User:Joshua Scott/IMDb
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. |
IMDB has been brought up a few times in various discissions:
- 19 April 2007
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines/Archive 1#IMDB User Ratings
- don't use the user ratings
- 18 July 2007
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Archive 14#IMDb as Valid Reference Material
- resulting in an failed proposal here.
- 7 January 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#IMDB
- IMDB may use information from Wikipedia in user submitted areas
- 16 April 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#IMDB Pro
- IMDB Pro is no more or less reliable than the normal site.
- 18 July 2007
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Archive 14#IMDb as Valid Reference Material
- resulting in an failed proposal here.
- 25 July 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 17#Is IMDb a reliable source?
- not as reliable as the new york times.
- 27 September 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#IMDb
- 2 October 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Are IMDB and personal websites reliable sources
- 17 November 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Is IMDb an unreliable source?
- 18 November 2008
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23#IMDB.com for plot synopsis
- 9 February 2009
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 28#IMDb for BLP info?
- 23 June 2009
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 37#IMDB
- 26 July 2009
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#IMDB, again
- 17 October 2009
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47#IMDB?
- 25 November 2009
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50#TV.com and IMDB
- 6 March 2010
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#IMDB as a source; List of documentary films
Perhaps the most telling is the IMDb FAQ, which states that they use on-screen credits. I take the position that the credits section is reliable, and a good secondary source for that information.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.