User talk:Pukerua

Welcome, but ... I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Core Practice, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Core Practice. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 08:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-06-16T08:53:00.000Z","author":"Fram","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fram-2006-06-16T08:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL\/eTOM-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z-ITIL\/eTOM"],"text":"ITIL\/eTOM","linkableTitle":"ITIL\/eTOM"}-->

ITIL/eTOM

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL\/eTOM-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z-ITIL\/eTOM"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL\/eTOM-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z-ITIL\/eTOM"],"text":"ITIL\/eTOM","linkableTitle":"ITIL\/eTOM"}-->

Will you back me on the ITIL/eTOM issue? Charles T. Betz 19:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z","author":"Charles T. Betz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Charles_T._Betz-2007-06-27T19:41:00.000Z-ITIL\/eTOM","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL_talk_page_RFC-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z-ITIL_talk_page_RFC"],"text":"ITIL talk page RFC","linkableTitle":"ITIL talk page RFC"}-->

ITIL talk page RFC

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL_talk_page_RFC-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z-ITIL_talk_page_RFC"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ITIL_talk_page_RFC-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z-ITIL_talk_page_RFC"],"text":"ITIL talk page RFC","linkableTitle":"ITIL talk page RFC"}-->

After the previous RFC on external links you stated "If I'd been here in time I'd have added my vote to drop both" and I notice that you have yet to comment on the current RFC which has been running for 8 days so far. This is a friendly highlight for you in case you missed it.—Ash (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z","author":"Ash","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ash-2009-09-14T15:46:00.000Z-ITIL_talk_page_RFC","replies":[]}}-->