PROFILPELAJAR.COM

User:Blueboar/drafts

This is my sandbox page for drafting articles, snippets for articles, or other material. Please do NOT move any material from this page without my express permission. Blueboar (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

RFC on CNN

(rfc tag here)

Inspired by the closure of our recent RFC as to the reliability of Fox News, and after some preliminary discussion (here), this RFC seeks to assess community consensus as to the reliability of CNN in the following specific areas:

  1. news excluding politics and science
  2. politics and science
  3. talk/opinion shows

Survey (CNN news excluding politics and science)

  • I think that, similar to Fox, CNN is generally reliable for news coverage on topics other than politics and science. Blueboar (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Survey (CNN politics and science)

  • Similar to Fox, I think we should use CNN with caution to verify contentious claims. I think CNN is biased and opinionated for politics; use in-text attribution for opinions. Blueboar (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Survey (CNN talk/opinion shows)

  • CNN talk/optinion shows, including (but not limited to) Reliable Sources (Brian Stelter, Anderson Cooper 360, Cuomo Prime Time, and CNN Tonight, should not be used for statements of fact but can sometimes be used for attributed opinions. Blueboar (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Discussion (RFC on CNN)

RFC on MSNBC

((rfc tag here)

Inspired by the closure of our recent RFC as to the reliability of Fox News, and after some preliminary discussion (here), this RFC seeks to assess community consensus as to the reliability of MSNBC in the following specific areas:

  1. news excluding politics and science
  2. politics and science
  3. talk/opinion shows

Survey (MSNBC news excluding politics and science)

  • I think that, similar to Fox, MSNBC is generally reliable for news coverage on topics other than politics and science Blueboar (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Survey (MSNBC politics and science)

  • Similar to Fox, I think we should use MSNBC with caution to verify contentious claims. I think MSNBC is biased and opinionated for politics; use in-text attribution for opinions. Blueboar (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Survey (MSNBC talk/opinion shows)

  • MSNBC talk/opinion shows, including (but not limited to) MPT Daily, All in with Chris Hayes; The Rachel Maddow Show, and the Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, should not be used for statements of fact but can sometimes be used for attributed opinions. Blueboar (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • (comment)

Discussion (RFC on MSNBC)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.