This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Conservatism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism

Can the brothers be added to the template? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-22T00:56:00.000Z","author":"Anna Frodesiak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-06-22T00:56:00.000Z-Koch_brothers","replies":["c-Lionelt-2011-06-22T04:05:00.000Z-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-06-22T00:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

See Americans For Prosperity Lionel (talk) 04:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-22T04:05:00.000Z","author":"Lionelt","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lionelt-2011-06-22T04:05:00.000Z-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-06-22T00:56:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Lionel"}}-->

The portal link doesn't belong in this template. Portal links are placed in the "See also" section, while navigational templates are at the bottom of the page. This means that articles like Tea party movement either have multiple portals split up, with this one being on its lonesome at the bottom of the page, or have the portal link unnecessarily repeated. For articles that only require a single portal link, if it's at the bottom of this template alone it's going to be very hard to find for the average reader.--~TPW 15:48, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-25T15:48:00.000Z","author":"True Pagan Warrior","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-25T15:48:00.000Z-Conservatism_portal","replies":["c-Lionelt-2011-11-26T08:39:00.000Z-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-25T15:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"T"}}-->

Is that a policy? If so, which one? – Lionel ^(talk) 08:39, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-26T08:39:00.000Z","author":"Lionelt","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lionelt-2011-11-26T08:39:00.000Z-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-25T15:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-26T10:40:00.000Z-Lionelt-2011-11-26T08:39:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Lionel"}}-->

I found it in WP:ALSO. I don't know that it's policy that helpful links always be found in the same place, but it is more helpful.--~TPW 10:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-26T10:40:00.000Z","author":"True Pagan Warrior","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-26T10:40:00.000Z-Lionelt-2011-11-26T08:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lionelt-2011-11-26T21:29:00.000Z-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-26T10:40:00.000Z"],"displayName":"T"}}-->

See also sections are optional. For those articles without a See also, the portal link on the template is necessary, as this would be the only method to display the link. – Lionel ^(talk) 21:29, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-26T21:29:00.000Z","author":"Lionelt","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Lionelt-2011-11-26T21:29:00.000Z-True_Pagan_Warrior-2011-11-26T10:40:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Lionel"}}-->

• 9–9–9 Plan
• FairTax
• Generation Opportunity
• Campaign for Liberty
• Young Americans for Freedom
• Young Americans for Liberty
• National Taxpayers Union
• Heritage Action

I removed these articles because they did not document any significant connections to the TPM. Some of these groups may have been added due to a link with Ron Paul. However Ron Paul isn't the TPM. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-10-26T07:26:00.000Z","author":"2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36-2015-10-26T07:26:00.000Z-Minimal_connections","replies":[]}}-->

Libertarianism is not a component of the Tea Party Movement. The Tea Party is socially conservative, libertarians are not; they're socially liberal. I'm removing right-libertarianism from the box. Right-libertarianism is put forth by the Libertarian Party and the Libertarian Party wholly rejects ALL members of the Tea Party movement.

There are no legitimate libertarians that are apart of the Tea Party movement. Individuals like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are grossly miscategorized by the ignorant media when they term them libertarians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.150.184.160 (talk) 08:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-24T08:58:00.000Z","author":"73.150.184.160","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-73.150.184.160-2016-12-24T08:58:00.000Z-Libertarianism_is_not_a_component_of_the_Tea_Party_Movement","replies":[]}}-->