Hi Rochambeau1783! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Rochambeau1783. Please avoid including sensitive information in articles, especially when it is not relevant. Regarding the edits on Carolina Amesty, the charges were dropped due to lack of evidence or because it was difficult to substantiate them. I say this based on the official report that was published. For this article, it is preferred not to use the Orlando Sentinel as a reference source, especially when it is at the center of attacks against the individual in question. Wikipedia is not a platform for attacking a person or entity. It is not the place to express your personal opinions. Please include neutral information without political bias or the sole intention of causing harm. If you undo the latest edit again, I will file a formal complaint. Bilonio (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241223151100","author":"Bilonio","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bilonio-20241223151100-Carolina_Amesty","replies":["c-Rochambeau1783-20241223152000-Bilonio-20241223151100"]}}-->

Hello. This information is published by the Orange County Jail. "This work was created by a government unit (including state, county, and municipal government agencies) of the U.S. state of Florida. It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright and is therefore in the public domain in the United States."

The Orlando Sentinel has nothing to do with this photo.

I'm very concerned about your edits and this clear violation of WP:NPOV. Please stop arguing here and use the appropriate talk page BEFORE making large edits. Rochambeau1783 (talk) 15:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241223152000","author":"Rochambeau1783","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rochambeau1783-20241223152000-Bilonio-20241223151100","replies":[]}}-->

Feel free to put your articles up! There's also a US and Europe one! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241227095800","author":"Dr. Blofeld","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dr._Blofeld-20241227095800-Wikipedia:The_20,000_Challenge","replies":[]}}-->

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241230105000","author":"Doug Weller","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Doug_Weller-20241230105000-Introduction_to_contentious_topics","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marion G. Wells Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion G. Wells Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Doug Weller talk 10:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241230105400","author":"Doug Weller","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Doug_Weller-20241230105400-Nomination_of_Marion_G._Wells_Foundation_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->