PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Archives

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

This is MikutoH's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Verification

Just sending a quick note to please make sure you are properly summarizing what secondary sources say when you make additions to articles. An open edit request brought me to our article on Phonk, and a few editors who disagreed with your recent addition there. I'm not familiar with either genre so I visited your supplied sources only to learn that basically everything you wrote failed verification. The first reference is to a NYT article about Art Basel in Miami, where Brazilian phonk is mentioned once: Mr. Korine described the sound, an aggressive blend of Brazilian phonk with elements of trap music, South Florida rap, ’90s pop and metal, as something made by "gamers in favelas.” Yet you used that to write, Brazilian phonk, a subgenre of hip-hop, blends traditional Brazilian rhythms with the dark, atmospheric beats of Memphis rap, creating a unique and captivating soundscape that has gained a dedicated following both locally and internationally. I don't speak Portuguese, but translated versions of the other references failed verification as well, and a Ctrl+F for "Kordhell" returns no hits in the source that is supposed to support the claim that he is one of the genre's pioneers. Please be careful going forward and just summarize reliable sources when writing. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, try verifying the next source. Not all sources are there to support the claims other sources are backing, instead they are there to help notability. Kordhell, for example, is mentioned in multiple sources cited. Of course they should be repeatedly cited inline, which I failed. But it's not my fault you also lack skills to verify information you read. --MikutoH ^talk! 02:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi MikutoH. Thank you for your work on Renildo José dos Santos. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello MikutoH, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brazilian phonk

The article Brazilian phonk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article's text is overly promotional and almost all claims failed verification from cited sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]