This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mike Peel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
There is a problem with Template:Infobox power station, being discussed here: Template talk:Infobox power station#Is this template broken?. But among the power stations there are a few telescopes and World Heritage Sites with broken maps. It looks like the same error, but I can see no recent changes anywhere that caused it, here or on Wikidata. It’s possibly buried deep in a template. As you worked on both templates you might have a better idea. Here’s the non-power station articles with errors.
--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds19:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-27T19:45:00.000Z","author":"JohnBlackburne","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JohnBlackburne-2017-11-27T19:45:00.000Z-Infobox_map_errors","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-11-27T20:47:00.000Z-JohnBlackburne-2017-11-27T19:45:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks for the heads-up. It looks like another editor fixed it before I could get to it. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-27T20:47:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-11-27T20:47:00.000Z-JohnBlackburne-2017-11-27T19:45:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Romaine-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-This_Month_in_Education:_November_2017-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Romaine-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z-This_Month_in_Education:_November_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"This Month in Education: November 2017","linkableTitle":"This Month in Education: November 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Romaine-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-This_Month_in_Education:_November_2017-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Romaine-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z-This_Month_in_Education:_November_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"This Month in Education: November 2017","linkableTitle":"This Month in Education: November 2017"}-->
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education
Volume 6 | Issue 10 | November 2017
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine17:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z","author":"Romaine","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Romaine-2017-12-01T17:23:00.000Z-This_Month_in_Education:_November_2017","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Mike Peel. Thank you very much for offering to help with the Cochrane update bot. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of the code. @Doc James:, do you know where we can find the actual code that the previous volunteer used? RexxS provided us with more information about dexbot here on his talk page. James, do you know if the Cochrane update bot has gone through an approval process already?
Thanks again for offering to help Mike. It is a pleasure meeting yet another friendly Wikipedian!
JenOttawa (talk) 01:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-22T01:30:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-22T01:30:00.000Z-Cochrane_Update_bot","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-11-22T01:44:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-22T01:30:00.000Z"]}}-->
User:Ladsgroup runs the bot. I will ask if he can share the code. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-22T01:44:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-11-22T01:44:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-22T01:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-11-22T01:53:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-11-22T01:44:00.000Z"]}}-->
That would be great. Thanks Doc James.JenOttawa (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-22T01:53:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-22T01:53:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-11-22T01:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
This is the code, it's super straightforward Ladsgroupoverleg15:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-26T15:10:00.000Z","author":"Ladsgroup","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ladsgroup-2017-11-26T15:10:00.000Z-Cochrane_Update_bot","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-11-27T15:23:00.000Z-Ladsgroup-2017-11-26T15:10:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thank you Ladsgroup. We greatly appreciate all your help putting this together and running the bot. It has been a useful tool for us, and volunteers have now completed almost all of the updates that were flagged in August! Mike Peel, is there anything else that I can help with? Do you think that this would be feasible for you? If there is anything that I can do to help, please let me know. Thank you again to both of you! JenOttawa (talk) 15:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-27T15:23:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-27T15:23:00.000Z-Ladsgroup-2017-11-26T15:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
OK, so it runs on my desktop, which is a good start. :-) I've put a copy at [1], and I've just been doing some test runs. I've added some caching code so that it only fetches a given report once to check if it's been updated, which speeds it up a little. Hopefully [2] and [3] are the desired edits.
When starting it up, it says "WARNING: API warning (search): The regex search timed out, only partial results are available. Try simplifying your regular expression to get complete results. Retrieving 50 pages from wikipedia:en." - @Ladsgroup: any idea how to improve this?
If <!-- No update needed --> exists anywhere in the page, it doesn't do an update, even if that's not associated with the reference that needs updating. Would it be feasible to change this to e.g. <!-- No update needed: 10484104 --> (where '10484104' is the pubmed ID), or would that break too many pages?
I'll run this by the Bot Approval Group shortly, and after that I'll set Pi bot to run the script on the 1st of every month, is that OK or would a different date/frequency be better?
Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-27T22:14:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-11-27T22:14:00.000Z-Cochrane_Update_bot","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Mike, thanks for doing all this work.
In the past, when Ladsgroup ran a new version of the bot, it created a new bot page with the date. I am not sure exactly how it works, but my understanding is that each time the bot was run, it re-did all the previous "update needed" tags making a new project page with all the Cochrane updates needed across Wikipedia. If you have the bot set up to add only new reviews to the most recent version (Aug17) and remove the Done PMIDs, that is great. Adding to the August page is actually helpful, as the vounteers already have this link and are presently accessing it. Doc James do you agree with me here?
I appreciate you offering to run it once a month. This is helpful.
no-wiki's: I believe this is in place in case an editor wants to cite an outdated Cochrane review in a historical context within an article. I am glad that you noticed this, as it means we could be missing some updates. If you can make it more specific for Cochrane reviews, that would be great.
Thanks again, JenOttawa (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z-Cochrane_Update_bot","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-11-28T15:23:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z","c-Mike_Peel-2017-11-28T21:00:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z"]}}-->
Yes the "<!-- No update needed -->" is for the times when we want to use an old review. Not often but sometimes. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-28T15:23:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-11-28T15:23:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
OK, archiving is now coded up, and I've run it once manually. I've also now submitted the bot request. Please have a look at both and let me know if there are any problems! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-28T21:00:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-11-28T21:00:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-28T14:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:26:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-11-28T21:00:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi Mike, thanks for taking care of all this admin work involved with setting this up. I noticed the one new review added to the August page here, and that it archived all the updates marked Done. Once you run the bot automatically will it pull the up the additional updates? I would expect at least 20, as it has been nearly 4 months since we have run it. I also looked at your proposal and it looks great. The in-text "update needed" tag looks good as well. Is there anything else that you want me to look at? Thanks again, JenOttawa (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-30T18:26:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:26:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-11-28T21:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:30:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:26:00.000Z"]}}-->
Do you have any suggestions on what to do in the case of the "withdrawn" cochrane review. There can be various reasons that Cochrane marks their reviews in this manner, not all negative. For now, I will leave the citation as the most recent non-withdrawn review, however I do not want to mark this with a "done" or put a no-update needed tag in the article, in case Cochrane comes out with a newer non-withdrawn review. I can also just leave these in the list for now, as they are not very frequent.
e.g: The one citation added to list was this one, and the newest, 2016 version, has been withdrawn.
Article Acupuncture (edit) old review PMID:27145001 new review PMID:27852100 - 22:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! JenOttawa (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-30T18:30:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:30:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-01T21:04:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:30:00.000Z"]}}-->
@JenOttawa: I only ran the code up to the point where it made its first edit, hence why only one update was posted - the first run by Pi bot will do the rest. I was wondering about the 'withdrawn' status of the update. What happens when a new update is posted that isn't withdrawn - does the replacement ID in the first article get updated to the non-withdrawn one, or does the withdrawn one get a replacement ID? Would it help if there was a separate way of tracking the uses of ones that have been marked as withdrawn (both current refs and updated refs)? It might be best to talk to others and let me know what the ideal process would be here, and I can see if I can add code that does that. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-01T21:04:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-01T21:04:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-11-30T18:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-12-01T21:10:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-01T21:04:00.000Z"]}}-->
Great points. I think it makes separate to separate these tasks, but I am open to suggestions! I am not certain the answer to your question regarding an update to a withdrawn review, I will look into it. I have access to an excel doc on file with DOIs for all withdrawn reviews to date (for future use). All looks good (from what I can see with the bot). I have volunteers ready to go, so your work is very helpful for our project! If I can help you with anything else, please let me know. JenOttawa (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-01T21:10:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-01T21:10:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-01T21:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Mike Peel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Working on fixing a regression after a change in MediaWiki core that makes edit links show up on diff pages (phabricator:T181807)
More work on persistent editing of statements on Forms of a Lexeme (specifically phabricator:T180467)
Improved size of the diff that we sent to Wikipedia and co for changes happening on Wikidata. This is one more needed step towards only showing meaningful edits in the watchlists and recent changes there. (phabricator:T113468)
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Lea Lacroix (WMDE)16:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-04T16:31:00.000Z","author":"Lea Lacroix (WMDE)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lea_Lacroix_(WMDE)-2017-12-04T16:31:00.000Z-Wikidata_weekly_summary_#289","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Romaine-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-This_Month_in_GLAM:_November_2017-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Romaine-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z-This_Month_in_GLAM:_November_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"This Month in GLAM: November 2017","linkableTitle":"This Month in GLAM: November 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Romaine-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-This_Month_in_GLAM:_November_2017-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Romaine-2017-12-08T20:47:00.000Z-This_Month_in_GLAM:_November_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"This Month in GLAM: November 2017","linkableTitle":"This Month in GLAM: November 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_December_2017-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_December_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 December 2017","linkableTitle":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 December 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_December_2017-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_December_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 December 2017","linkableTitle":"Administrators' newsletter \u2013 December 2017"}-->
Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.
Technical news
Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.
Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-02T20:58:00.000Z-Administrators'_newsletter_\u2013_December_2017","replies":[]}}-->
Incoming:Next Structured Commons IRC office hour will be on Tuesday, February 13, 2018, at 18:00 UTC.
Past: Tech-talk about knowledge technologies, featuring Wikidata, DBpedia, and Histropedia at Jakarta Digital Valley, Jakarta, Indonesia on Dec 8, 2017. Slides are available at Slideshare link.
Structured Data on Commons: Participate in this survey to help the team understand which tools and functionalities are most important to the Commons and Wikidata communities
QuickStatements now has a CSV-like import function (under "import commands")
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Lea Lacroix (WMDE)16:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-11T16:06:00.000Z","author":"Lea Lacroix (WMDE)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lea_Lacroix_(WMDE)-2017-12-11T16:06:00.000Z-Wikidata_weekly_summary_#290","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-The_Signpost:_18_December_2017-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z-The_Signpost:_18_December_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"The Signpost: 18 December 2017","linkableTitle":"The Signpost: 18 December 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-The_Signpost:_18_December_2017-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-18T06:28:00.000Z-The_Signpost:_18_December_2017"],"uneditableSection":true,"text":"The Signpost: 18 December 2017","linkableTitle":"The Signpost: 18 December 2017"}-->
Final step towards being able to store statements on Forms of a Lexeme
Disabled RDF support for Lexemes as the mapping isn't defined yet (phabricator:T182660)
Adding some more smart tracking for Lua usage so we better know which properties from an item are used on a Wikipedia article even when the whole item is loaded (phabricator:T179923)
Hi Mike,
I just wanted to follow up on our conversation about the Cochrane Update bot. We were discussing withdrawn reviews. I have started to look into this, but have not yet found a solution. Are you waiting for this response before the bot runs fully, or is it scheduled for the first of the month?
Thanks again for all your help.
Jenny
JenOttawa (talk) 03:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-09T03:32:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-09T03:32:00.000Z-Cochrane_bot_updates","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-09T10:31:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-09T03:32:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi @JenOttawa: I'm currently waiting for the bot approval group, see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Pi bot 3 (which is taking longer than I expected, maybe @Headbomb: can help?). Once that's there then I'll set it running to do a one-off update, then schedule it to run on the 1st of each month. If there's a solution to the withdrawn reviews, then I'm happy to implement it, but I don't see this as an issue that stops the bot from running (since the work-around is to leave them in the pending queue until a non-withdrawn update is available). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-09T10:31:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-09T10:31:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-09T03:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-12-10T02:03:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-09T10:31:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks for the update Mike. JenOttawa (talk) 02:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-10T02:03:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-10T02:03:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-09T10:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Mike, congrats on getting the bot up and running! I noticed that it is doing all the "withdrawn" reviews first. Just wondering if this was supposed to happen. This is great that they are included in the bot updates. We did not have them before, it used to just pull all the PMIDs of updated reviews. Thanks again for all your help with the approval process and behind the scenes work getting this up and running. I will be contacting the volunteers and we will get started tackling the new list!
JenOttawa (talk) 21:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T21:08:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:08:00.000Z-Cochrane_bot_updates","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T21:15:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
@JenOttawa: I'm surprised that so many "withdrawn" reviews are being returned, I don't think I changed anything in the code that made it more or less likely for these to be fetched. If you/others can have a look at them and figure out how best to deal with them, that would be good! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T21:15:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T21:15:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:50:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T21:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
It is great that it is pulling the withdrawn reviews, these can be easily updated manually on Wikipedia, and it is great to clean up the articles. Once it is finished we will see how it works for the non-withdrawn updated reviews (about 20 per month). There are about 300 withdrawn reviews in total for all cochrane reviews (not sure of time frame on this number). They are pretty rare, maybe a handful a year? Thanks again, Jenny JenOttawa (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T21:50:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:50:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T21:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:52:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:50:00.000Z"]}}-->
I only saw the "finished product" the other times the updates were performed, so I am not sure of the order that the bot flagged the updates. I can see that it is still plugging away pulling the withdrawn reviews alphabetically. JenOttawa (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T21:52:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:52:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T22:06:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
OK. It is still running, hopefully it will finish overnight. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T22:06:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-12T22:06:00.000Z-JenOttawa-2017-12-12T21:52:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hey Mike. Can you get your bot to not put updates when the update is withdrawn? [4]
Added [5] Thanks for taking this on :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z-Cochrane_bot_updates","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:43:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T19:15:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","c-JenOttawa-2017-12-19T01:32:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z"]}}-->
Also can you get the bot to add the pmid for the most recent version?
The next update is withdrawn but the one after that in 2013 is good.
:-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-13T04:43:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:43:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-12-13T05:07:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:43:00.000Z"]}}-->
Can you run the bot on the prior edits to remove the unneeded ones?
And might be good to run some practice runs. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-13T05:07:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-12-13T05:07:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
@JenOttawa and Doc James: Can you decide how best to handle the withdrawn cases, and I'll code that up? The bot stopped part-way through last night when trying to fetch a page from nih.gov to check, so I also need to improve the robustness of that part of the code I've made a change to that part of the code to avoid the issue. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-13T19:15:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T19:15:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T20:14:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T19:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
I've added some code that will catch cases where the updated version has itself been updated (but it won't check for a third level), so that should catch cases like [6]. I can check to see if the new one has 'WITHDRAWN' in it, and not update in that case, if that's what both of you want me to do. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-13T20:14:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T20:14:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-12-14T05:03:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T20:14:00.000Z"]}}-->
Basically we are looking for the most recent not "withdrawn" paper :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-14T05:03:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-12-14T05:03:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-13T20:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-18T23:36:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-14T05:03:00.000Z"]}}-->
If I exclude any update that contains "<h1>WITHDRAWN:" in the HTML, then I think that will do what you want, @Doc James. It does mean that cases where the currently-used reference has been withdrawn without an update that hasn't been withdrawn will not be flagged, is that OK? @JenOttawa: any comments? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-18T23:36:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-18T23:36:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-14T05:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Doc_James-2017-12-18T23:53:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-18T23:36:00.000Z"]}}-->
Yes I think that should be good. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-18T23:53:00.000Z","author":"Doc James","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Doc_James-2017-12-18T23:53:00.000Z-Mike_Peel-2017-12-18T23:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
That makes sense to me. I have an excel doc with all the withdrawn reviews, I can go manually and make sure that the reviews that are withdrawn are replaced with the most recent review. Thanks very much! JenOttawa (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-19T01:32:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-19T01:32:00.000Z-Doc_James-2017-12-13T04:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
It's that time of the year again, Mike. No fancy template, but just wishing you all the best for the holidays and the new year. It's probably a lot warmer where I am than where you are 😎 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-21T09:15:00.000Z","author":"Kudpung","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kudpung-2017-12-21T09:15:00.000Z-Wishes","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-23T15:08:00.000Z-Kudpung-2017-12-21T09:15:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Kudpung \u0e01\u0e38\u0e14\u0e1c\u0e36\u0e49\u0e07"}}-->
@Kudpung: Thanks, same to you! Mike Peel (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-23T15:08:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-23T15:08:00.000Z-Kudpung-2017-12-21T09:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Mike Peel, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
–Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year13:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-23T13:44:00.000Z","author":"Davey2010","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Davey2010-2017-12-23T13:44:00.000Z-Merry_Christmas!","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-23T15:09:00.000Z-Davey2010-2017-12-23T13:44:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Davey2010: Thanks, same to you! Mike Peel (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-23T15:09:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-23T15:09:00.000Z-Davey2010-2017-12-23T13:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-24T04:35:00.000Z","author":"Bzuk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bzuk-2017-12-24T04:35:00.000Z-Seasons'_Greetings","replies":["c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-26T14:26:00.000Z-Bzuk-2017-12-24T04:35:00.000Z"],"displayName":"FWiW Bzuk"}}-->
@Bzuk: Thanks, same to you! Mike Peel (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-26T14:26:00.000Z","author":"Mike Peel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mike_Peel-2017-12-26T14:26:00.000Z-Bzuk-2017-12-24T04:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Mike,
I just wanted to wish you a nice Christmas holiday. Thank you again for your help getting the bot up and going. Hope you have a chance to relax and enjoy the holiday season.
Kind regards,
Jenny
JenOttawa (talk) 15:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-26T15:48:00.000Z","author":"JenOttawa","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JenOttawa-2017-12-26T15:48:00.000Z-Holiday_Season!","replies":[]}}-->
_(cropped).jpg)
