Aircorn: Please consider the following observations in a spirit of friendship.
Please consider adding the following topics to the history section of the article:
More generally, is the cloth square really called a "bib?" A bib is generally used to describe something that one wears around the neck -- for example, skiers wearing numbers during a competition. (Although not a reliable source, please see: http://eps-doublet.com/media/.gallery/main70.jpg.)
In the "Passing" section, the word "should" is unencyclopedic. As you know, Wikipedia is not a "how to" manual, so perhaps it could be rephrased in terms of players in x position generally have y skills. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 07:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-01T07:47:00.000Z","author":"Racepacket","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Racepacket-2011-05-01T07:47:00.000Z-Rules_of_Netball","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-05-02T13:12:00.000Z-Racepacket-2011-05-01T07:47:00.000Z"]}}-->
Responding back on your talk page. The netball around the world articles had been copy and pasted over to daughter articles at Netball in the Americas, etc. as a kind of holding pen. I'm kind of leery about doing too much work on netball given the issues about it being addressed elsewhere. :/ So yeah, could you run things past User:Liveste and User:v to see if they good to go with them? --LauraHale (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-06T07:59:00.000Z","author":"LauraHale","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LauraHale-2011-05-06T07:59:00.000Z-Netball_around_the_world","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-05-08T01:55:00.000Z-LauraHale-2011-05-06T07:59:00.000Z"]}}-->
As it happens, I do think your review was "faulty", as you put it. I disagree with just about every comment you made. But more importantly, I take major issue with the way you closed the review – without any opportunity for me or anyone else to respond to your comments, revise the article, or ask for a second opinion. I find this dismissal especially insulting, given that the article in question came close to GA two years ago, and has been thoroughly improved since then. I've corrected your premature closing and asked for another reviewer – preferably one who can be bothered to work with the nominator. » Swpbτ • ¢ 16:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-19T16:08:00.000Z","author":"Swpb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Swpb-2011-05-19T16:08:00.000Z-Rotating_locomotion_in_living_systems","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-05-20T00:17:00.000Z-Swpb-2011-05-19T16:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hello Aircorn, I just reviewed Demographics of New Zealand. The article is not quite yet ready to be passed for GA; you can read my comments on the review for this article here. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-24T20:05:00.000Z","author":"12george1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-12george1-2011-05-24T20:05:00.000Z-Talk:Demographics_of_New_Zealand\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-05-25T13:34:00.000Z-12george1-2011-05-24T20:05:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi, I am a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University doing some research into editing and reverts on Wikipedia. I am looking for editors who have done some editing to Genetics articles on Wikipedia as participants in a short survey. The survey will take about 10-15 minutes, and will help me model what sorts of things are reverted on Wikipedia so that I can develop interfaces and tools for newcomers and administrators. If you would like to participate, please complete the survey on SurveyMonkey here. If you know of any other Wikipedians in the genetics domain who might also be willing to help, I'd appreciate it. You can find out more about me on my user page and personal home page. I'm more than happy to talk more about this research on my talk page or by email, and thank you for your time. JeffRz (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-29T19:54:00.000Z","author":"JeffRz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JeffRz-2011-05-29T19:54:00.000Z-Invitation_for_a_short_research_survey","replies":["c-JeffRz-2011-05-31T03:24:00.000Z-JeffRz-2011-05-29T19:54:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hey, thanks very much for the review and the pass! In regards to trimming down the Steve Moore section, I was actually thinking of expanding that into its own article. Think it's a good idea? Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 00:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-15T00:23:00.000Z","author":"Orlandkurtenbach","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Orlandkurtenbach-2011-06-15T00:23:00.000Z-Re:_Bertuzzi_GA","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-06-15T02:20:00.000Z-Orlandkurtenbach-2011-06-15T00:23:00.000Z"]}}-->
Quick question: The changes you're making to the netball article? Can you comment on the talk article to explain them in terms of what you're doing and why? Also, are the changes being made based on the preliminary feedback from the GAR and the first failed FAC nomination? Beyond that, I'd remove the references to rugby 7s and the Cricket t20 series. I don't think you can assume audience familiarity with those events. Otherwise, I really appreciate the continued efforts to improve the article. --LauraHale (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-15T11:16:00.000Z","author":"LauraHale","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LauraHale-2011-06-15T11:16:00.000Z-Netball_article_changes","replies":["c-Bidgee-2011-06-15T11:27:00.000Z-LauraHale-2011-06-15T11:16:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks for responding. My comment wasn't intended as a criticism of the content of your edits and I hope it wasn't taken that way. I was more interested in the whys and whats of your edits. Some of the edit descriptions were descriptive but I didn't see any that said things like "Per FAC1" or "Per GA feedback", which coupled with the lack of commentary on the talk page over major changes, was why I asked the question. I didn't mean it in any way as a criticism or to take away from the hard and good work you've been doing on the article to fix it. --LauraHale (talk) 21:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-15T21:01:00.000Z","author":"LauraHale","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LauraHale-2011-06-15T21:01:00.000Z-Netball_article_changes","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-06-15T22:15:00.000Z-LauraHale-2011-06-15T21:01:00.000Z"]}}-->
Moray An Par (talk) 03:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-19T03:24:00.000Z","author":"Moray An Par","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Moray_An_Par-2011-06-19T03:24:00.000Z-Talkback","replies":[]}}-->
An arbitration case regarding Racepacket has closed and the final decision is now viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 21:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-19T21:43:00.000Z","author":"AGK","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AGK-2011-06-19T21:43:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/Racepacket_closed","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2022"}}-->
- JuneGloom Talk 14:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-27T14:48:00.000Z","author":"JuneGloom07","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JuneGloom07-2011-06-27T14:48:00.000Z-Thank_you!-1","replies":[],"displayName":"JuneGloom"}}-->
NP all the ones that were covered by the BRFA are done by one or the other of us (and the ruleset deleted). I currently have someone who inspects every edit and complains vociferously if it's not in accordance with "the roolz" so I have to treat WP as if it were a bureaucracy a lot of the time. Which is a shame, because it is the ability to get things done that actually makes the project a success. Rich Farmbrough, 13:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC).__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-15T13:31:00.000Z","author":"Rich Farmbrough","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rich_Farmbrough-2011-07-15T13:31:00.000Z-RU_positions","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-07-15T13:40:00.000Z-Rich_Farmbrough-2011-07-15T13:31:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Rich"}}-->
On a related note, why are you replacing a lot of the links in player biographies with redirects? For example, the link Centre (rugby union) has no functional advantage over Rugby union positions#13. Outside centre & 12. Inside centre, and yet you changed the latter to the former in several articles. If you were changing from the former to the latter, that would make more sense, but this is just making pointless changes that put extra load on the Wiki servers. Every revision we make is one more that the servers have to deal with, which is why we are discouraged from making too many edits when one would suffice. But I digress: I won't revert any of the changes you've made so far in this regard, but I do recommend that you stop making any further ones. – PeeJay 11:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-16T11:24:00.000Z","author":"PeeJay2K3","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PeeJay2K3-2011-07-16T11:24:00.000Z-RU_positions","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-07-16T14:45:00.000Z-PeeJay2K3-2011-07-16T11:24:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pee"}}-->
Hey. I'm editing a bit again, so I may look over the Richie article later on. It's great you've got it to GA, but getting to FA can be pretty tough, especially with prose. At the moment I'm looking a bit at New Zealand, and fixing up Crusaders (rugby) (which has deteriorated a bit). I'll hopefully get to the Richie article after that. - Shudde talk 12:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-27T12:05:00.000Z","author":"Shudde","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shudde-2011-07-27T12:05:00.000Z-Richie_McCaw","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-07-27T12:58:00.000Z-Shudde-2011-07-27T12:05:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thank you for taking the time to do such a detailed review. It will take me a few days to go through your notes and make changes but your suggestions seem reasonable. GabrielF (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-01T17:16:00.000Z","author":"GabrielF","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GabrielF-2011-08-01T17:16:00.000Z-RE:_Your_GA_nomination_of_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting","replies":[]}}-->
This is a very belated response to this, only just saw it. I'm not sure, but I think my workplace has a subscription to it-- do you still need the article in question? sonia♫ 02:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-10T02:39:00.000Z","author":"Sonia","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sonia-2011-08-10T02:39:00.000Z-NZ_Geographic","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-10T03:14:00.000Z-Sonia-2011-08-10T02:39:00.000Z"]}}-->
"Delete all after merging in the team squads (as collapsible boxes) into the Rugby union at the 2009 Maccabiah Games." - See my comments on the page... the team articles are not just about those teams competing at the 2009 games, but all of the national sides which have competed since it was introduced into the Maccabiah.--MacRusgail (talk) 18:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-18T18:37:00.000Z","author":"MacRusgail","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MacRusgail-2011-08-18T18:37:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Australia_Maccabiah_rugby_union_team","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-18T22:57:00.000Z-MacRusgail-2011-08-18T18:37:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thanks for all those great questions and for asking Don to take a look at them. :) SarahStierch (talk) 04:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-22T04:35:00.000Z","author":"SarahStierch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SarahStierch-2011-08-22T04:35:00.000Z-netball...","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-22T04:39:00.000Z-SarahStierch-2011-08-22T04:35:00.000Z"]}}-->
Are you deliberately not reading what you're deleting and the edit summary reverting you? You deleted three sentences. Only the last of them could be considered speculation. Therefore, if you wish to remove speculation, you should only delete that one sentence. What is so hard about that? -Rrius (talk) 09:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T09:29:00.000Z","author":"Rrius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rrius-2011-08-11T09:29:00.000Z-Dance_with_Dragons","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-11T09:48:00.000Z-Rrius-2011-08-11T09:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
Are you planning on concluding this soon. It has been three weeks since the last comment. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-22T22:15:00.000Z","author":"Jezhotwells","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jezhotwells-2011-08-22T22:15:00.000Z-Talk:Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-23T00:34:00.000Z-Jezhotwells-2011-08-22T22:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thank you Aircorn i would prefer if you did delist it as its not a good article applicant. Thank You very much!. Should you reply to this i would appriciate if you did so on my talk page. much appreciated --Editor2205 (talk) 09:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-24T09:40:00.000Z","author":"Editor2205","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Editor2205-2011-08-24T09:40:00.000Z-Editor2205_Julia_Gillard_article_nomination_reply","replies":[]}}-->
Sorry for ignoring you but I've been on a Wikibreak for the last week (holidays at a site with no broadband). But I've read through your section and the three paragraph section reads very well. The only issue is how to bring this into the main article as it covers areas already covered by the laws section. Do you want to delete the laws section and add the gameplay instead? ...or trim the laws section back and introduce gameplay in front of it? FruitMonkey (talk) 12:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-27T12:49:00.000Z","author":"FruitMonkey","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FruitMonkey-2011-08-27T12:49:00.000Z-Rugby_union:_Gameplay","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-27T13:59:00.000Z-FruitMonkey-2011-08-27T12:49:00.000Z"]}}-->
Where are your comments about Wait Your Turn? And I assume I am one of the "antagonists"? Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 13:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-28T13:55:00.000Z","author":"Calvin999","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Calvin999-2011-08-28T13:55:00.000Z-Question","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-08-28T21:57:00.000Z-Calvin999-2011-08-28T13:55:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Calvin"}}-->
Hi Geek2003. I understand that you are upset that some editors are putting your articles up for deletion, but retaliating by nominating their articles is not the best way to go about saving them. It is very WP:Pointy and wastes a lot of other editors time. AIRcorn (talk) 04:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-01T04:44:00.000Z","author":"Aircorn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Aircorn-2011-09-01T04:44:00.000Z-Tit_for_tat_nominations","replies":["c-Geek2003-2011-09-01T05:11:00.000Z-Aircorn-2011-09-01T04:44:00.000Z"]}}-->
The guidelines for Wikipedia:Peer review ask that editors nominate no more than one article per day (and four total at any one time). While the rules say that one of the requests can be removed, I will let it slide since this is the first time. Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-06T04:13:00.000Z","author":"Ruhrfisch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ruhrfisch-2011-09-06T04:13:00.000Z-PR_limits","replies":[]}}-->
See what your good efforts brought forth. I'd like to know: why shouldn't that editor worry? I worry when editors place spurious cn-tags. Especially, yes, in an FA. Drmies (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-08T22:00:00.000Z","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmies-2011-09-08T22:00:00.000Z-Blanking","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-09-09T01:17:00.000Z-Drmies-2011-09-08T22:00:00.000Z"]}}-->
Many thanks for the review on Sam Tomkins. I intend on addressing the issues raised, however this is bad time for me, since my broadband has just been renegotiated and cancelled until it's reinstalled, which should be on this coming Saturday (24th) at the latest. I will correct the article as soon as possible, but please keep on hold until then. GW(talk) 20:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T20:21:00.000Z","author":"Ginger Warrior","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ginger_Warrior-2011-09-19T20:21:00.000Z-Sam_Tomkins\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-09-19T21:52:00.000Z-Ginger_Warrior-2011-09-19T20:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"GW"}}-->
Hello Aircorn. I would like your help in an issue please. I suspect BiggerAristotle is a sockpuppet of someone and is using his BA account simply to create un-needed problems on the article Sonny Bill Williams. His edit history seems to also back up my suspicions i.e. He started his account to by editing about HP Sauce (as cover i suspect) but has since focussed mainly upon edit warring over the SBW article with gaps in between (again i suspect to add authenticity i suspect). He seems to lie in wait purely to edit war over the article- as his quietness over the past few days may show. He seems to thrive on removing any facts that show SBW's skill. So what i ask from you is help in how to put BA under investigation for sockpuppetry because i do not know how. A prompt response would be most appreciated. Thanks.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 00:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-02T00:31:00.000Z","author":"Suid-Afrikaanse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-02T00:31:00.000Z-Please_help","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-10-03T09:22:00.000Z-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-02T00:31:00.000Z"]}}-->
Fair enough. Lastly, is it possible to replace the initial boxer/rugby sentence with the following instead: "He is possibly the only athlete to simultaneously pursue careers in both professional boxing and international rugby." Thanks.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-03T11:37:00.000Z","author":"Suid-Afrikaanse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-03T11:37:00.000Z-Please_help","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-10-03T12:02:00.000Z-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-03T11:37:00.000Z"]}}-->
Got it. Okay, thanks for your advice and guidance once again.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 14:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-03T14:03:00.000Z","author":"Suid-Afrikaanse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-03T14:03:00.000Z-Please_help","replies":[]}}-->
Hey there, I know you have a number of rugby refs on your watchlist, just keep an eye on the Bryce Lawrence article will you. I've reverted already a couple of times, just the usual fan whine. Cheers Khukri 10:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-10T10:15:00.000Z","author":"Khukri","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Khukri-2011-10-10T10:15:00.000Z-Bryce_Lawrence","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-10-10T10:23:00.000Z-Khukri-2011-10-10T10:15:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Khu"}}-->
Hello Aircorn. I noticed you undid my edit even though I gave a reference with clear detail that said: "the nation is pinning its hopes on the rugby player they call Superman" and "His All Black team-mates have dubbed him Superman". So this reference says that his teammates and even New Zealand call him and dub him Superman. And if they call and dub him this name other than his own real name then isn’t that a nickname? I mean Richie McCaw has the nickname “Fluffy” and even though such nickname is rarely heard I do not see anyone removing it, because it is referenced as well. The same applies to Dan Carter’s nickname of “Dezzy” or even to such people as Piri Weepu, Ma’a Nonu or Conrad Smith who have nicknames on Wikipedia without even any references. So why is no one removing these nicknames? Also, you state: “Superman is no more a nickname than Money Bill William and neither should be used.” Well I object for one (I believe) reasonable argument- it is not for us to determine whether a name is “no more a nickname” If that nickname does in fact exist and there is a reputable reference to back it up. If a reference says that SBW has a nickname of Money Bill William or $BW then it is not for us to question it and oppose its inclusion in the article. So unless you have another good reason for your revert then I will be adding Superman again. Thank you and hope to hear from you soon.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 05:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-11T05:42:00.000Z","author":"Suid-Afrikaanse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Suid-Afrikaanse-2011-10-11T05:42:00.000Z-On_Sonny_Bill_Williams","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Aircorn, have you seen this? Do you fancy contributing? FruitMonkey (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-15T21:43:00.000Z","author":"FruitMonkey","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FruitMonkey-2011-10-15T21:43:00.000Z-Signpost","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-10-16T12:35:00.000Z-FruitMonkey-2011-10-15T21:43:00.000Z"]}}-->
Sorry for my eventual inactivity on the Sam Tomkins/GA1 review. When I nominated it, I had lots of free time on my hand, but my circumstances changed over the months as the review got underway and I've found myself unable to contribute meaningfully. I'll take the comments on board in any future work on the article, and thanks for your work and patience. Also, congratulations on your country's win two weeks ago. GW(talk) 12:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-31T12:47:00.000Z","author":"Ginger Warrior","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ginger_Warrior-2011-10-31T12:47:00.000Z-Apologies","replies":["c-Ginger_Warrior-2011-10-31T12:53:00.000Z-Ginger_Warrior-2011-10-31T12:47:00.000Z"],"displayName":"GW"}}-->
Okay :) Thank you. --Editor2205 (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-04T10:11:00.000Z","author":"Editor2205","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Editor2205-2011-11-04T10:11:00.000Z-Julia_Gillard_GA_nomination","replies":[]}}-->
Hi. I have finished making the changes you requested in Talk:Aniru Conteh/GA1. For a summary of my changes, see User talk:Viriditas#Aniru Conteh GA review. For more detailed commentary, see the review page. Please feel free to spot check and make any changes you think will improve the article. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-05T13:29:00.000Z","author":"Viriditas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Viriditas-2011-11-05T13:29:00.000Z-Re:_Aniru_Conteh","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-06T00:09:00.000Z-Viriditas-2011-11-05T13:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
I'm not entirely sure which references you'd like to see replaced. Can you please provide more detailed and specific feedback, so I can either do so or demonstrate that the sources in question are, in fact, acceptable under our policies? I'll go through the prose in the mean time. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-05T22:38:00.000Z","author":"Jclemens","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jclemens-2011-11-05T22:38:00.000Z-Cripples_Bastards_and_Broken_Things_GA_review","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-06T00:10:00.000Z-Jclemens-2011-11-05T22:38:00.000Z"]}}-->
User:Ashliveslove, a relatively young Wikipedian, did a very brief review for my nomination Not Afraid at Talk:Not_Afraid/GA1 and I fear that it will not fully meet the criteria. I left a comment at the page, saying that I have addressed his one issue and I am concerned about if I should be taking any other responsibility. I see you left a note about his reviews and would like your view. Thanks! —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 12:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-06T12:10:00.000Z","author":"Wikipedian Penguin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wikipedian_Penguin-2011-11-06T12:10:00.000Z-Talk:Not_Afraid\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-07T02:32:00.000Z-Wikipedian_Penguin-2011-11-06T12:10:00.000Z"],"displayName":"WP:PENGUIN"}}-->
Hi, I would like to have your advice on this one. I'm in favor for not providing GA to this article due to reasons mentioned in review. Still before doing so would like last minute advice. ASHUIND 18:35, 11 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-11T18:35:00.000Z","author":"Ashliveslove","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ashliveslove-2011-11-11T18:35:00.000Z-Talk:Christopher_Nolan\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-11T19:31:00.000Z-Ashliveslove-2011-11-11T18:35:00.000Z"],"displayName":"ASHU"}}-->
I told him to participate, based on if he had any experience in editing episode articles, but reading my message now, I don't think that was so clear. Pancake (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-12T11:06:00.000Z","author":"PancakeMistake","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PancakeMistake-2011-11-12T11:06:00.000Z-Re","replies":[],"displayName":"Pancake"}}-->
Hello, thanks for the info. I used to edit wikipedia very often (mainly on music related articles), but over the last few months I've been very busy and I didn't start editing on a daily basis again until fairly recently. I'm likely a little rusty and have forgotten some of these things. Well take care. RG (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-13T04:06:00.000Z","author":"Rockgenre","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rockgenre-2011-11-13T04:06:00.000Z-Re:Nominating_GAs","replies":[],"displayName":"RG"}}-->
I just wonder if you have decided to review it? Someone crossed it from my list at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations, and you are the only one who mentioned it... :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-16T00:14:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2011-11-16T00:14:00.000Z-Single_parent_GAN","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-16T00:15:00.000Z-Piotrus-2011-11-16T00:14:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
I note from your edit summary at Talk:Regulation of the release of genetic modified organisms that you are a little despondent about about Wikipedia editing. I do not want my editing to drive editors away from WP. Please persevere with the work that you are doing. I will be giving an in depth reply at the article talk page in due course. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-16T00:46:00.000Z","author":"Alan Liefting","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Alan_Liefting-2011-11-16T00:46:00.000Z-We_need_good_editors","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-16T00:54:00.000Z-Alan_Liefting-2011-11-16T00:46:00.000Z"]}}-->
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pregnancy#RfC: Which photo should we use in the lead?. You participated in the previous RFC on the lead image, Talk:Pregnancy/Archive 4#Lead image RfC. Nil Einne (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-17T14:46:00.000Z","author":"Nil Einne","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nil_Einne-2011-11-17T14:46:00.000Z-Talk:Pregnancy#RfC:_Which_photo_should_we_use_in_the_lead?","replies":[]}}-->
Hi would appreciate your help in reviewing this article if you get time. This is really a long one and was more of written as a publicity since people in India are pretty excited about this film. Will need some one like you with neutral point to help reviewing the article. Thanks. ASHUIND 15:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-14T15:43:00.000Z","author":"Ashliveslove","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ashliveslove-2011-11-14T15:43:00.000Z-Talk:Ra.One\/GA1","replies":["c-Aircorn-2011-11-14T19:51:00.000Z-Ashliveslove-2011-11-14T15:43:00.000Z"],"displayName":"ASHU"}}-->
Thank you for your efforts on improving such a substantial article. For purposes of further improve, I will look through it and give it a GA-like review on its talk page, in which I will list my remaining concerns. Cheers, Auree ★ 00:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-22T00:43:00.000Z","author":"Hylian Auree","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hylian_Auree-2011-11-22T00:43:00.000Z-Re:_Ivan","replies":[],"displayName":"Auree"}}-->
Scieberking (talk) 12:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-22T12:21:00.000Z","author":"Scieberking","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Scieberking-2011-11-22T12:21:00.000Z-Talkback_2","replies":[]}}-->
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Conservatism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-28T02:15:00.000Z","author":"RFC bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RFC_bot-2011-11-28T02:15:00.000Z-Please_comment_on_Talk:Conservatism","replies":[]}}-->
Hello. Please visit this section of the Ra.One talk page, and provide a consensus so as to decide the future of my proposition. I will be glad if you also mention some comments regarding how to approach this (undoubtedly) longer and more detailed review. Thank you. AnkitBhattWDF AnkitBhattWDF 16:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-29T16:46:00.000Z","author":"Ankitbhatt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ankitbhatt-2011-11-29T16:46:00.000Z-Consensus","replies":[]}}-->
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Heterarchy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-04T03:15:00.000Z","author":"RFC bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RFC_bot-2011-12-04T03:15:00.000Z-Please_comment_on_Talk:Heterarchy","replies":[]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.216.236.59