User talk:DreamRimmer bot
| This is DreamRimmer bot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
john shahidi page
i noticed this page was deleted. this page is a notable place with a ton of news, what happened? Larryshamblin (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is a bot account- Questions should be redirected to the operator as listed on the Userpage. This bot will not automatically answer questions. Happy Editing!
Cooldudeseven7 talk 16:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Muckle
Is Muckle a good enough article for use on Wikipedia EliG233 (talk) 07:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- This is a bot account- Questions should be redirected to the operator as listed on the Userpage. This bot will not automatically answer questions. Happy Editing! Cooldudeseven7 talk 16:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Well, Here you go. Thanks for reviewing the redirect 🤖 Bryce M (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC) |
Al-Agha Company
Thank you for confirming that it was the( Al Agha Company)'s article, but I transferred it to the( Al-Agha Company ). Have a nice , day.
Matruq (talk) 15:22, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Unreviewing articles
@DreamRimmer, I’m curious why this bot is unreviewing articles and adding them to New Page feeds, just like it did with Dara Phiroze Chinoy, Shahi Hammam, Agra, Janki Lal Bhand and others. Zuck28 (talk) 10:52, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Zuck28: Please see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DreamRimmer bot 5 – DreamRimmer ■ 10:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thank you for your quick response! Zuck28 (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Even when users re-review articles, the bot unreviews them again. See Folk theorem (physics).--ReyHahn (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies. The bot already filters out pages that were re-reviewed later by other users. In this case, the review happened while the bot was still running, so it was processing pages fetched at the start and could not tell the difference. Since the run has now been completed, feel free to do the re-reviews. – DreamRimmer ■ 16:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer, I've had the bot unreview Mark Aldridge twice now. Once after I'd re-reviewed it. TarnishedPathtalk 00:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- This happened for the same reason I mentioned above. The bot completed its work hours ago, so there should be no issue if you mark it now. – DreamRimmer ■ 00:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer, I've had the bot unreview Mark Aldridge twice now. Once after I'd re-reviewed it. TarnishedPathtalk 00:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
bisa kunci halaman Republic west papua Bangjordan123 (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
can lock the Republic of West Papua page Bangjordan123 (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
NPP Award for 2025
|
Redirect Ninja Award | |
| Beep, bop, booop. (Translation: For over 60,000 redirect reviews during 2025.) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:40, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
Cross namespace redirect
As a heads up, I just noticed that the bot is marking some cross namespace redirects as reviewed ([1], [2], [3]). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:46, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.