To review past messages, see the archive subpages.
User talk:Denelson83/Archive page 1, page 2, page 3, page 4, page 5, page 6, page 7, page 8, page 9, page 10, page 11

If you leave a comment here, I will respond on your talk page. --  Denelson83  00:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In your list of GPS satellites, I believe there is an error or it is not up to date. The last GPS PRN 28 is listed having retired on June 23, 2021, yet I see plenty of tracking data of PRN 28 after that date, even well into 2022. Is there a new PRN 28? Or did the old one (block III) remain operational? Many thanks. Ssleroy (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move this page when there was a consensus not to do so? I have reverted the move, but I would appreciate an explanation. Thanks. --GW… 09:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The whole page was copyvio? Some of it, I think, was inputted from BCGNIS.....but while you're anti-copyvio'ing please see my notes on Talk:Haida re usage of material from http://www.civilization.ca Due to various edits/additions, it's not totally clear what shoudl be removed, maybe you'd care to oblige; I'm seen, I think, as a bit of a big bad white man/aggressor in editing this page, so didn't want to pull a bulk removal myself.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you unilaterally changed the timezones in timeline of spaceflight articles. When making changes like this, particularly if they affect this many pages, they really should be discussed first. This is the second time I have raised a concern about your editing in the last week, and I am particularly concerned that I am having to raise such issues with an administrator, who I would expect to have known better. --GW… 07:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the {{who}} template to The Stig was very inappropriate and I'd like to suggest you read into the context of such sentences before doing this to any further articles! Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:422-5Hz.ogg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Tone-422.5-Hz.ogg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Tone-422.5-Hz.ogg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:423-2Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone-423.2-Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:450Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 450Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:480Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 480Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:880Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 880Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:439Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 439Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:440Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 440Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:430-54Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 430-54Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:435Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 435Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:451Hz.ogg is now available as Commons:File:Tone 451Hz.ogg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectrum.png is now available as Commons:File:Spectrum.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NOAA Flag.svg is now available as Commons:File:NOAA Flag.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimood Neg1.png is now available as Commons:File:Wikimood Neg1.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I'm right, so I want ahead and reverted your changes, but your input is still appreciated. Technically, the "on time marker" is an instant, not a second; it's the instant of the leading (falling) edge of the :00 marker bit. (Think of someone saying "start the countdown on my mark... mark!") See http://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvbtimecode.htm and its arrow to "On time point A." Thus it's a bad name for the leading marker bit, as it's just similar enough to be confusing. Just below the diagram, though, there's a list of time code bits:

• 1 PPM frame reference markers
• Binary-coded decimal year and time-of-year code word (31 bits)
• 6 PPM position identifier markers (P₀ thru P₅)

That suggests to me that "frame reference marker" is an official name for the leading bit. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to question this edit. Do you really think that's a better explanation of the DST bits? While the DST1/DST2 definition isn't the same phrasing that NIST uses, it is equivalent and seems extremely unambiguous. This is a stylistic matter, not a factual one, so I'm not going to start an edit war over it, but I'm not sure that's an improvement. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er, what do you mean "as of 00:00Z today" and "as of 24:00Z today" don't make any sense? Could you explain in more detail; they seem perfectly sensible (not to mention simple, clear, and absolutely unambiguous) to me. Um... Are you perhaps unfamiliar with the ISO 8601 time format I'm using for clarity and conciseness? 00:00Z means the beginning of the day, Zulu (UTC) time. 24:00Z means the end of the day. Bit 58 is set if and only if DST is in effect at the beginning of the day. Bit 57 is set if and only if DST is in effect at the end of the day. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 07:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what the **** do you have against this edit, which you also reverted? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, call me confused. The separate bits definition very much does match the definition in the graphic. If you say that it doen't match, could you give an example situation when they would produce different results? I agree the words don't match, but that's the point: two equivalent definitions let the reader pick whichever they prefer. And ISO 8601 is the standard for writing dates and times unambiguously. As Date and time notation documents, the only formal standard that differs is RFC2822; RFC2445 and RFC3339 both use ISO 8601-compatible syntax. (Date and time notation by country varies greatly in year-month-day ordering, but not much in time notation.) It's extremely widely used, particularly by people working with precision timekeeping — who are also the people who care about the WWVB signal format. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No need to reply, just appreciating the much improved appearance. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 11:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 08:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Changing .fr back to .fx: Swine flu hasn't been reported in French Guiana or French Polynesia or New Caledonia or Saint-Pierre et Miquelon yet" Nor has it been reported in Alaska and Hawaii, yet other users insisted on including those. If we are going to include exclaves of one country that is marked on the map, we should include exclaves of all the countries marked on the map. Also, you are incorrect, as ".fr" does not include French Polynesia or New Caledonia or St Pierre et Miquelon. It only includes those areas which are part of France - which includes French Guiana, Reunion, Martinique, and Guadeloupe. So either put back .fr, or remove Alaska and Hawaii. We must be consistent. --Golbez (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Wikipedia:DL (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 14:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add some more parameters to this template? The one I particularly would like is one for the Parliament of New Zealand. I have also listed this on the template's talk page.
Adabow (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:256Hz.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a major contributor to Sailor Moon, this notice is to let you know that the article recently underwent a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article was delisted as a Good Article for failing the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Sailor Moon/GA1. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KHQ-TV.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Did you design this template? It's not working for me and I'm not sure how to get quick help. It looks like you can list an article title in the tag but I can't get that to work. Help? Thanks! Aristophanes68 (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merci! Should the template page be updated to show how to list the article? Aristophanes68 (talk) 19:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Denelson83

The Yuma Almanac for week 521, found at http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/almanacs.htm says that PRN 08 is in orbit and healthy. yet I find it nowhere in List of GPS satellite launches . What is the reason for this? RHB100 (talk) 21:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thank you for your response. This has made it possible to update the table in the GPS article Timeline and Modernization section RHB100 (talk) 02:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference to back up this edit? I have not seen anything indicating that there will be another Delta IV launch this year after WGS-3 in September and that the Block IIF satellites would not launch until next year. As you should know, all additions should be properly sourced to reliable sources, so please rectify this omission. -MBK₀₀₄ 21:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Even if WGS-3 wasn't going to be launched first, that date would be impossible. A Delta IV takes about three months to process. Given a WGS launch on 30 September, that would give 22 days for turnaround, which is out of the question (and WGS looks likely to slip into October anyway). --GW… 22:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bc7.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya :) I have a technical question... how did you produce this? How did you trace the rather grainy logo in the version linked to, into such a nice clean-lined version? Thanks!! ╟─TreasuryTag►Speaker─╢ 17:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "manually" – you mean what? Each curve and line by hand? :O ╟─TreasuryTag►Tellers' wands─╢ 19:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...that this was some kind of pathetic joke. Either way, it does not reflect well on you. If it was actually intended as a serious comment, I advise you steer clear of deletion discussions altogether... J Milburn (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson
I notice I just infringed your copyright by using your image with the parameter |link=, which renders it unlinked to the image page, like , thus probably not fulfilling your GFDL/CC-BY-SA attribution request.
It's being used thusly at the Wikipedia:Article wizard2.0 ff., by way of a template, and since it's used on buttons where newbie editors are supposed to click without ending up at the image page, it really needs to be linked to the target page.
This leaves me with two options, to get myself off the hook: I either replace the image on the buttons with one that has no attribution requirements, or I convince you to waive your attribution requirement, either for that template or completely. :)
Since yours is really the most beautiful right-pointed arrow and I would very much like to keep using it, would you consider the second option and spare me painting my own arrow? :)
Thanks for thinking about it, and no worries if you decide to stick with your original license.
Cheers, Amalthea 20:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.
Could you please comment on this one way or the other?
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea 23:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have already responded. Take a look at the licensing terms of that image now. --  Denelson83  00:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I should have watchlisted it over there. Thanks a lot!
Cheers, Amalthea 00:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you have an SM userbox on your userpage in expanded form(!?!?)! Isn't this a sufferance given your explained feelings on your userpage? I think something must be done about this :) . . . .

Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 18:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS I made some (actually quite a bit of) additions to the Departure Bay article you started. Tell me what you think.

About the Ferries "weasel" wording. I wasn't sure how to change it. I would consider "similar" to be a bit misleading in the opposite direction, because, of the little bit of (off computer) BC Ferries history I've read, it was actually meant to be different (due to the labour difficulties at the time and the nature of the service). Would you be okay if I added "alternative to," as that drops the value judgment (as your "similar") does, but does not imply that the structure / intent of the Crown corp. was meant to be "similar" to the private corps? Other ideas?

Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 00:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• 
• 
• 

Hey, you do amazing vector flag work, I was wondering if you could vectorize the above flags/CoA? Thanks in advance. Connormah (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In September 2008, you requested an SVG version of File:Flgraphic.png. I made such a version today with Inkspace and Emacs. The PNG file is 29365 bytes; the SVG is 39326 bytes but gzip compresses it to 5685. Before uploading this, I'd like to verify the licence. The PNG has been tagged as being in the public domain in the United States, but what does that mean for me in the EU? Was the picture published by the US government and when? The PNG has been derived from File:Flgraphic.jpg, but that one has apparently been deleted from Wikipedia and I can't find any copyright information about it. 85.23.32.64 (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The JPEG may have been scanned from some paper published by NACO. Their FAQ says that their publications are in the public domain but warns against using expired data. Because the graphic has no date on it saying when it was in effect, I'm not going to upload the SVG. Thanks for your help. 85.23.32.64 (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denelson83, I have added some remarks on vectors with a reference to the discussion page for GPS. If you are interested, you can look at it. RHB100 (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson. When editing Runway you made a very useful edit summary saying What's a clearway? I noticed it on my watchlist and I have now added a small section to Clearway explaining the meaning of clearway in aviation. See Clearway#Aviation. Thanks for your edit summary! Dolphin51 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson83,

May I ask why you keep removing my text added to the wiki Marine VHF page? I have done extensive testing of marine VHFs and am an authority in the field in the US. The comments I added are not spam, they are up to date additions to the otherwise fairly antiquated wiki page. I mean, common on, the radio photo featured is over five years old. That is simply an eternity in the marine electronics area. I'd post a good recent radio photo, but am not sure how to do. Nor do I want everything I do ripped down because you think it is spam. I think the links out to my site add significant material for those interested in this subject matter.

Thanks,

Al - you should be able to contact me through my website if needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.35.78.37 (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm on it right away. Thanks for the note. Connormah (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Republic of China (Taiwan) is forced to compete under Chinese Taipei as its designated title. However, I believe it's not just my freedom of speech, but along with the 23 million Republic of China citizens and any loyal supporters of the ROC and Taiwan. In 2009, the ROC (Taiwan) hosted two international sports events: the 2009 Kaohsiung World Games and the 2009 Taipei Deaflympics. Both times, the President of the ROC opened the games as the President of the ROC (not as Chinese Taipei). The IOC requests that the ROC (Taiwan) use the title Chinese Taipei for international sports events and NOC committees. The Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee respects the IOC decision (which is truly the pressure from the PRC and their disgustful acts of bullying)and follows the policies (i.e. using the Chinese Taipei Olympic flag, using the Chinese Taipei title, and using the Republic of China Flag anthem to sub for the National Anthem of the ROC); however, citizens, the government, and etc. don't belong or fall under the direction of the IOC. Thus, the ROC government and its citizens have the complete right to use the title the Republic of China (Taiwan) and to bring in our national flag into these sporting events, and so anybody else. There is also confusion between the PRC (Communist mainland) and the ROC (Taiwan) for most foreigners and westerners. The title and explanation of the usage of "Chinese Taipei" is usually altered to imply that the ROC (Taiwan) belongs to the PRC (mainland). For example, the Mandarin translation of "Chinese Taipei": in the mainland would be 中國臺北 (Zhōngguó Táiběi), but the correct translation in the ROC (Taiwan) and internationally should be 中華臺北 (Zhōnghuá Táiběi). As a Chinese/Taiwanese-Canadian living in Vancouver, I'm hoping that you can respect the freedom of speech and human rights by allowing the "Republic of China (Taiwan) - competes as Chinese Taipei" or similar to be the title of the ROC under the Participating Nations for the Vancouver 2010 Olympics article. Thank you! - Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.210.66 (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reference for the -15dB and -30dB levels of 100Hz?

The various PDFs I've found at the NIST site, for example http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1383.pdf (Jan 2002) and http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1969.pdf (Jan 2005), speak only of "75% modulation". There is no indication that there is any 100 Hz in the red periods in your diagram.

Nevertheless, a sonogram of a recent capture of WWV does show that 100 Hz is continuous through the second interval. The only time I see it absent is during the minute marker.

The not-quite-"off" state seems, though, to be 20 dB below the "on" state rather than 15.

I understand that this was changed at one point, but I'm pretty sure it was prior to 2002. Jeh (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are all now in the Public Domain in Canada. The copyright lapsed on January 1, 2010. See File:Trans-Canada Highway shield.svg for the explanation. Imzadi1979 (talk) 07:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction but I am still working on the table. Could you hold off for a bit so our edits don't cross? Jeh (talk) 03:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done now. Thanks again, I had fixed other errors but had not caught that one! Jeh (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the colors in the new WWV (radio station) table. I was thinking about them myself. Now to do the minute chart similarly. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bcflogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bc3b.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bc5a.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came across File:Same.ogg, and was curious if you could tell me the tools / process you used to create it. TonyYarusso (talk) 03:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to ask the same thing, I'm really curious. Edit: I read your response, but that doesn't really explain how you did it, or what you used. XD NoriMori (ノリモリ) 15:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was thinking about bring this to FL quality, and then realized it didn't have a clickable map yet. Nice work! Jujutacular ^T · C 04:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Denelson83

I'd like to invite you to participate in the discussion held in Template talk:SVG-Logo#Edit request from FleetCommand, 27 June 2010 regarding your recent edit. Would you please kindly report in? Thanks.

Fleet Command (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heya! I was wondering how you made a Specific Area Message Encoding signal... and if you'd be willing to make one for me for my shoutcast radio feed... with how the past three weekends have triggered tornado warnings, i think it would be a smart idea for me to have one. :)

RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 07:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson!

It seems that this file is not describing the sound /œ/ (as stated on its description page, and on Commons categories), but the sound /ø/.

As you are able to speak French, you would be welcome to discuss that with us on wikt:fr:Wiktionnaire:Wikidémie/juillet 2010#Sons représentant /œ/ et /ø/ dans Annexe:Prononciation/français#Tableau de l’API (on the french Wiktionary).

Really it's a good thing to record pronunciations, and I'm not in mind of discouraging to do it. But if there is a mistake we should correct it, to make Wikimedia projects more accurate. Thanks in advance for your help. --GaAs (d) 18:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The result is still not satisfactory. More precisely, for what I hear,

• commons:File:Open-mid front rounded vowel.ogg is still a close-mid front rounded vowel, while
• commons:File:Close-mid front rounded vowel.ogg is quite near of an open-mid front rounded vowel.

—C.P. (talk) 11:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Consonants has been nominated for merging with Template:IPA navigation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Actually, a redirect is proposed. See also: {{IPA consonant chart}}. You receive this message as you are the creator of the template. Discussion is here. DePiep (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vowels has been nominated for merging with Template:IPA navigation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Actually, a redirect is proposed. See also: {{IPA vowel chart}}. You receive this message as you are the creator of the template. Discussion is here. DePiep (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please reduce this talk page from protection to semiprotection - User talk:Richardshusr/Ancient persecution of non-Jews by Jews - in that you originally did the same to the article page. Thanks! JJB 18:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi - I was admiring your ZIP code map "ZIP_code_zones.png" and am working on a project that will require me to identify a person's state of residence from their ZIP code. I was wondering what your source for this map is? Thanks! George R. Brumder (talk) 19:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that quick response. I'm actually looking for the site (or other reference) from which you obtained the DATA for the map (e.g. that ZIP codes in Oregon all start with "97" or, for the way I'm looking at it, any ZIP code that starts with "97" is in Oregon... Thanks very much. 24.19.49.90 (talk) 21:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be so dense--and thank you for your help so far--but I just can't seem to find your source. I followed your link and ended up with several conflicting tables (I tried reconciling this one: http://pe.usps.gov/text/dmm300/L002.htm to your table and quickly made a mess of things. I'm selling something online that I'm not allowed to sell to people in certain states and to prevent people from lying about their state, I need to check their state against their ZIP. I could get in big trouble with 'the man' if my list isn't correct. I'd prefer to use your table, but need an official source in case someone asks, So, again, I'm sorry to be such a PIA but I could really use your further help. Many THANKS! Go Sailor Moon! 71.227.187.13 (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The userpage and talk page of RAM216166bot having one solicity of deletion and permanent blocked, you having rights for delete now. BRAMCPPF (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bc77.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson83,

I have found one of your graphics of the compass rose very useful for illustrating sectors (defined by me for the purposes of my particular study) in my thesis. In the case of my work, I have studied historic German-Russian farmsteads in the Dakotas. To discuss the placement of various buildings and features, I have divided the compass rose in to 8 sectors which are based upon the 32 direction azimuths. I would like to use your image with my modifications in my thesis. The image I am referring to is this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compass_Card.png

I don't particularly understand the licensing agreements regarding GNU Free Documentation. I posted a query at the WikiCommons help desk and there it was suggested that I would be best off asking you for the permission directly. I do not want to commit copyright infringement by not completeing my end of any user agreement due to my confusion. My thesis will be available at my school (the University of Southern Mississippi) and could be accessed by library users, as well as through interlibrary loan and possibly via the dissertation and thesis database known as ProQuest. In addition, I am providing copies of the thesis (when complete) to the pertinent historical societies, as well as the landowner's whose farmsteads I studied.

Would you grant me permission to you your compass rose image with my drawings? If you wish to see my modifications I will gladly email it. My modifications are not very sophisticated. I drew in the sectors with a pen and a straightedge across your image, scanned that image and then using photoshop elements, labeled my sectors - N/NE/E/SE/S/SW/W/NW and with those direction labels included the degrees they included.

I appreciate any help you could lend.

Sincerely

Friesweg

P.S. If you would allow me permission to use your images, would it be possible for us to correspond with email? I would need to include the offical permission email as an appendix to my thesis.

Friesweg (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Head Bay Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that does not establish notability and consists of a couple of sentences and a template.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a reminder to please remember to turn off "minor edit" whenever you're adding any amount of content, eg. Thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :), just the first time you have appeared in my watchlist. --Admrboltz (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to WP:TROUT me for that. Sorry again! --Admrboltz (talk) 04:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! Sent out invites w/o the date! It is Jan. 15 (Saturday). Hope to see you there! The Interior(Talk)

Very sorry, Denelson, but I am carless, so I don't think I'll be able to provide any transportation for the event. Getting from Horseshoe Bay to Kitsalano isn't very hard though, the Translink site could help you out. It should just be one transfer downtown. Wish the Foundation had supplied me with a bus, but no deal! Really hope you can make it though. The Interior(Talk) 22:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought, you could post a request on the event's discussion page (linked in the invite above) that anyone traveling from the Island or West/North Van pick you up. Worth a try. The Interior(Talk) 22:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scrabble 2LS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scrabble 3LS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 20:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scrabble tile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone ever goes to Metawiki, but I saw and commented about demotion and which is more likeable. Can we do anything at this point?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lib-can.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? 117Avenue (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you take requests? I have noticed your great graphic work, I am in need. We could use some of your skill as many of the Wikipedia versions of Scout emblems are rather substandard and could use improvement. Would this be something you would be willing to assist with? Thanks either way,--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

very nice. Decora (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Denelson83.

The Alaska section of the Haines Highway has always been Highway 7, the BC section has never had an official designation, and the Yukon section was originally known as Highway 4 until 1978, when it was changed to Highway 3. Various maps, including official maps issued by the highways branch in British Columbia, have illustrated a number to the BC section, even if it was not official. The Klondike Highway is similarly unnumbered between Alaska Highway 98 and Yukon Highway 2, but it is maintained by the Yukon government as if it were part of Yukon Highway 2. A B.C. section of the Alaska Highway is also Yukon-maintained, between Swift River and Morley River, Yukon (miles 737-777), while a Yukon section between Iron Creek and Contact Creek (miles 590-596) is maintained by Public Works Canada as a B.C. section of the highway. GBC (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Free' images for which more information or a review would be appreciated:

• File:CTV Newsnet.svg
• File:CBC Logo 1974-1992 construction sheet.svg
• File:Maple leaf transparent.png - Own work?
• File:500Hz.ogg = Own work? although it's obviously PD.

• File:NFPA diamonds comparison 2.png

Are these your own work?

• File:BC-Vancouver-Map.png
• File:BCMap-doton-PortAlberni.png
• File:BCMap-doton-CampbellRiver.png
• File:BCMap-doton-Nanaimo.png
• File:BCMap-doton-Courtenay.png
• File:BC RD 57 Stikine.png
• File:BC RD 59 Northern Rockies.png
• File:BC RD 55 Peace River.png
• File:BC RD 53 Fraser-Fort George.png
• File:BC RD 51 Bulkley-Nechako.png
• File:BC RD 49 Kitimat-Stikine.png
• File:BC RD 47 Skeena-Queen Charlotte.png
• File:BC RD 45 Central Coast.png
• File:BC RD 43 Mount Waddington.png
• File:BC RD 41 Cariboo.png
• File:BC RD 39 Columbia-Shuswap.png
• File:BC RD 37 North Okanagan.png
• File:BC RD 35 Central Okanagan.png
• File:BC RD 33 Thompson-Nicola.png
• File:BC RD 31 Squamish-Lillooet.png
• File:BC RD 27 Powell River.png
• File:BC RD 25 Comox-Strathcona.png
• File:BC RD 23 Alberni-Clayoquot.png
• File:BC RD 21 Nanaimo.png
• File:BC RD 19 Cowichan Valley.png
• File:BC RD 17 Capital.png
• File:BC RD 15 Greater Vancouver.png
• File:BC RD 9 Fraser Valley.png
• File:BC RD 7 Okanagan-Similkameen.png
• File:BC RD 5 Kootenay Boundary.png
• File:BC RD 3 Central Kootenay.png
• File:BC RD 1 East Kootenay.png

Are these your own work?

• File:IFIS Vertical unknown.png
• File:IFIS Vertical rotated.png
• File:IFIS Vertical normal.png
• File:IFIS Vertical inapplicable.png
• File:IFIS Variant.png
• File:IFIS Alternate.png
• File:IFIS Authorized.png
• File:IFIS De facto.png
• File:IFIS Mirror.png
• File:IFIS Normal.png
• File:IFIS Proposed.png
• File:IFIS Reconstruction.png
• File:IFIS Reverse.png
• File:IFIS Two-sided.png

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved - All now tagged for Commons :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sailor_Moon#Converstion_into_a_task_force_WP:ANIME. --Malkinann (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 29 Sunshine Coast.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 1 East Kootenay.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 15 Greater Vancouver.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating a large number of your images for deletion at the page specified above. Please consider this notice of all the nominations. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 19 Cowichan Valley.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 21 Nanaimo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 23 Alberni-Clayoquot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 25 Comox-Strathcona.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 27 Powell River.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 29 Sunshine Coast.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 3 Central Kootenay.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 31 Squamish-Lillooet.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 33 Thompson-Nicola.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 35 Central Okanagan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC RD 43 Mount Waddington.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm Hunter Kahn. I currently have a Pennsylvania-related article before FAC and a question came up recently about the image of the Pennsylvania flag, which had appeared in the article because of its use in an infobox template. The FAC reviewer pointed out that file has no author info (see the link for it above). I see you were the original uploader of that image. Is the author info something you could help me out with on that, by any chance? Let me know. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 18:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NRC Time Signal.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Denelson83! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

FYI. --Malkinann (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CBC Logo 1940-1958.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. InverseHypercube 23:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image on progress of digitization across the world that you moderate is very helpful. Currently south asian countries are marked in gray - I have digitization status and schedules, but don't know how to update a vector graphics image, nor how to edit images on wikimedia. If you have a link to a newbie page, or if I could give you the data, let me know? Thanks. A rambhia (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)a_rambhia[reply]

http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/PressReleases/388/FAQ.pdf and http://forum.aglasem.com/showthread.php/2146-Digital-signals-in-analog-out-from-2013-TRAI provide timelines for digitization in India.

Thanks, A rambhia (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC)a_rambhia[reply]

Great image - most helpful. However it is inaccurate insofar as South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe are concerned. All show as complted when in fact the conversion has barely begun.

Mike 77.246.57.115 (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Out of date aeronautical chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't really understand Wikipedia, but the IPA pronunciation guide was a really handy tool. However someone's recorded themselves over two of your files and while it seems they were trying to be helpful, the sound quality is a lot lower and the loss of an IPA vowel guide in a single voice is quite off putting. Also I don't have an account here so I don't think I have a "talk page". Just a heads up I suppose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.162.88 (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to your edit summary "Actually, the units do match" as a reply to my edit, removing the phrase:

• "300 bits/subframe x 5 subframes/frame x 25 frames = 37,500 bits / 50 bps = 750 sec."

The left hand side has "bits/subframe x subframes/frame x frames", which resolves to bits, whereas the right hand is expressed as sec. Surely they don't match.

I assume he meant to say something like:

• "300 bits/subframe x 5 subframes/frame x 25 frames = 37,500 bits, and 37,500 bits / 50 bps = 750 sec."

That would make the units match. It still would be an utterly ugly statement in an encyclopedia, but at least it wouldn't be wrong. Glad to see that you casted it into a proper sentence. Thanks and cheers. DVdm (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Swinomish Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...was well-founded. I've checked over a few different evenings on different freqs and I can't hear any hint of a "chime" effect. Maybe he was mistaking the seconds tick and/or the 100Hz time code buzz for that. Jeh (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably aware as an administrator that adding unsourced contents to any article, as you recently did at Flag carrier, goes against the verifiability policy.--Jetstreamer (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may now join the discussion.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Denelson83,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at [email protected] (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at [email protected]. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WWM. Since you had some involvement with the WWM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Imzadi 1979 → 19:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good sir, I believe that a picture on the Nanking Massacre page should be deleted.Just go through all the pictures, and it will be obvious wich one (Its not the decapitated head). Also, it has come to my attention that there are pictures on Wikipedia that could be classed as porn. These should be deleted, as a child at a school using the computer could easily acssess it. I hope that you take measures against that happening.P.S. I have aspergers as well!

Good sir, I believe that a picture on the Nanking Massacre page should be deleted.Just go through all the pictures, and it will be obvious wich one (Its not the decapitated head). Also, it has come to my attention that there are pictures on Wikipedia that could be classed as porn. These should be deleted, as a child at a school using the computer could easily acssess it. I hope that you take measures against that happening.P.S. I have aspergers as well! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybermat47 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:House of Commons logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you record the pronunciation of the word kung fu in the audio please ? Fête

I'm interested in changing the font on your SVG kanji map (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2230_Kanji.svg) and printing it out, but directly editing the underlying xml caused many of the characters to become misaligned. The font I'd like to use is Meiryo; I just did a simple find-and-replace with every instance of MS PGothic in the document. Do you know how I can change the font without messing up the rest of the formating? Digital infinity (talk) 15:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find that Florida has been officially given to Obama? Thanks. Travürsa (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your question about zugzwang has been answered. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 20:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you pronounce "fight" for the word fête ? Fête (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's pronounced "fight" in Quebec French. Fête (talk) 02:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have never heard it pronounced that way, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te69JK28DDo Fête (talk) 12:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation personalities, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Zimmerman and Dwight Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Sailor Moon English logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (orate) @ 11:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly add a reference about the comparison to the atmospheric pressure of the surface of Venus? Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag types gallery.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

W. D. Graham 08:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Alternate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Authorized.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Normal.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Proposed.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Reverse.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Variant.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Vertical inapplicable.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Vertical unknown.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have pronounced /ɔ/ instead of /ɒ/. /ɒ/ sounds exactly like the word awe in Canadian English. Can you record again please ? 198.105.100.45 (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strathcona Parkway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AdmrBoltz 23:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:MP. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:MP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on WikiProject Anime and Manga (WikiProject Sailor Moon's mother project) on whether or not the latter should be marked as historical, or if the project should be merged into WikiProject Anime and manga and be turned into a task force. Any input on that discussion is welcome. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 03:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

Thanks for uploading File:Sailor Moon English logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barrymano (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Hey Denelson83, I want to use an image( created by you) on Youtube. ( http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testbild#mediaviewer/File:SMPTE_Color_Bars.svg) But what I have to write in description, not to break copyright. Thanks barrymanoBarrymano (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Denelson,

In my current studies of Japanese, I encountered a file you helped create. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b9/2230_Kanji.svg/844px-2230_Kanji.svg.png. I also have, however, a very similar map consisting of 3002 kanji. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:3002_Kanji.svg I'm wondering, if you could tell me what the actual difference is. Both mention they contain "the most frequently used kanji". The 2230 map does (obviously) seem to omit certain kanji, but with my current level of understanding I fail to see the reasoning behind it. I ask you this, simply because you are the only active wikipedian I gather worked on the file. [edit] As I linked the 3002 file, I realized YOU are mentioned as the sole creator. While it is not my main source of information, it does aid me in my endeavours. At first, it simply amazed me with the sheer number of kanji I would be forced to conquer, but as of late it is becoming a friendly gauge of my (slow but) steady progress. So, in addition to any insight you might provide, I would also like to thank you for creating that file.[/edit]

Signed, a fellow '83; OmikronWeapon (talk) 22:43, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sailor Moon (1st uniform).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:British Columbia Highway 3.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Reverse.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:IFIS Variant.png

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IFIS Reverse.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:IFIS Variant.png

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on a videogame which involves recognising flags, emblems and insignias. I don't know much about the laws surrounding these but I've noticed some of the flag images are accompanied by the text "This image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. The use of such symbols is restricted in many countries. These restrictions are independent of the copyright status."

As you clearly have an interest in flags, I was wondering if you knew much about these kinds of restrictions and whether they might apply to my situation (or whether you could point me towards any resources on this which could be useful).

Arganoid (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson83.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry. I have found another vectorized file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Music-tremolo.svg). But this image published in public domain. I added to your image a template "Vector version available | Music-tremolo.svg".

IEPCBM (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Utah County Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that several of your images, such as the ICS numeral pennants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ICS_Pennant_Zero.svg is one example of several) are licenced under the GPL. It's the first time I see the GPL being used for an image, and I have a few concerns with this. First, the GPL requires the source code to be distributed alongside the "Program" (the term used by the GPL). This is often not practical or awkward. For instance, if I include these images in a document that I distribute in PDF format I will be required to provide all the SVG source images with it. I also need to include a copy of the GPL. A more serious problem is that the use of these images forces me to licence my document under the GPL too because the GPL is a "viral" licence (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License : "...meaning any derivative work you create containing even the smallest portion of the previously GPL licensed software must also be licensed under the GPL license."). This is often undesirable. For example, I may want to release my document under a Creative Commons Licence, but I can't do this once I include even just one GPL-licenced image. Incidentally, I noticed that you have provided other related images, such as images of the ICS alphabetic flags A-Z, under a public domain licence. I would like to suggest that for consistency and in order to maximize the possibility of reuse, those images now licenced under the GPL be re-licenced under a creative commons licence or be released into the public domain. Thanks. Robert (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 January 18 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:British Columbia Highway 3.svg
• File:British Columbia Highway 5.svg
• File:British Columbia Highway 113.svg

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been temporarily desyopped because of concerns that your account may be compromised. This was done under emergency procedures and was certified by Arbitrators BU Rob13, KrakatoaKatie and Ks0stm.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Katie^talk 02:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CBC Logo 1958-1966.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CBC Logo 1966-1974.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Messaging since you're the creator of this file, one that's been mentioned a few times in this page. I'd like to ask you where you got the indexint data from it. I've been doing in-depth kanji categorization and have noticed that, though there are 3002 kanji here, a few are duplicates, and not just in terms of different Unicode values. So far, I have found holes in spaces 405, 865, 1026, 1276, 1353, 1357, 1540, 1636, and 2721. I call them "holes" because Jisho and a few other dictionaries do not actually give results for these indexes. Examples: Index 404 https://jisho.org/search/%23kanji%20%23halpern_kkld_2ed%3A404 returns the kanji you have in your space 404, but index 405 https://jisho.org/search/%23kanji%20%23halpern_kkld_2ed%3A405 returns nothing. Visually it appears to be a duplicate of space 344, which does return a result in Jisho. Can you tell me why 404 seems to be missing in some dictionaries I've looked in and is filled with a duplicate in your chart? EI at10s (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:British Columbia Highway 5.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You made a revision to the page Template:Texas_County_Labelled_Map on May 26, 2013. The changes you made are mostly to the y axis, some to the x axis, of the counties of Texas. These changes moved the positions slightly more northward, and now every single two-letter county abbreviation is misaligned. Most two-letter county abbreviations were in the proper locations before the edit, slightly further northward after the edit.

Three examples before your edit
{{Image label|x=275|y=357|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Cameron County, Texas|CF]]}}
{{Image label|x=345|y=161|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Cherokee County, Texas|CE]]}}
{{Image label|x=123|y=45|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Oldham County, Texas|OL]]}}

Same three examples after your edit
{{Image label|x=275|y=350|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Cameron County, Texas|CF]]}}
{{Image label|x=345|y=154|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Cherokee County, Texas|CE]]}}
{{Image label|x=123|y=38|scale={{{width|420}}}/400|text=[[Oldham County, Texas|OL]]}}

Do you see accurate positions of the county abbreviations? Please view the earlier revision to see the difference. NewYorkeruser (talk) 23:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I used Internet Explorer 11 to edit the page. I just took a quick look at the same stuff on the current page and the one in 2013 using Google Chrome Version 70.0. They look the same. The current edition of the page (Texas map) has the same misalignment in both browsers. Both show same correct position before your 2013 edit. What browser did you use? (by the way, I prefer a new section on my talk page to be on the very bottom) NewYorkeruser (talk) 04:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. All locations are good. Each two-letter county abbreviation is within the county borders.NewYorkeruser (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1450 AM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WBTL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you have the information, you can get coordinates for Mexican AM stations (presumably what's prevented them from being made into sortable tables on pages like 1130 AM) now. Almost all facilities have details in the IFT Coverage Viewer. RECnet's fccdata.org uses the KMZ files from the Coverage Viewer to generate pages that have coordinate information, ex. XEPRS-AM.

If you come across a "No Facility Data Found", particularly with AM, it means either the station is too new, or as is the case with a number of stations, relicensed under a new callsign but technical data may be available in records under the old one. Raymie (t • c) 20:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article LAN eXtensions for Instrumentation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, only primary sources and is not NPOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clovermoss (talk) 06:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you knew, but CFRN on 1260 kHz is a Class A station, although it can't really be called a clear-channel station because 1260 is a regional frequency. I made note of this in the Canadian section of 1260 AM; feel free to make other changes. I think this is the only case of a Class A station broadcasting on a regional frequency. user:Rudy2alan (User talk:Rudy2alan)

Portal:Canada, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Canada and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Canada during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nemo 20:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article VFG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2003.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi its my understanding that you are the creator of the NY state flag. I was wondering if you would be able to update it. The state senate just voted to add the words "e pluribus unum" underneath "Excelsior", a change that legally goes into effect on November 30th 2020 (https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/STL/70). The file that needs updating is the vector file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_New_York.svg Someone did recently changed it, but it is a raster image on a vector file.

There is currently a png file on the "Coat of arms of New York" page that is what the new flag looks like: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coat_of_arms_of_New_York#/media/File:Flag_of_New_York_(Updated).png Thanks! Worldwidewebb77 (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Letter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Cboi Sandlin (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.[reply]

I appologize for my false accusation of vandalism. It was a mistake, as i am new to the anti-vandalism patrolers. Please accept my sincere apology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cboi Sandlin (talk • contribs) 19:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect II. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 15#II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 54nd60x (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sailor Quartetto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure why you are filling unnecessary parameters on many Canadian city articles. At New Glasgow, Nova Scotia, you added external links to the infobox. One was dead, and the other was a link to a satellite map showing a square area. There is already a link in the infobox to several satellite maps, I'm not sure why you are adding another. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came to say a similar thing about the dead link at Whitehorse. For some reason someone put KABPC as the GNBC code, it's for Dawson while the correct code is KAHFT and was in the coordinates (poorly). I fixed it to be a reference. However, the "https://www4.nrcan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique?id=" that you are using is a problem. The correct link is "http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique/". I don't think that any https to that site works. I don't know how many others you added the link to but they need fixing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi You so good I got u a kitty

Ahhna (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	I have a puppy for you.
	Hi ,I really liked your work ,take tis puppy ,puppies spread wikiLove. So give puppies to anyone on wiki. Ahhna (talk) 10:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, how are you planning on using this? I've seen a lot of subtemplates while patrolling Special:NewPages, but they don't seem to be in-use anywhere. Also, in general, mass data modules are generally better as Lua modules than purely as templates. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<Comment deleted - general violation>

Hi Denelson, I've been looking into Highways in B.C. for quite a while, and needless to say I am interested in them. As far as I know, a lot of the pages for individual highways were created by you and you gave the year that each highway opened. How did you find out the years that each opened? I've been unable to find any sources which don't have elements or cite the Wikipedia articles except for maybe this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/45379817@N08/9500173642/ and other cited and verifiable sources on wikipedia. I know of another website called Wegenwiki (which is in Dutch) and they (might) have independently verified the dates however I'm not sure. Thank you for all that you've done to preserve the history of B.C.'s Highways too! Hope you feel better as well! Allthecows (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allthecows (talk • contribs) 21:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CGNDB link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vector images of trademarks has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CCOTW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canada NTS Grid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canada NTS Map Name Links is filled with error codes. Is this now no longer needed since the necessary elements needed for this template have been merged into the main NTS template? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 02:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Designated place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shawnigan Lake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BC Highway Shield has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rschen7754 23:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denelson83! I was curious about the file "Near-close near-front unrounded vowel.ogg" which mentions you as its assumed author based on copyright claims. The file is also used on ipachart.com, an interactive tool to get familiar with the phonemes of the IPA. On your user page you mention that you are unable to roll Rs, however, on ipachart.com there are several recordings of the speaker that produced "Near-close near-front unrounded vowel.ogg" producing these exact sounds (rolled Rs). Thus my question is: are you the author of "Near-close near-front unrounded vowel.ogg" (i.e. the speaker that produced the sound)? Have a nice day! 212.201.83.166 (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The rolled R is the alveolar trill, not the near-close near-front unrounded vowel. --  Denelson83  19:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say that I enjoyed reading your user description. I also cannot pronounciate the Rolling R ^_^ I dont think you should be embarrassed to have a passion for SM, there are other things which are way more embarrassing :-) (Like for example having a total laughing fit on a public train because you're reading Dr. Slump.)

Have a great day and a kitten!

Anon from Switzerland

Anon5464 (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Acting Crazy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television stations in Portsmouth, Ohio has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Let'srun (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Sailor Moon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Washington State Patrol

added links pointing to Wahkiakum County, Thurston County, Pierce County and Douglas County

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]