This article is missing information about the film's plot, production, and theatrical/home media releases. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page.(July 2018)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (July 2018)
Boyd Van Hoeij from Variety was critical of the film, writing, "Less faithful to its source material and more concerned with delivering the goods visually, this handsome, studio-shot pic, somewhat ironically, lacks genuine pathos in telling its tale of how deceiving looks can be."[2] Neil Young from The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a positive review, writing, "Thoroughly old-fashioned but ultimately moving literary adaptation has more than enough exploitable features to indicate long-term commercial success."[3]
_poster.jpg)
![[icon]](File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small}
