This is an archive of past discussions with User:0xDeadbeef. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

• Three new partners
• Google Scholar integration
• How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240124133600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240124133600-Books_&_Bytes_\u2013_Issue_60","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240129192900","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240129192900-Tech_News:_2024-05","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you 2603:6010:3542:206B:EDAD:4582:E9FE:896E (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240113011900","author":"2603:6010:3542:206B:EDAD:4582:E9FE:896E","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2603:6010:3542:206B:EDAD:4582:E9FE:896E-20240113011900-God","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240113042700-2603:6010:3542:206B:EDAD:4582:E9FE:896E-20240113011900"]}}-->

Hmm? 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240113042700","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240113042700-2603:6010:3542:206B:EDAD:4582:E9FE:896E-20240113011900","replies":["c-Formerlychucks-20240201152500-0xDeadbeef-20240113042700"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

what did he mean by this? Formerlychucks (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201152500","author":"Formerlychucks","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Formerlychucks-20240201152500-0xDeadbeef-20240113042700","replies":[]}}-->

I have been waiting for an actual response for a while now on my rollback request for perms. I looked through the list and decided that asking directly would be quicker to just get it over with. May you please consider my request?

(P.S: Rust > Go) jayhawker6 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201164600","author":"Jayhawker6","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jayhawker6-20240201164600-Rollback_Request","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

• Red-tailed hawk
• Robertsky

• Ameliorate!
• Ancheta Wis
• Anthony Bradbury (deceased)
• Cobi
• Ev
• Moondyne
• Worm That Turned

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

• Enterprisey
• Izno

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hi! I was going to ask in the SPI if it'd be more convenient just to keep track of new socks somewhere and then report the bulk of them later on in the week or something. Most of my findings have just been getting lucky spotting an account or two late at night.

I'm mostly filing since it appears they abuse more on the Japanese Wikipedia and might just be using en wiki to make new accounts where our rangeblocks may not be as comprehensive. Should I just hold off for future filings? Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 21:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240204210300","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240204210300-Reporting_bulut\/ASPE","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240205014800-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240204210300"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Feel free to message me, actually. I have written an edit filter than automatically catches these socks so we can space out the filings. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 01:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240205014800","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240205014800-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240204210300","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240205015600-0xDeadbeef-20240205014800"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Forgive my lack of knowledge about on-wiki messaging methods - would that be via email, leaving a message here or on some user talk subpage, or some super secret on-wiki messaging? There's another pretty blatant (not really long term) vandal/spammer who I'm not sure has a filter yet. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 01:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240205015600","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240205015600-0xDeadbeef-20240205014800","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240205020300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240205015600"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

if you want to ask a filter to be created for a blatant vandal, send an email to the mailing list. (WP:EFMAILING) For the ASPE LTA feel free to just leave a message here. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 02:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240205020300","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240205020300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240205015600","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240205192000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240205192000-Tech_News:_2024-06","replies":[]}}-->

Congrats on becoming the top administrator! I am happy to relinquish the position to you, and wish you the best of luck with the truly strange emails you may receive by virtue of being the first administrator on the list. Cheers, 28bytes (talk) 16:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240117163700","author":"28bytes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-28bytes-20240117163700-Congratulations!","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240117231400-28bytes-20240117163700"]}}-->

Thanks, I realized that yesterday, and it explained some of the weird talk page comments I have received since I became an admin. I hope I don't have to reconsider my username choice because of this! 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240117231400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240117231400-28bytes-20240117163700","replies":["c-AirshipJungleman29-20240119124600-0xDeadbeef-20240117231400"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

I'm a rather big fan of #God above. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240119124600","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240119124600-0xDeadbeef-20240117231400","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240119131400-AirshipJungleman29-20240119124600"],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

That's a nice message, actually. Though I mostly referred to a comment I got that is now suppressed from the history. (from a wmf-banned user asking for my email) 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 13:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240119131400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240119131400-AirshipJungleman29-20240119124600","replies":["c-AirshipJungleman29-20240125155200-0xDeadbeef-20240119131400"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Ah, that's not so fun. Anyway, now that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DeadbeefBot 3 has been approved, how soon do you intend to set it loose? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240125155200","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240125155200-0xDeadbeef-20240119131400","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240126011800-AirshipJungleman29-20240125155200"],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

I spent some time doing housekeeping on the code, but it looks like PetScan is down. I do have some lists saved offline, but I'd rather go off from a fresh list that the bot definitely knows how to process. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 01:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240126011800","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240126011800-AirshipJungleman29-20240125155200","replies":["c-AirshipJungleman29-20240128160900-0xDeadbeef-20240126011800"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

It seems like it's up again. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240128160900","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240128160900-0xDeadbeef-20240126011800","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240129005900-AirshipJungleman29-20240128160900"],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

this week is quite busy for me. I'll try to get it up and running this weekend 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 00:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240129005900","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240129005900-AirshipJungleman29-20240128160900","replies":["c-AirshipJungleman29-20240213200500-0xDeadbeef-20240129005900"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Did you manage to find the time? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240213200500","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240213200500-0xDeadbeef-20240129005900","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240214095600-AirshipJungleman29-20240213200500"],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

@AirshipJungleman29: I did manage to find some time. (and it had a few hundreds of edits I think) There are more things to consider before the bot can be made to have a larger scope. For example, Talk:Therese Forster has a DYK image, but there's no way to specify that in the {{article history}} template currently, so I told the bot to not handle those yet. I asked more than a month ago at Template talk:Article history#DYK Image? but no one said yes or no. What do you think?

The other issue is determining if a PR is reviewed or not. I actually have some idea on this. If the page only has one signature, then it is definitely not reviewed. If it has more than one, we can put it as reviewed. I'll just have to find more time to code that into the bot. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240214095600","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240214095600-AirshipJungleman29-20240213200500","replies":["c-AirshipJungleman29-20240214100600-0xDeadbeef-20240214095600"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

I hadn't noticed that DYK image inclusion, and I don't really know what to think about it. On the one hand, I suppose it is nice to have that picture, but what if it gets deleted in the future? I also don't know where it would fit in the article history template, which is presumably why it was left out. That is a slight conundrum, yes. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240214100600","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240214100600-0xDeadbeef-20240214095600","replies":[],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

Hello, 0xDeadbeef,

I think the bot needs to be restarted or get a tune-up. It's not just the report I use, it looks like it overslept. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209034600","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20240209034600-User:HaleBot","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240209045400-Liz-20240209034600"]}}-->

I've restarted it. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209045400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240209045400-Liz-20240209034600","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

on the wojak page, you dismissed my edits concerning soyjak.party due to it being an unreliable source, yet the first reference on the article is know your meme, WP:KYM

i would like to remind you that soyjak party has a KYM article aswell, dont be a hypocrite

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/sites/soyjakparty Formerlychucks (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209161400","author":"Formerlychucks","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Formerlychucks-20240209161400-\"Unreliable_sources\"","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600-Formerlychucks-20240209161400"]}}-->

It isn't hypocrisy. Unreliable sources can't be used but we still get articles of poor quality using them. We don't have enough volunteer time to enforce that. Usually, someone is supposed to find a better source instead of removing content wholesale. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 16:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209162600","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600-Formerlychucks-20240209161400","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240209162700-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600","c-Formerlychucks-20240210110000-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

But in your case, the WP:BURDEN is on you to show that your content can be attributed to a reliable source. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 16:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209162700","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240209162700-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Yes it is hypocritical, why are you removing my content wholesale when "unreliable sources" are casually used in the articles and are only given a [better source needed] tag? your mental gymnastics contradict logic, also, please assume good faith.

Also, it seems you deleted my addition hastily and haven't checked my source, the source i am using, followchain.org is made by Lim How Wei, this man has 8+ years of experience in social media marketing, and has been quoted and referenced by major publications and media companies like WikiHow, Fast Company, HuffPost, Vice, New York Post, The Conversation, and many others, and despite having poor english (that still gets the point across and can be corrected thoughbeit) he can still research obscure social media websites and provide adequate information for them, i would argue he is more reliable than even know your meme. Formerlychucks (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210110000","author":"Formerlychucks","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Formerlychucks-20240210110000-0xDeadbeef-20240209162600","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240210121400-Formerlychucks-20240210110000"]}}-->

Seems like a spammy source at best. Primary and beware of WP:ONUS. Please try to work with us and find an actual reliable source. And also bring it up on Talk:Wojak instead of here. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210121400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240210121400-Formerlychucks-20240210110000","replies":["c-Formerlychucks-20240210144900-0xDeadbeef-20240210121400"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

"Spammy source"

That does not matter, it gives valuable information about social media.

All news articles are spammy, technically.

WP:ONUS: "Consensus may determine that certain information does not improve an article. Such information should be omitted or presented instead in a different article"

Mentioning soyjak.party presents the impact of the soyjak and how it created an entire thriving community, that definitely improves the section (and by addition; the article) by adding interesting and notable information about soyjak.

Do you understand now? Formerlychucks (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210144900","author":"Formerlychucks","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Formerlychucks-20240210144900-0xDeadbeef-20240210121400","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240210145400-Formerlychucks-20240210144900"]}}-->

No. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210145400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240210145400-Formerlychucks-20240210144900","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240213054600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240213054600-Tech_News:_2024-07","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240219153400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240219153400-Tech_News:_2024-08","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, 0xDeadbeef,

I just thought I'd let you know that Wikipedia:Database reports/Empty categories hasn't been updated since February 18th. I do have that alternative source for empty categories but in case this is a problem with HaleBot, I thought I'd alert you. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240222020900","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20240222020900-HaleBot","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240222084300-Liz-20240222020900"]}}-->

Looks like Legoktm took care of it. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240222084300","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240222084300-Liz-20240222020900","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

I'm not sure what happened here. The bot didn't like that I skipped over "1", so it deleted |action3=WAR ? [27] Schierbecker (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240223044700","author":"Schierbecker","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Schierbecker-20240223044700-DeadbeefBot_edit_to_Talk:Typhoon_Ike","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240223131400-Schierbecker-20240223044700"]}}-->

Yeah, I will take a note to fix this before I run the bot the next time. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 13:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240223131400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240223131400-Schierbecker-20240223044700","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Hello, I tried to use this query and got a 502. I am contacting you because you were listed as one of the maintainers. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 22:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240221220600","author":"NightWolf1223","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-NightWolf1223-20240221220600-sigma.toolforge.org\/summary.py_is_not_working.","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600-NightWolf1223-20240221220600"],"displayName":"NW1223"}}-->

Noted. I will take a look when I get time. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240225042600","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600-NightWolf1223-20240221220600","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Direction – Social Democracy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240225043700","author":"Qwerfjkl (bot)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Qwerfjkl_(bot)-20240225043700-CS1_error_on_Direction_\u2013_Social_Democracy","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240226192100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240226192100-Tech_News:_2024-09","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Administrator changes Sdkb The Night Watch East718 Isabelle Belato Mzajac Staecker Stan Shebs Sugarfish Tamzin

Bureaucrat changes SilkTork

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
• Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

• The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

• The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

May I create a table for the main cast and characters since season 7 is the final season also Matteo, Finn, Ava and Gwen are returning for season 7 as a guest character. Noah2004 (talk) Noah4000 (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240209175500","author":"Noah4000","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Noah4000-20240209175500-Bunk'd","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240210033900-Noah4000-20240209175500"]}}-->

You need to leave messages on the talk page. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 03:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210033900","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240210033900-Noah4000-20240209175500","replies":["c-Noah4000-20240210174200-0xDeadbeef-20240210033900"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

I did Noah4000 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210174200","author":"Noah4000","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Noah4000-20240210174200-0xDeadbeef-20240210033900","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240210174400-Noah4000-20240210174200"]}}-->

And another editor disagreed with you. So you need to try to get consensus for adding such a table. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 17:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240210174400","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240210174400-Noah4000-20240210174200","replies":["c-Noah4000-20240215175200-0xDeadbeef-20240210174400"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

how do I do that? Noah4000 (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240215175200","author":"Noah4000","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Noah4000-20240215175200-0xDeadbeef-20240210174400","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600-Noah4000-20240215175200"]}}-->

Convince them at Talk:Bunk'd#Table chart. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240225042600","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600-Noah4000-20240215175200","replies":["c-Noah4000-20240304033300-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

ok Noah4000 (talk) 03:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240304033300","author":"Noah4000","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Noah4000-20240304033300-0xDeadbeef-20240225042600","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240304194500","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240304194500-Tech_News:_2024-10","replies":[]}}-->

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

• Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
• 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240305163200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240305163200-Books_&_Bytes_\u2013_Issue_61","replies":[]}}-->

I suspect the following to be あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと.

Almost certainly あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと:

• ეპურასაგ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• UkEɔƑŋ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Possible sleepers:

• অ্যাপারজারস (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ƆƑŋUkE (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• საგეპურა (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• އެސްސްޕައެވެރޖަރ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

32.220.205.180 (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240211040100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240211040100-\u3042\u3059\u307a\u308b\u304c\u3042\u3059\u307a\u3057\u3083\u308a\u3059\u3068?","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900-32.220.205.180-20240211040100"]}}-->

Yes, the two users are them. I don't think we need to report them until more socks pop up though. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240211041900","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900-32.220.205.180-20240211040100","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240211061000-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240212043400-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

• ስጥየልስው (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ТьЕспрОбелы (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ዝጋሉፔ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

And possibly (not really sure because I can't read it):

• سرنئپ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

32.220.205.180 (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240211061000","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240211061000-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900","replies":[]}}-->

Seems there's more:

• 焙犀蠍焙ピオラ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) with diff
• 焙犀蠍焙 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) with diff 2

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240212043400","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240212043400-0xDeadbeef-20240211041900","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240213205900-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240212043400"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

More rearrangements of previous sock names. I'd be surprised if these weren't them:

• KEƆƑŋU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ጥውስየልብስ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ЕлытьЕспроб (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• גאספרר (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

32.220.205.180 (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240213205900","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240213205900-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240212043400","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240213210100-32.220.205.180-20240213205900","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216032800-32.220.205.180-20240213205900"]}}-->

Also noting that ዝጋሉፔ and ƆƑŋUkE that I put above have gone and created/blanked their talk pages. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240213210100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240213210100-32.220.205.180-20240213205900","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240214095900-32.220.205.180-20240213210100"]}}-->

I don't think it is necessary to report them frequently, and I personally would like to see at least 10 obvious accounts (with blanking and username) before it could be made more a satisfying task for the CUs than a tedious bureaucratic necessity. But feel free to start a report with what you have already. I can always be nudged to add to reports that others start. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240214095900","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240214095900-32.220.205.180-20240213210100","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240214100300-0xDeadbeef-20240214095900"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

actually, just went through some of them blocking them manually indef. I'll actually start a request. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240214100300","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240214100300-0xDeadbeef-20240214095900","replies":[],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Another one:

KEƆƑŋU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216032800","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216032800-32.220.205.180-20240213205900","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240216033100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216032800"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Mentioned above 32.220.205.180 (talk) 03:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216033100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240216033100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216032800","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200-32.220.205.180-20240216033100"]}}-->

Oops - saw them pop up in recent user page changes. Looks like the account maybe slept for a few days? Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216033200","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200-32.220.205.180-20240216033100","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240216033400-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200","c-32.220.205.180-20240216033700-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200","c-32.220.205.180-20240216034100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

The account سرنئپ that I mentioned on 11 February also wrote in Japanese on their talk page. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216033400","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240216033400-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200","replies":[]}}-->

And that account also wrote patent nonsense on their talk page. I don't see anything new in the User Creation Log. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216033700","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240216033700-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200","replies":[]}}-->

Oh. They're blocked on jawiki for sockpuppetry. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216034100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240216034100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240216033200","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240216034200-32.220.205.180-20240216034100"]}}-->

Both accounts (KEƆƑŋU and سرنئپ) are blocked on jawiki for sockpuppetry! 32.220.205.180 (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240216034200","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240216034200-32.220.205.180-20240216034100","replies":[]}}-->

I see that some of the new ones have already been caught (The last two are possible, but I think I would need to see them create their talk pages and blank them first).

• ልብስጥየውስ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ררספגא (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• UƒkɔEŋ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ރސްސްޕައެވެރޖައެ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• වාවාරු (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ገቀንነሜን (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ИемЧкеэк (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ध्यानदेंकृपया (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

32.220.205.180 (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240217161100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240217161100-\u3042\u3059\u307a\u308b\u304c\u3042\u3059\u307a\u3057\u3083\u308a\u3059\u3068?","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240211211100-32.220.205.180-20240217161100","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218032400-32.220.205.180-20240217161100"]}}-->

Thank you! Was about to report the first two. :) Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 21:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240211211100","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240211211100-32.220.205.180-20240217161100","replies":[],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Throw:

ጥውስየልብስ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

ЕлытьЕспроб (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

onto the pile. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218032400","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218032400-32.220.205.180-20240217161100","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218040100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218032400"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Caught those on 13 February already :) Maybe we should start a report, because سرنئپ, KEƆƑŋU, and these two evaded the latest check. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218040100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218040100-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218032400","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040200-32.220.205.180-20240218040100","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040500-32.220.205.180-20240218040100"]}}-->

Strange - they just edited their talk pages today. I guess you're checking new user creations and I'm on recent changes. With the username trends they all tend to look the same after a while, haha. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218040200","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040200-32.220.205.180-20240218040100","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240218050300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040200"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

I wouldn't act upon the accounts based on usernames alone. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218050300","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240218050300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040200","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218061100-0xDeadbeef-20240218050300"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Yes, but they've written on their talkpages in Japanese, in addition to their usernames. It's either them or someone impersonating them. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218061100","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218061100-0xDeadbeef-20240218050300","replies":[]}}-->

Two more popping up:

焙犀‎ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

焙犀ピオラ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218040500","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040500-32.220.205.180-20240218040100","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218060500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040500"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

I do check the user creation log, but I usually only check mobile creations because that's usually where the socks are. Some other accounts that were created in the same timeframe and also rearrangements of previous sock names (The six above this reply are already blocked on jawiki for sockpuppetry):

• ジ・焙犀 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (compare to 焙犀ピオラ and 焙犀)
• ジ・焙犀蠍焙 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (焙犀蠍焙ピオラ and 焙犀蠍焙)
• ብስየውስልጥ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (compare ልብውስጥየ, ስጥየልውስ, ስውስጥየል, ብስውስጥየል, ውስልብየስጥ, የውልብስስጥ, የውስልብስጥ, ጥየልብስውስ, whichever one, take your pick...)

Maybe? (They all end in the same three characters, and this master has used the last two characters to end some of their sock names before):

• 璋隙北 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ゴー!プリンセス璋隙北 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 旧璋隙北 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

I did see an account named 'ApseK12', but I don't think it's them because it's not like this master to misspell things.

32.220.205.180 (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218060500","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218060500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218040500","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218063500-32.220.205.180-20240218060500","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218203400-32.220.205.180-20240218060500"]}}-->

The socks continue! ジ・焙犀 and ジ・焙犀蠍焙 created their talk pages. This master has created their talk page with what was on ジ・焙犀蠍焙 before, though. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 06:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218063500","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218063500-32.220.205.180-20240218060500","replies":["c-0xDeadbeef-20240218080000-32.220.205.180-20240218063500"]}}-->

Blocked all of them that were obvious. Requested locks on Meta. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218080000","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240218080000-32.220.205.180-20240218063500","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218185500-0xDeadbeef-20240218080000"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

You forgot

• سرنئپ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• KEƆƑŋU (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

In addition,

• ስጥየልውስ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ገቀንነሜን (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• වාවාරු (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• خپگەشینەاس (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• სურააგეპ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ЫтьЕспРобел (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

have been CU blocked by Spicy.

In addition, I don't see how 璋隙北, ゴー!プリンセス璋隙北, 旧璋隙北 are obvious given that they don't have talk pages yet.

32.220.205.180 (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218185500","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218185500-0xDeadbeef-20240218080000","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218224700-32.220.205.180-20240218185500"]}}-->

I've created a user page to track Bulut's socks, please let me know 0xDeadbeef if this should be deleted to deny recognition. The table is probably a little messy, but should help keep track of who's been blocked and who hasn't (plus who to report and to not report). Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 22:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218224700","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218224700-32.220.205.180-20240218185500","replies":[],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Per their Japanese LTA page (taken with a grain of machine translated salt):

"...so you can find Romanized readings, non-Japanese spellings, and even anagrams of "Asperger", and similar user names..."

Romanized anagrams aren't out of the question. Since they've been pretty prolific here, an LTA page or a translated LTA page from jawiki may not hurt. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 20:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218203400","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218203400-32.220.205.180-20240218060500","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218225000-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218203400"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Yes, if we are to trust machine translation, most of the Japanese names have something to do (or are similar sounding) to 'Aspergers', but some of the other names don't have relation to Aspergers or don't translate at all (Sometimes, their names also machine translate to "Tomorrow", some of them also include "North" ):

• "UkEɔƑŋ" --> "UkEɔŋŋ"
• "ꯑꯦꯁ꯭ꯔ꯫" --> "ꯑꯦꯁ꯭ꯔ꯫"
• "焙犀蠍焙" --> "roasted scorpion" (or "Baked Rhinoceros Scorpion Baked"?)
• "跖芒拜蓼渠跖" --> "蓖苒苜蓼渠蓖"
• "ስጥየልውስ" --> "When I give it to you"
• "زلوااا" --> "Zaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" or "Zlwaaa"
• "متزوجشدد" --> "MarriedStressed"
• "تلوث اشعاعى" --> "Radioactive Contamination"

I think there are some translation issues, like not knowing the original language.

Another question, have any of their socks ever vandalized? 32.220.205.180 (talk) 22:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218225000","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218225000-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218203400","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218225200-32.220.205.180-20240218225000"]}}-->

I think there's been a few in the four archive pages (!!) that have made edits to mainspace, but most of their target articles (I believe) have at least some sort of semi-protection. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 22:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218225200","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218225200-32.220.205.180-20240218225000","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218233200-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218225200"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

I have some more questions:

1. What does "あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと" really mean? I can get it to translate to "Asperger Specialist", "Asperu is Tomorrow", "tomorrow is tomorrow", and "Tomorrow's Wikipedia".
2. Some accounts, such as Asperger'22, Aspe version2022, アスペルガー バージョン2022, Asperger version2022, or アスペ バージョン2022 are tagged as socks of ISECHIKA, are they impersonating?

32.220.205.180 (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218233200","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218233200-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240218225200","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000000-32.220.205.180-20240218233200"]}}-->

It's plausible going off of this section of Isechika's page. Google Translate says he'll impersonate ASPE. Either way, they both need global locks, so I hope it doesn't matter too much one way or another which LTA it is. I assume any offensive usernames that Isechika may come up with, if impersonating ASPE, will be noticed by jawiki admins. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 00:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240219000000","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000000-32.220.205.180-20240218233200","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000000"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

After looking at Special:Contributions/アスペ龍騎 & Special:Contributions/アスペルガー龍騎, it's plausible that this is Isechika. I have no clue if the CU data would be stale by now, but if any CUs passing by see this, it could be worth checking. The first is a lot closer to Special:Contributions/سرنئپ than any previously tagged socks are. It looks like they're both still active too, which doesn't make this any easier. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 00:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240219000300","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000000","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240219061900-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300","c-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Wow. I just realized the existence of the Sock list template. I could have done those lists above much easier... 32.220.205.180 (talk) 06:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240219061900","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240219061900-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300","replies":[]}}-->

It doesn't really matter. They're going to be socks either way, whether operated by isechika or bulut. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240219092500","author":"0xDeadbeef","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240219000300","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240303020100-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240309042500-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500"],"displayName":"Deadbeef"}}-->

Mind smacking 瀏楚ゲートウェイ for this? Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 02:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240303020100","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":13,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240303020100-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500","replies":[],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Sock drawer.

ジ・アスペルガーネクスト (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), see Special:Diff/1212681428/

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240309042500","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":13,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240309042500-0xDeadbeef-20240219092500","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310013800-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240309042500"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

脚抖北 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) for this. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 01:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310013800","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":14,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310013800-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240309042500","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014000-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310013800"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

And creating the user talk page for a locked sock. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 01:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310014000","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":15,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014000-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310013800","replies":["c-Drmies-20240310014500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014000"],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

Done. Please go through and see if any of their childish shit needs to be removed. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310014500","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":16,"id":"c-Drmies-20240310014500-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014000","replies":["c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014700-Drmies-20240310014500","c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310061200-Drmies-20240310014500"]}}-->

This, when (Google) translated, appears to be a legal threat (but not to Wikipedia). The edits from 脚抖北 just look like something about a restaurant and asking not to be blocked. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310014700","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":17,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310014700-Drmies-20240310014500","replies":[],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

More! Oh boy.

• ‎じ・あすぺるがあねくすと (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) recreating locked sock talk page (again), creating & blanking own talk page.

Locked sock pages are just requests to be unblocked. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310061200","author":"Schr\u00f6dinger's jellyfish","type":"comment","level":17,"id":"c-Schr\u00f6dinger's_jellyfish-20240310061200-Drmies-20240310014500","replies":[],"displayName":"Schr\u00f6dinger's\u00a0jellyfish"}}-->

I threw in User talk:ብስየውስልጥ and User talk:تحتتي; there is no charge. Drmies (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218225300","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmies-20240218225300-\u3042\u3059\u307a\u308b\u304c\u3042\u3059\u307a\u3057\u3083\u308a\u3059\u3068?","replies":["c-32.220.205.180-20240218230000-Drmies-20240218225300"]}}-->

Thank you for catching تحتتي, I was not sure on that one. 32.220.205.180 (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240218230000","author":"32.220.205.180","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-32.220.205.180-20240218230000-Drmies-20240218225300","replies":[]}}-->

Hello 0xDeadbeef,

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240306200200","author":"ToBeFree","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ToBeFree-20240306200200-Conflict_of_interest_management:_Case_opened","replies":[],"displayName":"~ ToBeFree"}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240311230200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240311230200-Tech_News:_2024-11","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240314105200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240314105200-RFA2024_update:_no_longer_accepting_new_proposals_in_phase_I","replies":[]}}-->