User:Gdk2000/sandbox

Article evaluation 1.) Everything in the article is relevant to the miscoduct of police officers, but they don’t not include what kind of misconduct, including the killing of dogs. 2.) the article never says it was against the police brutality, but they state all the facts making it seem as if they are against it. 3.) the viewpoints show the major part of the police misconduct but it doesn’t touch on the matter that dogs are shot everyday without the cops being investigated. 4.) the citations work, each one perfectly portraying what the word they used to cite is and the background information of it. 5.) each fact is represented with a reference to either a researched article or a book providing the facts. 6.) all of the dates seem to be in place, but there should be a section where it speaks specifically to the issue of cops shooting and killing dogs. 7.) in the talk tab, several people are talking about raising the required IQ to be a cop and for police body cameras that can record so that they can crack down on what really happen at a scene 8.) we haven’t talked about the article in class

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.