User:HighInBC/DTResponse
When posting your opinion in RfA please base it off of the candidate's merits as a potential administrator. If you think there should not be any more admins then individual RfAs are not the correct venue. Making your point in the wrong venue is one thing but doing it in the form of opposing a candidate that you do not appear to have given any personal consideration is just plain rude. Perhaps you can seek consensus for your ideas at WT:RfA? We are here to discuss this user's legitimacy as a candidate, not the value of having admins as a whole. You seem to be arguing your point at the incorrect debate. Looking through your history I see you have voted this exact same way for many, many, RfAs and I think it is disingenuous for you to oppose specific candidates with apparently no regard to the candidate's suitability as an admin.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.