Erabutoxin A, a neurotoxin that is a member of the three-finger toxin superfamily. The three "fingers" are labeled I, II, and III, and the four conserved disulfide bonds are shown in yellow. Rendered from PDB: 1QKD.[1]
Many LU domain containing proteins are involved in cholinergic signaling and bind acetylcholine receptors, notably linking their function to a common mechanism of 3FTx toxicity.[4][8][13] Members of the Ly6/uPAR family are believed to be the evolutionary ancestors of 3FTx toxins.[14] Other LU proteins, such as the CD59 antigen, have well-studied functions in regulation of the immune system.[13]
Gene structure
Snake three-finger toxins and the Ly6/uPAR family members share a common gene structure, typically consisting of two introns and three exons. The sequence of the first exon is generally well conserved compared to the other two.[4] The third exon contains the major differentiating features between the two groups, as this is where the C-terminalGPI-anchorpeptide common among the Ly6/uPAR globular proteins is encoded.[4][13]
Evolution and taxonomic distribution
Proteins of the general three-finger fold are widely distributed among metazoans.[4] A 2008 bioinformatics study identified about 45 examples of such proteins, containing up to three three-finger domains, represented in the human genome.[12] A more recent profile of the Ly6/uPAR gene family identified 35 human and at least 61 mouse family members in the organisms' respective genomes.[8]
The three-finger protein family is thought to have expanded through gene duplication in the snake lineage.[14][15] 3FTx toxins are considered restricted to the Caenophidia, the taxon containing all venomous snakes; however at least one homolog has been identified in the Burmese python, a closely related subgroup.[16] Traditionally, 3FTx genes have been thought to have evolved by repeated events of duplication followed by neofunctionalization and recruitment to gene expression patterns restricted to venom glands.[14][15] However, it has been argued that this process should be extremely rare and that subfunctionalization better explains the observed distribution.[17] More recently, non-toxic 3FP proteins have been found to be widely expressed in many different tissues in snakes, prompting the alternative hypothesis that proteins of restricted expression in saliva were selectively recruited for toxic functionality.[16]
^ abKini RM, Doley R (November 2010). "Structure, function and evolution of three-finger toxins: mini proteins with multiple targets". Toxicon. 56 (6): 855–67. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.07.010. PMID20670641.
^Hegde RP, Rajagopalan N, Doley R, Kini M (2010). "Snake venom three-finger toxins". In Mackessy SP (ed.). Handbook of venoms and toxins of reptiles. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 287–302. ISBN9781420008661.
^Utkin Y, Sunagar K, Jackson TN, Reeks T, Fry BG (2015). "Chapter 8: Three-finger toxins". In Fry B (ed.). Venomous Reptiles and Their Toxins: Evolution, Pathophysiology and Biodiscovery. Oxford University Press. pp. 218–227. ISBN9780199309405.
^Greenwald J, Fischer WH, Vale WW, Choe S (January 1999). "Three-finger toxin fold for the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the type II activin receptor serine kinase". Nature Structural Biology. 6 (1): 18–22. doi:10.1038/4887. PMID9886286. S2CID26301441.
^ abFry BG, Casewell NR, Wüster W, Vidal N, Young B, Jackson TN (September 2012). "The structural and functional diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system". Toxicon. Advancing in Basic and Translational Venomics. 60 (4): 434–48. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.02.013. PMID22446061.