I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ludo King. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-10T15:22:00.000Z","author":"Robert McClenon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Robert_McClenon-2016-11-10T15:22:00.000Z-AfC_notification:_Draft:Ludo_King_has_a_new_comment","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Perhaps notable but the current article is not showing it, so please first remove the appstore and downloads links as these not suitable, and then focus with only actual in-depth third-party news overall; However, please no press releases, trivial passing mentions or interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludo King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-11T05:58:00.000Z","author":"SwisterTwister","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SwisterTwister-2016-11-11T05:58:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(November_11)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to provide independent reliable third party sources discussing about the game.Most of the review sites mentioned appear to be notable.Further how the Alexa rank of the game developer's website shot up or detailed ratings or number of reviews in different app-systems are way too much for an encyclopedic article.Anyway, I fail to see any notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludo King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades ^Godric 06:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-01T06:37:00.000Z","author":"Winged Blades of Godric","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Winged_Blades_of_Godric-2017-02-01T06:37:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(February_1)","replies":[],"displayName":"Winged Blades"}}-->

Hello! Jaansha, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades Godric 06:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-01T06:37:00.000Z","author":"Winged Blades of Godric","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Winged_Blades_of_Godric-2017-02-01T06:37:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(February_1)-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Winged Blades"}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not a product catalog, please help with increasing reader interest in the article rather.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludo King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devopam (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-13T03:39:00.000Z","author":"Devopam","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Devopam-2017-06-13T03:39:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(June_13)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludo King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 15:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-13T15:43:00.000Z","author":"Shadowowl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shadowowl-2017-07-13T15:43:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(July_13)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Everything should be sourced to a reliable source. Also, you can't fix advertising by not fixing the tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludo King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 11:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-08-21T11:08:00.000Z","author":"RileyBugz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RileyBugz-2017-08-21T11:08:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Ludo_King_(August_21)","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ludo King, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-01-22T01:31:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2018-01-22T01:31:00.000Z-Draft:Ludo_King_concern","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Jaansha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ludo King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-02-21T12:01:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2018-02-21T12:01:00.000Z-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Ludo_King","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Jaansha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gametion Technologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-21T23:01:00.000Z","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-2021-11-21T23:01:00.000Z-Concern_regarding_Draft:Gametion_Technologies","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Jaansha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gametion Technologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-21T22:30:00.000Z","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-2021-12-21T22:30:00.000Z-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Gametion_Technologies","replies":[]}}-->