This is an archive of past discussions with User:Simply south. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rendlesham may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '' is a village and [[civil parish]] near [[Woodbridge, Suffolk|Woodbridge]], [[Suffolk]], [[United Kingdom. It was a royal centre of authority for the king of the [[Kingdom of East Anglia|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-08T21:21:00.000Z","author":"BracketBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BracketBot-2014-08-08T21:21:00.000Z-August_2014","replies":[],"displayName":"these opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hi, I notice that you haven't updated The Metropolitan newsletter this year. Are you intending to restart this, or should it be considered defunct now?--DavidCane (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-20T14:14:00.000Z","author":"DavidCane","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DavidCane-2014-09-20T14:14:00.000Z-The_Metropolitan_newsletter","replies":["c-DavidCane-2014-09-20T21:13:00.000Z-DavidCane-2014-09-20T14:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

There's no need to apologise. We're wikipedian's because we choose to be and if editing becomes a chore or too much like work, then it's not worth doing it. I wasn't asking because I expect or expected you to produce a new edition, but because I noticed that a user had added themselves to the distribution list and it made me think about when I saw the last update. If you don't have the time on a regular basis, then just put it to one side.

I have noticed that the number of project participants has been dwindling and the number of articles getting promoted to GA or FA has declined. The project has always been more a loose affiliation then a strongly organised project like WP:MILHIST, so perhaps the newsletter isn't required.

In any case, please don't feel that you need to produce an update just because I asked. --DavidCane (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-20T21:13:00.000Z","author":"DavidCane","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DavidCane-2014-09-20T21:13:00.000Z-DavidCane-2014-09-20T14:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star of Caledonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-10-02T09:17:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2014-10-02T09:17:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_October_2","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Template:Bexleyheath Line (modern route) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. YLSS (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-29T22:41:00.000Z","author":"YLSS","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-YLSS-2015-01-29T22:41:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Bexleyheath_Line_(modern_route)","replies":[]}}-->

.

As per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification points 1 and 4.2, I am seeking advice on this substantial [1] edit on Waverley Line. Discussion at Talk:Waverley Line please.--KlausFoehl (talk) 15:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-30T15:37:00.000Z","author":"KlausFoehl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KlausFoehl-2015-03-30T15:37:00.000Z-Waverley_Line_-_substantial_edit_-_seeking_advice","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I was trying to find a source to cite for the name Regatta Line with regard to the Henley Branch Line, and to my surprise I couldn't find anything particularly current. The only reference on the FGW web site, for example, was a side reference in a PDF of the 'Royal Regatta' timetable for 2013. So I'm wondering if this name is even still in use, or whether it has fallen into disuse. I see from the history that you have twice suggested renaming the Henley Branch Line to the Regatta Line, so I thought you might have something to say on the subject. Please see, and respond on, Talk:Henley Branch Line#Regatta line. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-07T15:18:00.000Z","author":"Chris j wood","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chris_j_wood-2015-05-07T15:18:00.000Z-Is_Regatta_Line_still_in_use.","replies":[],"displayName":"chris_j_wood"}}-->

Template:Infobox T&W Metro station has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 07:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-16T07:32:00.000Z","author":"Jc86035","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jc86035-2015-05-16T07:32:00.000Z-Nomination_for_merging_of_Template:Infobox_T&W_Metro_station","replies":[]}}-->