interpretations, or opinions do not belong on Wikipedia. Shortcut WP:5P2WP:5P2 All editors freely license their work to the public, and no editor owns an...

English and Bengali found zero reliable sources on the topic. According to WP:5P2, "editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

it may not be independent. This then makes it harder to maintain NPOV (WP:5P2). The source may still be referenced for an article who's subject meets notability...

sources are added, and article is reworded to be less like an advert (per WP:5P2, WP:ADVOCACY and WP:ADVOCACY). —Mjks28 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC) Keep...

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Delete This fails the WP:5P2; calling it the "Jim Crow caucus" is not neutral. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:05...

controversial, but currently indices I have seen are not obeying the WP:5P2 part that says that all articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing...

"Neutral point of view" policy WP:NPOV, one of the five Wikipedia pillars. WP:5P2, by giving it a negative tone. This article also harms Wikipedia itself by...

that this is incorrect and I think such a position is contradictory to WP:5P2. pburka (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC) I am thinking of multiple comments...

removal of any and all such userboxes could be WP:5P1 (WP:NOTSOAPBOX) + WP:5P2 (WP:NPOV) + WP:UBCR (quote, emphasis mine: Wikipedia is not an appropriate...

of "helping yourself" will usually leave that out, certainly against WP:5P2. Note: I am against sites like lownerwolf (not reliable source) because the...

classification, we want to know that a person meets WP:GNG so the article meets WP:5P2 (neutrally written and verifiable, citing authoritative sources). --Enos733...

point of view from the sources available at that time. The pillar of WP:5P2 was justified. Out of the sources now present with the article Bollywood...

should get the heave-ho. But in my opinion the problem is attribution. WP:5P2 tells us Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. LLMs can't be...

policies are part of the Five Pillars. WP:NOT is WP:5P1, and WP:OR is WP:5P2. I've now read the WP:OR talk page, and I thank you for the reading suggestion...

Reywas92Talk 04:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:5P2, WP:5P5, and WP:NODEADLINE. The relevant text of 5P2 says "All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy...

conglomerate? 2. Wikipedia's fundamental principals WP:FIVEPILLARS, specifically WP:5P2 states "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view...Editors' personal...

shape or form. These deletions threaten Wikipedia's stance on a WP:NPOV (WP:5P2) "Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

Editing | talk w/ me! 13:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Presumably they mean 5P1 and 5P2. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the clarification...

with the edit comment "In solidarity with WP:Wiki Workers United" fails WP:5P2. RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Comment my personal bias is irrelevant...

proof that they have caused a disaster for someone is a rejection of WP:5P2, which says that "All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing...

with the edit comment "In solidarity with WP:Wiki Workers United" fails WP:5P2. RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Comment my personal bias is irrelevant...

pillars are important to keep the project running. Specifically, I think WP:5P2 is more important since all information added should be written from a neutral...

other articles, trying to push for what I consider to be violations of WP:5P2, WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:LABEL. Ajñavidya (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC) Blocked –...

mind? A: I feel it has to be WP:NPOV, for a few reasons. The core of WP:5P2, NPOV ensures we tell a worldwide perspective, exclude bias, give proper...

these pillars, but you are violating many of them. You violate Wikipedia:5P2: "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view" by being biased against...

helping to build Wikipedia in accordance with core policy, specifically WP:5P2. If you're willing to change that, then of course I will strike that support...

(talk) 16:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC) I kindly suggest you re-read WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Delete the article is fine example...

the statement regarding it? 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC) WP:5P2: "We avoid advocacy" and "Editors' personal experiences, interpretations...

Jama'at/Barelvi agenda. Such an agenda would I believe be a breach of Wikipedia:5P2, namely "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". Goldsztajn has...

notice the reason that human rights related pages often were not following WP:5P2 and showed poor quality, was mainly because there were some users who always...

partiality and personal opinion contrary to wikipedia:Five_pillars, namely WP:5P2, WP:5P4 which I feel has escalated to personal harassment by this User:NormanGear...

international human rights issue and FG related pages often were not following WP:5P2 mainly because there were anti FG activists who often promoted their narrative...

perhaps also indicate the lack of neutrality in the opinions of Crossroads WP:5P2 - Crossroads might have an opinion on the subject that I don't agree with...

"offending" diffs and show that they were just strict application of WP:5P2 (more specifically WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:ATT). Do note that this is a current...

intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose", Project's purpose WP:5P2 "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". Pretty sure, adding...

There are significant problems with DS's editing: neutral point of view (WP:5P2), civility (WP:5P4), understanding, edit warring, and consensus building...

specific editor, I believe show an attitude which is incompatible with WP:5P2. [147], [148] Looking for feedback on whether or not the two week block should...

reliable source as seen in the next diff which Skb7 failed to do so as per WP:5P2. For thisand this diff, as per the rationale in the edit summary, the article...

conform to policies and guidelines that include WP:5P1 (not a newspaper), WP:5P2 (NPOV), and WP:BLP it should not exist. Unless consensus has changed the...

being sourced, it is unverifiable and therefore directly contradicts WP:5P2: All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative...

WP:5P2 which prohibits personal interpretations and opinions. The language of the older version of Eva Bartlett's biography page violates WP:5P2, WP:NPOV...

Editing | talk w/ me! 13:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Presumably they mean 5P1 and 5P2. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the clarification...

oppose No we should not AT ALL. This goes against everything in WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. We are supposed to be an encyclopedia and neutral. I'd feel this way regarding...

which does not comply with the Protestant point of view is contrary to WP:5P2. Kindly leave also categories which do not allign themselves with Protestant...

"licensed prostitutes" claim on this basis. This clearly violates 5P1 and 5P2. To maintain neutrality, this paragraph should be changed to, for example...

or if it's NPOV, which are two important things in editing and part of WP:5P2 of Wikipedia:Five pillars. Which is why I think without those two it would...

Reywas92Talk 04:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:5P2, WP:5P5, and WP:NODEADLINE. The relevant text of 5P2 says "All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy...

that label on them. If three of Wikipedia's pillars were wooden logs (WP:5P2, WP:5P3, WP:5P4) promoting this label is a bit like putting a 12 year-old...

reliable sources mentioning this aspect of the Syrian civil war to meet WP:5P2.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Editing Wikipedia from...

point of view from the sources available at that time. The pillar of WP:5P2 was justified. Out of the sources now present with the article Bollywood...

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Delete This fails the WP:5P2; calling it the "Jim Crow caucus" is not neutral. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:05...

(talk) 16:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC) I kindly suggest you re-read WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Delete the article is fine example...

"Neutral point of view" policy WP:NPOV, one of the five Wikipedia pillars. WP:5P2, by giving it a negative tone. This article also harms Wikipedia itself by...

controversial, but currently indices I have seen are not obeying the WP:5P2 part that says that all articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing...

With respect to the Five Pillars, this article fails both WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. Waggie (talk) 02:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Perhaps you overlooked these. Not...

of "helping yourself" will usually leave that out, certainly against WP:5P2. Note: I am against sites like lownerwolf (not reliable source) because the...

conglomerate? 2. Wikipedia's fundamental principals WP:FIVEPILLARS, specifically WP:5P2 states "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view...Editors' personal...

without thought or consideration of the Wikipedia:Five pillars." However, WP:5P2 writes that "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". The guideline...

2016 (UTC) Reliability of the sources is secondary? Oh, that must be why WP:5P2 says All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative...

more than enough for the alphabet. But the codepoints used were limited to 5P2=20 by the requirment for exactly two needles to point to a letter. In any...

English and Bengali found zero reliable sources on the topic. According to WP:5P2, "editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

one at a time deletions also threaten Wikipedia's stance on a WP:NPOV (WP:5P2) "Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

that this is incorrect and I think such a position is contradictory to WP:5P2. pburka (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC) I am thinking of multiple comments...

without thought or consideration of the Wikipedia:Five pillars." However, WP:5P2 writes that "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". The guideline...

conform to policies and guidelines that include WP:5P1 (not a newspaper), WP:5P2 (NPOV), and WP:BLP it should not exist. Unless consensus has changed the...

classification, we want to know that a person meets WP:GNG so the article meets WP:5P2 (neutrally written and verifiable, citing authoritative sources). --Enos733...

The above strawman is deserving of a block, as is advocacy of violating WP:5P2: presenting contentious claims as fact (especially "Inner Mongolia genocide")...

Mail. Although Fox may actually be more dangerous. I’m just saying that WP:5P2 and WP:V demand more of us. O3000 (talk) 01:36, 15 January 2019 (UTC) I would...

With respect to the Five Pillars, this article fails both WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. Waggie (talk) 02:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Perhaps you overlooked these. Not...

enforcement of non-firm rules as per WP:5P5 and a close that violate WP:5P2. Perhaps if I sell the movie rights of the encyclopedia, I can go for the...

However, I tend to use clear words when I observe that users violate e.g. WP:5P2. --Leyo 00:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC) Concerning JzG, see my statement in...

policy. The arguments against are primarily based on opinion yet (per WP:5P2): Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

of WP:COI. Or another principle of Wikipedia is neutral point of view WP:5P2 and WP:NPOV that one of subdivisions is avoid of Bias point. in brief deduced...

under the Five Pillars and the "Wikipedia is Not" (WP:NOT) policies. WP:5P2 Neutrality (WP:NPOV) & Inability to Address Severe Issues (WP:AfD & WP:PROD):...

front and centre. A WP:neutral point of view is the project's objective - WP:5P2. I don't feel either name is in accord with that objective. You should be...

of this seriously. Especially when we must neutrality reflect sources (WP:5P2 and WP:NPOV). To reiterate my point from earlier, "assigned (fe)male at birth"...

enforcement of non-firm rules as per WP:5P5 and a close that violate WP:5P2. Perhaps if I sell the movie rights of the encyclopedia, I can go for the...

firm rules). But there is also WP:5P1 (Wikipedia is an encyclopedia) and WP:5P2 (Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view), which explicitly includes...

rewrite has been exhausted on Talk. I believe that this article violates 5P2. Eyagi (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC) You're a WP:SPA whos opinion has...

sources. This change would also bring us into stronger alignment with WP:5P2, which says All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable...

contributions to Wikipedia. Again, I refer to Wikipedia:Five pillars namely: WP:5P2 WP:5P4. Finally and to address wrong assumptions you used previously “I noticed...

Wikimedia projects are. And, it is often the case that COI/UPE goes against WP:5P2; which can be observed with some regularity at NPP or AfC: We strive for...

it may not be independent. This then makes it harder to maintain NPOV (WP:5P2). The source may still be referenced for an article who's subject meets notability...

Nupedia and Citizendium. Knocking down WP:5P3 because we need to enforce WP:5P2 (WP:NPOV) is probably not a good idea, given that our project is explicitly...

investigateᛅ 20:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC) I think we are in agreement that WP:5P2 cannot be overridden by any old RFC. If people want to amend it then they...

protocol. If not, this layer of protection in terms of neutrality ie WP:5P2 seems like an obvious improvement. DN (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)...

delete. The article cannot possibly be WP:NPOV, so it cannot be kept. WP:5P2 trumps WP:N. Leijurv (talk) 04:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC) Blank, add banner...

sources are added, and article is reworded to be less like an advert (per WP:5P2, WP:ADVOCACY and WP:ADVOCACY). —Mjks28 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC) Keep...

as that that "recognition" isn't a significant enough majority as per WP:5P2 to justify omission of the seemingly widespread unsure and accusation-believing...

should get the heave-ho. But in my opinion the problem is attribution. WP:5P2 tells us Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. LLMs can't be...

interview [10] Should we add "transparent" or "transparency" to somewhere in WP:5P2? Bogazicili (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC) It seems to me that it's...

WP:Verifiability so is particularly important to WP:BLP. Indeed it's part of WP:5P2 too. If the sources do not exist archived or not, then we cannot allow OR...

--benlisquareT•C•E 16:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC) You're saying that we can ignore WP:5P2? Kolya Butternut (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2025 (UTC) What pillar is number 5...

encyclopedia that gives appropriate weight to how all approach a topic (WP:5P2). --Enos733 (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2025 (UTC) How could the proposal be...

proposal violates the spirit of the 5 pillars, most importantly 5P5, but also 5P2. We shouldn't have guidelines that sound unbreakable per the spirit of pillar...

under the Five Pillars and the "Wikipedia is Not" (WP:NOT) policies. WP:5P2 Neutrality (WP:NPOV) & Inability to Address Severe Issues (WP:AfD & WP:PROD):...

discussions either. LLMs are not reliable sources, and so this is as clear a WP:5P2 violation as it gets. It is also very likely to plant a seed for legal questions...

with the edit comment "In solidarity with WP:Wiki Workers United" fails WP:5P2. RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC) Comment my personal bias is irrelevant...

or if it's NPOV, which are two important things in editing and part of WP:5P2 of Wikipedia:Five pillars. Which is why I think without those two it would...

project. It undermines one of the very pillars this project was built on (WP:5P2). They have advocated and canvassed others, through WPID, for this. So I...

written in opinions. It should be written in major points of view. See WP:5P2 for extra information. Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 19:06...

delete. The article cannot possibly be WP:NPOV, so it cannot be kept. WP:5P2 trumps WP:N. Leijurv (talk) 04:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC) Blank, add banner...

18:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Here is where I found that wholistic matters WP:5P2. The logo of the scale for the second pillar in its use in Lady Justice indicates...

pontificating here do not seem to have any such credentials, right? Per WP:5P2, Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong...

rosters and statistics for team sports in the US, that is a problem. Our WP:5P2 Neutral point of view policy requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly...

is antithetical to how Wikipedia should operate. That is contrary to WP:5P2, WP:NPOV, WP:NOTCENSORED, not to mention WP:FRINGE itself. The wrongful consensus...

North8000 (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC) References Special:Diff/1158592123 WP:5P2 WP:Tendentious editing § What is tendentious editing? WP:BATTLEGROUND WP:RUCD...

politics, but I do not think that trying to help keep articles in line with WP:5P2 should attract such heavy mudslinging". TarnishedPathtalk 10:37, 24 May 2026...

but they have been a critical asset to the maintenance of WP:5P1 and WP:5P2. A logged warning would send the message to :bloodofox: that they need to...

various policies that get invoked (just in case: WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:5P2). And while I'd generally agree that an RM is an awkward place to be arguing...

disrupting the encyclopedia, and: adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia; WP:5P2 All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy with citations based on...