This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wikidata This template is within the scope of WikiProject Wikidata, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's integration with Wikidata. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.WikidataWikipedia:WikiProject WikidataTemplate:WikiProject WikidataWikidata Unique Identifiers (inactive) This template is within the scope of WikiProject Unique Identifiers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Unique IdentifiersWikipedia:WikiProject Unique IdentifiersTemplate:WikiProject UIDUnique Identifiers

This template was considered for deletion on 2018 July 8. The result of the discussion was "keep".

@Pigsonthewing: Is there an inline version for use on articles that use them like Industry#External_links? Thanks. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 08:42, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-25T08:42:00.000Z","author":"130.88.141.34","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-130.88.141.34-2014-07-25T08:42:00.000Z-Inline","replies":["c-Pigsonthewing-2014-10-17T12:00:00.000Z-130.88.141.34-2014-07-25T08:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

(Only just seen this, sorry) There isn't. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-10-17T12:00:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2014-10-17T12:00:00.000Z-130.88.141.34-2014-07-25T08:42:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

Where is the equivalent for P of Template:Q? Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-17T16:16:00.000Z","author":"Bluerasberry","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bluerasberry-2015-06-17T16:16:00.000Z-Equivalent_of_Template:Q?","replies":[],"displayName":"Blue Rasberry"}}-->

I propose two changes:

1. Changing "uses" link from "What links here" to "Wikidata SPARQL query result" which can provide to readers actual values of property.
2. Adding "see talk" link as same as {{Uses Wikidata}}. Because, in Wikidata, useful links and information are basically located in talk page.

Followings are comparison of before and after the change. --Was a bee (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-10T00:52:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-03-10T00:52:00.000Z-Proposed_change","replies":[]}}-->

Now

Wikidata has the property: child (P40) (see uses)

After change

Wikidata has the property:

• child (P40) (see uses)

 Done--Was a bee (talk) 10:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-03-12T10:09:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-03-12T10:09:00.000Z-Proposed_change","replies":[]}}-->

Currently this template has 3 link targets.

1. Data page (d:Property:P40)
2. Talk page (d:Property talk:P40)
3. Usage result (uses)

Among these, the first one (data page) is mere data, not human readable format, or difficult to read. So how about change the template style (see the comparison table below).

	Appearance	Link target
Now	Wikidata has the property: child (P40) (see talk; uses)	Data page Talk page Usage result
After change	Wikidata has the property: child (P40) (see uses)	Talk page Usage result

Even within WikiData, talk pages are frequently used as property link targets. For example, see d:Wikidata:Country property navboxes. There are many navigation templates there, and most link targets are talk pages, not data pages. This is basically because WikiData talk pages have human readable summary of the property.

So I think "linking to talk page" is better than "linking to mere data page" for most viewers, including both WikiPedian and WikiDatian. --Was a bee (talk) 16:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-07T16:44:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-07-07T16:44:00.000Z-Proposed_change_about_link_target","replies":["c-Was_a_bee-2018-07-10T16:52:00.000Z-Was_a_bee-2018-07-07T16:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done --Was a bee (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-10T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-07-10T16:52:00.000Z-Was_a_bee-2018-07-07T16:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Currently this template can show only one property. So if there are multiple properties per one article, it is needed to use this template multiple times (for example, at Cardinality#See_also). So I propose adding functionality which enables including multiple properties, by using Module:Uses Wikidata. See comparison below.

If this change is implemented, I'll check and fix all transclusion cases of this template (currently roughly 300 pages[1]) --Was a bee (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-15T21:18:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-07-15T21:18:00.000Z-Proposal_of_including_multiple_properties","replies":[]}}-->

	Appearance	Note
Now	Wikidata has the property: group cardinality (P1164) (see uses) Wikidata has the property: cardinality of this set (P2820) (see uses)	Two boxes
After change	Wikidata has the properties: group cardinality (P1164) (see uses) cardinality of this set (P2820) (see uses)	One box

 Done diff and fixed transcluded cases--Was a bee (talk) 19:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-07-19T19:20:00.000Z","author":"Was a bee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Was_a_bee-2018-07-19T19:20:00.000Z-Proposal_of_including_multiple_properties","replies":[]}}-->