A tag has been placed on White Dolls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. B. Wolterding (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-27T11:29:00.000Z","author":"B. Wolterding","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B._Wolterding-2008-03-27T11:29:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_of_White_Dolls","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Milo Turk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-28T18:43:00.000Z","author":"Excirial","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Excirial-2008-03-28T18:43:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_of_Milo_Turk","replies":[]}}-->

Yo, thanks for taking the time to edit Talk:Boxer_shorts instead of simply engaging in an edit war. Next time, though, try not to blank all the other content on the talk page so everyone has a chance to say what they want to say.  —Peco! Peco!^TALK 02:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-01T02:46:00.000Z","author":"PecoPeco","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PecoPeco-2008-04-01T02:46:00.000Z-Your_changes_to_Talk:Boxer_Shorts","replies":[],"displayName":"Peco!\u00a0Peco!"}}-->

Hi, I edited your user page to remove the link to myspace. It looked like you were trying to use wikipedia to promote the band you wrote about in And Bringer Of Light. Please don't use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Friday (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-30T20:43:00.000Z","author":"Friday","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Friday-2008-04-30T20:43:00.000Z-User_page","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Annavarneyblackwhite.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-21T04:47:00.000Z","author":"STBotI","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-STBotI-2008-05-21T04:47:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Annavarneyblackwhite.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Annavarneyisbeautiful.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-21T04:47:00.000Z","author":"STBotI","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-STBotI-2008-05-21T04:47:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Annavarneyisbeautiful.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Untitledr.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-07T06:44:00.000Z","author":"OrphanBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-OrphanBot-2008-09-07T06:44:00.000Z-Image_copyright_problem_with_Image:Untitledr.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Soporaeternus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-12T20:07:00.000Z","author":"Aspects","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aspects-2008-09-12T20:07:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_(Image:Soporaeternus.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Emo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TheLetterM (talk) 14:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-16T14:04:00.000Z","author":"TheLetterM","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheLetterM-2008-09-16T14:04:00.000Z-September_2008","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for uploading Image:Soporaeternus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-19T21:48:00.000Z","author":"Aspects","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aspects-2008-09-19T21:48:00.000Z-Disputed_non-free_use_rationale_for_Image:Soporaeternus.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

I have nominated Milo Turk, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milo Turk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-09-24T19:44:00.000Z","author":"Mr Senseless","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mr_Senseless-2008-09-24T19:44:00.000Z-AfD_nomination_of_Milo_Turk","replies":[],"displayName":"Mister Senseless"}}-->

A tag has been placed on Heavy metal monk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-19T23:02:00.000Z","author":"Vianello","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vianello-2008-11-19T23:02:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_of_Heavy_metal_monk","replies":[]}}-->

Nothing more. All the other genres are not compulsory connected to Goth. A Goth can listen to many other genres, pop, rock, jazz... but the main genre is Gothic Rock. Gothic Rock is the origin of the Goth subculture. Dark Wave is Dark Wave, Cabaret is Cabaret and Post-Punk is Post-Punk. It's no Goth music and it was never Goth music. --Ada Kataki (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-01T10:23:00.000Z","author":"Ada Kataki","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ada_Kataki-2008-12-01T10:23:00.000Z-Goth(ic)_music_is_Gothic_Rock","replies":[]}}-->

Your point being? Semitransgenic (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-13T21:22:00.000Z","author":"Semitransgenic","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Semitransgenic-2008-12-13T21:22:00.000Z-???","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Itm04.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-16T06:30:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2008-12-16T06:30:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(Image:Itm04.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-16T06:31:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2008-12-16T06:31:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(Image:Sopor.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:3723.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-16T06:36:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2008-12-16T06:36:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(Image:3723.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Sopor entrevista 5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-16T06:36:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2008-12-16T06:36:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(Image:Sopor_entrevista_5.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading Image:Our Lady Of The Flowers.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-16T06:37:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2008-12-16T06:37:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(Image:Our_Lady_Of_The_Flowers.JPG)","replies":[]}}-->

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Flaming sword (real), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --smurdah (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-24T00:03:00.000Z","author":"Smurdah","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Smurdah-2008-12-24T00:03:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Flaming_sword_(real)","replies":[],"displayName":"--smurdah"}}-->

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Conti|✉ 11:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-29T11:45:00.000Z","author":"Conti","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Conti-2008-12-29T11:45:00.000Z-Your_copy_&_paste_move_of_Sopor_Aeternus_&_the_Ensemble_of_Shadows","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Jim Bishop (construction worker) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Scapler (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-12-30T14:11:00.000Z","author":"Scapler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Scapler-2008-12-30T14:11:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_of_Jim_Bishop_(construction_worker)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:3723.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-13T05:02:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2009-02-13T05:02:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(File:3723.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Esreiten.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-14T05:04:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2009-02-14T05:04:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(File:Esreiten.jpg)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Ichtotemichalt.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-14T05:05:00.000Z","author":"BJBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BJBot-2009-02-14T05:05:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_media_(File:Ichtotemichalt.JPG)","replies":[]}}-->

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Female dominance, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 22:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-21T22:47:00.000Z","author":"MBK004","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MBK004-2009-02-21T22:47:00.000Z-February_2009","replies":[],"displayName":"MBK"}}-->

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-25T07:21:00.000Z","author":"CSDWarnBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CSDWarnBot-2009-02-25T07:21:00.000Z-Attack","replies":["c-Yandman-2009-02-25T08:51:00.000Z-CSDWarnBot-2009-02-25T07:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

I deleted the article. You just can't use a single website as a source, especially when even they say "This Story is not Presently Known as Verifiable". yandman 08:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-02-25T08:51:00.000Z","author":"Yandman","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Yandman-2009-02-25T08:51:00.000Z-CSDWarnBot-2009-02-25T07:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Baloo Reid. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DougsTech (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-18T22:45:00.000Z","author":"DougsTech","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DougsTech-2009-03-18T22:45:00.000Z-March_2009","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DEMOTAPE2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 07:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-07-19T07:33:00.000Z","author":"MBisanz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MBisanz-2009-07-19T07:33:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_File:DEMOTAPE2.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on R.A. Feller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-06T22:15:00.000Z","author":"Ttonyb1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ttonyb1-2009-08-06T22:15:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_R.A._Feller","replies":[]}}-->

You are welcome to comment in this deletion discussion. Ikip (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-10-03T16:34:00.000Z","author":"Ikip","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ikip-2009-10-03T16:34:00.000Z-Earth's_location_in_space_which_you_contributed_to,_is_currently_up_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

The article Lustmord (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't provide a disambiguation between more than one article with the title "lustmord"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Closedmouth (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-07T15:29:00.000Z","author":"Closedmouth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Closedmouth-2009-12-07T15:29:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Lustmord_(disambiguation)","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Schaeffer in 1953.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-13T05:39:00.000Z","author":"ZooFari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ZooFari-2009-12-13T05:39:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Pierre_Schaeffer_in_1953.JPG","replies":[],"displayName":"Zoo"}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:EtudeACDF.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-13T05:47:00.000Z","author":"Skier Dude","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skier_Dude-2009-12-13T05:47:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:EtudeACDF.ogg","replies":[]}}-->

Just wondering - how can an uninhabited rock have a "native name"? [1] ClemMcGann (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-24T15:34:00.000Z","author":"ClemMcGann","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClemMcGann-2009-12-24T15:34:00.000Z-Rockall_\/_Rocabarraigh","replies":["c-ClemMcGann-2009-12-26T11:35:00.000Z-ClemMcGann-2009-12-24T15:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

According to the article, that's what the natives called it upon its discovery. Perhaps it's not a "native name" more than it is a n "original name".

Which article? what natives? Discovery when? I'm inclined to revert the lot ClemMcGann (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-26T11:35:00.000Z","author":"ClemMcGann","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-ClemMcGann-2009-12-26T11:35:00.000Z-ClemMcGann-2009-12-24T15:34:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there. I've reverted your addition of the infobox on The Two Gentlemen of Verona page. If you check out the Wikipedia:WikiProject Shakespeare page, you'll see a standardised layout, and it doesn't use infoboxes. Granted, not all of the play pages conform to this standardised layout as of yet, but we're working on getting them all into a degree of uniformity. Now by all means, if you want to propose adding an infobox to the plays, go ahead and suggest it. Your best bet would probably be to propose it on one of the more frequently visited pages like Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet or on the project page itself, but as it stands at the moment, infoboxes aren't part of the design. Incidently, I also noticed you changed the section 'Synopsis' to 'Plot summary' and 'Date and Text' to 'Dating'. Again, the original section headings are part of the standardised layout, they're not just arbitrarily chosen. Cheers, talk soon. Bertaut (talk) 17:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-20T17:08:00.000Z","author":"Bertaut","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bertaut-2010-01-20T17:08:00.000Z-Two_Gentlemen_of_Verona","replies":[]}}-->

By the way, very nice re-design of the Shakespeare template. The new look is really well done. Bertaut (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-20T17:11:00.000Z","author":"Bertaut","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bertaut-2010-01-20T17:11:00.000Z-Two_Gentlemen_of_Verona","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on File:Soporaeternusandtheensembleofshadowslogo1995.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-23T15:07:00.000Z","author":"IngerAlHaosului","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-IngerAlHaosului-2010-01-23T15:07:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:Soporaeternusandtheensembleofshadowslogo1995.","replies":[]}}-->

The article Pig (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All that I can find for significant coverage is [2]. Fails WP:NF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-26T00:53:00.000Z","author":"Joe Chill","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Joe_Chill-2010-01-26T00:53:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Pig_(film)","replies":[]}}-->

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Twilight (2008 film). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 12:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-02-11T12:24:00.000Z","author":"Scarce","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Scarce-2010-02-11T12:24:00.000Z-February_2010","replies":[],"displayName":"\u03c2 \u062d"}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Soporaeternusandtheensembleofshadowslogo1995.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-03-14T17:22:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2010-03-14T17:22:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Soporaeternusandtheensembleofshadowslogo1995.gif","replies":[]}}-->

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Justin Bieber, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. this warning is for your this edit. It is totally inappropriate. You have been an editor since 2007 and should know better. If you cannot refrain from such edits, you have no place here. It is your only warning. If this edit was not made by you, than you need to learn to protect your account better and this will also be your final warning of that. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-04-27T21:55:00.000Z","author":"TheDJ","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheDJ-2010-04-27T21:55:00.000Z-April_2010","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-06-19T17:52:00.000Z","author":"Courcelles","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Courcelles-2010-06-19T17:52:00.000Z-You_are_now_a_Reviewer","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Natasha Norvikov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Natasha Norvikov and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 20:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-22T20:21:00.000Z","author":"Oni Ookami Alfador","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Oni_Ookami_Alfador-2011-03-22T20:21:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Natasha_Norvikov","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Itm04.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-24T16:22:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2011-06-24T16:22:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_File:Itm04.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Spiritfront.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-05T13:28:00.000Z","author":"Drilnoth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drilnoth-2011-07-05T13:28:00.000Z-File_permission_problem_with_File:Spiritfront.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:SpiritualFront.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-10T22:19:00.000Z","author":"Drilnoth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drilnoth-2011-07-10T22:19:00.000Z-File_permission_problem_with_File:SpiritualFront.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nearest planet to earth. Since you had some involvement with the Nearest planet to earth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Iceblock (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-10T10:54:00.000Z","author":"Iceblock","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Iceblock-2011-09-10T10:54:00.000Z-Nearest_planet_to_earth_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sopor entrevista 5.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-07-17T18:57:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2012-07-17T18:57:00.000Z-Non-free_rationale_for_File:Sopor_entrevista_5.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T17:35:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T17:35:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

The article Herman Tønnessen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Unable to find WP:SIGCOV of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Kvng (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-01T16:28:00.000Z","author":"Kvng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kvng-2017-10-01T16:28:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Herman_T\u00f8nnessen","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flaming sword (effect) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaming sword (effect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-11T12:54:00.000Z","author":"Zxcvbnm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zxcvbnm-2019-08-11T12:54:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Flaming_sword_(effect)_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

The article Nico B. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film director. No evidence of secondary sources through WP:BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-05-04T22:58:00.000Z","author":"Cardiffbear88","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cardiffbear88-2020-05-04T22:58:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Nico_B.","replies":[]}}-->

Template:Rockall has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-02T13:30:00.000Z","author":"LaundryPizza03","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LaundryPizza03-2020-11-02T13:30:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Rockall","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Symbol of Jusa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220913172800","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-20220913172800-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Symbol_of_Jusa.png","replies":[]}}-->