Please on the copyedit tag you placed on Wofai Samuel, it have been resolved by collective efforts of editors and I urge you to remove the tag. Thank you Amosflash (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-18T03:03:00.000Z","author":"Amosflash","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amosflash-2019-03-18T03:03:00.000Z-Copyedit_Tag","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, JAH2k, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Valero Energy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Marquardtika (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-04T15:18:00.000Z","author":"Marquardtika","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Marquardtika-2019-03-04T15:18:00.000Z-Welcome!","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Please allow articles to be completed before slapping stub and unreferenced tags all over them, its very frustrating when you create an article, save it, go back to edit it and an edit conflict appears because several tags have been slapped on it 2 seconds after it's been created. I've been editing for 10 years and created nearly 5,000 articles related to cricket so they'll always be referenced. Many thanks. StickyWicket (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-14T22:50:00.000Z","author":"AssociateAffiliate","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AssociateAffiliate-2019-03-14T22:50:00.000Z-Peter_Hatch_(cricketer)","replies":[],"displayName":"StickyWicket"}}-->

Please the page Wofai Samuel you placed a copyedit tag have been improved and resolved, please help in removing the tag template thank you. Amosflash (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-18T07:02:00.000Z","author":"Amosflash","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amosflash-2019-03-18T07:02:00.000Z-Tag_Removal","replies":["c-JAH2k-2019-03-19T18:15:00.000Z-Amosflash-2019-03-18T07:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Resolved JAH2k (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-19T18:15:00.000Z","author":"JAH2k","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JAH2k-2019-03-19T18:15:00.000Z-Amosflash-2019-03-18T07:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi JAH2k. You put an unreliable sources tag on my article on John Eellerker Boulcott soon after I began it and when only a few sentences had been written. It is pretty much finished now and draws on a range of sources that I believe are reliable. If you agree I would appreciate if your unreliable sources tag could be removed. Thanks.(Bardo Nerang (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-21T01:14:00.000Z","author":"Bardo Nerang","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bardo_Nerang-2019-03-21T01:14:00.000Z-Tag_removal_2","replies":[]}}-->

Please read WP:Deletion Policy beforethe mark any additional articles for deletion , or placing inappropriate tags such as "hoax" on articles" .

You marked Anodonthyla eximia as a hoax, but it's a well documented ordinary article on a frog species.

You listed Elinor Burns for deletion. The article was unanimously keept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elinor Burns

You listed Patricia Patts for deletion. The article was unanimously keept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Patts

You listed Alán Aspuru-Guzik for speedy as no indication of importance. He meets WP:PROF as a fellow of the APS.

As less important problems, but still problems:

We also do not add "uncategorized"tags to Draft articles. They are not supposed to be added to categories until they are accepted.

You added "divide into sections" to Amaury II of Montfort, which is a 3-sentence article, and division of an article this short would be inappropriate,. , and, in f this one in fact had an introdcutory sentence explaining what it was about. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-04-30T19:23:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DGG-2019-04-30T19:23:00.000Z-deletion_nominations","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:24:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:24:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I noticed your edit here so I took a look at your contributions and became a bit concerned at your frequent label of edits as vandalism. The edit that you reverted on Zoey's wasn't vandalism. It wasn't a good edit (it was unencyclopedic and unsourced), but it wasn't vandalism; it was just an inexperienced editor trying to add information they found interesting. You labelled your revert on American Public Power Association "Vandal", but the IP editor was actually adding correct information plus removing an external link in the body which didn't belong there, so the edit shouldn't have been reverted at all. You might want to study What is vandalism?, and you might also look into Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy for training. Only label a revert as vandalism when it is clear-cut, unambiguous vandalism. Edits can be incorrect without being vandalism, and there are many reasons to revert an edit other than vandalism. Schazjmd (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-19T20:08:00.000Z","author":"Schazjmd","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Schazjmd-2020-02-19T20:08:00.000Z-Vandalism","replies":[]}}-->

I apologize. I wasn't trying to vandalize the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.141.200 (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-21T21:15:00.000Z","author":"69.112.141.200","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-69.112.141.200-2020-02-21T21:15:00.000Z-\"Homer's_Enemy\"","replies":["c-JAH2k-2020-02-21T21:21:00.000Z-69.112.141.200-2020-02-21T21:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

That is alright. Just please make sure to cancel your edits if you are not 100% sure that you want them to be applied. JAH2k (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-21T21:21:00.000Z","author":"JAH2k","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JAH2k-2020-02-21T21:21:00.000Z-69.112.141.200-2020-02-21T21:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST, I COMMAND YOU TO HOLD YOUR PEACE, LEAVE GOD'S WORLD, AND GO BACK TO HELL, NEVER TO ESCAPE AGAIN. Savethebirds (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-21T22:11:00.000Z","author":"Savethebirds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Savethebirds-2020-02-21T22:11:00.000Z-Hawaiian_honeycreeper","replies":["c-JAH2k-2020-02-21T22:15:00.000Z-Savethebirds-2020-02-21T22:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you for your comments, but I will not take this suggestion into consideration for obvious reasons. JAH2k (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-21T22:15:00.000Z","author":"JAH2k","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JAH2k-2020-02-21T22:15:00.000Z-Savethebirds-2020-02-21T22:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I saw your message on my page about how my edit to Italian New Zealanders was unconstructive yet, you failed to explain how. You even went as far to say it was vandalism which I don’t see how it was vandalism. Do you think you could explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-24T20:31:00.000Z","author":"2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA-2020-02-24T20:31:00.000Z-Italian_New_Zealanders","replies":["c-JAH2k-2020-02-24T21:48:00.000Z-2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA-2020-02-24T20:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA The purpose of having the countries linked as they were before your edits was to allow the reader to gain a general overview of the locations listed, as according to WP:MOS. I suggest that instead of changing the sentence that you did, you should make a new section in the article with links such as "More information on X in Y country." Also, for future content debates, I highly recommend that you do not re-do your un-done edits, as it is likely to start an edit war. Best, JAH2k (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-24T21:48:00.000Z","author":"JAH2k","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JAH2k-2020-02-24T21:48:00.000Z-2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA-2020-02-24T20:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

OK. I understand. Just wanted to make sure. That’s all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-24T22:10:00.000Z","author":"2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2601:183:C600:20A:C409:6FCC:9395:4ABA-2020-02-24T22:10:00.000Z-Italian_New_Zealanders","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for cleaning up Austin, Texas. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-27T00:17:00.000Z","author":"Magnolia677","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Magnolia677-2020-02-27T00:17:00.000Z-Austin,_Texas","replies":[]}}-->

JAH2k, I have just reverted your GA nomination of Austin, Texas. The GA nomination instructions are quite clear that Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. You aren't a significant contributor yet you haven't done that, and if you wish to nominate the article, you need to.

The article also needs quite a bit of work yet before it's ready to be nominated, well beyond the four edits you just did: a number of sections are without any source citations at all, which runs afoul of the verifiability criteria; this is also true of some individual paragraphs containing a great deal of information.

Once you have made the improvements and gotten a consensus of the regular editors that the article is ready (the process takes at least seven days to give them to respond), by all means renominate the article. Thank you for your interest in the GA nomination process, and best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-27T02:43:00.000Z","author":"BlueMoonset","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BlueMoonset-2020-02-27T02:43:00.000Z-Your_GA_nomination_of_Austin,_Texas","replies":["c-JAH2k-2020-02-27T17:35:00.000Z-BlueMoonset-2020-02-27T02:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

BlueMoonset I appreciate your concern and I will take your suggestions into account. Thank you. JAH2k (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-27T17:35:00.000Z","author":"JAH2k","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JAH2k-2020-02-27T17:35:00.000Z-BlueMoonset-2020-02-27T02:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Howard W. Peak Greenway Trails System Logotype.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-28T03:30:00.000Z","author":"ImageTaggingBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ImageTaggingBot-2020-02-28T03:30:00.000Z-Image_tagging_for_File:Howard_W._Peak_Greenway_Trails_System_Logotype.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Howard W. Peak Greenway Trails System Logotype.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-02-28T03:46:00.000Z","author":"Mifter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mifter-2020-02-28T03:46:00.000Z-Unspecified_source\/license_for_File:Howard_W._Peak_Greenway_Trails_System_Logoty","replies":[],"displayName":"Owner"}}-->

Hi and thanks for adding Telephone to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/March 10. However, per the rules that article is ineligible due to requiring more references (no yellow/orange/red maintenance tags allowed). By the same token, Alexander Graham Bell cannot be featured either (too many inappropriate external links). Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 04:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-03-08T04:14:00.000Z","author":"Howcheng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Howcheng-2020-03-08T04:14:00.000Z-Telephone_on_OTD_March_10","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T03:00:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T03:00:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Politicsfan4 (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-02T23:49:00.000Z","author":"Politicsfan4","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Politicsfan4-2021-01-02T23:49:00.000Z-January_2021","replies":[]}}-->

"Impact" does not mean "affect". Although this is becoming increasingly common, it is incorrect. To claim my revision was not constructive is preposterous. Proper grammar is fundamental to an operation like Wikipedia, and a professional and mature tone should be created and maintained. Please research items to which you have no knowledge before haphazardly altering someone's contribution. As an aide, please see https://languageandgrammar.com/2008/01/18/impact-does-not-mean-to-affect/

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:56:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:56:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hi JAH2k, regarding Special:Diff/1060107146, please keep the following points in mind.

• Per WP:ONUS, part of the verifiability policy, the onus is on you to gain a consensus for the inclusion of material.
• Per WP:BURDEN, part of the verifiability policy, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies on you, with WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:PSTS and the table at WP:RSP in mind.
• Joining an edit war is not part of the recommended dispute resolution methods.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-14T23:02:00.000Z","author":"ToBeFree","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ToBeFree-2021-12-14T23:02:00.000Z-Important_notice","replies":[],"displayName":"~ ToBeFree"}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129014200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129014200-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->