This is an archive of past discussions with User:Guy Harris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Actually the ROMP page mentions it. It would be nice to get more info. Peter Flass (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-26T14:34:00.000Z","author":"Peter Flass","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Peter_Flass-2019-08-26T14:34:00.000Z-OPD_Mini_Processor","replies":["c-Guy_Harris-2019-08-26T18:43:00.000Z-Peter_Flass-2019-08-26T14:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Peter Flass: The IBM ROMP page has nothing to say about it than that 1) it was used in the IBM OS/6 systems and 2) ROMP is a successor to it. The OPD Mini Processor page, as of its last revision before being merged into the OS/6 page, had significantly more to say; as noted, that information's now in the OS/6 page.

So, for now, the OS/6 page is the home of information about the OPD Mini Processor. If we can get more information about it, perhaps the merge of OPD Mini Processor into IBM OS/6 can be undone. Guy Harris (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-26T18:43:00.000Z","author":"Guy Harris","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Guy_Harris-2019-08-26T18:43:00.000Z-Peter_Flass-2019-08-26T14:34:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I didn't know how best to handle this and other lines that had both 16- and 32-bit systems. I created a redirect for the 9400 and put the 32-bit cat there, but I'm not satisfied with that. Maybe the best way is to have both cats in the main article. Peter Flass (talk) 02:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-29T02:23:00.000Z","author":"Peter Flass","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Peter_Flass-2019-08-29T02:23:00.000Z-univac_9000","replies":[]}}-->