This user may have left Wikipedia. KTo288 has not edited Wikipedia since 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, KTo288, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --KTo288 (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-08T20:33:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-02-08T20:33:00.000Z-Welcome","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mountain rescue may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• by-line.--> |date=1 August 2014|website= |publisher=Civil Aid Service|access-date=14 February 2015}}</ref> The unit works alongside the [[Government Flying Service]] in the air and [[Hong Kong Fire

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-14T11:39:00.000Z","author":"BracketBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BracketBot-2015-02-14T11:39:00.000Z-February_2015","replies":[],"displayName":"these opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hi my name is White Mobile

I deleted a section of the 'sinhalese people' article because it states that the current sinhalese are the aborignals mixed with aryans from the north. However this is not correct. This is due to the many studies which can be seen on the wikipedia page 'Genetic studies on Sinhalese' and many other websites which all state that the Sinhalses are of bengali descent and although they have many contributions the native sri lankan aborigingal gene proportion found in the sinhalese is muinute. This therefore contradicts what is stated on this website. I then decided to see for myself where this incorrect data was sourced from and found it was from a sinhalese hritage website. These websites often like to say that the sinhalese are of aboriginal descent for their own means and thus if you were to search elsewhere would find no other factual evidence has shown the same message but actually quite the contrary. Therefore i deleted a section of the article so that it would not mislead people to fact. This was why i made these changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemobile (talk • contribs) 21:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-17T21:39:00.000Z","author":"Whitemobile","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T21:39:00.000Z-Sinhalese_people","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-02-17T21:58:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T21:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for taking the time in explaining this. The thing to do now, if you haven't done so already is to repeat what you have written above on the article talkpage, and if possible find a reliable reference for the genetic studies. Actually I don't see much conflict in what the article says and your claims. The phrasing can be rewritten to emphasise that these claims are part of the national mythology and folklore which is not supported by recent genetic studies. --KTo288 (talk) 21:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-17T21:58:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-02-17T21:58:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T21:39:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

That is true it does not confict much but i believe it would be better and more easier for readers if multiple claims were not laid down. There is a seperate article for that and i thought that for some readers that do not focus much they would take this in the wrong way and interpret it wrong and believe it is factual rather than ideological. My reference is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Sinhalese#mediaviewer/File:Genetic_admixture_of_Sinhalese_by_Papiha.PNG which shows the genetic makeup of the sinhalese people and all the studies on their show little genetic input into the sinhalese population. Therefore the ideas stated that they descend from the aboriginals is incorrect. Thanks you though for showing me ow to do this since i only just started editing and i'm quite new to this all :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitemobile (talk • contribs) 22:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-17T22:30:00.000Z","author":"Whitemobile","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T22:30:00.000Z-Sinhalese_people","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-02-17T22:38:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T22:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

Don't worry we were all new to this at one time. But for the moment an you refrain from editing the article until tomorrow. We have something called the 3 revert rule which means, you shouldn't revert an article more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. I'm working on a form of words that should serve as an acceptable compromise, please be patient.--KTo288 (talk) 22:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-17T22:38:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-02-17T22:38:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-17T22:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Sure no problem sorry for any inconvienience caused Whitemobile (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-18T00:18:00.000Z","author":"Whitemobile","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Whitemobile-2015-02-18T00:18:00.000Z-Sinhalese_people","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-02-18T10:34:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-18T00:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

No problem at all, sometimes what an article needs is a fresh pair of eyes to look at it, and call out the inconsistencies and misstatements, and I agree with you this one needed it. Its just that on contentious articles (you can tell its contentious because it was protected with pending edits review) in order to carry the community major changes should either first be discussed, or be referenced. I hope this experience doesn't put you off from editing. Anyway have fun, and when you have time have a read of the editing guidelines in the welcome package.KTo288 (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-18T10:34:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-02-18T10:34:00.000Z-Whitemobile-2015-02-18T00:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural cleansing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Guards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-02-27T09:16:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2015-02-27T09:16:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_February_27","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hello, KTo288. You have new messages at Talk:Hamza Bey.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, It is a long time since the CZEMS was merged into the Zenana article; perhaps its notability was doubtful then, as it still seems to be. Most of the time I do not pay much attention to Wikisource and do not know the recommended method of citing it so those citatons may look somewhat odd. I noticed it this time because it was an unassessed Anglicanism article and first I found the Commons img, then thought of Wikisource and found much more than expected. Here is a book published by CEZMS 27 Chancery Lane, London:Chopsticks; by F. I. Codrington [1928]; and 2 more: Macfee, K. J. & Codrington, Florence I. Eastern Schools and Schoolgirls. An account of the educational work of the Church of England Zenana Missionary Society, CEZMS, [1927] // Codrington, Florence I. Hot-Hearted: some women builders of the Chinese Church. CEZMS, [1934] (these two from the British Library catalogue).--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-08T15:24:00.000Z","author":"Johnsoniensis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Johnsoniensis-2015-03-08T15:24:00.000Z-Zenana_missions","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-03-08T15:49:00.000Z-Johnsoniensis-2015-03-08T15:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

Notability wise it seems to be a small part of then large English speaking Anglican community, but a large part of the Chinese speaking Anglican community. Individual members of the Anglican and Baptist societies, and the schools they found!d and ran, are also considered to be notable in their own right. Which is a bit of a new one for me, editing Kpop bands, I usually encounter the argument "notability is not inherited" with regards the band may be notable but not the individual members. In this case the "notability is not inherited" argument would mean that the individual members are notable but the organisations they belonged to are not.--KTo288 (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-08T15:49:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-03-08T15:49:00.000Z-Johnsoniensis-2015-03-08T15:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey HTo288! I'm new and I wanted to ask, are you muslim? Cuz I saw you edit the "Islam" page. ~Avatar Raava.

No, but I do have the greatest of respects for that faith, and most of its adherents.--KTo288 (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-08T15:59:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-03-08T15:59:00.000Z-Edit_to_Islam_page","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seaplane tender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-10T08:56:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2015-03-10T08:56:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_10","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Monsanto legal cases. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Jytdog (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-10T12:16:00.000Z","author":"Jytdog","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jytdog-2015-03-10T12:16:00.000Z-edit_war_notice","replies":["c-Jytdog-2015-03-10T12:20:00.000Z-Jytdog-2015-03-10T12:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

please do come talk. And i see your edit note where you wrote "revert again see you in 24 hours". If you revert again after 24 hours, you will still be open to a 3RR action as the policy explictly discusses intentional gaming of the 24 hour limit, as you just acknowledged you intend to do. Please discuss on Talk - that is what we do here when there is a disagreement about content. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 12:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-10T12:20:00.000Z","author":"Jytdog","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jytdog-2015-03-10T12:20:00.000Z-Jytdog-2015-03-10T12:16:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I enjoyed reading your user page. Have a pie. :) DangerousJXD (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-17T08:28:00.000Z","author":"DangerousJXD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DangerousJXD-2015-03-17T08:28:00.000Z-A_pie_for_you!","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-03-17T08:36:00.000Z-DangerousJXD-2015-03-17T08:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, I'll have it for elevenses.--KTo288 (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-17T08:36:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-03-17T08:36:00.000Z-DangerousJXD-2015-03-17T08:28:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Bluebird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-22T13:48:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2015-03-22T13:48:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_22","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Scarf (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-05T08:58:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2015-04-05T08:58:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_April_5","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Thanks for creating Kim Ho-sun (director), KTo288!

Wikipedia editor Newrunner769 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice, but it's a stub. You'll improve the content, right.

To reply, leave a comment on Newrunner769's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

yes work in progress, wasn't expecting it to be reviewed so quickly.--KTo288 (talk) 23:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-07T23:16:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-04-07T23:16:00.000Z-A_page_you_started_(Kim_Ho-sun_(director))_has_been_reviewed!","replies":[]}}-->

You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-17T14:51:00.000Z","author":"Another Believer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Another_Believer-2015-04-17T14:51:00.000Z-WikiProject_Hillary_Rodham_Clinton","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-26T18:41:00.000Z","author":"NickCT","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NickCT-2015-04-26T18:41:00.000Z-Hillary_Rodham_Clinton_-_Move_Discussion","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-04-26T19:14:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-26T18:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for the headsup.--KTo288 (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-26T19:14:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-04-26T19:14:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-26T18:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-NickCT-2015-04-27T03:47:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-04-26T19:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

No problem. And thanks for weighing in.

re "just that it isn't the one they most commonly associate with her," - I think we're arguing it isn't the one the sources most commonly associate with her. That's how WP:COMMONNAME works. NickCT (talk) 03:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-27T03:47:00.000Z","author":"NickCT","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-NickCT-2015-04-27T03:47:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-04-26T19:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-04-27T07:11:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-27T03:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

Having to sit on my hands to do it, but for my own sanity, I'm not going to comment on this further. Willing to just let the poll play out.--KTo288 (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-27T07:11:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-04-27T07:11:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-27T03:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-NickCT-2015-04-27T12:35:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-04-27T07:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sanity is overrated. NickCT (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-04-27T12:35:00.000Z","author":"NickCT","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-NickCT-2015-04-27T12:35:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-04-27T07:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-05-06T14:57:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-27T12:35:00.000Z"]}}-->

Seeing this, I've just got to keep telling myself "...I have the willpower to not make cheap jibes, I have the willpower to not make cheap jibes, I have the willpower to not make cheap jibes, I have the willpower to not make cheap jibes..." Sod it. That e...(sits on hands again before its too late).--KTo288 (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-06T14:57:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-05-06T14:57:00.000Z-NickCT-2015-04-27T12:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Han River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-03T09:08:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2015-05-03T09:08:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_3","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hello! Your submission of Royal Air Force Marine Branch at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-03T11:33:00.000Z","author":"RightCowLeftCoast","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RightCowLeftCoast-2015-05-03T11:33:00.000Z-DYK_nomination_of_Royal_Air_Force_Marine_Branch","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Guatemala syphilis experiment page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-08T00:39:00.000Z","author":"ReferenceBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ReferenceBot-2015-05-08T00:39:00.000Z-Reference_errors_on_7_May","replies":[]}}-->

I made the edit about info on Midget submarines. I named it Indian SOVs Because the proposed submarine Project is named "Strategic Operating Vessels" and no official name yet given to the individual boats. You could verify it in the corresponding Article.M.srihari (talk) 07:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-28T07:48:00.000Z","author":"M.srihari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-M.srihari-2015-05-28T07:48:00.000Z-Template_Indian_Navy_Ship_Classes","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-05-28T09:13:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-05-28T07:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

@M.srihari: I know. But the article is wrong, if you look at the source cited for the name (Dutta, Sujan (26 October 2014). "'Midgets' on navy mind". The Telegraph.) used, the name "Strategic Operating Vessels" (SOV) does not appear, rather the article refers to “special operations boats/swimmer delivery vehicle” SOB/SDV, the source has been misrepresented. I have renamed the article to Indian Navy Swimmer Delivery Vehicle, and will edit the template to reflect this. However I want to make sure that all the articles using the "Strategic Operating Vessels name are corrected, however this is complicated by the fact that most of the articles have the link via the template rather than in the article body, rather than checknevery single incoming page I want to give a chance for the database to update, and just edit those pages which link to the article.--KTo288 (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-28T09:13:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-05-28T09:13:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-05-28T07:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-M.srihari-2015-05-28T10:46:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-05-28T09:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

yes, I saw this classification in media reports. I will try to make edits in other articles that use the term SOV. Thank you for your explanation. Regards--M.srihari (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-28T10:46:00.000Z","author":"M.srihari","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-M.srihari-2015-05-28T10:46:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-05-28T09:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-05-28T19:08:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-05-28T10:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

You're welcome.--KTo288 (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-05-28T19:08:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-05-28T19:08:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-05-28T10:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Sir, as you are interested in reviewing defense related articles, I request you to take a look on the RfC as well as the section "Definition of Supercarrier" in the supercarrier talk page. The RfC is almost in freeze without any new discussion. I wish you could express your views to help solve them. Regards--M.srihari (talk) 00:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-02T00:47:00.000Z","author":"M.srihari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-M.srihari-2015-06-02T00:47:00.000Z-Supercarrier_Dispute","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-06-03T20:17:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-06-02T00:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

If I were to comment, my comment would be along the lines that it is pre-mature to get into such disputes about a ship that not only hasn't yet been laid down, but which may never be built. It will be the best part of a decade before anything is decided, there'll be plenty of time later to fix the article between now and then, as sourrcesvand better ones become available.--KTo288 (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-03T20:17:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-06-03T20:17:00.000Z-M.srihari-2015-06-02T00:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-M.srihari-2015-06-07T16:42:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-06-03T20:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sir, there are 2 ongoing issues in the supercarrier. I request your opinion on both. I wish you could express it in the Supercarrier Talk Page because the discussion is frozen for a very long time.M.srihari (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-07T16:42:00.000Z","author":"M.srihari","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-M.srihari-2015-06-07T16:42:00.000Z-KTo288-2015-06-03T20:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Space Shuttle Programme. Requesting you to add your opinion. Regards Thanks. M.srihari (talk) 07:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-08T07:15:00.000Z","author":"M.srihari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-M.srihari-2015-06-08T07:15:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Indian_Space_Shuttle_Programme","replies":[]}}-->

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating Template:United Arab Emirates space program, thank you! Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-22T14:49:00.000Z","author":"Winner 42","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Winner_42-2015-06-22T14:49:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":[]}}-->

I invite you to a move discussion because you were involved in Talk:Leung Chun-ying. --George Ho (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-27T05:15:00.000Z","author":"George Ho","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-George_Ho-2015-06-27T05:15:00.000Z-Talk:CY_Leung_as_Chief_Executive_of_Hong_Kong","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tracy Councill, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-07-24T01:32:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2015-07-24T01:32:00.000Z-Draft:Tracy_Councill_concern","replies":[]}}-->

Why are you removing the flags of countries that once were part of the ottoman empire. What you are doing is vandalism. --User:78.173.58.21pp KTo288

Not me, check the diffs, and even if it was me,it would not necessarily be vandalism.--KTo288 (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-07-25T20:13:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-07-25T20:13:00.000Z-Ottoman_Empire","replies":[]}}-->

Your article “kunlun company” was malicious deleted by the PRehse who deleted my article more times.--User :120.72.128.254 pp KTo288

Not my article, no one owns articles, just one I happened to work on. PRehse didn't delete the article just nominated it for speedy because it was a recreation of an article previously deleted after a deletion discussion. The thing to do is not endlessly recreate exactly the same article, but to create a new article which addresses the concerns raised by the discussion namely lack of reputable third party sources and proof of notability. Pretty difficult at the moment, I looked and could find only three sources I could use. My advice is to maybe wait a year, either the company will run out of cash and fizzle away into the aether or it will gain traction, and will gain more coverage that can be used. At that time if it can be demonstrated that the issues raised in the deletion discussion no longer apply, an article can be created that will survive. Until then best wishes and don't take anything wikiwise personally.--KTo288 (talk) 00:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-07-27T00:47:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-07-27T00:47:00.000Z-Kunlun_company","replies":[]}}-->

Please help this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Return_of_the_King_Middleweight_Tournament_2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kk2010123 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-08T06:11:00.000Z","author":"Kk2010123","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kk2010123-2015-08-08T06:11:00.000Z-Kunlun_company","replies":[]}}-->

I will be editing the article again tonight (if not, more likely than not, someone else will). Best to leave it as it is. -- Urquhartnite (talk) 18:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-05T18:10:00.000Z","author":"Urquhartnite","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Urquhartnite-2015-08-05T18:10:00.000Z-Kids_Company","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-08-05T18:26:00.000Z-Urquhartnite-2015-08-05T18:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Urquhartnite: "It is announced on 5 August 2015", grates, it reads like historical present tense reads and looks out of place. "It was announced on 5 August 2015" is a better match. If you want to keep it in the present tense try "Kids Company announced on 5 August 2015"

See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Relative_time_references with regards using words that will date e.g. currently, recently e.t.c..--KTo288 (talk) 18:26, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-05T18:26:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-08-05T18:26:00.000Z-Urquhartnite-2015-08-05T18:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, KTo288. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tracy Councill".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-23T02:00:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2015-08-23T02:00:00.000Z-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Tracy_Councill","replies":[]}}-->

There is another RM discussion. Join in. --George Ho (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-10-02T05:32:00.000Z","author":"George Ho","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-George_Ho-2015-10-02T05:32:00.000Z-Talk:228_Incident","replies":[]}}-->

Hi KTo288 ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

1. Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
2. Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
3. The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
4. There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-10-31T23:29:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-10-31T23:29:00.000Z-Wikipedia_Asian_Month_is_COMING!","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T16:18:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:18:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tongyeong-class salvage and rescue ship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yann (talk) 11:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-14T11:32:00.000Z","author":"Yann","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yann-2015-12-14T11:32:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Tongyeong-class_salvage_and_rescue_ship","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-12-14T11:49:00.000Z-Yann-2015-12-14T11:32:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Yann article under construction, creatung the redirect was to get the undashed version used in an article to goto the new page to the name space.--KTo288 (talk)

User:Yann I guess its the Christmas Holidays and everyone has too much time on their hands, I've always done article creation in mainspace with the underconstruction template,without a hitch, whats with patrolling and deleting from the top of the new pages today.--KTo288 (talk) 11:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-14T11:49:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-12-14T11:49:00.000Z-Yann-2015-12-14T11:32:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi KTo288, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 03:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-15T03:29:00.000Z","author":"Xaosflux","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:29:00.000Z-WP:PERM_Request","replies":["c-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:31:00.000Z-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

In regard to your notes at WP:PERM, as you know the project has changed a lot in the almost decade you have been editing! Even with +autopatroll I think you will still run in to the problem you mentioned at WP:PERM. I highly suggest you do your initial drafts in personal sandbox if you want to avoid other editors during your initial article creation. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-15T03:31:00.000Z","author":"Xaosflux","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:31:00.000Z-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-KTo288-2015-12-15T10:05:00.000Z-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks.--KTo288 (talk) 10:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-15T10:05:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KTo288-2015-12-15T10:05:00.000Z-Xaosflux-2015-12-15T03:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-17T14:35:00.000Z","author":"AddisWang","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AddisWang-2015-12-17T14:35:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lesche of the Knidians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulysses. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-04T09:27:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2016-01-04T09:27:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_January_4","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Hi, KTo288 - You removed File:Kerry_Fonda_2004_election_photo.jpg using the rationale in your edit summary that (fair use rationale of copyrighted image does not include its use in this article, add link to see also) The license for that image states that use of the work to illustrate the subject in question' where no free equivalent is available to adequately give the same information qualifies as fair use under US copyright law. While I am not a copyright attorney, I am well-versed in copyright law after having experienced several copyvio cases (never as a defendant) during my 30+ year career as a photog and television producer. It appears to me that your rationale for removing the subject image contradicts the license rationale as follows: The image was used to specifically illustrate the subject, i.e. Kerry being added to a photograph to make it appear he attended a political rally he did not attend. The photograph was used specifically to illustrate the subject in question in the sections, "Use in journalism" and "Political and ethical issues". Since you are an admin at Commons, will you please explain why you think your argument for removal is any more valid than the argument to keep per the license? Also, if use of that image makes it subject to wiki-lawyering with each use, then please explain why it is allowed to remain on Commons. Thank you in advance....Atsme^📞📧 17:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z","author":"Atsme","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Atsme-2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z-Image_removal","replies":["c-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:22:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z","c-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:27:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Atsme: Wikipedia policy is that a non free image should never be used when a free one can be used instead (...only use non-free content as a last resort.). On the Photo manipulation page the focus is on the techniques, history and rationale of photo manipulation, and the inclusion of this file there serves merely as another example amongst the many other free pictures on the page, including composite images, so the removal of this file does not adversely affect the understanding of this article. The file was not removed from Kerry Fonda 2004 election photo controversy were it is absolutely essential to the understanding of that article, and fair use of it is outlined at File:Kerry Fonda 2004 election photo.jpg, note that, in the description, justification of using this file, is only for this article. That it has a fair use license for this one article, does not mean it can be used as such in all other articles. I'm not a copyright lawyer, nor do I work with images and copyright on a professional basis, but I am a volunteer admin at Commons, and have dealt with the copyrights of free and non free works as they relate to the Wikimedia projects for a number of years now. If you want, you may consider asking for the adding of Photo manipulation to the articles that this file is authorised for at Wikipedia:Non-free content review--KTo288 (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-25T18:22:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:22:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

p.s. The image is not hosted at Commons, but directly here on Wikipedia. All non free images used in Wikipedia are held here rather than at Commons, and a much greater limitation on their use here is imposed, compared to a Commons file.--KTo288 (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-25T18:27:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:27:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T17:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Atsme-2016-01-25T21:40:00.000Z-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

The section Use in journalism in Photo manipulation states, Image manipulation software has effected the level of trust many viewers once had in the aphorism, the camera never lies. Images may be manipulated for fun, aesthetic reasons, or to improve the appearance of a subject but not all image manipulation is innocuous as evidenced by the Kerry Fonda 2004 election photo controversy. The image in question was a fraudulent composite image of John Kerry taken on June 13, 1971 and Jane Fonda taken in August, 1972 sharing the same platform at a 1971 antiwar rally; the latter of which carried a fake Associated Press credit with the intent to change the public's perspective of reality. The photo serves a legitimate need in the manipulation article considering there are two sections that directly address the repercussions of such manipulation. I was not previously aware that we had Kerry Fonda 2004 election photo controversy - apologies for my negligence in not noting where the photo was being used, or that it was not uploaded to Commons - but now that I've seen it, I question whether the photo controversy article meets GNG requirements per ...a topic is "notable" in Wikipedia terms only if the outside world has already "taken notice of it". As such, brief bursts of news coverage may not be sufficient signs of notability, while sustained coverage would be, as described by notability of events. It was basically a one-time news event, a private photog sued, and nothing else came of it beyond a bit of politically motivated "play" and I doubt that it's appropriate to use the encyclopedia for that purpose. I'm thinking that article should probably be merged with the Photo manipulation article as it will eliminate the "newsy" political bent, reflects more of an encyclopedic approach and serves to demonstrate such manipulations can also be political without making politics the main topic. What are your thoughts on the matter? Atsme^📞📧 21:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-25T21:40:00.000Z","author":"Atsme","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Atsme-2016-01-25T21:40:00.000Z-KTo288-2016-01-25T18:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-KTo288-2016-01-26T20:18:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T21:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

Personally I'd be against a merge, the Kerry case in the context of photo manipulation as a whole is just one example amongst others, and argues against the keeping of a non free file, the Kerry article has been around since 2007 and I don't see much wrong with it, but don't claim ownership of either, if you want can add {{mergeto|Photo manipulation}} template to the Kerrt article and see what others think.--KTo288 (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-26T20:18:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KTo288-2016-01-26T20:18:00.000Z-Atsme-2016-01-25T21:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-Atsme-2016-01-26T21:45:00.000Z-KTo288-2016-01-26T20:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, please? I think it's worth getting input based on the GNG aspect and the potential for it setting the standard for what WP accepts despite the political slant. I shudder to think about the number of political photo manipulations there are on the internet, some of which may end up being articles if they aren't already, and all using the argument that was used for the Kerry photo. The following link examples a tiny bit of it, [1]. It's flash-news; here today, gone tomorrow, the latter of which is noncompliant with GNG, not to mention the political aspects of various advocacies. Atsme^📞📧 21:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-26T21:45:00.000Z","author":"Atsme","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Atsme-2016-01-26T21:45:00.000Z-KTo288-2016-01-26T20:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

	The Special Barnstar
	Your participation in Har Cheong Gai, I appreciate. Thank you. Lee788 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-02-03T09:11:00.000Z","author":"Lee788","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lee788-2016-02-03T09:11:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!_3","replies":["c-KTo288-2016-02-03T10:30:00.000Z-Lee788-2016-02-03T09:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

You're welcome, only problem with working on that article is that I'm hankering after some. Being in the UK I'll have to make my own though, and I don't know if I can make them taste right.--KTo288 (talk) 10:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-02-03T10:30:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2016-02-03T10:30:00.000Z-Lee788-2016-02-03T09:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

COASTIE I am (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-03-02T01:02:00.000Z","author":"COASTIE I am","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-COASTIE_I_am-2016-03-02T01:02:00.000Z-Wikiproject_United_States_Coast_Guard_Auxiliary","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korean Music Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AOA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-03-03T10:05:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2016-03-03T10:05:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_3","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

I see that you suggested this page be merged back in December, but no action has been taken. Well, I've opened up a nomination for deletion here and I would really appreciate your input. I simply don't believe this page should exist, as it includes materials from franchises that are unrelated to the small amount of content for Alien vs. Predator. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 00:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-03-05T00:55:00.000Z","author":"DarthBotto","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DarthBotto-2016-03-05T00:55:00.000Z-Alien-Predator_universe","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Venetian navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voyages of discovery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-03-26T09:56:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2016-03-26T09:56:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_26","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Technopolitics. Since you had some involvement with the Technopolitics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-04-12T19:55:00.000Z","author":"Tavix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tavix-2016-04-12T19:55:00.000Z-Technopolitics_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 農夫. Since you had some involvement with the 農夫 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-04-17T02:12:00.000Z","author":"Tavix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tavix-2016-04-17T02:12:00.000Z-\u8fb2\u592b_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Hi! I see that you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 1 (2nd nomination). You may be interested in commenting at this new Article for Deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 09:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-26T09:19:00.000Z","author":"Jcc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jcc-2016-07-26T09:19:00.000Z-Article_for_Deletion_that_you_may_in_interested_in","replies":[]}}-->

Category:Labour corps, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-15T10:03:00.000Z","author":"Marcocapelle","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Marcocapelle-2016-10-15T10:03:00.000Z-Category:Labour_corps_has_been_nominated_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-24T15:47:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-10-24T15:47:00.000Z-Invitation_from_Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2016","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 김광석 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 김광석 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z-\uae40\uad11\uc11d_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 장범준 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 장범준 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z-\uc7a5\ubc94\uc900_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 이병우 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 이병우 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:05:00.000Z-\uc774\ubcd1\uc6b0_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 松尾早人 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 松尾早人 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z-\u677e\u5c3e\u65e9\u4eba_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 陈慧琳 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 陈慧琳 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z-\u9648\u6167\u7433_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 李榮浩 (artist). Since you had some involvement with the 李榮浩 (artist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z","author":"Gorthian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gorthian-2016-10-26T21:24:00.000Z-\u674e\u69ae\u6d69_(artist)_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, KTo288. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hi KTo288. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-23T23:51:00.000Z","author":"Kudpung","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kudpung-2016-11-23T23:51:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_-_RfC","replies":[],"displayName":"Kudpung \u0e01\u0e38\u0e14\u0e1c\u0e36\u0e49\u0e07"}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Oh My Ghostess promotional poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-10T19:17:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2016-12-10T19:17:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Oh_My_Ghostess_promotional_poster.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of most viewed kpop music videos. Since you had some involvement with the List of most viewed kpop music videos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-01-04T12:11:00.000Z","author":"Yoshiman6464","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yoshiman6464-2017-01-04T12:11:00.000Z-List_of_most_viewed_kpop_music_videos_listed_at_Redirects_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

User:Gyoza Rain seems to be another sock puppet account of a banned user. Would you monitor the edits?

sure.--KTo288 (talk)

Can you please help revert sockpuppet edits on Park Bo-gum and Ryu Jun-yeol? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:E800:E610:1D5:65D3:C0FC:D52E:BE8A (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-01-25T14:01:00.000Z","author":"2404:E800:E610:1D5:65D3:C0FC:D52E:BE8A","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2404:E800:E610:1D5:65D3:C0FC:D52E:BE8A-2017-01-25T14:01:00.000Z-Sockpuppet_edits","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-01-31T16:43:00.000Z","author":"Juliancolton","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Juliancolton-2017-01-31T16:43:00.000Z-New_page_reviewer_granted","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 813 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-05T06:11:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-05T06:11:00.000Z-Coordinator_election","replies":[]}}-->

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-19T08:17:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-19T08:17:00.000Z-New_Page_Review-Patrolling:_Coordinator_elections","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 813 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-21T15:35:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-21T15:35:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_-_newsletter_No.3","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathematical table, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tables. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-15T10:13:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2017-03-15T10:13:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_15","replies":["c-KTo288-2017-03-15T11:01:00.000Z-DPL_bot-2017-03-15T10:13:00.000Z"],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Thanks again. DPL bot.--KTo288 (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-15T11:01:00.000Z","author":"KTo288","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KTo288-2017-03-15T11:01:00.000Z-DPL_bot-2017-03-15T10:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 813 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-21T15:43:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-05-21T15:43:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_-_Newsletter_No.4","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on KakaoStory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-11T17:53:00.000Z","author":"Finnusertop","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Finnusertop-2017-07-11T17:53:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_KakaoStory","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
• Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

• Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
• The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
  • User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

• Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-14T03:48:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-07-14T03:48:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_Newsletter","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

• Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
• Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-24T20:33:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-08-24T20:33:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_Newsletter_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-09-19T02:16:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-09-19T02:16:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_Newsletter_3","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-10-21T17:47:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-10-21T17:47:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_Newsletter_4","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, KTo288. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
• Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

• If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

• A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

• ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
• The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-12T20:27:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-12-12T20:27:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_Newsletter_5","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

• The total number of reviews completed for the month.
• The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-30T20:24:00.000Z","author":"TonyBallioni","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyBallioni-2017-12-30T20:24:00.000Z-New_Years_new_page_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello KTo288, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

• New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
• Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
• Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

• Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

• The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-30T00:00:00.000Z","author":"Insertcleverphrasehere","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Insertcleverphrasehere-2018-07-30T00:00:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.12_30_July_2018","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:The Predator promotional poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-08-05T17:59:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2018-08-05T17:59:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:The_Predator_promotional_poster.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello KTo288, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018^[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

• There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
• Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

• ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
• There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

• User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-10-21T20:49:00.000Z","author":"Insertcleverphrasehere","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Insertcleverphrasehere-2018-10-21T20:49:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.14_21_October_2018","replies":[]}}-->

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello KTo288,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

• Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-16T18:37:00.000Z","author":"Insertcleverphrasehere","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Insertcleverphrasehere-2018-11-16T18:37:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.15_16_November_2018","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, KTo288. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-12-14T21:14:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-12-14T21:14:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.16_15_December_2018","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Template:Philippine films by year requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-13T18:46:00.000Z","author":"Zackmann08","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zackmann08-2019-03-13T18:46:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Template:Philippine_films_by_year","replies":[],"displayName":"Zackmann"}}-->

Hello KTo288,

News

• The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

• Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
• {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
• A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
• There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

• NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

• Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
• copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
• The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-15T23:18:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-03-15T23:18:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.17","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

• Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
• Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

• A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
• There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
• What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-05-17T19:17:00.000Z","author":"DannyS712","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DannyS712-2019-05-17T19:17:00.000Z-NPR_Newsletter_No.18","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-06-30T04:38:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-06-30T04:38:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_newsletter_July-August_2019","replies":[]}}-->

Template:2015 TVB has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 20:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-30T20:51:00.000Z","author":"The Banner","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Banner-2019-07-30T20:51:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:2015_TVB","replies":[],"displayName":"The\u00a0Banner"}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-09-11T22:15:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-11T22:15:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_newsletter_September-October_2019","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 813 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

• It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
• It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

• Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
• Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-03T08:33:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-03T08:33:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_newsletter_November_2019","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-12-20T16:10:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-12-20T16:10:00.000Z-New_Page_Review_newsletter_December_2019","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello KTo288,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-06-18T02:52:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-06-18T02:52:00.000Z-New_Page_Reviewer_newsletter_June_2020","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello KTo288,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-25T01:58:00.000Z","author":"Buidhe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buidhe-2021-10-25T01:58:00.000Z-November_2021_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 813 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 845 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello KTo288,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14747 articles, as of 00:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-24T10:02:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-06-24T10:02:00.000Z-New_Page_Patrol_newsletter_June_2022","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-07-01T20:25:00.000Z","author":"Buidhe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buidhe-2022-07-01T20:25:00.000Z-NPP_July_2022_backlog_drive_is_on!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220806212400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220806212400-New_Page_Patrol_newsletter_August_2022","replies":[]}}-->

Hi KTo288,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220820231000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220820231000-NPP_message","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220923211600","author":"Buidhe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buidhe-20220923211600-October_2022_New_Pages_Patrol_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Hello KTo288,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of officials purged and executed by Kim Jong-un is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of officials purged and executed by Kim Jong-un until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Freedom4U (talk) 10:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230305101500","author":"Freedom4U","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Freedom4U-20230305101500-Nomination_of_List_of_officials_purged_and_executed_by_Kim_Jong-un_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230420171200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230420171200-New_Page_Patrol_\u2013_May_2023_Backlog_Drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Hello KTo288,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230701065900","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230701065900-New_pages_patrol_needs_your_help!","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230909091300","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230909091300-New_page_patrol_October_2023_Backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230922164500","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230922164500-New_pages_patrol_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->

Hello KTo288:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231031132400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231031132400-November_Articles_for_creation_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231220021000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231220021000-New_pages_patrol_January_2024_Backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->