This is an archive of past discussions with User:The Quill. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template:History_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z-Template:History_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia","linkableTitle":"Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template:History_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z-Template:History_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia","linkableTitle":"Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia"}-->
Hi! Please take a look at "Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia". You recently made some edits, but you made some mistakes. " v • d • e " do not work and are currently linking to a non-existent page "Template:History of Republic of Macedonia". It must be "Template:History of the Republic of Macedonia". Also you forgot to include the period of the "Socialist Republic of Macedonia" (until 1991) that was previously part of the template. Plus, it was decided that the current Flag of the Republic of Macedonia should be used in the template, because the Coat of arms of the Republic of Macedonia is from the socialist, pre-independence period of the country and people would believe that the template deals with a country with a currently socialist/communist political system. Please edit the template, so that the links work and all segments of Macedonian history are displayed. Regards 87.158.59.204 (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","author":"87.158.59.204","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z-Template:History_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia","replies":["c-Merbabu-2009-04-01T00:10:00.000Z-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z"]}}-->
I also note that aesthetically the pre-existing template was superior to the new standard template in the Macedonian case. While standardisation on wikipedia does have its advantages it is niether the sole or most important consideration.. In most cases the use of this standard template has indeed been an improvement, but in this case, and 1 or 2 others, it is not. Please consider. --Merbabu (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-01T00:10:00.000Z","author":"Merbabu","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Merbabu-2009-04-01T00:10:00.000Z-87.158.59.204-2009-03-31T23:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-87.158.59.204-2009-04-01T01:11:00.000Z-Merbabu-2009-04-01T00:10:00.000Z"]}}-->
Also another important thing is no more present in the template: The "Also see terminology and history
of the region of Macedonia"-section. The history of the Republic of Macedonia and the Macedonian people is very closely related ::to the region of Macedonia, therefore that must be included, too. Thanks and regards. 87.158.59.204 (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-01T01:11:00.000Z","author":"87.158.59.204","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-87.158.59.204-2009-04-01T01:11:00.000Z-Merbabu-2009-04-01T00:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-TinucherianBot-2009-04-12T01:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Christianity_Newsletter_-_April_2009-2009-04-12T01:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-TinucherianBot-2009-04-12T01:43:00.000Z-WikiProject_Christianity_Newsletter_-_April_2009"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - April 2009","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - April 2009"}-->
The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 65 FAs, 7 FLs, and 146 GAs. That is a wonderful number, particularly of the GAs. Thanks to all those who worked on these articles!
Secisek was interviewed by the Wikipedia Signpost in their 9 March 2009 issue here. Thank you for your great work in getting more attention to the project!
Member news
Our membership continues to expand. We are currently at a stunning 278 registered members. A profound thank you to all of you. Without your support and work, this project, and wikipedia itself, would not exist.
Other news
We have recently started a separate subpage of the project dedicated to keeping the members informed of the latest activities regarding FA and GA status, requests for peer review and comment, proposed deletions, and other article related activity. That information can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Article alerts. Please feel free to look at the page frequently and respond to any and all items posted there that you wish.
Related projects news
The Iglesia ni Cristo work group, Syriac Christianity work group, and Oriental Orthodoxy project are all currently being considered for restructuring. Any and all members of any of those groups are welcomed and encouraged to take part in the discussions.
Welcome to the Seventh, admittedly delayed, issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.
Yes, it's been more than a bit of a rough time for some of us, okay, me, for a while here. Several things, most of them not real pleasant, kept coming up. I think most of that is over with know. I hope and pray as much anyway. Easter is the church's time of rebirth, and I hope it's a good time for the rebirth of this newsletter. I hope that the project grows in numbers and effectiveness as the church itself has over the years. Thanks again for all your efforts to date. Oh, yes, and please note that this section is entitled "From the Members". That means you, all of you. If any of you have any comments you'd like to share with the other members in this section, please feel free to let us know, and we'll put them in the next issue. We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. Thanks again.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-12T01:43:00.000Z","author":"TinucherianBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TinucherianBot-2009-04-12T01:43:00.000Z-WikiProject_Christianity_Newsletter_-_April_2009","replies":[]}}-->
As one of the previous editors/maitainer of {{Religion}}, I thought I'd personally ask for your thoughts of my proposal at Template talk:Religion#Metatemplate selection, namely that as a meta-template for creating religious sidebar navboxes, it should really use the {{Sidebar}} rather than {{Navbox}} - this would allow optional addition of 2nd article-specific images (per request I had at User_talk:Davidruben#Shinto_template_again). David RubenTalk12:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-13T12:17:00.000Z","author":"Davidruben","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Davidruben-2009-04-13T12:17:00.000Z-Template:Religion","replies":[],"displayName":"David Ruben"}}-->
I recently removed Template:Christianityportal from the Template:Infobox Cardinal page which you reverted. I felt the Christianity portal template tagged at the bottom looked clumsy. The Cardinal template still includes Christianity portal, but within the box rather than tagged on. I hope will agree with this edit. Scrivener-uki (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-18T13:14:00.000Z","author":"Scrivener-uki","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Scrivener-uki-2009-04-18T13:14:00.000Z-Cardinal_template","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SeNeKa-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template:Prime_Ministers_of_Russia-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-SeNeKa-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z-Template:Prime_Ministers_of_Russia"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Template:Prime Ministers of Russia","linkableTitle":"Template:Prime Ministers of Russia"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-SeNeKa-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Template:Prime_Ministers_of_Russia-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-SeNeKa-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z-Template:Prime_Ministers_of_Russia"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Template:Prime Ministers of Russia","linkableTitle":"Template:Prime Ministers of Russia"}-->
Please stop constantly to return its version of the template.
Heads of government of the USSR is not a de jure head of the Government of Russia.
Russian SFSR to the Education of the USSR during its existence and after its dissolution - the same state, since 1991 called Russian Federation.
I have to please you removed this version, although it is correct.
View at least a list of Prime Ministers of Russia in the English Wikipedia.--SeNeKa (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z","author":"SeNeKa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SeNeKa-2009-04-23T11:06:00.000Z-Template:Prime_Ministers_of_Russia","replies":[]}}-->