User talk:Tamfang
I know you likely reverted your Reference Desk question re: daily driver because you immediately stumbled upon the answer, but I'm just glad one of my two guesses as to the phrase's initial referents (either cars or golf clubs) turned out to be the case. Remsense ‥ 论 06:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241003063100","author":"Remsense","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Remsense-20241003063100-Driver","replies":["c-Tamfang-20241003071400-Remsense-20241003063100"]}}-->
- Your perception is noted. I thought of golf clubs but, well, daily? Oddly, vehicles did not occur to me. —Tamfang (talk) 07:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241003071400","author":"Tamfang","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Tamfang-20241003071400-Remsense-20241003063100","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2014Tamfang"}}-->
Tamfang, the phrase originated in American car culture, where antique cars, hot rods and collectible cars are usually only driven on special occasions, in parades or to be exhibited at car shows, or to impress someone. The "daily driver", in contrast is not a special or unusual or collectible car, but rather a reliable, reasonably priced car driven to or from work and to the grocery store. By extension, the term is applied to other types of products like you mentioned. Cullen328 (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241003063700","author":"Cullen328","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cullen328-20241003063700-\"Daily_driver\"","replies":[]}}-->
I’m in agreement with you that this is not notable. Do you want to send it to WP:AfD? Bearian (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241111194300","author":"Bearian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bearian-20241111194300-Dutch_exonyms","replies":["c-Tamfang-20241111202600-Bearian-20241111194300"]}}-->
- “No consensus” three times, the latest less than a year ago. —Tamfang (talk) 20:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241111202600","author":"Tamfang","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Tamfang-20241111202600-Bearian-20241111194300","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2014Tamfang"}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119000800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241119000800-ArbCom_2024_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Why did you revert? It does say Wait at least a year... unless you have some other reason... Is an abrupt stop and continuing gap after 210 months of continuous consistent edits, not reason enough that we need to wait for an year? Jay 💬 06:32, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241224063200","author":"Jay","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-20241224063200-Missing_Wikipedians_revert","replies":[]}}-->
|
|