The No Nonsense Guide to Science is a 2006 book on Post-normal science (PNS). It was written by American born British historian and philosopher of science Jerome Ravetz.[1]
Main
What should a young person do who aspires to make the world a better place and to make their way in science?
The problem of science being at once 'little'[5] and big or 'mega', embedded in institutions and corporations[1]: 47–60
The fallibility of science, against a possibly 'dogmatic' teaching of the power of science[1]: 38
The democratization of science as a necessary and realistic antidote to its hubris[1]: 112–126
The opportunity of forming extended peer communities - inclusive of whistle blowers and investigative journalists as well as academics and interested stakeholders, when science is called to answer conflicted policy questions.[1]: 75–76, 93
The relationship between science and society[1]: 94–111
The book makes themes that are well known to philosophers and sociologists of science accessible to a larger, less specialized audience, including young scientists.[2] The foreword was written by biochemistTom Blundell, who approves of Ravetz' "direct and provocative" approach to describing science, inclusive of its self-destructive tendencies as well as of its hopes and promises.
Reception
No Nonsense Guide to Science was translated and published in Japan in 2012.[6] Ravetz's work has found use for teaching philosophy and ethics of science, e.g at the University of Copenhagen.[7] The volume may help to develop the competencies that scientists need to perform ethically[8] in postnormal research, by developing the ability to identify issues that fit postnormal settings where "facts are uncertain, values in dispute, stakes high and decision urgent".[7]
References
^ abcdefRavetz, Jerome R. 2005. The No Nonsense Guide to Science. Oxford: New Internationalist.
^Carrozza, C. (2015). Democratizing Expertise and Environmental Governance: Different Approaches to the Politics of Science and their Relevance for Policy Analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 108-126.
^Funtowicz, Silvio, and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–55.
^Tsukahara, Togo. 2017. “Commentary: New Currents in Science: The Challenge of Quality, Examining the Discrepancies and Incongruities between Japanese Techno-Scientific Policy and the Citizens’ Science Movement in Post-3/11 Japan.” Futures, Post-Normal science in practice, 91 (August): 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.04.008.
^Kønig, Nicolas, Tom Børsen, and Claus Emmeche. 2017. “The Ethos of Post-Normal Science.” Futures, Post-Normal science in practice, 91 (August): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.12.004.