Wikipedia should be treated as journalism. It should be an accurate, in tune, with matters, and avoid bias.

E.g., In subjects of ancient History:

• - Sources of chronology should verify, sourced, and referenced.

E.g., My main sources as new sources:

• - Cnn self proclaimed "most trusted name in trust news." Although sometimes I reference ABC.

• - Honest: free of deceit; truthful and sincere. fairly earned. simple and unpretentious. genuinely; really. - (based on Oxford dictionary definition)
• - Accurate: correct in all details. capable of or successful in reaching the intended target. - (based on Oxford dictionary definition)
• - Reliable: able to be relied on. - (based on Oxford dictionary definition)

• - Wonderful resourceful sources:

• - Quackwatch:

www.quackwatch.org

Spell Check:

• - www.spellchecker.net/spellcheck

Oxford dictionary:

• - http://www.askoxford.com:80/results/?view=dict&freesearch=&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact

Visual thesaurus:

• - www.visualthesaurus.com

Questions: What? When? Where? Which? Who? Whom? Why? and How? are important but, it must be relevant! Relevance is of utmost importance, in this encyclopedic database, at least in my personal opinion and, take of mine own perspective and Wikipedia...

• - Relevant: closely connected or appropriate to the matter in hand. - (based on Oxford dictionary definition)

• - Egypt:

- http://www.museumsector.gov.eg/

- http://www.drhawass.com/

- http://www.zahihawass.com/home.htm

- http://www.thebanmappingproject.com/

- http://www.egypttoday.com/