Total Westernization (Chinese: 全盘西化; pinyin: quánpán xīhuà) is a trend of intellectuals in Greater China, first proposed in 1915.[1]Chen Xujing, Hu Shih, and others believed that the invasion of the late Qing dynasty by Western great power was due to the backwardness of Chinese monarchical culture. Therefore, they advocate learning from Western ways of thinking and behavior, and completely abandoning China's authoritarian culture. Later, Hu Shih changed the concept of total westernization to "full globalization".[2]Hu Qiuyuan believed that the failure of the war was the result of the wrong policies of the Ming and Qing governments and that the appeasement mentality of the traditionalists, the inferiority mentality of the Westernizers, and the dependence mentality of the Russians could all led to the downfall of the country. They should go beyond the three Open Door Policy, maintain an independent perspective, and find the ability of the Chinese nation to create culture. Ju Haoran believed that total Westernization should focus on the technical aspects based on modern Western science, emphasizing "total scientification" and industrialization.[3]
In 1988, Liu Xiaobo proposed that China should be fully Westernized, and more importantly, it should become a "three-hundred-year colony" of Western countries. In the same year, the China Central Television (CCTV) documentary "River Elegy" totally denied Chinese culture and Chinese civilization. Before the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, the theory of total Westernization reached its zenith. Researchers believed that the total Westernization theory of the 1980s was a continuation of the proposition of China's national direction since the Opium War, a reaction of the intelligence community to the halt of China's reform under the demonstration effect of Western countries, and also related to the tendency of the Chinese government to guide public opinion.[5] After the 1990s, in the context of China's economic take-off and national strength improvement, Chinese nationalism rose and the total westernization theory declined.
Negative impact
In China, homosexuality was not specifically rejected and even has the privilege of being 'sexually explicit'. However, the term 'homosexuality' and the medical theories surrounding it gradually contributed to the social stigmatization of homosexuality in China and the Chinese region as a result of the widespread disparagement of homosexuality in the West at the time. Western sexologists were translated into Chinese during that period, including Hirschfeld, Ellis, Bloch, Krafft-Ebing, Freud, and Carpenter. In those translated works, there were not only a few pathological discussions, but also a few views, such as Carpenter's view that homosexuality is a noble emotion. After the 1920s, the praise of homosexual love became weaker and weaker, and negative views occupied the mainstream.[6]