{{helpme}}

Is this article good for publication?

No it is not for a number of reasons. It reads like an advertisement and thus deletable under {CSD G11, (see Wikipedia:Spam, the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). It cites no sources and is thus unverified (note first that having an external links section is not citing sources, and second that at least some of the links you have there are not reliable third party which are independent of the subject. Most importantly, you are violating the copyright of multiple websites, such as http://www.dcinematoday.com/dc/ProductInfo.aspx?ID=121 and http://www.xdcinema.com/ You cannot copy any content and post it here. You can use external websites as a source of information but not of sentences; say it in your own words. In short, in its present form this is exactly the type of material we don't want on Wikipedia, and can't accept.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

I've made several changes after reading your spam policy... Personally I think that now it is good... Could you confirm me? If I'm wrong, can you tell me what I have to change exactly please? Thank you for your reply!

No, it's not appropriate, because it still lifts lots of text from other websites. Copying from copyrighted websites is strictly forbidden, you will have to write the text yourself from scratch instead. Even if you have a connection to the company and can secure a copyright release, such a contribution will still not be accepted because corporations' web pages do not conform to Wikipedia standards of neutrality, and constitute advertising. I've removed the article draft because even on your user page, copyright violations are not allowed. Mangojuice^talk 17:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

Still the same question! :)

Yep. Addhoc (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Moved article to XDC.--Addhoc (talk) 14:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)