PROFILPELAJAR.COM

September 2020

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lucien von Römer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 13:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Loudon (politician). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to James Loudon (politician). Materialscientist (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 15:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Dear user, I have noticed a disturbing pattern of unhelpful edits. You cannot determine the ethnicity of a person purely on the basis of a surname, and certainly not so when it contradicts the cited sources in the article. Your opinion is not a replacement for a citation. Francoisdjvr (talk) 09:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Hergé, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. I see your edit at Hergé is part of a pattern of editing people's ethnicity on the basis of their surname origin. Please read WP:OR - it's important that whatever we put on this is cited to reliable sources. As Geert Bourgeois could tell you, surname is a very poor indicator of ethnicity. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hergé, you may be blocked from editing. I undid your edit and left a message here explaining why. Please do not simply repeat the same edit without sources or explanation, or you are liable to be blocked. —Brigade Piron (talk) 21:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rafael Merry del Val—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cornelis Caesar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Maarten Schmidt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Frederik de Moucheron—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Balthazar de Moucheron. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pierre de Moucheron, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thomas Cadmus. Materialscientist (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Question,

Hello GorrillaWarfare,

I would like to know why I was temporarily blocked from editing, my contributions were only to provide facts that I have gotten from other sources. If you could respond to my message I would really appreciate that. (Btw my Instagram account is Arnoldswartzajager if your interested. :) )

Thanks, Kohl

December 2020

Hello, I'm Igarnish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to George Blake have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Igarnish (talk) 00:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.