PROFILPELAJAR.COM

User:Begoon/ACE2015

This is a sortable table - click arrows in header row...

Candidate Comments Opinion Result
Callanecc Officious, rules-bound. Not what I'm looking for at all. Oppose 5
Casliber Proven record. Sense of humour. Common sense. Experience. Obvious support. Support 1
Drmies Sometimes a little too "cliquey", but I nearly always agree with his decisions. He has wikipedia's interests at heart. Would do well in the role. Support 4
Gamaliel Too political/drama prone. I don't like GamePlayers and Gamaliel is one of those. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 9
GorillaWarfare Too political. Activist. Thinks you can recuse then unrecuse. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 7
Hawkeye7 Desysopped for cause. Oppose 12
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. Support 18
Keilana Just doesn't give the "responsible and ready for authority" vibe to me. Sorry. Oppose 3
Kelapstick Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. Support 6
Kevin Gorman Too political. Breeze-driven activist. Seeks out drama and often makes poor decisions. Craves power/recognition. Do not trust to be neutral. No. Oppose 15
Kirill Lokshin Disappeared, then returned to explain and "demonstrate" how he could do what other admins were "too scared" to do. Don't trust his motives. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 8
Kudpung Means well, I think, deep down, but utterly fails to convey that, often upsetting users new and old with a surly and rude manner. Also seems very inflexible.

Acted ludicrously on his questions page. Not suited for position(s) of responsibility, imo. I seem to remember he was not always like this - maybe time has taken a toll?

 Oppose 13
LFaraone I have not been impressed with his tenure to date. May mature for another term later. Oppose 11
Mahensingha Too inexperienced. Oppose 21
MarkBernstein Too political. Activist. Seeks out drama. Here for Mark Bernstein. No. Oppose 19
NE Ent I'd like to have supported Ent. It's a close call for me, but in the end I'm not comfortable he has the right balance between IAR and applying the strict letter of the law.

That's particularly important for this role, and flexibility is a crucial quality I'm looking for here.

Neutral 17
Opabinia regalis Excellent candidate. Would be a boon to the committee. Fresh and innovative. Support 2
Rich Farmbrough Have to stay on the fence. I like Rich - lots of common sense, but can be a touch too intransigent. That's not a good thing for ArbCom. Neutral 14
Thryduulf Poor performance in current committee. Officious, inflexible and rules-bound Oppose 10
Timtrent I'd like to support this candidate, but just too milquetoast, plus some odd edits wrt NOTCENSORED give me pause Neutral 16
Wildthing61476 Too inexperienced. Oppose 20

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.