Welcome!

Hello, Squidonius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Melchoir 20:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you want help with anything, you might find a willing audience at Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology, especially Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Help. Cheers, Melchoir 20:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, good to see another scientist here. Have you had a look at the MCB Wikiproject? TimVickers 01:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I keep uploading/fixing images and forget to change the licence to public and Bots spam me.. these are the ones that I forgot in case anyone cares

• Phosphoramidite.jpg
• Isocytodine.gif
• 2-amino-6-(2-thienyl)purine (S).gif
• Adventures in Synthetic biology.JPG
• L-fly-larva.gif
• Schild regressions.jpg

--Squidonius (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't know where to write this so I did it here. I think your explanation of the oligonucleotide ligation assay within the SNP genotyping is wrong. Does the common probe not have to hybridize downstream of the first probe so it lies directly at 3' of the first probe. see: http://international.abbottmolecular.com/images/content/ola%20overview.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ydon (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's better now, but I still think that part of the article is too difficult to understand if you aren't familiar with the technique. Maybe adding the picture I sent you can clear things up, but I'm not so familiar with wikipedia so I don't know how to do it + I want your opninion about this. Ydon (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please reference your contributions. They will not be retained otherwise. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 01:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lycaon (talk) 14:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Ng, P.K.L., Guinot, D. & P.J.F. Davie (2008). Systema Brachyurorum: Part 1. An Annotated checklist of extant Brachyuran crabs of the world, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement Series, No. 17, 286pp.

A Useful document. Lycaon (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unanswered}} I am wikipedia reader that is worried about x, but I am not an expert. shouldn't it be y? --Squidonius

See my response to this most pressing, very urgent, catastrophally important question, at the talk page of {{unanswered}}!!! :)

--David Göthberg (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw you made this diagram. I noticed there is a slight problem with overlapping text in the middle box. It would be great if you could fix it and re-upload. Thanks a lot, Splette :) ^{How's my driving?} 14:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I mainly did only some copy edits on what you've added before. By and large the entry is not too shabby as far as the basics are concerned, but I'm sure it needs to evolve to reflect the advances in this area. I didn't see any differences between the current microarray lead and your suggested new one @ DNA_microarray#New_Opening. So I'm not sure if there's a glitch somewhere that doesn't let me see the new one? Thanks! Malljaja (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adventures in Synthetic biology.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I replied to your concern on the Pivot Table talk page. Best regards, Wikidan829 (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

on the genetic code talk page before the figure being discussed is inserted. Doug youvan (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary was created here: Glossary of gene expression terms. I moved some of your 'Glossary' terms from the main DNA microarray page into the gene-expression glossary. --Jethero^Talk 05:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading images/media such as Image:L-fly-larva.gif to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Richard001 (talk) 05:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isocytodine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Badan.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Topaz brainstorm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 13:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squidonius. Thank you for your work on this article. I browsed through the Fisher and VWR catalogs before I removed the information regarding the colors of pipette tips. Although the color scheme may have once been common, it seems like manufacturers sell a lot of clear tips for all sizes. That coupled with the awkward combination of sentences and sentence fragments after the tip volumes, I thought it best to just remove the color information. Perhaps it would go better elsewhere in paragraph form? I'm not willing to get into a revert war over this, so I won't change it. As for the capitalization of L for liter, I'm going to stick by that change! To be internally consistent, the Liter article shows preference for capitalization as do the VWR and Fisher catalogs in the pipette tip section. As for mL not being SI, neither is ml, as dm³ is that actual SI unit for volume. Pdcook (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done my best to address your question, in Talk:Benzene#Benzene>Benzina, Naphtalene>Naphta, Anthracene>ἄνθραξ. That particular template, {{unanswered}} is not really in use any more - or, at least, nobody seems to be monitoring it much; hence this being hugely delayed; in future, please feel free to use a {{helpme}} here, on your own talk page - or the excellent reference desk. Cheers!  Chzz  ►  03:03, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squidonius. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

 Chzz  ►  09:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied again, same place  Chzz  ►  10:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Nucleic acid analogues at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♠ B.s.n. ♥R.N.contribs 16:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squidonius, I noticed that in the SVG images which you have uploaded, such as the recent File:Microarray_exp_horizontal.svg, you are saving all of the image text as paths, rather than as texts. This is not very desirable because it makes it much harder to go back and edit the text later, such as for corrections or translations. Of course, it's not as bad as having a raster image, but still less than ideal.

I notice that on your user page, you mentioned that you started doing this because the ArialMT font wasn't rendering properly. This is not because MediaWiki can't render SVG text: it is because the ArialMT font is not available. The ArialMT font isn't available under a free license, so MediaWiki won't use it to render SVG images (More info here). MediaWiki does know how to do some common replacements automatically, such as Arial->DejaVu Sans, but it probably doesn't know about the ArialMT font name.

Fortunately, there are some good freely-available replacements for the common fonts. For example, the DejaVu fonts provide excellent replacements for Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier New... including great Unicode coverage.

In order to make your SVG files render as faithfully as possible in Wikipedia, try using the DejaVu fonts in the diagrams you create. You can download a Zip file of the DejaVu fonts from their official website, and they'll work fine under Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux. Feel free to ask if you need any additional help! It looks like you're doing really great work with SVG diagrams :-) Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 22:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be helpful! I hope that you'll be able to get the Illustrator/RSVG issue worked out as well... unfortunately I have no experience with Illustrator specifically so I can't help there. I'm a big proponent of SVG, so it's always great to find another user who "gets" it and is making great images with it. Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 14:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to add a copyright tag to File:Microarray exp horizontal.svg that you uploaded yesterday. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bioprotocols has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 70.91.178.185 (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I fixed the missing link issue on your template. However, I still believe it violates WP:SELF and that really should be addressed. 70.91.178.185 (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on that TfD listing. 70.91.178.185 (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm amused that you made the response you did to a US-based IP (I think you understood, but s/he didn't, that any building with a national-level heritage designation is notable). You may have missed the point, though, that what was unique about them was the window arches. Not so uncommon in Georgian buildings, as you noticed, but very unusual in Italianate rowhouses (of which I don't think there are many in Europe, and as you noted whatever ones are there probably aren't all that notable in a broader context) which almost always stick with rectilinear forms.

I do sort of apologize for it showing up on DYK when it did ... another user decided to thank me for reloading the queues (you need to be an admin as they're protected) by putting my freshly-created and just-nominated article in the next one. Hopefully the one on East 78th Street Houses will wait a full cycle out, with whatever improvements come along. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! There's WikiProject Historic Sites, sort of an umbrella project for things like WP:NRHP and WP:WHS. And while our coverage of listed buildings in Britain is pretty good, I've heard some British editors express similar amazement that they don't have a coordinated project like NRHP (actually the seventh most active WikiProject). Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you like it! I've been thinking about re-doing it, since it's been pretty much the same for so long. As for the writing, it's kind of been getting the better of me lately... it should have been done ages ago, but there's always some experiment to run or (more often) something considerably less productive to do. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 17:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to File:Malacostran parade.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Lycaon (talk) 19:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the data crunching. I'd guess the best solution would be to host these lists on proper non-talk pages on Wiktionary, and to summarise their content in the article (in a clear context such as "of 123,000 words on Wiktionary, 456 have no vowels"), using the list as a reference. You might hit some resistance from the people at Wiktionary, if that isn't an appropriate use of their article space, but that should at least guide you in the right direction. (I guess the other alternative would be to put up your own neutral website somewhere that listed all these things, and either use it as a reference or put it in the "external links" section.)

The other editor is right in removing your links to talk pages, though - I can't quite find the policy about this (WP:SELF certainly implies it), but linking directly from articles to talk pages is definitely inappropriate. They should be a reference or an external link. --McGeddon (talk) 07:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like wow. 180.217.78.49 (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your barnstar, Squidonius. This kind of appreciations is what give us force to work on. Flakinho (talk) 03:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the User:Squidonius/userpage/wikt note template transclusion from Talk:English words with uncommon properties/No vowels, Talk:English words with uncommon properties/Many vowels and Talk:English words with uncommon properties/Many consonants since it transcludes {{under construction}} which I feel is past its sell-by date:

1. It has not been edited for fifty days, whereas {{under construction}} suggests removal after "several days" without editing.
2. Less importantly, I think it is probably unreasonable — and certainly unusual — to transclude a user-space template on an article talk page, although personally I have no trouble with that.
3. If you intend that the template itself is marked as construction but not the pages that transclude it, you should put the transclusion inside a <noinclude> HTML element.

I hope this is OK. Best wishes Si Trew (talk) 22:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a look at Talk:Krill#Phylogeny? I just noticed your additions to Malacostraca, which look as if you might be our in-house expert in about that area. Would be great if you could help add some info about it to the article. Cheers, Lupo 12:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Thermococcus gammatolerans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 01:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, I added it to the ribose article after seeing your addition to the riboflavin one. However, I don't subscribe to the dictionary, so I couldn't get the full cite. If you can find one that on-line that doesn't require paying, it would be nice. Can you tell me what this one says, and why Fischer transposed letter from arabinose (I presume he had D-arabinose and liked the idea of a transposed name for a 2' chiral enantiomer?) SBHarris 02:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your nomination of Fluorescent glucose biosensors at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 08:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still issues. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squidonius, I noticed you often reference scientific publications. There are a few templates you can use which make this much quicker - {{cite pmid}}, {{cite doi}} and {{cite jstor}} automatically add a full citation when you simply add the relevant pmid, doi or jstor number to the template, so you don't have to write out/copy + paste the whole thing yourself. For example, you can just add {{Cite journal| last1 = Himmelreich | first1 = R.| last2 = Hilbert | first2 = H.| last3 = Plagens | first3 = H.| last4 = Pirkl | first4 = E.| last5 = Li | first5 = B. -C.| last6 = Herrmann | first6 = R.| title = Complete sequence analysis of the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae| journal = Nucleic Acids Research| volume = 24| pages = 4420–4449| year = 1996| doi = 10.1093/nar/24.22.4420 | pmid=8948633 | issue=22 | pmc=146264}} to make:

Himmelreich, R.; Hilbert, H.; Plagens, H.; Pirkl, E.; Li, B. -C.; Herrmann, R. (1996). "Complete sequence analysis of the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma pneumoniae". Nucleic Acids Research. 24 (22): 4420–4449. doi:10.1093/nar/24.22.4420. PMC 146264. PMID 8948633.

Hope this helps. Happy editing. Smartse (talk) 11:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It sure saves a lot of time! Smartse (talk) 20:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm helping a researcher who's looking for images on a number of genetics topics. Based on your editing work, I'm hoping you may have recommended resources or that can you contact me off-wikipedia ([email protected]). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtoes (talk • contribs) 20:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The picture in the following article contains a spelling mistake: It's "Isopropanol", not "Isopropananol". Phenol-chloroform_extraction

Best regards, --Hrshgn (talk) 10:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are a little upset at my treatment of the article Malacostraca, and I guess you deserve an explanation. Your phylogeny section always sat awkwardly in the article; it was too long in comparison to the other sections, skewing the article towards that one aspect. I would say, indeed, that the text was too long for the subject, since there isn't a lot of consensus about relationships, with even the latest study, despite using genes from two genomes and morphological data, concluding that other sources would be needed before a robust phylogeny could be produced. What your text did say contradicted the existing material at Malacostraca, for instance in the use of "Eumalacostraca" to mean Malacostraca except Phyllocarida, rather than the Martin & Davis meaning of Malacostraca except Phyllocarida and Hoplocarida. This is a problem since we need to ensure consistency both within and between articles. Finally, it was written in a style which suggests that it was originally prepared for some other purpose; it feels like an essay that has been recruited for insertion into an encyclopaedia, rather than an entry written for an encyclopaedia. For all these reasons, I concluded that a simple statement that relationships remained unclear would be preferable. I appreciate that you put a lot of work into it, but that isn't the only relevant factor here. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bacterial phyla, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the number of known major lineages of bacteria has more than quadrupled in the past 20 years but many of them cannot be grown in a lab? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 03:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2-amino-6-(2-thienyl)purine (S).gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 00:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thanks for your picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NA_hybrid.svg it is perfect for a report I'm writing about a model of partially-complementary-hybridization. (We are required to grab images from various sources rather than make our own, it's sort of weird.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.209.34.77 (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Acetoanaerobium, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.thelabrat.com/protocols/Bacterialspecies/Acetoanaerobiumnoterae.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Actinocatenispora, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thelabrat.com/protocols/Bacterialspecies/Actinocatenisporarupis.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squidonius, I see you are adding a bunch of new bacteria articles, and thank you for that! Would you please take a look at the changes I've made here, and modify your page layout accordingly. Notice that "See also" should have a lower-case a in also and that you do not need both parent and daughter categories. Thanks, LadyofShalott 04:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi Squidonius, i patrol new pages, on friday i noticed you creating a whole bunch of new pages of good quality so (to save myself some work!) i nominated you for autopatrolled permission which was subsequently granted here. cheers -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 02:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isoguanine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! I only noticed it because I created a page for Nisaea (the ancient port) and checked "What links here," and I figured you wouldn't want your heading pointing there. Languagehat (talk) 23:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Squidonius, I noticed your article Halomonas alkaliphila and have a question about bacteria in general (as regards the article): forgive my ignorance, but could you tell me which rules apply when disambiguating specific name? Should it be disambiguated to specific name (zoology), or specific name (botany), or are there rules even different from those mentioned for bacteriology. I would guess the rules are the same as zoology, but hesitate to make a change without being sure. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I piped the link on the article from [[specific epithet]] to [[specific name (botany)|specific epithet]]. The latter redirs, for now, to botanical name, but I think eventually specific name will become its own short article sometime soon. Feel free to enter the fray, as there appears to be (possibly) somewhat different rules for disciplines aside from just botany and zoology (virology?, bacteriology?, mycology?, etc.). Thanks very much for responding so soon! Hamamelis (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should have mentioned this: specific name was an article in its own right, but discussed zoology almost exclusively, and so has been moved to "specific name (zoology); "specific name" was then changed to a disambiguation page, with links to "specific name (botany)" and "specific name (zoology)" (with the 'botany' one redirecting to "botanical name"). Just a quick FYI for you, Hamamelis (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have listed your oppose under the wrong proposal at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals), you may want to take a look at it. (you are currently opposing a change in the range block capability) Monty₈₄₅ 21:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hmm I think I like the idea of making 3 different E.coli pages(ecology, medicine and genetics) even if the individual pages are going to have less information, the content is going to more specific. My interest mainly is in the non-pathogenic E.coli strains and specifically the strain genealogy of strain K-12. Our lab at Texas A&M university runs [www.ecoliwiki.net Ecoliwiki], where we are trying to generate as much information as we can on non-pathogenic E.Coli. Sgouni (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Medicine Barnstar
		For your courage and skill in logically dividing a bacterium in more than two parts with proper notice and no immediate controversy. Truly remarkable! -- Scray (talk) 15:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. Nice work you're doing! Please see Talk:Bacterial phyla and Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Daughter_pages -- fg^TC 06:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Squidonius! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Squidonius. I think this a good article and deleting was pettifogging pedantry. Anyway, while I'm not really qualified to do much work it, if you need any help, or particularly review when it's ready to go back to regular article space, give me a shout and I'll help out in some small ways if I can. Herostratus (talk) 05:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled across this article when looking through Category:Lists of English words. I agree with your thoughts on the talk page, and would like to see the article salvaged. Given that there are already a number of articles that delve into various uncommon properties, I'd think that this article should be conceived of more as a list of uncommon properties of English words, with short entries for each (perhaps with a few examples). Any exhaustive or semi-exhaustive lists of words that have these properties (like the entries under "Many vowels" and "Many repeated letters") should be moved to their own articles, if the articles don't already exist, or merged into such articles. Having a single article that explores such properties seems really worth having. Waitak (talk) 02:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They do work, you merely have the code wrong. They are – and —. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 13:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just stumbled upon one of your images on commons. I have no clue what category to put it in. :) Maybe you could fix that? commons:file:ARB UPGMA Tamura.png Thanks a bunch!! --Hedwig in Washington ^(TALK) 03:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squidonius. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In your lovely image Evolution_of_minuscule.svg, some of the strokes are broken up. For example, the top stroke of the Insular 'g' is divided into two parts. Do you agree that it should really be a single continuous stroke? I assume that such broken strokes are a result of auto-tracing. Are you interested in correcting them? I could do it but I'm hesitant to defile your work. WRJF (talk) 23:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your article about Aestuariimicrobium has the wrong name, see Aestuariibacter. I don't know how to rename an article so I please you to do it. All the best, --Dodshe (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is both a genus name and a class name! How does that work!? SmartSE (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the talk page of "Bacterial taxonomy"? I left the following text there. I think there are three things that should be changed.

"The section "Subdivision based on Gram staining" says that Oxyphotobacteriae use water as electron acceptor in photosynthesis, but I think it is an electron donor. In the secction "Phyla endings" I think in "Aquificae (from Aquifica)" it should be Aquifex instead of Aquifica, because in the other cases you are speaking about Genera. In the seccition "Names after places", Borrelia burgdorferi is not a good exemple because it was named after its discoverer Willy Burgdorfer."--Miguelferig (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) BE BOLD and fix it! Don't wait around to have someone tell you that it is ok to do - if you think something should be changed it probably should be! SmartSE (talk) 22:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A very late reply to your comments is at Wikipedia talk:WikiFauna#Cute but.... Also, I hadn't heard of the Belkin Team Inventory, so added that to my list. Ta :) -- Quiddity (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

go to petsnearby.com

Sauropterygia (talk) 06:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of words in English with many vowels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words in English with many vowels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DoctorKubla (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Non-proteinogenic amino acids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PLP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unanswered has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Technical 13 (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of words in English without A, E, I, O or U is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words in English without A, E, I, O or U until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —rybec 03:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transsulfuration pathway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• or succinyl group of a homoserine ester with cysteine via its thiol group to form cystathionine (catalysed by [[Cystathionine gamma-synthase|cystathionine γ-synthase]], which is encoded by ''metB''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transsulfuration pathway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PLP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of words in English with many consonants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words in English with many consonants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 16:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Topaz brainstorm. Since you had some involvement with the Topaz brainstorm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 13:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've read your watchmen analysis. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on how it might relate to images.

They seem to me to have a very different update behaviour then text. I guess because they're effectively harder to edit, they tend to be very long-lived. When they do change, it's often for something completely different, rather than a better rendering of the same thing. I get the impression that many are just put present because they are what people had to hand, rather than specifically intended for the article. Similarly some articles just have collections of redundant pictures.

Any thoughts from your time editing? T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 11:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if I might pull you out of retirement like a clichéd cop show to help out on the gene article. B class? Really? I know we can do better. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 10:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squidonius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of words in English with tripled letters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words in English with tripled letters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squidonius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squidonius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bio Clipart squidonius.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused collage of SVGs. No obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]