User:Sandmadd
Help me. I tried to edit something on Ivan Van Sertima's page regarding a criticism from Glyn Daniel printed in the New York Times. In response, the New York Times printed a letter from Dr. Clarence Weiant, an archeologist with the National Geographic Society and the Smithsonian Institute. I reproduced Dr. Weiant's letter alongside the statement from Glyn Daniel so that assessment of Dr. Van Sertima's work wouldn't be one-sided. The letter from Dr. Weiant was deleted and the reason given was that it didn't conform with Wikipedia's standard of neutrality. How can Wikipedia allow a comment like "rubbish" from someone who's not an authority in the field in which Dr. Van Sertima writes, but the letter from someone who is an authority is deleted? How is this being neutral?
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.