Put me in a box This user has been on Wikipedia for 13 years, 11 months and 28 days. This user is of Irish ancestry. This user drinks water regularly. CHC This user is a fan of the Chicago Cubs This user is interested in the History of Africa. This user is not religious. This user prefers cold weather.

I work slowly. I do not edit my field of expertise because I'm a little too close to that and it probably will lead to POV editing and needless conflicts. To avoid this, I edit my side-interests primarily. These change regularly, but right now are West African history, turn of century baseball, and places I am visiting soon. Took a break from January 2015 until June 2016, I highly recommend it.

• Anlu and Takembeng
• Art in Sierra Leone
• French Sudan/Soudan which became part of the Mali Federation and then the Union of African States
• Hawad
• Kisra legend
• Kojo Tovalou Houénou (important figure in the History of the Kingdom of Dahomey) who was married to Roberta Dodd Crawford who studied with N. Clark Smith
• Komenda Wars
• Morris Industrial School for Indians
• Nyarroh who was kidnapped by Ndawa
• Panyarring
• Pope Anastasius II
• Presidential Council (Benin)
• Rassemblement Démocratique Africain
• Slavery in Mali and Slavery in Niger and some of the other Slavery in Africa articles.
• State formation
• William Clarence Matthews
• 1963 Togolese coup d'état

Since I weigh in on a few AFDs, figured I'd be transparent about my process:

• I do not read the article in question at first. I think this is sometimes misleading and so I start with a search in a couple of databases to see if I can ascertain notability through the results in them.
• Then I read the discussion and follow any evidence presented for keep or delete.
• Then I read the article and see where that leads me.
• Finally, I give it a best vote. My general rule of thumb is: A topic is probably not notable if a Wikipedia stub/start class article would be the best thing written about the topic. This is a helpful way to figure out if a topic has significant coverage or simply marginal mentions. This is imperfect and I won't be 100% faithful to it, but it is just sorta my guide.
• I follow all AfD discussions in which I participate and will gladly change votes based on other ideas later presented. I might even flip back.
• Philosophically, I'm probably closer to an inclusionist, but who thinks that depth is preferable to breadth while including as much information as possible. So, that leads me towards being a deletionist, I guess. I couldn't care less about these.