Hardie became President of Corpus Christi College in 1950, (being replaced as philosophy tutor by David Pears)[7] and during his tenure saw the college fellowship double and the student numbers increase.[1] He retired in 1969 and was appointed an honorary fellow by his college.[3]
Hardie has also been credited with naming the academic discipline of psephology,[1] the study of voting behaviours and the statistical analysis of elections, but this has been disputed.[8]
Personal life
Im 1938, Hardie married Isobel St Maur Macaulay. Together they had two sons.[3]
Hardie died on 30 September 1990 in Oxford, England.[1]
Works
A Study in Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1936.
^Berlin, Isaiah (31 August 2013). Henry, Hardy (ed.). Building: Letters 1960-1975. Random House. p. 533. ISBN978-1-4481-9134-5. 1. William Francis Ross (Frank') Hardie (1901-90). Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy. CCC, 1926-50. President 1950-69; IB's philosophy tutor at CCC, and a profound influence on his literary style, as well as his intellectual approach: 'extremely clever, modest, sharp — one couldn't get away with a single piece of rhetoric. however harmless, without explaining exactly what one meant, very clearly. Extremely deflationary; all the same, just and kind' (MI Tape 5).
^Chapman, Siobhan (2005). Paul Grice, philosopher and linguist. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 13–14. ISBN0-230-00585-3. OCLC191953003. Grice always emphasised what he saw as his own good fortune in being allocated as tutee to W. F. R. (Frank) Hardie.
^Berlin, Isaiah (2005). Henry, Hardy (ed.). Flourishing : letters 1928-1946. Internet Archive. London : Pimlico. p. 710. ISBN978-0-7126-3565-3. Mr Hardie, when a tutor, turned out many more first-rate philosophers than most, so that his method was certainly-successful; but he was certainly inclined to judicious questioning rather than to imparting information or propagating his own views. One had very little idea what his views were. An essay beginning with a confident assertion of some generality would be greeted with a low, but agonised, moan. One would be required to say what one meant, what were one's grounds, how one would deal with this and that objection. . . . J. O. Urmson, 'W. F. R. Hardie: President 1950-1969', Pelican 1 No 1 (Michaelmas 1969), 4.