Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Boy Scouts of America membership controversies was changed by 112.205.7.91 (u) (t) deleting 10308 characters on 2010-10-25T01:29:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-10-25T01:29:00.000Z","author":"ClueBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClueBot-2010-10-25T01:29:00.000Z-October_2010","replies":[]}}-->

The recent edit you made to Boy Scouts of America membership controversies constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 01:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-10-25T01:32:00.000Z","author":"MJ94","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MJ94-2010-10-25T01:32:00.000Z-October_2010","replies":[]}}-->

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elockid ^(Talk) 01:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-20T01:37:00.000Z","author":"Elockid","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elockid-2010-11-20T01:37:00.000Z-November_2010","replies":[]}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 01:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-20T01:38:00.000Z","author":"Elockid","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elockid-2010-11-20T01:38:00.000Z-November_2010","replies":[]}}-->

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The article Éamon de Valera‎, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions. All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related. Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

--Domer48_'fenian' 15:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T15:12:00.000Z","author":"Domer48","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Domer48-2010-11-28T15:12:00.000Z-Notice","replies":[]}}-->

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Éamon de Valera‎. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Éamon de Valera. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T15:49:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2010-11-28T15:49:00.000Z-Notice","replies":[],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 13:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-12-24T13:15:00.000Z","author":"Elockid","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elockid-2010-12-24T13:15:00.000Z-December_2010","replies":[]}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Impalement, you may be blocked from editing. There's too much vandalism going on from this IP Trigaranus (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-12T21:22:00.000Z","author":"Trigaranus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trigaranus-2011-02-12T21:22:00.000Z-February_2011","replies":[]}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Castellan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yopie (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-14T12:47:00.000Z","author":"Yopie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yopie-2011-02-14T12:47:00.000Z-February_2011","replies":[]}}-->

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of six months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

HalfShadow 17:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-14T17:19:00.000Z","author":"HalfShadow","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HalfShadow-2011-02-14T17:19:00.000Z-February_2011","replies":[],"displayName":"Half"}}-->

Thank you.