Hello, Stuart1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SLBedit (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-06-15T16:21:00.000Z","author":"SLBedit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SLBedit-2016-06-15T16:21:00.000Z-Welcome!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Stuart1234. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Stuart1234. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hi bro, thank you for your correction, and many thanks for your advice for make me better. --FredericoHibertus95, 8:34 PM, 18 January 2017 (WIB)

Hello from Portugal,

I apologize for any inconvenience that may have stemmed from my edits, especially in the starts chat below (immediately after realizing what I'd done, I reinstated your version of it). However, please don't say I "revert(ed) an entire edit" when I did not (storyline-wise), I merely tried to reach a compromise between your version and mine, it was you that subsequently reverted pretty much all of my adjustments.

I have tried it again (if I get reverted again I will leave article in peace, don't want no bad blood and/or needless edit wars), but before so I explain here what I have done, step by step and respecting the order of the article flow:

1 - intro: I have the impression that if you say "has represented Portugal" then all those competitions one assumes he IS STILL representing the country in all the tournaments; however, since I don't want to pretend I speak English like a native, maybe I'm missing something there; 2 - why can't we write the link of the competition of AEK Athens; 3 - do not understand why can't we use ";" in the flow of this or that sentence; 4 - match results: to me, as a Portuguese person/editor/footy fan, it confuses me why do you folks say "2-0 win" and not "0-2", but OK I have to come to terms with/respect that; 5 - the name of the sub-section is PORTO, no need to repeat the name of the club over and over again; 6 - speaking of sub-sections, in the ZENIT one, I wrote "in the group stage of the UEFA Europa League" to avoid WP:OVERLINKING or WP:SEAOFBLUE, which will occur if you revert it to "UEFA Europa League group stage"; 7 - I still have a major difficulty understanding as to why club names must be piped in storyline and not written in full for extra detail (WP:COMMONNAME they say, if so why name the article - for example - CA Osasuna and not Osasuna), but I have to respect that as it's common practice (but if so, you missed the SPAL club); 8 - overall, I tried to avoid the tireless repetition of "club", as "side"/"team" have the same effect; 9 - last but not least, in the last two charts of stats below, the name of the page is EUROPEAN FOOTBALL, not EU FOOTBALL.

All in all, you'll see I am here to improve this (and all) article, as you (you now added +1 ref and wording to his int'l career, I added +3 sources overall). Attentively, keep up the good work (and if you re-revert/adjust again, please message me so that I understand where did I err) --Quite A Character (talk) 09:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-22T09:28:00.000Z","author":"Quite A Character","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Quite_A_Character-2017-06-22T09:28:00.000Z-Bruno_Alves_-_Reply","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Stuart1234. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for pointing out this problem. There was an error in generating the density ranks held in Template:English cerem counties, which I have now fixed.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 21:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-17T21:31:00.000Z","author":"Keith Edkins","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Keith_Edkins-2018-07-17T21:31:00.000Z-List_of_ceremonial_counties_of_England","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Stuart1234. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:13:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:13:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. The image of Brandon Williams is clearly him. You can tell from his eyes, hair, body size/shape. Plus, he's wearing a United coat, and the file is called "Brandon Williams.jpg". Who else in the world could it be? It's only Brandon Williams - you know it, I know it. So therefore that image should remain on the article, in my opinion. If you do not know what Brandon Williams looks like, please search him up on Google. Anyways - I'm reverting your edit. Best regards. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-29T20:43:00.000Z","author":"Paul Vaurie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Paul_Vaurie-2020-10-29T20:43:00.000Z-Brandon_Williams_picture","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T02:28:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T02:28:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I see you reverted my up to date Dean Henderson pic to replace it with the pre-existing three year old one. While I understand your point to some extent, what is a very up to date article deserves to have an up to date picture, not one three years old. Please revert. Ardfern (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-07T21:43:00.000Z","author":"Ardfern","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ardfern-2021-08-07T21:43:00.000Z-Dean_Henderson","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello,

every edit I made on the Paul Pogba page was referenced. Please don't disregard additional information for personal reasons such as club affiliation. Other so-called 'flops' such as Alexandre Pato and Bebe have the context of their careers explained in their Wiki articles, which is important. If you would like to edit the language used (other than direct quotes) feel free, but the information added was all valid and pertinent.

Thanks, rocc0137 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocc0137 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-09T05:55:00.000Z","author":"Rocc0137","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rocc0137-2022-01-09T05:55:00.000Z-Paul_Pogba","replies":[]}}-->

One season/3 games does not a European career make - so they can be included in 'other' for now. GiantSnowman 07:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-11T07:10:00.000Z","author":"GiantSnowman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GiantSnowman-2022-02-11T07:10:00.000Z-Reece_Devine","replies":[],"displayName":"Giant"}}-->

Sorry about the stats: I checked the last couple of subs, and they'd been updated, so I assumed the rest had been done as well, particularly given it was the day after the game. Should know better... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220831171200","author":"Struway2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Struway2-20220831171200-Hannibal","replies":["c-Stuart1234-20220831191800-Struway2-20220831171200"]}}-->

No worries, it might be fixed at some point on soccerbase anyway. They seem to make more mistakes than the likes of soccerway, worldfootball for some reason. Stuart1234 (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220831191800","author":"Stuart1234","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Stuart1234-20220831191800-Struway2-20220831171200","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129010700","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129010700-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Please update Anthony Martial, Marcus Rashford, David de Gea, Bruno Fernandes; they played vs Wolves. Thanks. 2001:448A:50E2:513C:90C7:5F4B:9407:D0B6 (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221231144900","author":"2001:448A:50E2:513C:90C7:5F4B:9407:D0B6","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2001:448A:50E2:513C:90C7:5F4B:9407:D0B6-20221231144900-Update","replies":[]}}-->

You claim that "access-date" on a reference isn't when a reference was added to an article, but it is changed every update? Is that what you're saying? And could you point me to other football articles where the date is constantly changed? TylerBurden (talk) 08:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230208081500","author":"TylerBurden","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TylerBurden-20230208081500-Access-date","replies":["c-Stuart1234-20230208085900-TylerBurden-20230208081500"]}}-->

The "access-date is the date that the URL was found to be working and to support the text being cited". Of course to support the stats it will have to be updated every time. It is normal practice in the 100 plus articles in my watchlist. Just because there is poor practice in an lot of articles doesn't mean we should settle for low standards. Stuart1234 (talk) 08:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230208085900","author":"Stuart1234","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Stuart1234-20230208085900-TylerBurden-20230208081500","replies":["c-TylerBurden-20230208091800-Stuart1234-20230208085900"]}}-->

I suppose it makes sense when you put it that way, thanks for the explanation. TylerBurden (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230208091800","author":"TylerBurden","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-TylerBurden-20230208091800-Stuart1234-20230208085900","replies":[]}}-->

He is a Chelsea come the summer window, once he’s announced I’ll just put his wiki page back to RB Leipzig 2A02:C7F:4C7C:5200:CAE:A837:1F59:A0FE (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230228035700","author":"2A02:C7F:4C7C:5200:CAE:A837:1F59:A0FE","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2A02:C7F:4C7C:5200:CAE:A837:1F59:A0FE-20230228035700-Christopher_Nkunku","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I found out that you erased the link of the Youtube video that supports the IPA of the 'Bruno Fernandes' is [ˈbɾunu fɨɾˈnɐ̃dɨʃ], not [ˈbɾunu feɾ.ˈnɐn.des] which the commentators of the Premier League often say. Were there some mistakes or errors like the copyright issues inside in it? --YellowTurtle9 (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230509104000","author":"YellowTurtle9","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-YellowTurtle9-20230509104000-Bruno_Fernandes_IPA","replies":[]}}-->

How is transfermarkt an in-depth factual website on clubs,players, managers and agents etc etc isn’t a reliable source for Rashfords height? Elliotstone25 (talk) 12:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230828123000","author":"Elliotstone25","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elliotstone25-20230828123000-Explain_to_me_how_transfermarkt_is_not_reliable","replies":["c-PeeJay-20230828123400-Elliotstone25-20230828123000"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) Transfermarkt is open to user-generated content, which means it's not reliable, even though it's moderated to an extent. – PeeJay 12:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230828123400","author":"PeeJay","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PeeJay-20230828123400-Elliotstone25-20230828123000","replies":[],"displayName":"Pee"}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231128003400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231128003400-ArbCom_2023_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->