Hello, MathMan4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Gold Coast, Queensland did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  HiLo48 (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Sport Clips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport Clips. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan1999 23:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, MSK, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Beluga is not notable. Both CNET articles are entirely insubstantial coverage (see WP:DEPTH), UNILAD Tech is owned by LADBIBLE which is unreliable (guilty of slop), Catster, Pangovet, and Excited Cats all have insubstantial coverage and are probably slop, Daily Dot doesn't even mention Beluga nor his second channel's subscriber count, PC Gamer is questionably in-depth in coverage, Vidpros is AI slop written by just "Ryan", Plugged In is unreliable per WP:VG/S, and Influencer Creep is insubstantial coverage.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

msk 01:24, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

he was not the evil person you portrayed his as. Nekoprime (talk) 23:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Nekoprime,

I reverted one of your edits to Daniel Siad because it contained promotional, personal, and opinionated content, which is prohibited on Wikipedia per WP:PROUD and WP:NOT. I see you have made other constructive edits to the page since then, which they all follow Wikipedia's policies. If you have any further questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thank you! MathMan4 (talk) 00:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply