1, 2, 3, 4
I don't know how I missed it all these months, but according to the edit history on my talk page you added the category: Wikipedia sockpuppets of Vinukin at the bottom of my talk page. Why did you do this? It appears that you mentioned Vinukin in a discussion and referred to him with a category link, but that established a category link at the bottom of my user page. I am hoping that it was not your intention of accusing me of being a sock puppet, which is why I am consulting you first rather than taking the matter to WP:ANI. Hope all is well. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-22T22:45:00.000Z","author":"Gwillhickers","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gwillhickers-2020-10-22T22:45:00.000Z-Sockpuppet??","replies":[]}}-->
Regards. Eastfarthingan (talk) 12:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-23T12:04:00.000Z","author":"Eastfarthingan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Eastfarthingan-2020-10-23T12:04:00.000Z-Sockpuppet??","replies":["c-Gwillhickers-2020-10-24T19:59:00.000Z-Eastfarthingan-2020-10-23T12:04:00.000Z"]}}-->
The way to refer to a category is like this [[:Category:Wikipedia]] which shows as: Category:Wikipedia. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240602211200","author":"Rich Farmbrough","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rich_Farmbrough-20240602211200-Sockpuppet??","replies":[],"displayName":"Rich"}}-->
Hello. What's the thinking behind changing coordinates to be inline-only for battles? That the conflict itself shouldn't be considered to have a single geographic location? --Lord Belbury (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-28T14:14:00.000Z","author":"Lord Belbury","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lord_Belbury-2020-10-28T14:14:00.000Z-Inline_coordinates","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2020-10-28T15:47:00.000Z-Lord_Belbury-2020-10-28T14:14:00.000Z"]}}-->
Checking out the edit history of that page. I think we should request the page to be semi-blocked (preventing further edits by IP) for PERMANENTLY (yes, PERMANENTLY). Sesroh Fo Maerd I (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-10-31T19:40:00.000Z","author":"Sesroh Fo Maerd I","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sesroh_Fo_Maerd_I-2020-10-31T19:40:00.000Z-Second_Afghan_War","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2020-10-31T20:10:00.000Z-Sesroh_Fo_Maerd_I-2020-10-31T19:40:00.000Z"]}}-->
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T02:27:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T02:27:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
{{NoACEMM}}
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Cambridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Cambridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Edouard2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Edouard2-2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Capture_of_Cambridge_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Oxford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Oxford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Edouard2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Edouard2-2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Capture_of_Oxford_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Cardiff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Cardiff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Edouard2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Edouard2-2020-11-30T16:52:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Siege_of_Cardiff_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anglo-French War (1778–1783), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrol.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-12-14T06:35:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2020-12-14T06:35:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_December_14","replies":[],"displayName":"Opt-out instructions"}}-->
Hi Eastfarthingan, could you please explain why you insist on linking the Janssen vaccine to Janssen Pharmaceutica instead of Janssen Vaccines? Both are subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, but the vaccine was developed in Leiden by Janssen Vaccines (formerly Crucell). I don't really understand why the division headquarters in Belgium need to be mentioned. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-18T13:38:00.000Z","author":"Fentener van Vlissingen","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fentener_van_Vlissingen-2021-03-18T13:38:00.000Z-Janssen_Vaccines","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2021-03-18T13:51:00.000Z-Fentener_van_Vlissingen-2021-03-18T13:38:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks! Here are some sources:
Best, Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-18T13:57:00.000Z","author":"Fentener van Vlissingen","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fentener_van_Vlissingen-2021-03-18T13:57:00.000Z-Janssen_Vaccines","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2021-03-18T15:42:00.000Z-Fentener_van_Vlissingen-2021-03-18T13:57:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-31T17:27:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-31T17:27:00.000Z-April_2021_WikiProject_Military_History_Reviewing_Drive","replies":[]}}-->
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-31T22:09:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-31T22:09:00.000Z-April_2021_WikiProject_Military_History_Reviewing_Drive_2","replies":[]}}-->
Good morning.
I do not want to simply assume a certain level of bias but your inconsistency related to the edits on this page in particular is quite bothersome.
Turning the result of the Battle of Redinha to "Indecisive" is certainly more than reasonable considering the mess that was its previous state (the whole French "tactical" victory or draw nonsense was ridiculous).
But the fact that you did so as well with the Battle of Pombal after such an obviously deliberate edit of the lead by the user Marcuscribb89 actually makes your intentions questionable as you seemed to have had no particular issues with it and solely focused on reverting a specific set of edits.
Is the purpose of the battle and what was at stake at Pombal a point of contention among British historians? In contrary to Redinha which in francophone sources is either presented as a tactical victory or as "inconclusive" (hence my judgement on the "Indecisive" result being appropriate), there is no such debate about Pombal at all. What exactly about driving the allies out of Pombal and proceeding on the march warrant "Indecisive" as a result in the infobox? Especially when the origin of it is a dubious edit of the lead by a random user (who has quite the history of doing that from what I could gather from his profile)?! (Jules Agathias (talk) 16:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-04-13T16:12:00.000Z","author":"Jules Agathias","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jules_Agathias-2021-04-13T16:12:00.000Z-Battle_of_Pombal","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2021-04-14T10:05:00.000Z-Jules_Agathias-2021-04-13T16:12:00.000Z"]}}-->
Why not review the article? It is currently nominated at GA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-05T19:23:00.000Z","author":"Hawkeye7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hawkeye7-2021-06-05T19:23:00.000Z-British_logistics_in_the_Siegfried_Line_campaign","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2021-06-05T20:16:00.000Z-Hawkeye7-2021-06-05T19:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hello Eastfarthingan, I noticed the fine article you wrote about Francis Drake's circumnavigation. Please know that it inspired me to write an accompanying list article Timeline of Francis Drake's circumnavigation. First I checked with Teahouse hosts about the viability and acceptance of such an article as I've had 3 rejected. They were encouraging. I do hope you have a moment to look at it. Also, I'm aware of some footnote cleanups I need to do. After much study of the source code, I finally realized what the problem was--I'll get to it soon.Hu Nhu (talk) 00:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-12T00:08:00.000Z","author":"Hu Nhu","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hu_Nhu-2021-08-12T00:08:00.000Z-New_article","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2021-08-12T14:32:00.000Z-Hu_Nhu-2021-08-12T00:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
For creating and developing Battle of the Narrow Seas. Perhaps I am betraying my ignorance, but I consider it an obscure battle in a largely-forgotten conflict and as such efforts to create and develop articles on it are particularly important and appreciated. Beyond this, it was enjoyable to read, and I feel have learnt something from doing so - thank you.
While here, I would also like to thank Weymar Horren and MWAK for their contributions to the article, as while they were not as extensive as your own, I feel they also warrant a mention.
Encountered in "On this day", and sometimes the "thank you" button is not sufficient
BilledMammal (talk) 19:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-04T19:56:00.000Z","author":"BilledMammal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BilledMammal-2021-10-04T19:56:00.000Z-Thank_you","replies":[]}}-->
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Hello Eastfarthingan. When I posted a third opinion notice on 97.120.93.30's talk page, I noticed that you had already made a request regarding 97.120.93.30's edits. I've made further comments on the Timeline of Francis Drake's circumnavigation talk page toward that end. I appreciate your work and am waiting for an wp:3O editor to weigh in. I've never sought a third opinion and hope it works out well. Kind regards,Hu Nhu (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-10T01:33:00.000Z","author":"Hu Nhu","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hu_Nhu-2022-02-10T01:33:00.000Z-Timeline_of_Francis_Drake's_circumnavigation","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-02-10T12:27:00.000Z-Hu_Nhu-2022-02-10T01:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
That is interesting to know. While I still have much to read about Sir Francis Drake, I certainly have read somewhat about him and his influence. And in that reading I was unaware of the Spice Island aspect to the circumnavigation. From my understanding, circumnavigation was far from a certainty and the load of cloves from Sultan Babu in Ternate was mostly a fortunate development. What you say makes much sense about the Iberian Union. You seem to know your way about this era is history . . do you have any suggested reading about the Iberian Union or East India Company? If so, I am interested in knowing.
Also, I've posted another polite invitation to User 97.120.93.30 HERE. I'm really not up to an edit war and plan to focus on the alterations 97.120.93.30 makes to either the New Albion or Timeline of Francis Drake's circumnavigation article.Hu Nhu (talk) 23:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-02-12T23:18:00.000Z","author":"Hu Nhu","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hu_Nhu-2022-02-12T23:18:00.000Z-Timeline_of_Francis_Drake's_circumnavigation","replies":[]}}-->
Hey, you reverted my edit on "List of wars involving the United Kingdom", I dont see what your issue is there, statistically, the UK had lost more men, than EOKA even had in that "war" if thats what you wish to call it, The Turkish Government, was indeed on the British governments side [1] and that TMT had fought against EOKA [2] and statistically speaking, the UK had lost more men in Cyprus, than the ammount of men that EOKA even had, additionally, with regards to the battles fought, EOKA had won more engagements than the UK, mainly in the 1st of April attacks, bombings at RAF Akrotiri [3] [4] [5], Battle of Spilia [6], [7]. Also given the fact that in the House of Commons, it was clearly expressed that Cyprus could never have expected to be fully independent (Which it now is, see Cyprus) [8] I think consolidates my point well enough. With this information, I ask politely that you do not revert my edit again as the previous information is factually wrong on more than one issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.199.0.18 (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-08T19:26:00.000Z","author":"46.199.0.18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-46.199.0.18-2022-03-08T19:26:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-08T19:34:00.000Z-46.199.0.18-2022-03-08T19:26:00.000Z"]}}-->
Ok, then show me peer reviewed, scholary articles that point to EOKA failing because like I said, their goal was to get rid of british rule in Cyprus, which, unless your living in another dimension, they succeeded in, the Queen isn't even the head of State in Cyprus so you couldn't even use the commonwealth argument. And no I didn't say you lost more than we did, I said you lost more than we HAD, thats the major difference. So no, you're only editing this because you simply have a pov problem and cant be neutral and to further consolidate my point you are literally putting EOKA and TMT on the same side. I have provided multiple sources to prove my points, you? Not even one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.199.0.18 (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-09T03:04:00.000Z","author":"46.199.0.18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-46.199.0.18-2022-03-09T03:04:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-09T10:33:00.000Z-46.199.0.18-2022-03-09T03:04:00.000Z"]}}-->
Im not changing the subject, all sources I have provided are reliable you simply dont like the answers so you move your goalposts as to what is reliable. As to me proving how EOKA beat the UK politically, thats like me now asking you to tell me how the SAS beat the Taliban politically. Youre asking me to literally compare apples and oranges here. EOKA was not a political action group it was a paramilitary organisation conducting an unorthodox warfare campaign against the british, in most battles, they had come out the victors as I have proven, im sorry, but if you dont like the fact that the UK had MILITARILY lost, thats not anyones elses problem because throughout this discussion, it still amazes me how you haven't even given me a source to back your claims. Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk) 11:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-09T11:15:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-09T11:15:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-09T13:23:00.000Z-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-09T11:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
Again, those are political agreements and have nothing to do with my argument, please stop changing the subject where it doesnt suit you, EOKA was not a political organisation, it was a paramilitary/guerrilla organisation, the political organisation was PEKA [9]. Now, it seems you are either willfully or unknowingly dodging the question at hand which are the battles/engagements/operations Britain and EOKA undertook against each other, which in this, EOKA had won by far (Look at the Cyprus Emergency category with the engagements, since you used wiki for London-Zurich I too will use it for this). The UK in comparison to EOKA, had, a larger Army (UK had approx. 40k soldiers, EOKA had 300), it had a Navy and an Air Force The same Air Force and Navy that might I add that had won the Battle of Britain, the UK had more and better technology than anything EOKA had, it had MI5 and MI6 (SIS), it had Royal Marines in Cyprus (Which is a unit capable of conducting unconventional warfare itself), with all these as advantages to the UK, it still failed in multiple fronts:
These are things that contrary to your belief, do not need to be "peer reviewed" or "scholorary", there just needs to be proof that they happened which I have provided plenty of.
In the Article I think I was fair enough in saying Greek Tactical Victory, Im clearly making the intentions of what is meant and I have in no way involved the political element.
Another issue is that youre just reverting the edits without just reverting the part you have an issue with (Which is the result), I had also put that Turkey was involved (Via TMT) and I will also add the KKE (Communist Party of Greece)/ AKEL to the list of units with the UK in the Freedom Struggle since it was the KKE that had originally revealed that Digenis, was Grivas [12] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk • contribs) 09:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-10T09:26:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-10T09:26:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-10T10:57:00.000Z-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-10T09:26:00.000Z"]}}-->
I don't need to show you any peer reviewed or scholarly sources seen as I have proven that these battles have occurred, if you do not provide me, in your next reply, with any reliable (Reliable being that it can be cross-referenced with other corresponding sources, in English or Greek), sources to back your argument, I will be changing back the edit because clearly you have no intellectual argument, youre just pushing back by your own delusion. If you cant handle that the UK lost thats a you problem, and im using my opinion? Really? Says the guy who on his user page states he is affiliated with the RAF (The same RAF that was up against EOKA which btw is a neutrality issue on your end), and whos actively trying to argue a point which he cant even present 1 source on his behalf. So please, next time dont make false accusations and if you are, make sure to provide me with scholarly, reliable peer reviewed sources about your accusations on me since thats apparently how this goes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk • contribs) 14:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-10T14:11:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-10T14:11:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-10T17:35:00.000Z-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-10T14:11:00.000Z"]}}-->
"The COIN force was ultimately unsuccessful in Cyprus", where in that conclusion do you find no side could win? Like do you not know what unsuccessful means? If you dont, its just one search away. Anyways, like you said before, this conversation is over, I was just entertaining this one sided debate (Because you really didnt give me your side you just denied every source I threw at you) because by wikipedias rules, I have to. Ive provided you with every kind of source you could have asked for (And in fact did ask for), but we both knew that you were never going to stop your kickback. Anyways, in future, when youre going to start edit wars, at least be correct in reverting edits. Anyways, have a good day I guess. Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-11T05:16:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-11T05:16:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-11T10:32:00.000Z-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-11T05:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
Sir I understand the political side, I was talking about the Military side of things, im glad that at least we could agree on the Military side of things, for both politics and Military, you can refer to Cyprus Emergency, where it has the political consequences too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk • contribs) 13:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-11T13:49:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-11T13:49:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-11T13:58:00.000Z-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-11T13:49:00.000Z"]}}-->
I mean, sure. Ένα μήλο την ημέρα (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-11T14:14:00.000Z","author":"\u0388\u03bd\u03b1 \u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u0388\u03bd\u03b1_\u03bc\u03ae\u03bb\u03bf_\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd_\u03b7\u03bc\u03ad\u03c1\u03b1-2022-03-11T14:14:00.000Z-List_of_wars_involving_the_United_Kingdom","replies":[]}}-->
References
Hello. I saw that you created the article about the British occupation zone in Germany. I wanted to thank you, as it bugged me for some time, that French and Soviet zones had their own articles, while British and American zones had only the redirects to the Allied-occupied Germany. Do you think, that maybe you could also write an article about the American zone, so every zone could have its own article now? Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-27T18:09:00.000Z","author":"Artemis Andromeda","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Artemis_Andromeda-2022-03-27T18:09:00.000Z-British_and_American_Occupation_Zones_of_Germany","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-2022-03-27T19:19:00.000Z-Artemis_Andromeda-2022-03-27T18:09:00.000Z"]}}-->
I have nominated Battle of Dien Bien Phu for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 18:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-04T18:58:00.000Z","author":"Hog Farm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hog_Farm-2022-06-04T18:58:00.000Z-FAR_for_Battle_of_Dien_Bien_Phu","replies":[]}}-->
Hi. I made this edit, which you reverted, just because writers/editors mostly do not put an "AD" abbreviation after dates like 1788 (WP:MoS/Dates & numbers#Era). -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025110500","author":"Hamid Hassani","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hamid_Hassani-20221025110500-1788_AD","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20221025123500-Hamid_Hassani-20221025110500"]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129004100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129004100-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
I am confused by your edit to the article on the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation.
Your citation is to page 201 of the 2007 edition of Nick van der Bijl's book Confrontation, The War with Indonesia 1962–1966. I have a copy of the 2009 reprint of the 2007 edition. So the pagination should be the same as the 2007 edition. Page 201 is the second page of Chapter 16 Turmoil in Indonesia. This has:
There is nothing about a British/Commonwealth victory.
What edition of the book did you use? I noticed that your initial edit cited the 2014 edition. This suggests that it might have been either:
-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230426064700","author":"Toddy1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Toddy1-20230426064700-Indonesia\u2013Malaysia_confrontation","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20230426165400-Toddy1-20230426064700"]}}-->
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Blaauwberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waldeck.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230531063200","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-20230531063200-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_31","replies":[],"displayName":"Opt-out instructions"}}-->
What does this even mean? I assumed you were referring to the templates' collapsible state, which, if set to 'collapsed', indeed prevents it from automatically uncollapsing. Now I'm not so sure, given your revert here after I set its state to 'autocollapse'. You are aware that 'autocollapse' means that a template will remain collapsed if a page contains similar templates, right? What am I missing here? Jay D. Easy (t) 16:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230708164500","author":"Jay D. Easy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay_D._Easy-20230708164500-\"The_dropdown_doesn't_work_in_all_formats\"","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20230708165300-Jay_D._Easy-20230708164500"],"displayName":"Jay\u00a0D.\u00a0Easy"}}-->
Hello, Eastfarthingan Recently, I created articles about Korean War
But some user want to delete these articles. If you have the spare time, please participate in the discussion.
Best regards Footwiks (talk) 16:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230714161500","author":"Footwiks","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Footwiks-20230714161500-Articles_about_Korean_War","replies":[]}}-->
I believe that it is necessary to temporarily take down "Victory of Dien Bien Phu" photo in every Wiki article to avoid misinformation. Information relating to its origin and whether this is a real capture or not are contradictory in various sources, ranging from foreign books, military generals' statements to major Vietnamese online newspapers. I have listed some of them in the discussion page of the Vietnamese version of the "Battle of Dien Bien Phu" article. If you could, I hope that you can check the reliability of those sources.
Thank you. Nghia7554
This user (185.119.90.12) who waged Edit war on you at the "war of quadruple alliance" page is obviously part of that network of socks and IPs by a Spanish suprematist user that I already talked you about regarding the Spanish Armada article...and I have reported him. It's literally always him. Many many articles his socks have been relentlessly attacking over the year. Basically every time there's something fishy regarding Spain/Spanish history it ends up being him, it's almost unbelievable. When you talk to him he wants to make you believe he stating something obvious and shared by maaany other people and that you are in the minority, but nope, it's one dude claiming non-sense. Barjimoa (talk)
Hi Eastfarthingan, re this edit, could you tack the source on? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231030182600","author":"Gog the Mild","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gog_the_Mild-20231030182600-Razing_of_Friesoythe","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20231030183000-Gog_the_Mild-20231030182600"]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231128003300","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231128003300-ArbCom_2023_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Hi, is your reference "Richter 2011" the same as the "Richter 2011" in the EOKA article? Or is it a typo for the "Richter 2010" used already in Cyprus Emergency? DuncanHill (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240225155100","author":"DuncanHill","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DuncanHill-20240225155100-Cyprus_Emergency","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20240225170500-DuncanHill-20240225155100"]}}-->
Do you mind giving your opinion about what should happen to this page: Talk:Dano-Dutch War DavidDijkgraaf (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240323220300","author":"DavidDijkgraaf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DavidDijkgraaf-20240323220300-Need_opinion","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20240323231300-DavidDijkgraaf-20240323220300"]}}-->
I'm not sure what is going on, but you moved Talk:Dano-Dutch Colonial Conflict on the Gold Coast to Dano-Dutch Colonial Conflict on the Gold Coast and left a redirect to the "article" which is not actually an article, but a talk page. Clearly the talk page needs to be moved back, but I cannot see a real article to reinstate on the article page. Please sort this out - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240329151700","author":"Arjayay","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arjayay-20240329151700-Dano-Dutch_Colonial_Conflict_on_the_Gold_Coast","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20240329153900-Arjayay-20240329151700"]}}-->
How can you know that you are dealing with a sockpuppet? DavidDijkgraaf (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240606150600","author":"DavidDijkgraaf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DavidDijkgraaf-20240606150600-Sockpuppets","replies":["c-Eastfarthingan-20240606155800-DavidDijkgraaf-20240606150600"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.22.81.107