Thank you for reviewing the All England Championships, I do intend to add further information at a later date ie all the womens singles results, there may be some gaps but they were not available on the Times Online Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Racingmanager (talk • contribs) 23:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kieranian2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DGG (talk)

I've seen your new article, Bonville Courtenay Feud. It's a good start, but some improvements are needed--perhaps see our |guide to writing Wikipedia articles is the clearest of the various introductions. The references need to go in standard form, and links made to other wp articles. Some context is needed --you need to say who was on what side.

More generally, the "hangon" tag is used only is response to a deletion warning, and even by itself it lists an article for speedy deletion; when you're in the middle of an article use {{underconstruction}} DGG (talk) 14:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Michael and All Angels Church, Polwatte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Sinhala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in my comments, I created the page Antiochis (daughter of Antiochus the Great) out of despair, because the interwiki robots were doing stupid things, interwiking a disambiguity page to the page of this princess. There is enough about her in the ancient sources (the Portuguese interwiki is 100% based on Diodorus, that's the way I've been creating articles about historical characters: the first pass is taken from one author, in the second pass I add another author, and so on, eventually finishing with modern authors), but there is much speculation by genealogists, like the unsourced reference to her mother. I think the English wikipedia has been too careless in taking too much from genealogists, I just came across one of those sites that claims that Jesus of Nazareth's father Joseph was the son of Cleopatra of Jerusalem, the daughter of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra. Albmont (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• And, BTW, it's ridiculous that Cleopatra redirects to Cleopatra VII; there's not any single ancient author and modern author that numbers her as seven. In William Smith she is Cleopatra 10, in E. R. Bevan she is Cleopatra VI - these artificial numbers are the invention of Wikipedia and should be removed and replaced by the naming convention that the Greeks used for themselves, like A (daughter of B). Albmont (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for appreciating my hard work on Robert de Romille. It was difficult to get the translation you wished for. The French translator complained the mediaeval French was spelled all wrong in Whitaker's "History and Antiquities of the Deanery of Craven" and was perplexed particularly by "renommes" but decided it was "renowned" Kildwyke (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hiii....Thanks a lot for your review and valuable comments. I will be happy if you give any valuable suggestions to improve the articles which i have wriiten and edited. Once again thanks a ton.Lachitbarphukan (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for reviewing my article! You are free to view the other articles i've created!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉^Talk_Contribs 11:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I am glad you found it interesting! Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kieranian2001. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using the Page Curation suite recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation Wikipedia:Page Curation/Introductionhere that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kieranian2001, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful: WikiProject Article rescue squadron's (ARS) main aim is to help improve Wikipedia articles and content. If someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and clarification. Sometimes we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our notability and sourcing policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Sometimes editors who are new to Wikipedia may perceive the deletion of "their" article as discouraging. Encourage civility and maybe even {{welcome}} them if they have only been templated with deletion messages. The Articles for deletion (AfD) discussion is where the concerns regarding each article are brought up and addressed. To be an effective member of the project you need to know how AfD works as well as how to improve articles. Introduction to deletion process gives a good overview and some good advice for newcomers to deletion. Our primary work is improving Wikipedia articles and content. A more dynamic list with article links and descriptions are located at our rescue list. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to the list of translators available. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation for those of us who cannot translate for ourselves. Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again — Welcome! Northamerica1000(talk) 05:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I try to help Wikipedia where I can, and do what I can. Argonnessen (talk) 21:07, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 08:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at the new page I created for this project, and it's my first time to edit on wikipedia so it's good to have such clear advice. I've added more references as suggested, and later in the week will see if I can add an image and some further references. There will be new material to add in the winter as the finds from the dig are being detailed. Also in general, more material will arrive over the next 12 months Dominica Williamson (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article from Sanshen, which is now a redirect. That's why. I need to work on it later; I don't like to create stubs.--Seonookim 04:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Kieranian2001, my knowledge of the English language is of school. I apologize.I try to give you some more news' of Leo I.

References: a) Vitae quatuor priorum abbatum cavensium Alferii, Leonis, Petri et Costabilis Hugone Abbot Venusino is a Benedictine lived in the eleventh century that gave us the biography of the first four abbots of the Abbey of Cava. This is a parchment manuscript preserved in the Abbey of Cava. b) Santi. Gli autentici apologeti della Chiesa Joseph Ratzinger is Pope Benedict XVI.

For the biography: Birth Lucca? Death Cava de 'Tirreni, July 12, 1079 Venerated by the Catholic Church Canonization in 1893 by Pope Leo XIII Main sanctuary Abbey SS. Trinity of Cava Recurrence July 12

Lion from Lucca (Lucca, ... - Cava de 'Tirreni, July 12, 1079) is venerated as a saint by the Catholic Church and is remembered as 2nd abbot of the Abbey of Cava. In the early years of his government abbey, Leo, a native of Lucca, he had a hard time. Sant'Alferio Pappacarbone, by virtue of the privileges which had been conferred by the Lombard princes of Salerno, appointed him his successor, in contrast with the tradition that considered the property of the monasteries as owned by the family of the founder. More news you can obtain them from the Italian version of Wikipedia. I entrust to you the task of preparing the page of Leo I. good Work Sincerely Borgosiepi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borgosiepi (talk • contribs) 14:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kieranian2001. You have new messages at Mr Serjeant Buzfuz's talk page.
Message added 15:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi Kieranian2001! Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the page. It is always nice to hear feedback. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the translation. The article is not my work, only its translation. Also in my opinion it is interesting. And when it is in English it will have more readers. Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaxevi (talk • contribs) 15:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at ColonelHenry's talk page.

==Reuben Ward Binks==

I am delighted to meet you. Thanks for reviewing Sankalpa (Hindu thought), in fact this page was already linked to 3 other pages. I am not at all conversant with the intricate and dynamic Wiki-technology. I had recently created Daridra yoga (Hindu astrology) and linked it with Kemadruma yoga (Hindu astrology) and Yoga (Hindu astrology) but the link-up is not appearing. Do set this matter right if you please. This page has yet to be reviewed. Thanks again.Aditya soni (talk) 03:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To add Categories,use Preferences,Gadgets enable Hotcat. References can be more difficult as different articles may need different systems. Template Reflist is useful.

A lot more work has been done developing the article in the past three days.Kieranian2001 (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kieranian2001. You have new messages at Arms Jones's talk page.
Message added 13:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University College Dublin Students' Union has been nominated for deletion - it needs support (and then a re-edit which I will work on) - can you assist? 🍺 Antiqueight ^chat 14:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kieranian2001

Regarding User_talk:RobbieIanMorrison#A_page_you_started_.28Energy_modeling.29_has_been_reviewed.21 and page on energy modeling.

Thanks for reviewing my very incomplete page! I intend to working on it over the next few weeks and in particular to beef up the citations.

with best wishes, Robbie Morrison —Preceding undated comment added 12:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kieranian2001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kieranian2001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Kieranian2001/common.js, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:24, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you created Kieranian2001/common.js in the mainspace in error, can you please move it to your userspace. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved the javascript to my user space, the toolbar works now. Kieranian2001 (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kieranian2001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]