PROFILPELAJAR.COM

User:Colonies Chris/Evidence

  • My talk page: 21 July 2008 I explained about the change to the MoS but the editor would not accept that.
  • My talk page: 24 July 2008 An editor asked why I had unlinked dates, then noticed the earlier discussion on my talk page and considered that sufficient explanation
  • My talk page: 31 July 2008 User:Bzuk objected and would not accept my argument. User:Philip Baird Shearer accused me of disruptive behaviour [I had unlinked dates while fixing a spelling error; several weeks later I returned to the same article while fixing a different spelling error, and, not remembering that I had been there before, unlinked dates that he had relinked in the meantime; he took this as edit-warring]
  • My talk page: mid August User:BillCJ objected in extremely uncivil terms, describing my edits as 'trash' and 'vandalism', reverted all my changes, including many non-date related ones, and then wiped all my responses from his talk page. However, I preserved the interaction on my talk page.
  • My talk page: Aug 2008 User:MBK004 objected to my removal of date links, but another editor of the same article dissented. Among other things, MBK004 accused me of acting 'nefariously' by combining date delinking with other edits. This makes an interesting contrast with the discussion that took place later over the use of AWB, where Locke Cole and Tennis expert tried, unsuccessfully, to claim that making only unlinking edits to an article was a 'minor edit' prohibited under AWB rules. Damned if you do and damned if you don't, it would seem.
  • My talk page: 26 Aug 2008 User:Bluewave accepted my explanation
  • September - No objections or praise
  • My talk page: 22 October 2008 User:Smjg did not object to unlinking per se but complained that I had left the unlinked dates in an inconsistent state. My unlinking had revealed the inconsistency to him, not created it, but he seemed to think it was my fault. Another editor might have thanked me for showing him what almost all our readers had always been seeing, and fixed the inconsistencies himself, but 'nowt so queer as folk', as they say.
  • My talk page: 31 October 2008 An IP complained about my removal of a bare year link, but offered no explanation of why it should be retained.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.