doing so I cited WP:ADMINCOND and both GeneralNotability and I additionaly included reference to the...

(talk) 02:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC) WP:ADMINCOND certainly applies. Getting the current Committee to apply ADMINCOND is likely to be challenging, but if...

however, falls well short of the standards expected of admins, per WP:ADMINCOND. I don't know if this is a one-off or a pattern, but admins who insult...

EA that SFR's civility could be improved (one of the core tenets of WP:ADMINCOND). Being proven right isn't a reason to glibly dismiss people's concerns...

penalty, Coretheapple (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC) I've checked WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT, and [[32]] also. Nergaal (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)...

does seem like a non-issue here. El_C 13:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC) @El C: WP:ADMINCOND is something we all agree to follow as admins. And that has little to...

I do care that they commit to not repeating it again. WP:CIVIL and WP:ADMINCOND document broad consensus about behavior expectations, and they were not...

big drama shows. Nemo 17:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Support 1 Per WP:ADMINCOND and ongoing issues re BHG, see Wikipedia:Administrators'...

conduct (aside: this needs a shortcut – I'd suggest WP:ADMINCON or WP:ADMINCOND or something...) is an actual thing: "However, sustained or serious disruption...

inconsistent with the high expectations of administrative conduct (WP:ADMINCOND) to characterize opposing arguments as "pandering to the smugness of Wikipedia...

at least 3 of the 4 points there), is WP:WIN behavior, and also an WP:ADMINCOND failure greater than the civility lapses and bogus aspersions. Yet more...

permission. For the record, this is an under-a-cloud resignation after ADMINCOND concerns had been voiced at WP:ANI. It's a rather uncomplicated solution...

behaviour, ones that anyone dragging an admin to ANI can point to. (WP:ADMINCOND isn't much help - it basically says "don't do things that other editors...

would be asking for you to consider the personal attack you made per WP:ADMINCOND. Also it's pretty clear that per their signature TheresNoTime uses they/them...

things an admin should not do. But WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE, WP:ADMINACCT, WP:ADMINCOND, WP:INVOLVED, WP:TOOLMISUSE, and so on apply here to greater or lesser...

implications, it's not technically feasible. Your concern sounds like one of WP:ADMINCOND and the only real solution there is I think ARBCOM and a request for desysopping...

be to revert normally with an explanation. I think there's also an WP:ADMINCOND issue here. There's what I mentioned in the bullet-points above, and also...

WP:ADMINACCT is a problem. I'm not sure if this rises to a level of WP:ADMINCOND worthy of an Arbcom case, but at minimum, I would expect a clear, public...

hurtful. [175]. Besides incredibly rude, they're not leading by example WP:ADMINCOND, and it's definitely not a neutral approach of the subject.Saflieni (talk)...

a desysop. --Jayron32 18:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC) There is also WP:ADMINCOND. The failure to drop the stick might reasonably be construed as sustained...

of an alleged side, instead of treating editors as individuals, see WP:ADMINCOND and WP:BATTLE. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC) Support...

the article's content without referring to its contributor at all." WP:ADMINCOND: "Administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful...

him. Let me remind you of two of the duties of an administrator, per WP:ADMINCOND: "administrators are expected to lead by example and to behave in a respectful...

Desysoping? Over one poorly-judged admin action? That's ridiculous. Compare WP:ADMINCOND: "Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with adminship; administrators...

you wish to comment on that, please. That was an admin who failed WP:ADMINCOND and resorted to personal attacks on the ArbCom case. My comments there...

citing it for effect. When you're done there, have a gander at WP:DSAN, WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT. You may well learn something. Then again, you may not...

that part. I still believe in the rest of the paragraph, however. WP:ADMINCOND doesn't just relate to use of admin permissions. ProcrastinatingReader...

alternative is that you won't be able to edit BLPs. I ask that you remember WP:ADMINCOND when discussing blocks with other users. You're in a position of power...

January 2020 (UTC) @Pawnkingthree: This thread can't solve the underlying ADMINCOND issue --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 16:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC) This thread...

the article. This ANI thread is for discussing personal attacks and WP:ADMINCOND, and other behavioral issues of anyone involved. Softlavender (talk) 05:20...

oes_and_does_not_apply do not seem to appear to be consistent with WP:ADMINCOND and WP:CIVIL. The user's response was condescending, passive aggressive...

2019 (UTC) Indeed. I suggest that, for starters, OhanaUnited re-reads WP:ADMINCOND, andthen perhaps explains how accusing editors of xenophobia represents...

of what is required of him as an administrator, as can be found at WP:ADMINCOND. I also specifically draw the communities attention to...

my part or Black Kite's. We do expect more of administrators, see WP:ADMINCOND: "Administrators are expected to lead by example". That, I presume, was...

more than one party, and if it is confined to the specific parameters of ADMINCOND and ADMINACCT that AHeneen specified, I don't think it would be a witchhunt...

conduct herself in alignment with the core pillars of WP and with WP:ADMINCOND. Netherzone (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Support No issues as far as...

lot of concerns. --B dash (talk) 08:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Oppose. WP:ADMINCOND states: "Administrators should strive to model appropriate standards of...

allowed. Additional questions from Leaky 4. Are there any aspects of WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT with which you disagree and why? A: After reading the...

infraction of the civility policy) show a consistent failure to uphold WP:ADMINCOND, which states that "Administrators should strive to model appropriate...

appropriate standards of courtesy and civility to other editors. (WP:ADMINCOND) -2019-09 Administrators are trusted members of the community; they are...

tools. The current Committee, in particular, has essentially pretended WP:ADMINCOND doesn't exist. There is zero community recourse if ArbCom chooses not...

I'll hypothesize that ArbCom being more willing to desysop for obvious ADMINCOND / ADMINACCT failures might have a short-term minor negative impact on...

which administrators are held, specifically as at WP:ADMINACCT and WP:ADMINCOND. We make this request without the assumption that Alex Shih must be desysopped...

(talk) 15:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC) There is a serious WP:ADMINACCT/WP:ADMINCOND concern here that merits a community discussion. -- Maddy from Celeste...

to the Community at large or which cannot be revealed pursuant to a WP:ADMINCOND request. If anyone thinks they possess offwiki evidence that merits a...

through diffs and this discussion. Targets other users. This violates WP:ADMINCOND and is against Wikipedia policy through the pilars. 2. Violation of WP:ADMINACCT...

administrative actions. Civility has been an even greater enduring problem. ADMINCOND has been a growing source of concern by the community in recent years...

getting deleted, violated WP:3RR policy, violated WP:OWN, violated WP:ADMINCOND policy, violated WP:RPA policy, and violated WP:BLP policy. This is just...

you have made seems uncivil to me, especially from an Administrator (WP:ADMINCOND) which makes it impossible for me to agree with you. Again the How the...

sanctions at community noticeboards; and, being more willing to accept ADMINCOND examinations. Those are just a few off-the-cuff ideas. How to tackle the...

that it be handled by an uninvolved administrator. Under WP:ADMIN, WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT, and WP:INVOLVED, administrators are expected to use tools...

but everything I'm seeing now suggests it was the correct move from an ADMINCOND perspective.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  16:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Lets...

_accountability—Bagumba (talk) 19:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC) Reading WP:ADMINCOND, that conduct policy does not explicitly limit its application to use...

[11]). Gamaliel's conduct was below that expected of an administrator (WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT) and an arbitrator (WP:ARBCOND). Support: I support in that...

Part 3 as well. As NeilN has stated, Administrators are subject to WP:ADMINCOND and this section seems to be trying to go against that policy in my opinion...

pages) constitute "consistently or egregiously poor judgment" for WP:ADMINCOND. That's my humble opinion. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:18, 30 December...

only closing two AfDs on 7 June (nothing more as of typing this). Per WP:ADMINCOND they have failed the “like all editors, should behave in a respectful...

whether you are or aren't deliberately doing something that violates ADMINCOND, merely whether your behaviour gives the impression that you are. Black...

consider supporting this, largely due to Lourdes' lack of communication per ADMINCOND. At present, though, we do not have a finding that reaches desysop, so...

support a revision that adds a statement that we were not satisfied that WP:ADMINCOND or WP:INVOLVED were met per SilkTork's comments. — Wug·a·po·des 22:38...

I'll hypothesize that ArbCom being more willing to desysop for obvious ADMINCOND / ADMINACCT failures might have a short-term minor negative impact on...

am wrong. I missed the first AfD. I should have known better. See WP:ADMINCOND\WP:ADMINACCT That said, I do not think I have misused my WP:ADMIN privileges...

clutch) Denominator: The pipeline for ADMINCOND cases is leaky. This is a good thing. It means that most ADMINCOND issues get solved before it comes to...

of just any editor. The fact that he is also an editor governed by WP:ADMINCOND means he is further "expected" to be even more scrupulous. -- Alanscottwalker...

And just to be clear about Arbcom, beside ADMINACCT, there was also WP:ADMINCOND issues. -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Alanscottwalker...

amended my comment. SilkTork (talk) 10:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Accept, WP:ADMINCOND & AE escalation. Cabayi (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC) I've been...

in the PD: given the same level of behavior, this person does not meet ADMINCOND and should go through a new RFA. Katietalk 15:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)...

used, for example, is it WP:ROLLBACK, is it the general conditions in WP:ADMINCOND, is it all of these and more, and so on. Fish+Karate 10:08, 10 January...

with both WP:INVOLVED, which the community polices very well, and WP:ADMINCOND. (We're not so great at maintaining that standard, but it can be done)...

because I think it should be considered, at least, but it relies more on WP:ADMINCOND. An administrator who fails to respond to repeated community requests...

process works, but I sure would like to see an explicit reference to WP:ADMINCOND made here if this is the consensus version of this finding... --IJBall...

defamatory, or derogatory phrases based on…..political beliefs and WP:ADMINCOND Administrators should lead by example and, like all editors, should behave...

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac/Evidence § Mzajac was dismissive of ADMINCOND concerns in this case, even while acknowledging unfamiliarity with admin...

February 2022 (UTC) Since the current and previous case requests involved ADMINCOND relating to removal of ECP, I hacked together a quarry to report on removals...

not there exists "consistent ... poor judgement", in the sense of WP:ADMINCOND. Forwarding information to a functionary while omitting that the information...

in the PD: given the same level of behavior, this person does not meet ADMINCOND and should go through a new RFA. Katietalk 15:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)...

WP:ONUS, WP:BRD, WP:ROLLBACK, WP:INVOLVED, WP:COOLDOWN, WP:ADMINACCT, WP:ADMINCOND, and understand WP:3RR and our other policies. G did not wait weeks for...

the circumstances, it was misconduct. Honestly I would prefer that an ADMINCOND takes place *immediately after* I am relieved of the tools, so that the...

arbitrator who can freshly remember what it's like to not be an admin. Many ADMINCOND cases involve understanding how an administrator's actions affected non-admins...

appeared just to me per WP:INVOLVED. Admins are expected to be civil per WP:ADMINCOND but I see no reason to suspect that Headbomb will misuse the tools to...

reverted, but never should have happened in the first place) a review of WP:ADMINCOND might be in order. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC) I refer...

Admins are expected to uphold a "high standard of conduct" and follow WP:ADMINCOND. The Conduct of Mister Wiki editors case involved paid editing and an...

Comment by parties: Comment by others: See my evidence comment, citing WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT. The proposed statement should also cite TRM's refusal...

Perhaps Fram was singled out because he was an admin, and it fell under ADMINCOND. Softlavender (talk) 22:56, 10 June 2019 (UTC) This just seems like a...

not interested in the topic is not up to the highest standards of WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT. Relisting seems like the best way forward, but I have...

Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC) Another WP:ADMINCOND case where going to ArbCom is sadly the only applicable venue, whether...

closer's not having written a detailed rationale does not in itself violate ADMINCOND or the requirements for closing an AfD. Many Wikipedians (although I am...

whatever the outcome, here, please blank it out of prudence (see, WP:ADMINCOND). Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC) BLOODY OBVIOUS DELETE...

happen with some level of confidence is that I expect that at least some ADMINCOND cases that would have ended up at ArbCom may not any more, as they will...

Bbb23's access to checkuser was revoked for fishing and even violating ADMINCOND by failing to respond to queries regarding his use of such a tool, with...

with both WP:INVOLVED, which the community polices very well, and WP:ADMINCOND. (We're not so great at maintaining that standard, but it can be done)...

(eg [1], [2]). This goes far beyond the necessary, a good sign for WP:ADMINCOND, and you'll find similar thoroughness and attention to detail in his AFD...

Being an administrator is relevant (WP:ADMINCOND). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Agree that ADMINCOND is important to note. Like it or not...

happen with some level of confidence is that I expect that at least some ADMINCOND cases that would have ended up at ArbCom may not any more, as they will...

you have made seems uncivil to me, especially from an Administrator (WP:ADMINCOND) which makes it impossible for me to agree with you. Again the How the...

not interested in the topic is not up to the highest standards of WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT. Relisting seems like the best way forward, but I have...

responding to questions about an admin's actions is compliant with WP:ADMINCOND. Guy has his own reasons for requesting the removal of the tools, but...

business he owns review Joe's ADMINCOND/ADMINACCT compliance and determine whether "disclosing COI" is part of ADMINACCT/ADMINCOND or not (so the community...

a pattern and I agree with my colleagues regarding the lower bar for ADMINCOND cases and the significance of the community referring a case to us. I...

simply because I vote to accept a case - particularly one in the area of ADMINCOND - does not mean that I am presupposing any outcomes of that case. We could...

Admins are expected to uphold a "high standard of conduct" and follow WP:ADMINCOND. The Conduct of Mister Wiki editors case involved paid editing and an...

reverted, but never should have happened in the first place) a review of WP:ADMINCOND might be in order. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC) I refer...

closer's not having written a detailed rationale does not in itself violate ADMINCOND or the requirements for closing an AfD. Many Wikipedians (although I am...

moment in your editing career where you came closest to violating WP:ADMINCOND, or otherwise exhibited bad judgement in an administration-related area...

support it broadly per Wugapodes. I've been on ArbCom for quite a few ADMINCOND cases over the years, and Wugapodes is absolutely right that Scottywong...

you are not welcome here is astoundingly rude and falls far short of WP:ADMINCOND. It is unacceptable that of their 64 blocks in September, 12 had to be...

editing history and the exact wording was directly relevant to my point. ADMINCOND can sometimes be unpleasant, particularly because it often centers around...

arbitrator who can freshly remember what it's like to not be an admin. Many ADMINCOND cases involve understanding how an administrator's actions affected non-admins...

an administrator—and thus held to a higher standard of behavior per WP:ADMINCOND—would they lose the tools? I realize that the standards to grant and remove...

change, as that opens the door to collaboration and consensus. Per WP:ADMINCOND, communication is an utmost requirement for admins. It may be hard to...

administrator. While I understand it's very unlikely we would be here without the ADMINCOND dimension, we are here, and I would expect any experienced editor of Nihonjoe's...

arbitrator who can freshly remember what it's like to not be an admin. Many ADMINCOND cases involve understanding how an administrator's actions affected non-admins...

comments are among the occassional mistakes afforded to him under WP:ADMINCOND, he could still be expected to make a number of comments that are, on...

errs above, and without some guidelines, that word could turn into an WP:ADMINCOND case request for an admin that takes what we're throwing over the fence...

suggest the rollback was intentional, and this is not the place to bring WP:ADMINCOND cases. RAN1 (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC) Also, to quote the instructions:...

consensus for these edits. This is not expected from an admin per WP:ADMINCOND. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 03:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC) The content from the...

relatively low activity is not an issue - it is enough IMO to assuage any ADMINCOND issues, and is more than overcome by the significant technical work the...

2026 (UTC) No comment regarding the actual concerns, I note. Anyways, WP:ADMINCOND states Administrators should lead by example and, just like all editors...

To be clear, this question was more aimed at your interpretation of WP:ADMINCOND, which you've given but which I admit runs counter to my own. Barkeep49...

The evidence phase for this case is closed. Any further edits made to this page may be reverted by an arbitrator or arbitration clerk without discussion...

more, but hypothetical next step is unfortunately to raise it as an WP:ADMINCOND issue at WP:AN, then if that is ineffective and others agree it's a big...

leading me to lash out completely unnecessarily in complete violation of WP:ADMINCOND) and I was unblocked, easily within a week. If you can't successfully...

personal accountability is concerned. On the English Wikipedia, we have WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT: both of these allow users to hold specific admins to...

position that requires that editors behave in a respectful, civil manner (WP:ADMINCOND). It is deeply concerning that Scottywong doesn't seem to have read or...

say you had removed the RfC tag. You should be de-admined per Wikipedia:ADMINCOND for "egregious poor judgment" in this matter. Skyerise (talk) 21:53, 4...

scope. There is no "COI policy" and Nihonjoe is not a "functionary". WP:ADMINCOND exists but there is no formal higher standard for bureaucrats beyond this...

that amounts to an allegation of disruptive editing and by extension an ADMINCOND inquiry. Rather than continue to debate this with them, I would like to...

guide to comment on content, not contributors. I suggest you read WP:ADMINCOND.  // Timothy :: talk  08:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC) A kettle calling the pot...

extremely broad ranging and all encompassing aspects of WP:ADMINACCT and WP:ADMINCOND do we actually have any solid explicit policy basis that could be acted...

"current conduct issue of concern," namely the long-term violations of WP:ADMINCOND that have been duly pointed out by several editors. The only reason why...

(eg [1], [2]). This goes far beyond the necessary, a good sign for WP:ADMINCOND, and you'll find similar thoroughness and attention to detail in his AFD...

explicit acceptance of the responsibility and that they'll abide by WP:ADMINCOND by the user concerned, and evidence of recent activity in the Wikipedia...

that it be handled by an uninvolved administrator. Under WP:ADMIN, WP:ADMINCOND, WP:ADMINACCT, and WP:INVOLVED, administrators are expected to use tools...

admin is gaming the activity requirements; such concerns are clear WP:ADMINCOND violations. (And since, so far, all the concerns about inactivity have...

adherence to the letter. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC) As WP:ADMINCOND notes, "Occasional mistakes are entirely compatible with the use of the...

happen with some level of confidence is that I expect that at least some ADMINCOND cases that would have ended up at ArbCom may not any more, as they will...

can't imagine Arbcom or anyone else considering this to be a breach of WP:ADMINCOND or WP:INVOLVED. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 20:04, 14 June 2026 (UTC) If...

hearing cases of IP addreeses who are blocked, a deep violation of WP:ADMINCOND. (3) It seems highly likely WeatherWriter WP:PAID admins to block these...

but probably not a fixable one, since we can't make space for legit ADMINCOND complaints without also humoring a lot of bullshit ones. P.S. @Joe Roe...

appropriately. Unfortunately, their responses are falling quite short of WP:ADMINCOND at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2024...

anyone who wasn't present (and isn't an OS) can't judge whether it was an ADMINCOND violation. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 13:37, 21 November 2024...

for raising this issue but there is nothing in here to disturb either admincond or adminacct. I particularly draw attention to the sentence from the first...

still think that this was an acceptable answer, even when considering WP:ADMINCOND? Nobody (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC) Hmph. It's blunt, but it's not...

admins would disagree with. Differences in judgement are expected, but WP:ADMINCOND calls for civil discussion of our administrative actions which isn't quite...

is to take this to ArbCom, no? Seems they'd be likely to accept an WP:ADMINCOND case if some form of recidivism exists. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) ...

do with it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC) WP:ADMINCOND is a thing. Also we expect admins to uphold policy, not violate it. Don't...

have no opinions on whether or not they were), it would be a serious WP:ADMINCOND issue, potentially warranting a formal warning. It's certainly important...

you're an administrator on this project, subject to the stipulations of WP:ADMINCOND, and someone whom I respect highly for your encyclopaedic work and your...

criticism directed exclusively at Mzajac, with participants raising WP:ADMINCOND concerns that go far beyond the details of the original report. I think...

ArbCom. So I tend to agree with KoA that referring this to ArbCom as an ADMINCOND matter is not necessary at this time. (That said, Leyo, you may want consider...

intended it as such). Even if this is considered insufficient, it is an ADMINCOND issue of the sort that is beyond AE's remit: there is little in the history...

reason is that there would have to be a lot of policy rewrites related to ADMINCOND and the blockers would have to be watched very carefully. I can see how...

arguably a stronger case to be made that this behavior falls afoul of WP:ADMINCOND. Whether or not it's time to go to WP:ARC is above my pay grade, but every...